Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the RNLI are 100% in the right

727 replies

SanFranBear · 29/07/2025 09:44

I've just seen this story on the BBC news homepage where the RNLI are being accused of acting as a taxi service for migrants trying to enter the UK on small boats from Europe.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8dejyg4l37o

The organisation and volunteers quite rightly have responded to say they make no apologies for saving lives at sea and that their work has no political motivation.

Damn straight - one of the volunteers further down the article explains the profound impact he feels of encountering people struggling in our waters.

It makes me wonder what critics of the service expect them to do - just sail away, leaving the people to die? Pick them up and cross the channel to dump them back 'where they came from'?

What is wrong with them? Where is their compassion? Regardless of your thoughts on immigration, this is so cold and inhuman....

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Viviennemary · 29/07/2025 11:34

I have given to this charity in the past but wouldn't now. They are facilitating illegal immigration.

Phobiaphobic · 29/07/2025 11:35

BlankBlankBlank14 · 29/07/2025 11:23

Well luckily according to this post you’re in the minority.

And the RNLI don’t agree with you either.

According to Reform's position in the polls, you are in the minority.

pointythings · 29/07/2025 11:35

Zebedee999 · 29/07/2025 11:27

British law and international law. Already covered above.

Except that you are wrong.

2dogsandabudgie · 29/07/2025 11:35

pointythings · 29/07/2025 11:10

And? So? They can go where they want to. Their reasons for choosing the UK are well documented. Want to stop it? Then provide legal routes for seeking asylum from outside the UK (there are none at present) and tackle the shadow economy hard.

The point being, as you well know, that France is a safe country. No one needs to make that crossing.

Yes there should be legal routes and we should take our share of asylum seekers, but just because our Government and the Governments of other countries haven't got a clue what to do about this situation, doesn't mean that we should shrug our shoulders, or maybe it doesn't bother you.

BlankBlankBlank14 · 29/07/2025 11:36

Phobiaphobic · 29/07/2025 11:35

According to Reform's position in the polls, you are in the minority.

Please do show me the “polls”? I haven’t voted myself in those “polls”, who has and when and how?

Azerothi · 29/07/2025 11:37

I always thought it wasn't RNLI who decided who to rescue and that it is in fact the Coastguard who has deemed every single migrant boat is in peril whether or not they actually are. If this is the case then I don't understand the RNLI hate they seem to get. I might be wrong and RNLI might be full independant.

DuncinToffee · 29/07/2025 11:38

2dogsandabudgie · 29/07/2025 11:35

The point being, as you well know, that France is a safe country. No one needs to make that crossing.

Yes there should be legal routes and we should take our share of asylum seekers, but just because our Government and the Governments of other countries haven't got a clue what to do about this situation, doesn't mean that we should shrug our shoulders, or maybe it doesn't bother you.

You also know that France being a safe country has nothing to do with their right to seek asylum in the UK, which they can only claim on UK soil.

Zebedee999 · 29/07/2025 11:40

pointythings · 29/07/2025 11:33

International law requires no such thing. That is a myth, still eagerly peddled by xenophobes and racists.

Aside from your silly childish insults designed to stifle debate you are completely wrong:

https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/

"... there is some UK domestic law which allows the government to refuse to consider an asylum application if it is judged that the person could have claimed asylum elsewhere. Refugees who arrive in the UK after passing through another EU country can, under certain circumstances, also be returned to the first EU country they entered, under an EU law known as the Dublin Regulation."

So yes most illegals can and should be returned to France.

Do refugees have to stay in the first safe country they reach? – Full Fact

Refugees are not required to seek asylum in the first safe country they reach. But under EU law they can sometimes be returned to the first safe EU country they reached.

https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/

TherelsALightThatNeverGoesOut · 29/07/2025 11:40

Viviennemary · 29/07/2025 11:34

I have given to this charity in the past but wouldn't now. They are facilitating illegal immigration.

No they're not. They're saving lives. Maybe one day they'll save your life or that of someone you love.

JustSawJohnny · 29/07/2025 11:43

They're literally doing their job.

The twats who criticise them for it are showing themselves for what they are - people who would be happy to let others drown at sea because they are brown.

Fuck them, their racism and their skewed view of our country.

TherelsALightThatNeverGoesOut · 29/07/2025 11:43

BlankBlankBlank14 · 29/07/2025 11:36

Please do show me the “polls”? I haven’t voted myself in those “polls”, who has and when and how?

I actually have. If you sign up to YouGov or similar you can too.

I certainly haven't voted the way @Phobiaphobic seems to think 'the majority' have. Indeed current polling suggests that the Corbyn/Sultana party would be on course for a landslide if there were an election tomorrow.

Pancakeaddict · 29/07/2025 11:45

Smallsalt · 29/07/2025 11:32

Ask the ordinary people if any country who didn't benefit from the stitch up how legal it all was.

"colonial powers which were not there "illegally" but used legal financial and political means to exert power over the native populations of those countries“

I mean seriously🙄

India might have only had 150k Brits, but they certainly harvested more wealth than current immigrants will get in benefits.

There are also rather a few more countries than India where Britain has dabbled, or should I say "used legal financial and political means to exert power over the native populations of those countries"

The "legality" is what made it possible and so dangerous, being inaccurate about history is not helpful in this discussion. I think colonialism is morally reprehensible but comparing it in any way to small boat crossing now is absolutely absurd. It required organised financial and loaning institutions, religion, using legal mechanisms, all the rest of it. You are also wrong about the scale of migration.

And now you want some bizarre revenge fantasy to be acted out against ordinary British people who haven't colonised anywhere because they have inherited sin from over 100 years ago which most ordinary people had no part in deciding.

BlankBlankBlank14 · 29/07/2025 11:45

TherelsALightThatNeverGoesOut · 29/07/2025 11:43

I actually have. If you sign up to YouGov or similar you can too.

I certainly haven't voted the way @Phobiaphobic seems to think 'the majority' have. Indeed current polling suggests that the Corbyn/Sultana party would be on course for a landslide if there were an election tomorrow.

But that’s only by people who have cast a vote. They’re angry people who what to think they’re true majority, to say “told you so”.

The rest of us are just sitting back, waiting for a proper vote.

Buggabootwo · 29/07/2025 11:45

My view is very much that small boats and people smuggling is a huge problem. However it is not RNLIs problem and it is worth looking at some of the facts. I am a member of the RNLI so receive their publications that give the number of launches by station and there is a lot less activity in the eastern channel than certain areas of the media would like you to believe. There is also an increased investment in equipment for lifeboat crews to deal with expected mass casualty events in the water. And investment in counselling to support crews with what they witness (and those crews are volunteers). The crews have a very strong ethical commitment to going to sea to save lives, whoever that person is and however they got there. I am incredibly proud to support them and think they represent the best of us.

Interestingly, if you look at some of the RNLI archive material, the headlines were very similar during WW2 when they went to sea to rescue downed Luftwaffe pilots.

BlankBlankBlank14 · 29/07/2025 11:46

TherelsALightThatNeverGoesOut · 29/07/2025 11:40

No they're not. They're saving lives. Maybe one day they'll save your life or that of someone you love.

Will that prompt a donation, or still not worthy?

EasternStandard · 29/07/2025 11:46

RantzNotBantz · 29/07/2025 10:54

Why does Farage’s stupid comment from 4 years ago keep getting dredged up to feed the X accounts of total bone heads?

These days the majority of small boats are picked up by border force very shortly after arriving in British waters. The migrants are told to call them as soon as they make it into Uk waters.

Of course the RNLI should (and do) rescue anyone in trouble on the water.

I hope the publicity really does result in more donations.

I watched from the beach as they rescued some kayakers recently.

Wouldn’t it have been tragic if they had not been able to launch because stupid ‘taxi’ comments meant they didn’t have the money.

I wondered what the news was for the BBC to run the same comment from years ago, and why a volunteer was speaking this morning. It’s to promote a programme going to air.

The person spoke about their experience with emotive impact, they are committed to volunteering and it’s not really their remit to work out what to do with the chaotic and dangerous system we have. That’s for politicians to resolve based on voters’ mandate.

TaupeLemur · 29/07/2025 11:47

The idea that they should sit there and watch humans dying when they could save them is fucking outrageous. You think these volunteers should watch people drown? Then don’t give money to the RNLI. The rest of us will.

DuncinToffee · 29/07/2025 11:47

Zebedee999 · 29/07/2025 11:40

Aside from your silly childish insults designed to stifle debate you are completely wrong:

https://fullfact.org/immigration/refugees-first-safe-country/

"... there is some UK domestic law which allows the government to refuse to consider an asylum application if it is judged that the person could have claimed asylum elsewhere. Refugees who arrive in the UK after passing through another EU country can, under certain circumstances, also be returned to the first EU country they entered, under an EU law known as the Dublin Regulation."

So yes most illegals can and should be returned to France.

We are not in the EU anymore

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 29/07/2025 11:49

DuncinToffee · 29/07/2025 11:47

We are not in the EU anymore

I guess we could always rejoin...

EasternStandard · 29/07/2025 11:51

Smallsalt · 29/07/2025 11:32

Ask the ordinary people if any country who didn't benefit from the stitch up how legal it all was.

"colonial powers which were not there "illegally" but used legal financial and political means to exert power over the native populations of those countries“

I mean seriously🙄

India might have only had 150k Brits, but they certainly harvested more wealth than current immigrants will get in benefits.

There are also rather a few more countries than India where Britain has dabbled, or should I say "used legal financial and political means to exert power over the native populations of those countries"

What are you wanting to happen in return? How many people are you thinking

OneAmusedShark · 29/07/2025 11:51

Totally agree with RNLI.

Saving lives is the priority, regardless
of the situation.

Leaving someone to die because “they’re an illegal immigrant” or because “they took the risk” is unthinkable IMHO.

BlankBlankBlank14 · 29/07/2025 11:52

TaupeLemur · 29/07/2025 11:47

The idea that they should sit there and watch humans dying when they could save them is fucking outrageous. You think these volunteers should watch people drown? Then don’t give money to the RNLI. The rest of us will.

Some people are inhumane sadly.

JHound · 29/07/2025 11:52

SanFranBear · 29/07/2025 09:44

I've just seen this story on the BBC news homepage where the RNLI are being accused of acting as a taxi service for migrants trying to enter the UK on small boats from Europe.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8dejyg4l37o

The organisation and volunteers quite rightly have responded to say they make no apologies for saving lives at sea and that their work has no political motivation.

Damn straight - one of the volunteers further down the article explains the profound impact he feels of encountering people struggling in our waters.

It makes me wonder what critics of the service expect them to do - just sail away, leaving the people to die? Pick them up and cross the channel to dump them back 'where they came from'?

What is wrong with them? Where is their compassion? Regardless of your thoughts on immigration, this is so cold and inhuman....

I don’t understand those who criticise them. Is their argument that they should just leave people to drown at sea?

nahthatsnotforme · 29/07/2025 11:54

The answer is to make coming here pointless.

I have every sympathy with the RNLI.

BeRedRobin · 29/07/2025 11:56

Simonjt · 29/07/2025 09:46

Of course they’re right, sadly a small subset of deeply unpleasant people only see white people as human beings.

I'm not white, I'm an immigrant from a muslim majority country and I say pick them up, call French side to take them back to France!

Swipe left for the next trending thread