Despite being the pigeonnier correspondent, I remain baffled by the French property angle. What we know from the Observer article and follow up DM visit to the village du Dropt appears to be as follows:
- a villager shared a photo with the DM of TW,SW and their 2 children, TW's younger brother and their 6 children dated from 2004.
- according to the villager, both families were involved with doing up a property in the village
- the photo suggests that the property they were doing up was the building adjacent to the pigeonnier owned by Martyn. According to the Observer article, TW and SW bought the property in 2007 to prevent it being bought by a property developer. SW's rebuttal statement suggests that they remortgaged their Welsh property to purchase the French property even though it may not have cost more than a couple of thousand euros
- in 2006 the younger brother, Martyn, bought a chateau some 40 mins away which he has been renovating for the last 19 years
- if,as seem likely, Martyn owned the property next to the pigeonnier in 2004, why did TW purchase it in 2007? Why did he never visit the property subsequently and why was neither the property he bought or the pigeonnier owned by his brother, ever refurbished?
- why did TW not make any attempt to sell the property they had bought in 2007 until 2013 when they were either on the brink of or had just been evicted from their Welsh home?
- if the younger brother owned both the pigeonnier and the adjacent property in 2004, why did he sell the farmhouse to his brother in 2007?
Photos from Google Earth (2022) appear to show the farmhouse owned by TW with a roof. The DM photos from 2025 show that the roof has collapsed. This suggests that in 2013 (when the Walkers were evicted from their Welsh home) the French property was in a sense habitable and that the roof has only collapsed in the last 3 years.
The very close proximity of the farmhouse and the pigeonnier suggests that at one point (when the younger brother Martyn bought it?) they were part of the same plot. It wouldn't make much sense to refurbish just one of the properties due to their proximity to each other. So what happened and why did TW and SW purchase the farmhouse in 2007?
One possible explanation is that the younger brother wanted to focus on renovating the chateau he had bought in 2006. Possibly his ability to access renovation grants/tax breaks from the French government to refurbish an historic chateau might have been hindered by his ownership of a second property in the same department, hence his decision to sell the habitable property, rather than the pigeonnier, to his elder brother. However, after the Hemmings embezzlement case occurred the following year, there was little if any chance of TW and SW either having the time or money to spend renovating the property they had just bought from Martyn when all their focus was making ends meet by running their holiday cottage business in Wales. Consequently both properties were never renovated and both fell into disrepair.