Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To invite the grammar and language pedants to share their pet peeves?

1000 replies

AlertCat · 19/07/2025 14:33

AIBU to feel annoyed when I see people say Slither instead of sliver? It was even in a book I read recently. A slither of cake. No! That makes no sense, unless the cake’s been trodden into the carpet!

Also see: step foot in instead of set foot in

There’s plenty of others but those will do for now.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Abitofalark · 19/07/2025 17:53

cgiwaly · 19/07/2025 16:30

I absolutely hate the overuse of "would" especially when it is used twice in a conditional sentence.
"If we would have eaten earlier, we wouldn't have missed the train."
The first would is superfluous. "If we had eaten earlier, we wouldn't have missed the train."
I don't know why this bugs me so much but it really does.
As well as appearing in the conditional, would can be used to describe repeated events in the past such as, "When we were little, my dad would take us to the lake every weekend". "Used to" can also be used instead of would.
However, I've noticed would creeping in everywhere, where simple past would suffice.

Once you see it, you can't unseen it. It's everywhere, like Japanese Knotweed.

There's another variant of that, even when the 'would' is taken out and 'had' put in: 'If we had have eaten earlier...' when it should be 'If we had eaten earlier...'

user1471516498 · 19/07/2025 17:55

"A myriad of" drives me crazy.

HonoriaBulstrode · 19/07/2025 17:55

So "the doctor will be with you momentarily" should mean the doctor will pop into the room for a few seconds. But now more likely infers that the doctor will enter the room and start the appointment soon.

I think momentarily in that sense is an Americanism.

It implies that the doctor will be there soon, from which you infer that you will not have much longer to wait.

Isittimeformynapyet · 19/07/2025 17:57

user1471516498 · 19/07/2025 17:55

"A myriad of" drives me crazy.

I looked this up recently and it's not as cut and dry as you think. I was going to say the same as you but I thought I'd double check first and I was glad I did.

CurlyhairedAssassin · 19/07/2025 18:02

HonoriaBulstrode · 19/07/2025 17:55

So "the doctor will be with you momentarily" should mean the doctor will pop into the room for a few seconds. But now more likely infers that the doctor will enter the room and start the appointment soon.

I think momentarily in that sense is an Americanism.

It implies that the doctor will be there soon, from which you infer that you will not have much longer to wait.

I was waiting for someone to pick that up...

MarinaDelRay · 19/07/2025 18:02

TheBewleySisters · 19/07/2025 14:58

Currently bothering me is the widespread use of the word 'iconic' applied to everything and everyone. TV ads, programmes, presenters - all happily misusing it non-stop! Stop saying everything is iconic!

OMG me too!!!! I can’t stand it!!!

pikkumyy77 · 19/07/2025 18:03

SerendipityJane · 19/07/2025 16:36

Why do these mistakes bother you so much?

Language - and the way we use it - is a fundamental component of the socialisation that makes us human.

So much so that people have been killed over how they pronounce something, let alone a tiny grammatical or syntactical slip.

So it can arise deep deep emotions.

(In case anyone needs a defence in court 😀)

But arise is wrong here.

SerendipityJane · 19/07/2025 18:03

MarinaDelRay · 19/07/2025 18:02

OMG me too!!!! I can’t stand it!!!

Edited

There is "iconize", if you dabble in user interfaces ...

CurlyhairedAssassin · 19/07/2025 18:04

Isittimeformynapyet · 19/07/2025 17:57

I looked this up recently and it's not as cut and dry as you think. I was going to say the same as you but I thought I'd double check first and I was glad I did.

Are people just playing now? Cut and dry?

cyvguhb · 19/07/2025 18:05

CurlyhairedAssassin · 19/07/2025 17:52

Nonsense. They have discrete meanings. (See what I did there? 😉)

Very clever 😄 but I still maintain that there are very few real life occasions when one sees either written down correctly or incorrectly that it could be a supposed bug bear of so many people

Charabanc · 19/07/2025 18:05

pikkumyy77 · 19/07/2025 18:03

But arise is wrong here.

Indeed it is. "Rouse" is the word needed in that sentence.

CurlyhairedAssassin · 19/07/2025 18:06

cyvguhb · 19/07/2025 18:05

Very clever 😄 but I still maintain that there are very few real life occasions when one sees either written down correctly or incorrectly that it could be a supposed bug bear of so many people

I see it all the time on social media. Usually with other errors: "He should of been more discrete about it."

Serpentstooth · 19/07/2025 18:07

Ha! Everything is uniquely iconic or even iconically unique. Which is Amazing.

FestivusMiracle · 19/07/2025 18:07

Of instead of have.

All of the your/you’re/ there/they’re/their offences.

Grocer’s apostrophes.

Reflexive pronoun abuse. I just saw an OP on here that says ‘told my myself’ 😡

cgiwaly · 19/07/2025 18:07

Abitofalark · 19/07/2025 17:53

There's another variant of that, even when the 'would' is taken out and 'had' put in: 'If we had have eaten earlier...' when it should be 'If we had eaten earlier...'

Oh good grief. That's even worse than would.

Funnywonder · 19/07/2025 18:08

Isittimeformynapyet · 19/07/2025 17:35

I've just looked them up. Belfast, right? I'll tell them for you.

🤣🤣

SerendipityJane · 19/07/2025 18:09

pikkumyy77 · 19/07/2025 18:03

But arise is wrong here.

Merely proving Muphrys law 😀

And yes, I meant to write "arouse" - possibly distracted by the pet perve poster 😈

mrpenny · 19/07/2025 18:12

niadainud · 19/07/2025 15:15

Surely if there are, say, two or three of something in the world it can be almost unique?

No! Unique means only one so there can’t be three of them!!

Isittimeformynapyet · 19/07/2025 18:13

Charabanc · 19/07/2025 18:05

Indeed it is. "Rouse" is the word needed in that sentence.

Edited

I'd say "arouse" in that sentence myself personally.

OK, I'm fucking with you now. Of course I wouldn't say I, myself and personally in one sentence. But some would 😣.

mrpenny · 19/07/2025 18:14

Isittimeformynapyet · 19/07/2025 17:57

I looked this up recently and it's not as cut and dry as you think. I was going to say the same as you but I thought I'd double check first and I was glad I did.

Cut and dry????? Surely that’s only in a salon???.

prelovedusername · 19/07/2025 18:16

This is such a stupid one but when people pronounce Moulin Rouge “Moulon Rouge”. And also comraderie instead of camaraderie.

DrinkReprehensibly · 19/07/2025 18:18

It seems quite common now for people to use lead when they mean led.

It's almost as common as people using loose when they mean lose. There's a local weight watchers leader who would often post about her journey loosing weight and asking if you want to loose weight too.

I'm not usually that bothered by these things but I always find these two examples really noticeable.

SerendipityJane · 19/07/2025 18:18

prelovedusername · 19/07/2025 18:16

This is such a stupid one but when people pronounce Moulin Rouge “Moulon Rouge”. And also comraderie instead of camaraderie.

English has a long, proud tradition of mangling any word that dares to try and smuggle it's way into our pristine tongue. Just ask any passenger what they call someone who carries messages ?

Isittimeformynapyet · 19/07/2025 18:21

mrpenny · 19/07/2025 18:14

Cut and dry????? Surely that’s only in a salon???.

I almost chose black and white. I just looked up cut and dry - I used it correctly but it's actually "cut and dried". I made a mistake, but I won't go making that same mistake over and over and over again!

prelovedusername · 19/07/2025 18:21

I might have missed this but has anyone mentioned “restauranteur” for restaurateur?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.