Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that just because you say something about Israel and Gaza does not mean that you should be threatened with arrest under the terrorism act?

482 replies

cakeorwine · 18/07/2025 18:59

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/17/armed-police-threatened-to-arrest-kent-protester-for-holding-palestinian-flag

She had a sign saying "Free Gaza" and "Israel is committing genocide"

She was threatened with arrest under the terrorism act because a certain group that has been deemed to be a terrorist group also share those same views - and therefore the lady was supporting a terrorist group.

In the encounter, which she filmed, one officer told her: “Mentioning freedom of Gaza, Israel, genocide, all of that all come under proscribed groups, which are terror groups that have been dictated by the government.”

He went on to say that the phrase “Free Gaza” was “supportive of Palestine Action”, adding it was an offence “to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, namely Palestine Action is an offence under section 12(1A) of the Terrorism Act”. The officer told her she had committed that offence.

I can think of many groups who share those same beliefs. Having that belief does not mean you support that group.

A Kent police spokesperson said: “Under the Terrorism Act it is a criminal offence to carry or display items that may arouse reasonable suspicion that an individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation such as Palestine Action.”

Armed police threatened to arrest Kent protester for holding Palestinian flag

Officers accused Laura Murton who also had a sign saying ‘Free Gaza’ of supporting a proscribed organisation

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/17/armed-police-threatened-to-arrest-kent-protester-for-holding-palestinian-flag

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
YourOnMute · 19/07/2025 13:24

It's really not a bit rich.
Either everything is equal under the law, or it's not. Either an act is legal, or it's not.
We cannot have one law for this, one law for that for the same essential act.

Willyoujustbequiet · 19/07/2025 13:27

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 13:02

This is the judgement on what Section 12 means - and how the police misinterpreted when they said that what she was doing gave them reasonable grounds that she was expressing support. They did not ask her if she was a member of the group

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ABJ-v-Rex-and-BDN-v-Rex-judgment.pdf

  1. As the judge was also careful to emphasise, there must be proof of an invitation of support for the proscribed organisation. This is to be distinguished from the (mere) expression of personal beliefs, or an invitation to someone else to share an opinion or belief, conduct that does not fall within the ambit of section 12(1)(a) offence.” (emphasis in original)

  2. Thus, as set out above, in order to convict, the jury had to be sure i) that the organisation was a proscribed organisation; ii) that the defendant used words which in fact invited support for that proscribed organisation; and iii) that the defendant knew at the time that they did so that they were inviting support for that organisation.

First, it is necessary to consider the terms of s. 12(1A) itself. The expression must be of an opinion or belief that is supportive of the “organisation”. To express an opinion or belief that is shared by the organisation is not the same thing as to express an opinion or belief that is supportive of the organisation.

The organisation does not merely exist to promote a (terrorist) belief. It exists to promote that belief by the means identified in the definition of terrorism in s. 1 of the TA. The offence requires the expression of an opinion or belief that is supportive of Hamas, and not merely that it may be supportive of the achievement of aims which Hamas shares.

That is an important distinction which will require the court deciding the case to pay careful attention to what was said and done, the circumstances in which that happened, and the meaning which the speaker intended to convey.

  1. It is also essential to recognise that s. 12(1A) does not prevent a person from holding or merely expressing an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation.

What is required in addition is expression of an opinion or belief supportive of a proscribed organisation, being at least reckless as to whether a person “to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support the organisation”.

It is not only the expression of the opinion or belief which must be proved, but the circumstances in which it is expressed must be such as to satisfy the requirements of s. 12(1A)(b)

We are going round in circles. I'm not naive as to the law, I'm not a lay person so to speak.

I understand you feel strongly but I feel you are cherrypicking to fit your narrative whilst ignoring points that don't suit.

Happy to leave it at that thanks.

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 13:30

Willyoujustbequiet · 19/07/2025 13:27

We are going round in circles. I'm not naive as to the law, I'm not a lay person so to speak.

I understand you feel strongly but I feel you are cherrypicking to fit your narrative whilst ignoring points that don't suit.

Happy to leave it at that thanks.

If you're happy to live in a world where police can threaten people with arrest under the Terrorism Act unless they tell them who they are, then so be it...

It's not a world I want to live in - and I hope the police reflect on their conduct and training is provided.

OP posts:
Swiftie1878 · 19/07/2025 13:32

Livelovebehappy · 19/07/2025 12:53

I think probably now coming down hard due to increasing anti semitic hostility in the UK from certain sections. The Jewish community are under attack daily so the whole pro Palestinian thing needs to be brought under control. Not the same issue with Ukraine.

The pro-Palestinian thing doesn’t need to be brought under control; anti-semitism does.
They are NOT the same thing.

Livelovebehappy · 19/07/2025 14:02

YourOnMute · 19/07/2025 13:10

But either law is applied equally to all or not at all.

But there is no ‘law’ to enforce with Ukraine protests. There are none? The majority of protests and anti semitic attacks are perpetrated by the pro Palestinian protestors. I’m sure if the Ukrainian people here protested as aggressively (although not sure what they’d have to protest about), then they would be dealt with as equally harshly.

Livelovebehappy · 19/07/2025 14:05

Swiftie1878 · 19/07/2025 13:32

The pro-Palestinian thing doesn’t need to be brought under control; anti-semitism does.
They are NOT the same thing.

It kind of does. When it’s taking part every weekend in our capital city disrupting people being able to go about their business, and is very intimidating towards the Jewish community there, then yes, these protests do need to be broughtt under control. People can voice their concerns in a respectful way that doesn’t involve intimidation.

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:08

Swiftie1878 · 19/07/2025 13:32

The pro-Palestinian thing doesn’t need to be brought under control; anti-semitism does.
They are NOT the same thing.

They are both the same thing.

YourOnMute · 19/07/2025 14:12

Livelovebehappy · 19/07/2025 14:02

But there is no ‘law’ to enforce with Ukraine protests. There are none? The majority of protests and anti semitic attacks are perpetrated by the pro Palestinian protestors. I’m sure if the Ukrainian people here protested as aggressively (although not sure what they’d have to protest about), then they would be dealt with as equally harshly.

Anti semitic attacks are illegal.
Protesting is not.

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:15

Livelovebehappy · 19/07/2025 14:05

It kind of does. When it’s taking part every weekend in our capital city disrupting people being able to go about their business, and is very intimidating towards the Jewish community there, then yes, these protests do need to be broughtt under control. People can voice their concerns in a respectful way that doesn’t involve intimidation.

Well the police have clearly said that it is NOT illegal under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act to express support for Gaza when attending these protests.

OP posts:
thepariscrimefiles · 19/07/2025 14:15

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:08

They are both the same thing.

Are you saying that everyone who is pro-Palestinian is anti-semitic?

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:17

thepariscrimefiles · 19/07/2025 14:15

Are you saying that everyone who is pro-Palestinian is anti-semitic?

I have this feeling that there are some posters who are more than happy to see people expressing support for Gaza being threatened with arrest under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act and being labelled as terrorists.

OP posts:
Swiftie1878 · 19/07/2025 14:20

thepariscrimefiles · 19/07/2025 14:15

Are you saying that everyone who is pro-Palestinian is anti-semitic?

That’s exactly what they’re saying, and it is patently nonsense.
No need to engage further.

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:22

thepariscrimefiles · 19/07/2025 14:15

Are you saying that everyone who is pro-Palestinian is anti-semitic?

No, I'm saying to the OP, since yesterday, the undertones of the protests are dark. They call for death but implicitly. Parliament, as well as police chiefs know this. The poor rank and file have to navigate through all this crap.

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:27

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:22

No, I'm saying to the OP, since yesterday, the undertones of the protests are dark. They call for death but implicitly. Parliament, as well as police chiefs know this. The poor rank and file have to navigate through all this crap.

I am not talking about the protests

I am talking about what is legal and illegal when it comes to expressing support for a proscribed organisation.

I think that you are more than happy for anyone who expresses support for Gaza to be arrested under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act.

If you aren't happy with that statement, then you are free to say that that is not your view.

OP posts:
Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:31

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:27

I am not talking about the protests

I am talking about what is legal and illegal when it comes to expressing support for a proscribed organisation.

I think that you are more than happy for anyone who expresses support for Gaza to be arrested under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act.

If you aren't happy with that statement, then you are free to say that that is not your view.

Are you still insisting the protests are irrelevant. Get MN to edit your thread title then.

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:37

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:31

Are you still insisting the protests are irrelevant. Get MN to edit your thread title then.

It's about what is legal and illegal under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act when it comes to expressing support for a proscribed organisation.

That's very clear from the OP.

And it's clear from UK case law and from the judgement about Palestine Action and from what the Met Police have said about what is legal and illegal.

It's very clear that saying "Free Gaza" is not illegal under Section 12.

I think you think it is illegal under Section 12 to say "Free Gaza" but I could be wrong in your beliefs.

OP posts:
Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:42

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:37

It's about what is legal and illegal under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act when it comes to expressing support for a proscribed organisation.

That's very clear from the OP.

And it's clear from UK case law and from the judgement about Palestine Action and from what the Met Police have said about what is legal and illegal.

It's very clear that saying "Free Gaza" is not illegal under Section 12.

I think you think it is illegal under Section 12 to say "Free Gaza" but I could be wrong in your beliefs.

I've lost the will to live.

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:47

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:42

I've lost the will to live.

It's a yes or no question

There has been plenty of links posted on here showing that it is not illegal under Section 12 to have a poster saying "Free Gaza"

So instead of deflecting, you could answer if you think it's illegal. I think you do think it's illegal but I could be wrong.

OP posts:
ThePinkOtter · 19/07/2025 14:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I wonder whether you will call for the release of Israeli hostages. BTW, according to the OP, your post is irrelevant.

ThePinkOtter · 19/07/2025 15:09

Dangermoo · 19/07/2025 14:58

I wonder whether you will call for the release of Israeli hostages. BTW, according to the OP, your post is irrelevant.

Of course. Hopefully something is left of them after all the bombs Israel has dropped on them.

ssd · 19/07/2025 15:24

cakeorwine · 19/07/2025 14:17

I have this feeling that there are some posters who are more than happy to see people expressing support for Gaza being threatened with arrest under Section 12 of the Terrorism Act and being labelled as terrorists.

Absolutely. And they are tying themselves in knots trying to avoid answering you directly, while pretending to be exasperated.

It would be fun to watch if it wasn't such an important topic

Willyoujustbequiet · 19/07/2025 15:28

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Calling for death is appalling. Disgraceful.

Littleoakhorn · 19/07/2025 15:38

Dangermoo · 18/07/2025 20:04

She's just another Thunberg looking for attention. I can only laugh at their pitiful attempts to make a shred of difference in a conflict they have no skin in.

No man is an island,
Entire of itself;
Every man is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.

If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less,
As well as if a promontory were:
As well as if a manor of thy friend's
Or of thine own were.

Any man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in mankind.
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 19/07/2025 15:58

thepariscrimefiles · 19/07/2025 14:15

Are you saying that everyone who is pro-Palestinian is anti-semitic?

The sad thing is people like @Dangermoo and others who seem to believe the above are doing significantly more damage to the Jewish people than they seem to realise. Connecting the two implies Jewish people are OK with shooting innocent civilians and letting children starve. Which is ridiculous, good Jewish people are just as horrified as anyone else, to suggest they are pro genocidal monsters isn't going to improve their image is it, it's only going to encourage widespread anti sematism. Any critical thinking person can see that you can be against killing innocent civilians in any circumstances without political agenda, you can be pro Palestine and against Hamas, you can be a proud Israeli Jew and against the current government.

Swipe left for the next trending thread