Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

4 yrs for cutting down tree, no jail time for rape

464 replies

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 19:45

Why are 2 men being given custodial sentences for cutting down a tree when men convicted of rape regularly get suspended sentences.

Is an important tree more important than a random woman! Justice system seems to think so.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
LittleBearPad · 16/07/2025 08:19

Thingyfanding · 15/07/2025 20:44

4 years is the right sentence for chopping down such a sacred and protected tree. But the sentence for rape should be higher.

It wasn’t bloody sacred!

BIossomtoes · 16/07/2025 08:22

LittleBearPad · 16/07/2025 08:19

It wasn’t bloody sacred!

It was to some people.

Cheese55 · 16/07/2025 08:25

BIossomtoes · 16/07/2025 08:22

It was to some people.

It was to most people!

Thingyfanding · 16/07/2025 08:30

OP this might help you to get some perspective.

High-profile Case: Aldeburgh, East Suffolk (July 2023)

  • Defendant: Russell Abrahams, age 62
  • Offence: Felling a healthy Turkey oak under a TPO in August 2022
  • Penalty:
  • £5,500 fine
  • £1,302 prosecution costs
  • £2,000 court surcharge
  • Mandatory tree replacement under a tree replacement notice

£10,000 Fine: South Hams, Devon (March 2024)

  • Incident: Removal of two protected trees in woodland under a Woodland TPO (December 2022)
  • Penalty:
  • £10,000 fine
  • £5,000+ legal costs
  • Must replant replacement trees southhams.gov.uk
Woodland Mass Pruning: Guiseley, Leeds (Nov 2023) Conservation Area Felling: Totland, Isle of Wight (May 2025) Massive Proceeds Order: Poole, Dorset
  • Defendant: Neil Davey
  • Offence: Felling neighbour’s maritime pine under a TPO to improve his view
  • Penalty:
  • £75,000 fine
  • £50,000 confiscation under the Proceeds of Crime Act
  • Contractor (tree surgeon) fined £2,500 plus £3,000 costs The Sun+8acorn-grp.co.uk+8Leading Property Lawyers+8
Wales Forestry Crackdown (Apr 2025) Legal Context & Penalties
  • Breaching a TPO under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (s.210) is a criminal offence, punishable by:
  • Unlimited fines at Crown Court (Magistrates’ Court capped at £20,000 per tree historically, though Crown Court can go beyond) The Times+15Leading Property Lawyers+15gotelee.co.uk+15
  • Confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act if the land’s value increased from fellingReddit+6Leading Property Lawyers+6gotelee.co.uk+6
  • For larger timber volumes, a forestry felling licence under the Forestry Act 1967 is required. Breaching this can also trigger criminal charges and unlimited fines gov.uk+1gotelee.co.uk+1. A nuance exists: trees under a forestry licence may lie outside TPO enforcement depending on volume and location gotelee.co.uk.
Summary Table Offence TypeSample Penalty TPO breach felling healthy oak £5,500 + replacement Woodland TPO felling 2 trees £10,000 + replant Pruning 150 TPO trees £13,840 total Felling neigbour’s pine £75,000 + £50,000 confiscation Illegal felling in woodland £2,000 + costs

This is the norm. The felling of the Sycamore tree was much more complex case and needed a suitable sentence to reflect this.

Man felling fallen trees

New powers to crack down on illegal tree felling

Unlimited fines and prison sentences for those felling trees without a licence to be introduced

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-powers-to-crack-down-on-illegal-tree-felling?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Lighteningstrikes · 16/07/2025 08:32

They should have got far more than 4 years.

I don’t know what rapists get, but they should be punished accordingly too.

DrowningInSyrup · 16/07/2025 08:33

ObelixtheGaul · 15/07/2025 19:58

YANBU. I was watching a truly awful episode of 24 hours in police custody last week. This man had thousands of images and videos of girls in their late teens/early twenties, video footage of him raping girls obviously not fully conscious. Victims had no idea what he did to them.

10 years he got because he pleaded guilty to one count of rape, one count of voyeurism and one count of public exposure. 10 years for a vile individual who groomed young women, got them to his flat, got them so drunk/drugged they couldn't consent. Footage included him dragging a young woman, unconscious, across a concrete floor. She was naked.

When someone gets 4 years for chopping down a tree, 10 years for all that individual did is doubly insulting, as if it wasn't insulting enough.

Jesus, that is awful. Our neighbour had 15 years worth of child rape imagery on his computer of the worst kind. He got a 12 months suspended sentence, because his mental health wasn't great at the time. At the time! For FIFTEEN years. He was then housed in a small block of flats, in a lovely area, with several young girls under 8, with views of the garden and lots of communal areas. All this when women are jailed for being unable to pay council tax or protesting or being mouthy on public forums. What message is this sending, that pedophilia is forgivable, but poverty isn't?

EmeraldShamrock000 · 16/07/2025 08:36

DrowningInSyrup · 16/07/2025 08:33

Jesus, that is awful. Our neighbour had 15 years worth of child rape imagery on his computer of the worst kind. He got a 12 months suspended sentence, because his mental health wasn't great at the time. At the time! For FIFTEEN years. He was then housed in a small block of flats, in a lovely area, with several young girls under 8, with views of the garden and lots of communal areas. All this when women are jailed for being unable to pay council tax or protesting or being mouthy on public forums. What message is this sending, that pedophilia is forgivable, but poverty isn't?

I'm not 100% here, I heard a journalist explaining the law wasn't written with digital media and photos in mind, it impacts sentences, the law needs to be modernised.
It is disturbing.

AddictAlice · 16/07/2025 08:38

Moglet4 · 16/07/2025 00:11

I voted YABU because I don’t think the two are related. Rape sentences should carry almost the same sentence as murder imo and to be perfectly honest, I wouldn’t be all that adverse to knackers being cut off. The cutting down of the Sycamore Gap tree is a completely unrelated crime and yes, I do believe it deserves a decent length prison sentence. I think 4 years is an appropriate sentence for the tree but not for rape.

You're right. Rape is a form of murder. My friend was raped and she has been robbed of her future. She will always be a woman who was raped. I am sure that she will survive, but she will not be able to erase this event. We should be campaigning for life sentences for rape, sexual assault and domestic violence. The fact that men are given (as they should have been) such a long sentence for cutting down a tree reminds us that the law really only exists to protect the wealthy and their assets.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 16/07/2025 08:41

@ObelixtheGaul I believe that was the worst most shocking episode I ever saw.
The first young lady to report, my heart broke for her, I'm still thinking about her days later, if i met her, I'd tell her, she is a brave beautiful young lady. Thank god she found the strength to report him. I hope she continues to recover. Devastating.

He should never be free.

Thingyfanding · 16/07/2025 09:44

For those saying ‘ it’s just a tree’ they were convicted of the highest level of criminal damage, aggravated by its impact on a UNESCO World Heritage Site and damage to Hadrians wall.

Thingyfanding · 16/07/2025 09:45

LittleBearPad · 16/07/2025 08:19

It wasn’t bloody sacred!

Who are you to decide?

grumpygrape · 16/07/2025 10:40

Thingyfanding · 16/07/2025 09:44

For those saying ‘ it’s just a tree’ they were convicted of the highest level of criminal damage, aggravated by its impact on a UNESCO World Heritage Site and damage to Hadrians wall.

Was just coming on to say exactly this.
Even the defendants own lawyer admitted the tree would be valued at over £100.000 which put it in the highest level
Everything was further escalated by it being a UNESCO W H site.
It wasn't 'just a tree'. In the same way that rape isn't 'just a bit of Dom sex'.

LostFuse · 16/07/2025 10:42

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 22:31

Actually I just found a piece of legislation stopping judges giving suspended sentences for rape in England specifically in December 2023.

That doesn't include other serious sexual assaults though.

I guess I should rephrase. Do you not think the discrepancy between suspended sentences for serious and repeated sexual assaults of women and young girls are an insult to women and speak of systemic mysogyny when compared to 4 yr custodial sentences for cutting down a tree and being an accomplice to someone to cutting down a tree?

Also interesting that being drunk doesn't absolve someone of cutting down a tree but is often used to justify a man getting carried away and 'accidentally' assaulting someone

Just wondering if you realise that the judge in this case was a woman.............

Oldglasses · 16/07/2025 10:48

It's not 'just a tree' in a random park, it was a cultural significant tree for that area and beyond. Probably bought in viistors to the area and was 150 years old. I'd say serves them right for a mindless act of idiocy and it's deterrent to anyone else thinking of doing similar.
I agree that rapists should get longer sentences, but that is a completely different matter.

Tiswa · 16/07/2025 12:32

And a fairly high profile female judge @LostFuse who led the inquiry into Jimmy Saville, murder of Star Hobson and the Hillsborough Inquest

ZamaZama · 16/07/2025 12:41

Thingyfanding · 16/07/2025 09:44

For those saying ‘ it’s just a tree’ they were convicted of the highest level of criminal damage, aggravated by its impact on a UNESCO World Heritage Site and damage to Hadrians wall.

Just a lot of old stones, some on this thread are no doubt thinking.

The argument seems to go that since there are injustices against human beings, it is unseemly to care about destruction and vandalism. Given the former are never going away, we may as well stop caring about anything. Fancy scratching your name on the colosseum or defacing an artwork? Go for it!

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 16/07/2025 13:03

So you can fined for cutting down a forest in Wales but jail time for a tree in England. Not just any tree…..it’s a special tree”!

absolutely fucking ridiculous - two tier justice

BIossomtoes · 16/07/2025 13:20

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 16/07/2025 13:03

So you can fined for cutting down a forest in Wales but jail time for a tree in England. Not just any tree…..it’s a special tree”!

absolutely fucking ridiculous - two tier justice

It was part of a UNESCO World Heritage site. That’s considered pretty special.

Thingyfanding · 16/07/2025 13:29

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 16/07/2025 13:03

So you can fined for cutting down a forest in Wales but jail time for a tree in England. Not just any tree…..it’s a special tree”!

absolutely fucking ridiculous - two tier justice

Your comment doesn’t even make sense

Hereforthechat79 · 16/07/2025 14:48

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 15/07/2025 21:56

They will do a third of their sentence. They got away lightly.

Yes and some rapists get away Scot free due to level of convictions made. Doesn’t say much about society that we value a tree being damaged more than another human being damaged for the rest of their life!

ChattyChai · 16/07/2025 14:49

The thing is, they are two different crimes.

We need sentencing for rape to be harsher. Not for petty crimes like this to go unpunished.

BeamMeUpCountMeIn · 16/07/2025 14:51

Jail terms for rape should be longer and far more common. Violence against women is not taken seriously.

It is right they were jailed for chopping down the tree though. There's too many yobs out there who don't give a care for our environment.

grumpygrape · 16/07/2025 15:18

Hereforthechat79 · 16/07/2025 14:48

Yes and some rapists get away Scot free due to level of convictions made. Doesn’t say much about society that we value a tree being damaged more than another human being damaged for the rest of their life!

But we don't value criminal damage to a tree more than damage to a human being. Every case is individual.

Tiswa · 16/07/2025 17:12

grumpygrape · 16/07/2025 15:18

But we don't value criminal damage to a tree more than damage to a human being. Every case is individual.

Exactly they are under very different bits of legislation.

Mrs Justice Lambert is looking to be the judge for the Andrew Tate civil case and looking at her past history (Libby Squires - 27 years for her murder /Marcus Osbourne whole life sentence for murder and crucially 10 years for rape and 10 years for false imprisonment)

so yes her sentence here is commensurate with her sentences for rape and murder (and now and really pleased she is the civil judge for Andrew Tate)

the problem is we don’t have more judges like her (and not enough women!)

JohnTheRevelator · 16/07/2025 17:14

I was absolutely gob smacked when I heard this. I appreciate that you can't just go around felling trees because you feel like it,but 4 years does seem a tad excessive, considering rapists get off much more lightly. I think community service would have been more appropriate.