I think that in the past there was a cultures of people who were less educated trying their best to understand. That is certainly true of the older generations in my family. And despite having left school in their early teens they made the effort to become informed and cast their vote accordingly.
However now the attitude seems to be to reject an idea because it is endorsed by that stuck up educated lot.
But in fact, do we want government policy that has been endorsed by those who are intelligent, and informed (whether by way of formal education or by making an effort to understand the facts) or do we really want government policies votes for by those who have no understanding of and are proud of that?
Is rejecting the ideas of those who are knowledgeable really desirable? ( I by that I mean knowledge gained in a whole range of ways, not just formal university education etc).
Everyone has a vote, but I find this cultural shift worrying, as surely it can't lead to effective policies that bring about positive changes.
Having worked my way to a senior role, I know first hand how challenging it is to implement changes across large organisations, never mind whatnot must be across a whole country. To be prepared for all the possibilities etc. So policies based on popularity with people proud to not know or care what the inner workings of the process is, is likely to be much harder to successfully implement and be successful.
It's like saying we want unfit, middle aged people in the army because they're like me and I don't want these arrogant young, fit types representing me. In life the people best suited to the job should be doing it. And if anyone objects shouting 'you're elitist' it's my country and army too.