Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

3 day suspension for having phone out in school

343 replies

TooBored1 · 25/06/2025 17:17

Would you think this was reasonable?

For context my DC's school is consulting on going phone free - pupils will have to put their phone into a lockable pouch when they enter school. They will be subject to random bag checks, and if your phone is not in the locked pouch, or if you are caught using it, there will be an automatic 3 day suspension.

Overall, I'm in favour of going phone free, but I think the punishment is too much, especially as it is harsher than that given for fighting/bullying or disrupting lessons.

I also don't think it will prevent cyber bullying, as, as experienced by both my children, this happens in the evening, rather than during the day.

The punishment is ok - your are being unreasonable
The punishment is not ok - you are not being unreasonable

OP posts:
BackToRealitySigh · 25/06/2025 20:08

I think it's ridiculous - dd's school is lose it for 5 days and i thought that was extreme..
Sad thing is has probably become necessary
Actually solution is kids follow the put it away rule then no issue. But so many days of education will be lost to this.

adviceneeded1990 · 25/06/2025 20:09

100% reasonable. My school has children who CANNOT be filmed. One had to leave a foster placement they’d been settled safely with for 4 years because the biological family tracked them down via being in the background of another child’s video, filmed in school and posted to social media. They threatened the lives of the carer and her family. No phones out in school isn’t an arbitrary rule, it can be life saving.

Mew2 · 25/06/2025 20:10

herbalteabag · 25/06/2025 19:28

I'm not against the phone ban but a three day suspension is stupid as children are at school to get an education and a suspension should be reserved for serious incidents, such as harming someone.
I'm also against the random bag searches as children could have sensitive things in their bags that they don't want a random teacher to see.

So a sensitive thing- like a knife or a gun.....
Come on bag searches are to keep children safe- not every school has metal scanners......

Mulberryblackbird · 25/06/2025 20:12

Wrt scholbags, we definiyely had joints, lighters and things that could be used as weapons if so inclined (which we weren't), but mine was a small, private girls' school and there wasn't ever any trouble.

Phones: DC's (normal inner city state secondary) school has a no phones rule but they're allowed in their bags off/silent and confiscated for 24 hours if seen or heard. Teachers tell me they never have any problems.

Digdongdoo · 25/06/2025 20:18

It's a pretty simple rule to follow. Don't like the punishment, don't break the rules. Don't like the rules, look for a different school. I'm all for no phones in schools and would back the school 100%. Phones have no place in schools, and if kids can't go through a school day without one, then it's a massive problem that requires radical solutions.

FatherFrosty · 25/06/2025 20:18

RedToothBrush · 25/06/2025 18:34

The pouch system is the dumbest idea ever. Yet there's 'really positive results from it'. Which are in no way related to having phones kept overnight and could be done without the cost of the bags.

They could just do the sanctions without the pouches.

in my DCs school they’ve put dumb phones in, used Apple Watches (now banned), they’ve unpicked the stitching and seen in Velcro. Bought the magnets to unlock them.

for the kids, it was just a challenge. No one used their phones because of the sanctions

FatherFrosty · 25/06/2025 20:20

Whosaidwhatandwhen · 25/06/2025 19:49

A school would never take away a child’s access to their app for diabetes .

I have been in schools where a TA has had it on a school phone so gets alerts about blood sugars etc

They have different pouches for this so are allowed access.
DCs school nurse also has it sent to her as well

DrowningInSyrup · 25/06/2025 20:22

3 days suspension! I think that's ridiculous. I very much agree with no phones during the school day, but 3 days suspension is overkill. I'm guessing a lot of kids have just found a foolproof way of getting a few days at home.

Bringinguptherear · 25/06/2025 20:25

TruthOrAlethiometer · 25/06/2025 18:44

I think my kid’s school must be so crazy. They need their phones! If they don’t have a smart phone (or a tablet) in some classes, they need to borrow one from the school. They’re told to use them to look things up, to go check stuff on google classroom etc .
There are consequences for misuse, but they can have their phones out all the time. Just like most adults do at work really.

Some of this is so eye-opening. DS is due to start secondary in September and all the schools we looked round made a big deal about the fact that they had a no-phones policy (implemented in various ways) and children were never expected to use phones in lessons. It was literally one of their selling points, but I never realised these schools were unusual as they all basically had the same policies.

Vivienne1000 · 25/06/2025 20:29

Easy rule to follow.
if you don’t like it, there are plenty of other schools to go to. This is a school making a stand. No doubt the rules have been ignored up til now.
Your choice. Comply or move on.

Anonusername1234 · 25/06/2025 20:31

I am actually a strong advocate for no phones. But three days does seem extreme with no other background story. Tbf though if you do the crime, do the time.

As an aside, we have a local school, no phones at all. Two others that allow phones.

It’s actually a pleasure seeing the kids from the no phones school walking to school laughing and chatting with each other. Phone schools and the kids are walking along side by side staring at screens it’s so sad!

ThriveIn2025 · 25/06/2025 20:32

If you had any idea how much time is wasted every single school day by staff trying to manage student phone usage, you’d be 100% behind a 3 day suspension as punishment.

Ours is until the end of term and you would be shocked how many parents come into reception shouting about it and demanding the phone back. The world’s gone mad.

luckylavender · 25/06/2025 20:33

HairyMaclaryInTheDairy · 25/06/2025 17:20

I can believe it, OP. My eldest's school is like this and I elected to send my younger ones elsewhere because of it. I'd consider moving him too, but he's made friends. It's draconian and I can't see how missing three days of education is proportionate.

Edited for grammar.

Edited

Do you worry about your children following instructions when they enter the workplace? It’s a rule, nothing will happen if you follow it. Just do as you’re told.

PeppyLilacLion · 25/06/2025 20:34

TizerorFizz · 25/06/2025 19:56

@PeppyLilacLion How did we manage 40 years ago then? We managed!

You paid with cash everywhere and used public phone boxes. Neither of which are always easily accessible now. Families also managed without central heating and indoor toilets but I don’t see anyone not embracing those. We are not preparing them to be adults if we completely ban phones, that is not the world we live in anymore. A three day suspension is ridiculous and illustrates what is important to the school when assaults and bullying are probably given the same or lesser punishment.

Bringinguptherear · 25/06/2025 20:34

PeppyLilacLion · 25/06/2025 19:45

If a school openly introduces rules like this with good enough notice for a new Y7 intake to make their choice and not apply then I would support the school. The problem is however this sort of thing often comes along with some egomaniac of a new head, trying to stamp their new rules on things so they can be quoted in some Sunday newspaper. Let’s face it any kid who has a clue is going to take an old phone out of a drawer for school use and use that and risk that getting spotted and confiscated whilst keeping their actual iphone 16 in their inside blazer pocket. We can’t expect kids to have digital bus passes, make arrangements for if schools unexpectedly close and access homework/ kahoot in lessons and school emails/ classrooms constantly online yet then say phones can’t be in school at all.

the rules don’t say the child can’t use the phone outside school (so they can still use bus apps etc, make after school arrangements etc) . Everything else is within the power of the school to change - they dont have to use apps for homework or expect children to use phones in lessons. Plenty of schools have implemented no phone use in school hours policies and seem to be managing just fine.

PeppyLilacLion · 25/06/2025 20:36

luckylavender · 25/06/2025 20:33

Do you worry about your children following instructions when they enter the workplace? It’s a rule, nothing will happen if you follow it. Just do as you’re told.

Perhaps they will be self-employed and not just blindly following instructions from other people. Judging by those around me those are the ones with plenty of cash to spare.

ruffler45 · 25/06/2025 20:41

Thems the rules...take your chances

Sounds like phones are a serious collective problem compared with fighting.

Viviennemary · 25/06/2025 20:54

TooManyCupsAndMugs · 25/06/2025 17:20

If they are telling everyone well in advance what the policy will be and you are going to continue to send them to the school that has this policy, then yes, everyone has to abide by it or face the well publicised consequence. I do think 3 days is a bit much (and it will affect their attendance figures so they may well roll back a bit). The disruption phones cause is off the scale believe me.

If the rule is no phones then that's the rule. There has to be some punishment that means something otherwise what's the point.

SapphireSeptember · 25/06/2025 20:56

DazedAndConfused321 · 25/06/2025 18:18

I think pouches are a great idea, I think bag checks are inappropriate and often misused- creating trust>demanding answers.

My other concern is regarding students with longterm illness or disability- becoming unwell and wanting advice or comfort from parents, being stuck physically if in a lift, inaccessible area etc and unable to get help, forgotten about inside during fire drills (as in news recently, and witnessed myself) and also parents have a right to be able to hear from and about their children. I remember a fellow student at school who was put in isolation (in a corridor, alone, next to head teacher's office) who wasn't allowed to use the toilet, go outside or access their bag for water/no access to food at lunchtime and had no way of contacting their parent or even police because their phone was confiscated.

Unfortunately schools are not always a safe space, and I would be hesitant to allow my children with additional needs to not have access to their own phone. They would however be expected and instructed by me to not access their phone unless in dire emergency.

The hell? Oh my goodness, that's inhumane. You couldn't treat someone like that in a prison. What happened eventually?

Hotmoodle · 25/06/2025 20:57

Why do they need their phone during school time? If anything was to happen etc family emergency you would surely phone the school and vice versa. Also they have computers so they could easily email or use SM to send a message to a parent. You can’t have your phone on you in certain jobs so best they get use to it now.

LT1233 · 25/06/2025 20:58

Crazy how you can't take 3 days off for a holiday etc because even one day off school is "missing valuable education" and "causing disruption to teaching", but can get suspended for 3 days for something as petty as this, which apparently doesn't miss valuable education or cause disruption. What's wrong with detention?

MsOvary · 25/06/2025 21:03

3 days suspension would be seen as a reward by some kids. I think they would be better employed picking up litter or cleaning etc so that it isn't a break from school - I believe a bit of community service around the school would be much more of a deterrent.

Vivienne1000 · 25/06/2025 21:04

LT1233 - you would have 500 pupils in Detention!

Foodylicious · 25/06/2025 21:04

I dont think the two things are comparable in quite the same way.

Personally I dont feel that suspension is a suitable punishment for anything, though should be used if its about keeping another pupil safe whilst a plan is worked out.

The 3 day suspension for using your phone I think could be reasonable, as it is a large enough punishment to be a good deterrent for something that lots of people might want to actively engage in, but massively disrupts the school day, thier learning etc.

The punishments for physical agression might not seem as severe, but the motivation for such behaviour is different and the rule of 'no agression' is likely to be broken by a much smaller number of people.

Evvyjb · 25/06/2025 21:05

sunshinesunday · 25/06/2025 18:56

Surely that only works with the consent of the parent? Otherwise it’s ultimately theft

It's a condition of entry. If you don't like the rule, choose another school. It's been this way for at least 10 years.

We have no issues with phones during the school day. After the end of school- it's the parents' responsibility.