Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that free breakfast at school is a bad idea due to the quality?

637 replies

Mushypeass · 07/06/2025 21:20

Firstly, I fully agree with the principle of free breakfast for all pupils. My reservation comes from the quality of food that is often served up in UK school canteens. Obviously a poor quality breakfast is better than no breakfast at all but AIBU that it could encourage children to eat even more UPFs? For example, children who have may had a relatively healthy breakfast at home may now opt eat UPFs at school with their pals instead.

Seocondly, why is the food so poor in so many schools? How can other countries manage to provide their youth with nutritious and healthy meals but we can’t?

OP posts:
Baddaybigcloud · 08/06/2025 15:58

Schools can’t even provide students with proper teachers. All money goes to senior management at the trusts. Our children are being robbed.

Hankunamatata · 08/06/2025 16:00

It will literally be cereal, milk, toast and fruit. How can that be bad?

Princessfluffy · 08/06/2025 16:07

Cereal and cheap bread are ultra highly processed foods. Not healthy at all.

Rhayra · 08/06/2025 16:41

cheesycheesy · 08/06/2025 14:08

Oh it’s definitely neglectful and lazy. My parents never had money when I was growing up and were younger They always made sure I had food and was clean

Yes I agree I'm waiting for the excuses though, personally I have no time for them if I managed to feed my kids breakfast having no job and being young what excuse does someone with a job or over 25 and getting a lot more benefits than an under 25 have? Cornflakes is literally 80p and even though it's processed it's not the end of the world it's fortified with vitamins if it was kraves or that Oreo balls cereal I'd get the arguement it's unhealthy but not all cereals are even that sugary.

Parents not feeding their kids breakfast is neglect and breakfast club won't stop them because they're not the type to get to school on time anyway let alone earlier

Fetaface · 08/06/2025 16:44

Princessfluffy · 08/06/2025 15:54

In the USA 25% of all healthcare spending is on diabetes. Here it’s £11 billion a year and rising, about 10% of the entire NHS budget. 80% of this cost could be avoided if people ate a healthier diet and exercised more. This is a huge national disaster and it affects all of us. Even if your own life is not touched by diabetes you will be paying a lot of tax that doesn’t need to be paid and have an NHS with 10% less capacity than it could have.
It’s a big mistake for the government to stick its head in the sand, but the sorry truth is that many many companies are profiting hugely from the status quo. Diet and exercise do matter and schools are not setting children up for healthy lives. Neither are a lot of parents, and to be fair our society doesn’t make it easy.
Cocopops for breakfast in my opinion is not a healthy or responsible choice. As a society, we need to do better.

You mean the government are not setting the children up. If it was fully funded then the schools could provide. Because it isnt then they cant. They literally have to provide food for say 200 kids a day not knowing how many will rock up. Food waste will be appalling from that if they bought enough eggs and avos to feed 200 kids a day but only 10 turned up! The parents are the issue here. Not feeding their kids so they're not setting the kids up. The schools are doing what they can on bare bones budget which means staff work for free. Coincidentally usually the ones on the lowest income meaning staff earn less than minimum wage as a result. Also this club removed the education from the children who need it the most because staff are washing up dishes instead of helping them in class. Now it is toothbrushing too and potty training. Might as well bring their PJs and they can sleep. Hand them back at 18 is the idea I think. We as a society shouldn't just nod when new initiatives are loaded onto schools then criticise them as they do their best without money to fund it properly.

What would your idea to ensure no food waste or ensure staff aren't shopping each night because more kids rocked up than anticipated? Yes staff do food shopping themselves in their own time and do not get the money back for months in many schools.

ClassicalQueen · 08/06/2025 16:52

I work in a school that is in a deprived area. To put it simply, there is no money. Our breakfast club provides cereal or toast and runs at a loss, despite not being part of the government scheme and charging per session. The government scheme would leave us worse off, as the funding is not enough to feed the children and pay staff to man the breakfast club.

Coconutter24 · 08/06/2025 16:53

RaininSummer · 07/06/2025 21:33

I agree with you if it's going to be white bread with jam or cheap spread or cheap nutrition free cereal. If it is a decent bread with healthy toppings or porridge or fruit then great.

So you would rather see a child have no breakfast and go hungry over having jam on toast at school?

MrsSkylerWhite · 08/06/2025 16:53

Princessfluffy · 08/06/2025 16:07

Cereal and cheap bread are ultra highly processed foods. Not healthy at all.

Bloody sight healthier than an empty stomach. Even cheap cereal is usually eaten with milk.

ClassicalQueen · 08/06/2025 16:54

Mushypeass · 07/06/2025 21:34

I don’t work at a school but I visit them as part of my role. I’ve seen donuts, pizza, chicken wings, chips, chicken nuggets, cheese burgers, etc. quite frequently. Very few vegetables or fruit in my experience.

This isn’t served at breakfast. Most schools are similar to mine and are toast, cereal and if you’re lucky, porridge. There is also fresh fruit provided on occasion.

MrsSkylerWhite · 08/06/2025 17:01

ClassicalQueen · 08/06/2025 16:54

This isn’t served at breakfast. Most schools are similar to mine and are toast, cereal and if you’re lucky, porridge. There is also fresh fruit provided on occasion.

Porridge is a really cheap option and highly nutritious.

feelingbleh · 08/06/2025 17:05

Why is everyone so against jam its fruit and low in fat obviously it has a high sugar content but in moderation is fine

RosesAndHellebores · 08/06/2025 17:09

It depends on the jam and what's in it.

My issue is with universality and the dumbing down it brings.

RosesAndHellebores · 08/06/2025 17:10

Fetaface · 08/06/2025 16:44

You mean the government are not setting the children up. If it was fully funded then the schools could provide. Because it isnt then they cant. They literally have to provide food for say 200 kids a day not knowing how many will rock up. Food waste will be appalling from that if they bought enough eggs and avos to feed 200 kids a day but only 10 turned up! The parents are the issue here. Not feeding their kids so they're not setting the kids up. The schools are doing what they can on bare bones budget which means staff work for free. Coincidentally usually the ones on the lowest income meaning staff earn less than minimum wage as a result. Also this club removed the education from the children who need it the most because staff are washing up dishes instead of helping them in class. Now it is toothbrushing too and potty training. Might as well bring their PJs and they can sleep. Hand them back at 18 is the idea I think. We as a society shouldn't just nod when new initiatives are loaded onto schools then criticise them as they do their best without money to fund it properly.

What would your idea to ensure no food waste or ensure staff aren't shopping each night because more kids rocked up than anticipated? Yes staff do food shopping themselves in their own time and do not get the money back for months in many schools.

If we take your argument to the next stage, it comes pretty close to bringing back workhouses.

ThisDandyWriter · 08/06/2025 17:29

feelingbleh · 08/06/2025 17:05

Why is everyone so against jam its fruit and low in fat obviously it has a high sugar content but in moderation is fine

It really, really is not fine. And it’s not high in fruit, especially not the very cheap stuff served at school.

CrispEatingExpert · 08/06/2025 17:48

feelingbleh · 08/06/2025 17:05

Why is everyone so against jam its fruit and low in fat obviously it has a high sugar content but in moderation is fine

In moderation, yes it’s fine. But we’re not talking about moderation. We’re talking about kids eating it every day for breakfast.

Jam generally has more sugar than fruit. It usually contains added gelling agents and other chemicals that are doing us more harm than good and has no nutritional value at all.

Add a scraping of spread that has a closer resemblance to plastic than butter and some cheap white bread (I’ve just googled Sainsbury’s own white sliced and it contains 15 ingredients that I can barely say, when bread should be made of just 4), and we’re filling our kids with chemicals and no nutrition to feed their growing bodies and brains.

Supergirl1958 · 08/06/2025 17:55

Mushypeass · 07/06/2025 21:20

Firstly, I fully agree with the principle of free breakfast for all pupils. My reservation comes from the quality of food that is often served up in UK school canteens. Obviously a poor quality breakfast is better than no breakfast at all but AIBU that it could encourage children to eat even more UPFs? For example, children who have may had a relatively healthy breakfast at home may now opt eat UPFs at school with their pals instead.

Seocondly, why is the food so poor in so many schools? How can other countries manage to provide their youth with nutritious and healthy meals but we can’t?

The quality of school meals in my school is actually ok. Many staff actually have one.

Im not against the principle of providing breakfast either and I think it’s amazing. But schools are now providing free breakfast, teeth cleaning, free school meals for all for reception and ks1 children. Foodbanks, uniform banks, lifts to and from school for children. Many staff pay out of their own pockets for children and parents! I have in the past purchased a small inexpensive Christmas present for some of my pupils and provided some of my DCs clothing for parents in need. Yet we constantly get torn to shreds over all sorts, holiday fines, safeguarding issues in the mainstream media! Hardly anyone looks at the positive things we do, that we didn’t get into the job to do, but do willingly! That’s without being the ears for several parents who are struggling on a day to day basis. I do love my job but it’s certainly not what it was when I started teaching 20 years ago :(

Izyboo · 08/06/2025 17:55

Please feel free to donate enough healthy cereal to your local school for every single child for the full academic year.

My school is from a deprived area and we still manage it. Breakfast club has been free for a very long time, not just since the government introduced it. Everything is healthy, wholemeal toast, fortified cereals. Special treats they may get Jam, or pancakes.

We do what we can with next to no budget.

Fetaface · 08/06/2025 17:56

RosesAndHellebores · 08/06/2025 17:10

If we take your argument to the next stage, it comes pretty close to bringing back workhouses.

Well yeah it is similar to that if you work in a school! We're not far off for staff at the moment!

hopspot · 08/06/2025 17:56

Schools have no money. The funding isn’t enough. They’re doing the best they can to provide food that children will eat. I’m not sure why so many people seem so obsessed with porridge.

ednakenneth · 08/06/2025 17:58

I can tell you now from experience working in a deprived primary school. They only give them toasted white bagels with cheap margarine. The children could eat as much as they liked but there was no fruit. The fruit that they were given was donated from a farm which was on the turn. Kids were still hungry. That was every day.
It's very commendable of the government to say they will give free breakfast but the quality does matter.
What about giving the kids porridge and if a local farm wants to donate they can top it up on the porridge. That's more nourishing for the children

Fetaface · 08/06/2025 18:00

Supergirl1958 · 08/06/2025 17:55

The quality of school meals in my school is actually ok. Many staff actually have one.

Im not against the principle of providing breakfast either and I think it’s amazing. But schools are now providing free breakfast, teeth cleaning, free school meals for all for reception and ks1 children. Foodbanks, uniform banks, lifts to and from school for children. Many staff pay out of their own pockets for children and parents! I have in the past purchased a small inexpensive Christmas present for some of my pupils and provided some of my DCs clothing for parents in need. Yet we constantly get torn to shreds over all sorts, holiday fines, safeguarding issues in the mainstream media! Hardly anyone looks at the positive things we do, that we didn’t get into the job to do, but do willingly! That’s without being the ears for several parents who are struggling on a day to day basis. I do love my job but it’s certainly not what it was when I started teaching 20 years ago :(

This with bells on. Schools are vilified but do more than other services and go above and beyond - even going without themselves as staff to make sure the children have.

TheignT · 08/06/2025 18:02

MrsSkylerWhite · 08/06/2025 17:01

Porridge is a really cheap option and highly nutritious.

And if kids won't eat it then it's a waste of effort.

MrsSkylerWhite · 08/06/2025 18:03

CrispEatingExpert · 08/06/2025 17:48

In moderation, yes it’s fine. But we’re not talking about moderation. We’re talking about kids eating it every day for breakfast.

Jam generally has more sugar than fruit. It usually contains added gelling agents and other chemicals that are doing us more harm than good and has no nutritional value at all.

Add a scraping of spread that has a closer resemblance to plastic than butter and some cheap white bread (I’ve just googled Sainsbury’s own white sliced and it contains 15 ingredients that I can barely say, when bread should be made of just 4), and we’re filling our kids with chemicals and no nutrition to feed their growing bodies and brains.

So no breakfast at all is better?

Calories are what matter, with very limited resources, when a child is hungry.

RosesAndHellebores · 08/06/2025 18:03

Supergirl1958 · 08/06/2025 17:55

The quality of school meals in my school is actually ok. Many staff actually have one.

Im not against the principle of providing breakfast either and I think it’s amazing. But schools are now providing free breakfast, teeth cleaning, free school meals for all for reception and ks1 children. Foodbanks, uniform banks, lifts to and from school for children. Many staff pay out of their own pockets for children and parents! I have in the past purchased a small inexpensive Christmas present for some of my pupils and provided some of my DCs clothing for parents in need. Yet we constantly get torn to shreds over all sorts, holiday fines, safeguarding issues in the mainstream media! Hardly anyone looks at the positive things we do, that we didn’t get into the job to do, but do willingly! That’s without being the ears for several parents who are struggling on a day to day basis. I do love my job but it’s certainly not what it was when I started teaching 20 years ago :(

There is a significant issue in that the role of schools is to educate, not to provide social provision for the deprived. That needs to be addressed separately, even if school.premises are concerned. The same goes for CAMHS services/MH, particularly in secondary schools. The lines are being blurred and it is unacceptable. Children with MH issues and their families should retain the right for clinical care to be provided through clinical facilities and to retain Confidentiality if required.

My DC attended a leafy cofe, top of the tables primary in the noughties. The HT grasped every blairite initiative going, including deciding to teach the DC table manners. The only problem was they were misinterpreted and the notion of the knife and fork crossing the plate to sit together at the end of the meal was interpreted and sent home in pictorial form with the knife and fork crossed on the plate at right angles. One couldn't have made it up. The poor woman had missed the fact that 70% of the children had professional parents.

CrispEatingExpert · 08/06/2025 18:04

hopspot · 08/06/2025 17:56

Schools have no money. The funding isn’t enough. They’re doing the best they can to provide food that children will eat. I’m not sure why so many people seem so obsessed with porridge.

Porridge is really cheap - 89p for 25 servings. Made with milk, it contains fibre, protein, b vitamins and other minerals. It’s good for heart health, gut health and slow release energy.

Top with some fruit and it’s a really healthy breakfast and completely UPF free. A much, much better way to start the day than what a lot of schools offer.