Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cervical Smears-Not to Go?

377 replies

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 21:10

So I’ve always been very compliant with anything medical but after a number of really bad experiences (most NHS but some private) I’m now more sceptical.

I’ve been invited for my latest smear test, and inspired by another current thread on women’s health, I wanted to ask IABU if I don’t go?

I know for some people smears can be painful and even traumatic. I’ve been lucky not to have been in that situation. However, I am concerned about the downsides-mainly, the risk of false positives. Basically where something “abnormal” is treated but where it wouldn’t have actually caused harm. I think these are a recognised downside for preventative screening programmes, but I don’t know what the risk is for smears and breast screening. I’m not in an at risk group so far as I know. If I noticed a problem I would definitely get it checked out but just want to take a risk-based approach.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
DearDenimEagle · 30/05/2025 22:42

aodirjjd · 30/05/2025 22:35

Presuming the vaccine doesn’t negate the entire screening program I think another 10 years we’ll all get home testing kits and be shocked that you had to go a smear. I can’t face a smear and ive HAD cancer. I really don’t understand why they cant just give you a stick to get your own sample and then bring you back for proper smear if you test positive for hpv. Cynical part of me thinks it’s because it’s cheaper for nhs to only have 1 appt and the fact that it’s humiliating and painful to women when it doesn’t need to be doesn’t matter.

I’ll probably buy a private kit and test for hpv. I’ve put up with enough dehumanising nhs appts for one lifetime.

Because the stick for you to take your own sample does not guarantee you go high enough or cover enough area to get sufficient cells. There’s a reason they use a speculum and why it hurts a bit. No woman is going to get a good enough sample with a stick. It’s ridiculous. These tests save lives but only if you take them. In time/ often enough.

ThisCraftyHelper · 30/05/2025 22:43

MyUmberSeal · 30/05/2025 21:17

Don’t allow that other thread to distort your views. For most women, it’s a simple 10 minute appointment. If you can, you should.

If I remember correctly it was op spreading misinformation on the other thread. A lot of people were telling her to go get tested.

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 22:45

ThisCraftyHelper · 30/05/2025 22:39

I remember you from the other thread…you didn’t think you could get HPV because you and your husband were virgins when you met? That’s you isn’t it? There was plenty of information and good advice on there for you.

Haha not me 😂

OP posts:
mindutopia · 30/05/2025 22:45

It’s an STI test. It’s quite unlikely that you would get a false positive on a viral swab, then have cells investigated under a microscope and get another false positive. And then even if you did, it’s just a colposcopy and biopsy. No big deal. I’ve had several of them. And only then after 3 rounds of screening and diagnostic testing would they diagnose you with cancer. At which point you’d be very grateful they did.

I was diagnosed late for cancer (not cervical) because my GP fobbed me off as making a big deal over an obviously benign condition. Except it wasn’t benign. It was a particularly aggressive cancer that historically has a fairly low survival rate. Instead of being diagnosed at stage 1, it was already stage 3c by the time I did get them to refer me 6 months later. One teeny bit off being stage 4 and incurable. I got diagnosed pretty much on my 44th birthday.

Now I’m very fortunate that I am in otherwise peak health and I have had an absolutely fantastic NHS surgical and oncology team who have advocated for me and pushed my case through and gotten me on treatment incredibly quickly. As a result, I’m now half way through 12 months of treatment and 5 planned surgeries (2 more left to go), and I am currently cancer free. I would not have been so lucky if things had gone differently for me or I hadn’t push for a 2nd opinion. I’d be bloody running not walking to any cancer screening. You truly cannot imagine what it’s like to look your own death in the face until it happens to you.

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 22:46

ThisCraftyHelper · 30/05/2025 22:43

If I remember correctly it was op spreading misinformation on the other thread. A lot of people were telling her to go get tested.

No this wasn’t me! I don’t know enough about this (that’s why I posted) so I definitely wouldn’t be advising others!

OP posts:
Lovelynames123 · 30/05/2025 22:46

Over the years I've had 2 loop biopsies and a punch biopsy following abnormal smears. It has never come to anything but I still never miss a test.

They have changed the way they screen now, unless you test positive for HPV they don't tend to send you for biopsies, apparently. Just go, it's better to be safe than sorry surely?

Helloworlditsmeagain · 30/05/2025 22:48

It is a simple quick appointment the nurse doesn't want to be poking down there for to long. My mum died at 65 from a stroke and a heart attack she had endometriosis it was on her death certificate. She had regular smear tests. It is easy and you are in and out.

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 22:48

mindutopia · 30/05/2025 22:45

It’s an STI test. It’s quite unlikely that you would get a false positive on a viral swab, then have cells investigated under a microscope and get another false positive. And then even if you did, it’s just a colposcopy and biopsy. No big deal. I’ve had several of them. And only then after 3 rounds of screening and diagnostic testing would they diagnose you with cancer. At which point you’d be very grateful they did.

I was diagnosed late for cancer (not cervical) because my GP fobbed me off as making a big deal over an obviously benign condition. Except it wasn’t benign. It was a particularly aggressive cancer that historically has a fairly low survival rate. Instead of being diagnosed at stage 1, it was already stage 3c by the time I did get them to refer me 6 months later. One teeny bit off being stage 4 and incurable. I got diagnosed pretty much on my 44th birthday.

Now I’m very fortunate that I am in otherwise peak health and I have had an absolutely fantastic NHS surgical and oncology team who have advocated for me and pushed my case through and gotten me on treatment incredibly quickly. As a result, I’m now half way through 12 months of treatment and 5 planned surgeries (2 more left to go), and I am currently cancer free. I would not have been so lucky if things had gone differently for me or I hadn’t push for a 2nd opinion. I’d be bloody running not walking to any cancer screening. You truly cannot imagine what it’s like to look your own death in the face until it happens to you.

Edited

I’m really glad you have a good team. This is actually really helpful, and it sounds very thorough if they do 3 rounds of testing.

OP posts:
DearDenimEagle · 30/05/2025 22:51

I’ve watched my colposcopy, twice. It’s not something they can do unnecessarily. The bits they treat are visible ..the ‘bad cells’ are obvious. if the skin is healthy, they can see that and aren’t going to remove it. The danger is what they cannot see..if it’s spread much higher and gone into the womb. So be careful what you’re worrying about.

Same with breast screening..I noticed someone mentioned that. Anyone who thinks it’s safe to miss the opportunity to have a test is deluded. I was in a low risk category for both Smears and even lower for breast screening. But I do have something in my left breast. They say it’s tiny and might be benign but I’ve to go back in a couple of years…I don’t get regular screening any more . I need to self refer. Old enough they don’t really care. For gods sake, take all the screening tests they offer. It’s a bit of time, but can save your life.

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 22:52

Katewashere · 30/05/2025 22:37

Hi Op, I have health anxiety too so I can understand where you are coming from. I went for my smear last year and tested positive for HPV and had cell changes. I then waited about 6 months for a colposcopy. The Dr told me it was all fine and was incredibly reassuring. The HPV had caused the cell changes and no further treatment was needed. I’ve to get another smear in a few months. Cervical cancer is fortunately slow growing so if it’s detected early and at a pre-cancerous stage then you can get treatment and no issues or anything to worry about. I do understand the not know can be scary if you have anxiety but it’s really preventative. I hope you make the decision that is best for you but I’d encourage you to speak to a nurse or GP who can put your mind at rest.

Thank you @Katewashere I think a lot of PPs are not understanding why I posted/my concerns. For someone who has health anxiety (so severe I’ve been actively suicidal) monitoring and waiting for test results isn’t so simple. I really appreciate you posting.

And again just to be clear to other PPs I’m not trying to discourage anyone ftpm
getting a smear and I haven’t posted about this before!

OP posts:
BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 22:52

Fatsnowflakecunt · 30/05/2025 21:28

They give you the choice if it’s not progressed too far (and even then - it’s your choice). I had CIN 2 and was offered watch and wait or treatment. I went for the treatment. But don’t refuse screening. It gives you information that’s all.

They never presented it to me as a choice. First I had a really painful follow up smear, then an incredibly painful LLETZ where I was left with burns and scarring on my labia, then 6 monthly very painful smears for 5 year follow ups and the whole thing kicked off a major health anxiety that took a further 4 years to get treatment for because, well, GPs basically told me to pull myself together until it got to the point I couldn’t leave the house. Having had my records reviewed by a second gynae when I had my hysterectomy she concluded I was at minimal risk of the abnormal cells being linked to cervical cancer.

I understand the wider picture about the numbers, but it’s also worth knowing that a study from Bristol in 2003 found that 1,000 women have to be screened for 35 years to prevent one death from cervical cancer; and to prevent that death, 80 women have to have further investigation, with 50 women having treatment to their cervix. Four out of five women found at screening to have "high-grade" changes in their cervix did not go on to develop invasive cancer.

We hear all the stories of how Jade Goody missed a smear test and died of cancer. But that’s a tiny part of the story. She had abnormal cells removed when she was 15. She had cells removed a further two times and what she actually missed was going back for a fourth procedure when she had an abnormal smear result. She also had other symptoms of cancer. It’s incredibly sad that she died, and IMO it’s a failure of the health system, and how it treats women but her case is incredibly rare. There are also dozens of “smear test saved my life” stories in the media, but what you don’t hear is the stories of the 49 women who have needless treatment for every one of those people who were saved.

Would I still have had the treatment if I’d known all this before? Probably. Risk v consequence, I guess what I went through outweighed the risk of developing cancer. But anyone who trivialises it as “it’s just a quick test” or treats someone as an idiot for being concerned about it, should understand that even NICE publishes information about the disadvantages of the test and clinicians are supposed to advise patients about it. Unfortunately the narrative seen here about it being the single most important thing a woman does, also pervades the NHS who think that treating women as commodities and having targets for how many women have the test is a good thing to do.

Helloworlditsmeagain · 30/05/2025 22:52

My mum didn't take care of herself it wasn't the endometriosis that killed her.

itsobviousright · 30/05/2025 22:52

I've seen someone post about this before and they were basically told they deserved to die if they didn't go for their smear....glad this thread hasn't gone there yet!

BelaLug0si · 30/05/2025 22:53

Hercisback1 · 30/05/2025 22:36

I'm more than aware of this. A false positive isn't a negative either. Nor is a negative confirmation you definitely don't have cancer.

Why did you write that a call back is a false positive then?

MumWifeOther · 30/05/2025 22:53

They can be very invasive and I understand your concerns. They now only test for (some) hpv strains which can be done via a urine sample home kit which you can order if you prefer. You’ll need to pay for it x

ManchesterLu · 30/05/2025 22:54

Since they only test for HPV now, I just do a private HPV test that you can administer yourself, from home.

Obviously if it comes back positive you have things to think about, but most don't.

There are currently trials about this being how the NHS do smears in the future anyway - home testing - and the tests are reliable.

BelaLug0si · 30/05/2025 22:55

aodirjjd · 30/05/2025 22:35

Presuming the vaccine doesn’t negate the entire screening program I think another 10 years we’ll all get home testing kits and be shocked that you had to go a smear. I can’t face a smear and ive HAD cancer. I really don’t understand why they cant just give you a stick to get your own sample and then bring you back for proper smear if you test positive for hpv. Cynical part of me thinks it’s because it’s cheaper for nhs to only have 1 appt and the fact that it’s humiliating and painful to women when it doesn’t need to be doesn’t matter.

I’ll probably buy a private kit and test for hpv. I’ve put up with enough dehumanising nhs appts for one lifetime.

Self sampling is under assessment for use in the NHS. If you search for HPValidate and YouScreen, you can read the published studies so far.

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 22:55

BoredZelda · 30/05/2025 22:52

They never presented it to me as a choice. First I had a really painful follow up smear, then an incredibly painful LLETZ where I was left with burns and scarring on my labia, then 6 monthly very painful smears for 5 year follow ups and the whole thing kicked off a major health anxiety that took a further 4 years to get treatment for because, well, GPs basically told me to pull myself together until it got to the point I couldn’t leave the house. Having had my records reviewed by a second gynae when I had my hysterectomy she concluded I was at minimal risk of the abnormal cells being linked to cervical cancer.

I understand the wider picture about the numbers, but it’s also worth knowing that a study from Bristol in 2003 found that 1,000 women have to be screened for 35 years to prevent one death from cervical cancer; and to prevent that death, 80 women have to have further investigation, with 50 women having treatment to their cervix. Four out of five women found at screening to have "high-grade" changes in their cervix did not go on to develop invasive cancer.

We hear all the stories of how Jade Goody missed a smear test and died of cancer. But that’s a tiny part of the story. She had abnormal cells removed when she was 15. She had cells removed a further two times and what she actually missed was going back for a fourth procedure when she had an abnormal smear result. She also had other symptoms of cancer. It’s incredibly sad that she died, and IMO it’s a failure of the health system, and how it treats women but her case is incredibly rare. There are also dozens of “smear test saved my life” stories in the media, but what you don’t hear is the stories of the 49 women who have needless treatment for every one of those people who were saved.

Would I still have had the treatment if I’d known all this before? Probably. Risk v consequence, I guess what I went through outweighed the risk of developing cancer. But anyone who trivialises it as “it’s just a quick test” or treats someone as an idiot for being concerned about it, should understand that even NICE publishes information about the disadvantages of the test and clinicians are supposed to advise patients about it. Unfortunately the narrative seen here about it being the single most important thing a woman does, also pervades the NHS who think that treating women as commodities and having targets for how many women have the test is a good thing to do.

I’m really sorry to hear about your experience x

OP posts:
ThisCraftyHelper · 30/05/2025 22:57

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 22:46

No this wasn’t me! I don’t know enough about this (that’s why I posted) so I definitely wouldn’t be advising others!

My mistake op. There was a woman from a different thread last week just said something very similar in how you worded your thread and was spreading misinformation and thought it was you. But it’s ultimately up to you to make that choice. You have a lot of good advice here. You have the decision to not make an appointment and you can’t be forced into anything you don’t want to do. HCP are there to help and look after you.

DearDenimEagle · 30/05/2025 22:58

mindutopia · 30/05/2025 22:45

It’s an STI test. It’s quite unlikely that you would get a false positive on a viral swab, then have cells investigated under a microscope and get another false positive. And then even if you did, it’s just a colposcopy and biopsy. No big deal. I’ve had several of them. And only then after 3 rounds of screening and diagnostic testing would they diagnose you with cancer. At which point you’d be very grateful they did.

I was diagnosed late for cancer (not cervical) because my GP fobbed me off as making a big deal over an obviously benign condition. Except it wasn’t benign. It was a particularly aggressive cancer that historically has a fairly low survival rate. Instead of being diagnosed at stage 1, it was already stage 3c by the time I did get them to refer me 6 months later. One teeny bit off being stage 4 and incurable. I got diagnosed pretty much on my 44th birthday.

Now I’m very fortunate that I am in otherwise peak health and I have had an absolutely fantastic NHS surgical and oncology team who have advocated for me and pushed my case through and gotten me on treatment incredibly quickly. As a result, I’m now half way through 12 months of treatment and 5 planned surgeries (2 more left to go), and I am currently cancer free. I would not have been so lucky if things had gone differently for me or I hadn’t push for a 2nd opinion. I’d be bloody running not walking to any cancer screening. You truly cannot imagine what it’s like to look your own death in the face until it happens to you.

Edited

I had trouble convincing my doc. For 2 years he told me I was imagining things after my second colposcopy. I was being neurotic. A different doc then arranged an ultrasound…which led within 4 weeks to a CT scan and anothefpr few weeks to an MRI. The biopsy failed..too much risk of perforating the womb they said. So they went ahead with a total hysterectomy. From ultrasound to hysterectomy was 4 months..pretty quick for the NHS. The first doc was wrong and if I hadn’t pushed , I might not be here but I’d be dead like my sister

ThisCraftyHelper · 30/05/2025 22:58

itsobviousright · 30/05/2025 22:52

I've seen someone post about this before and they were basically told they deserved to die if they didn't go for their smear....glad this thread hasn't gone there yet!

Awful. And these are women that are saying this 🙄

BeagleHound1 · 30/05/2025 22:58

B1rthdayD1lemna · 30/05/2025 21:22

Idiot science? I’m not claiming to be an expert on this and so am asking if people have any info/stats. But it’s a well-known risk with preventive tests that they sometimes give false positives. Basically where the abnormality picked up wouldn’t have caused harm if it had never been found. As they don’t know which abnormalities will be harmful treatment is offered to everyone. They literally explain that on the NHS materials that come with the smear invite. So it’s not something made-up or not recognised. I don’t know how common false negatives are for smears and I’m certainly not trying to discourage anyone from going, just trying to get accurate info

You are absolutely right. All screening tests carry the risk of harm. That’s why you have every right to say no. Cervical screening however has a low risk of this and a high chance of picking up something at an early treatable stage. There is much less evidence breast screening is a good screening programme. Even though I know this I still go. It’s my choice and you have every right to make a choice just make sure it’s an informed one. Read the screening information on the nhs websites

ManchesterLu · 30/05/2025 22:59

DearDenimEagle · 30/05/2025 22:42

Because the stick for you to take your own sample does not guarantee you go high enough or cover enough area to get sufficient cells. There’s a reason they use a speculum and why it hurts a bit. No woman is going to get a good enough sample with a stick. It’s ridiculous. These tests save lives but only if you take them. In time/ often enough.

You don't "get cells" with a home sample though. A vaginal swab can test for HPV, which is all the smear tests do in the first instance. If that's clear, a smear wouldn't have checked for abnormal cells anyway.

CalmDownCats · 30/05/2025 23:01

I was called back for a repeat smear once, would this have been a false positive? Nothing was found. All smears since have been clear.

Sarah2891 · 30/05/2025 23:04

YANBU. It's your choice.

I've never had one and never will. I don't have HPV.

Swipe left for the next trending thread