Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if people were actually healthier when everyone smoked

370 replies

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:11

(I have never smoked and used to hate going to bars etc that stank of smoke so this is a very against my own interests question but)

Smoking makes people thinner (it just does)

Cigarettes can be good for people with anxiety

Smoking is a social activity and social connection is good for health

Should we try and get a tiny bit more going?

(Not me I still don't want my hair to smell)

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 29/05/2025 22:12

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:15

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace and nobody was long term unemployed with anxiety when smoking was commonplace

I guess I forget that people rarely think about health and just believe what they are expected to believe (understandably survival attitude)

I used to smoke a lot.
I was still obese.

I gave up smoking over five years ago, and gained even more weight.

I was toying with the idea of starting smoking again, to see if I could lose some weight, when GLP-1s arrived.

Yay Mounjaro! I've now lost over 7st without smoking.

Gettingbysomehow · 29/05/2025 22:12

I was born in the early 60s and started .y nurses training in 1981
People most certainly weren't healthier. There was a lot of malnutrition and TB that required many months of isolation in hospital, plenty of cancer and alcoholism all the usual vascular diseases from smoking. It was very depressing.

DBSFstupid · 29/05/2025 22:13

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:19

And nobody needed specially reinforced hospital beds for their enormous hefts

😂

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 22:13

cranberryshortcake · 29/05/2025 22:12

Amphetamines make people thinner.

Why not put everyone on those and skip the lung cancer?

Edited

I'd be fine with this tbh

OP posts:
Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 22:14

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 29/05/2025 22:12

I used to smoke a lot.
I was still obese.

I gave up smoking over five years ago, and gained even more weight.

I was toying with the idea of starting smoking again, to see if I could lose some weight, when GLP-1s arrived.

Yay Mounjaro! I've now lost over 7st without smoking.

Most people can't get mounjaro, though.

OP posts:
SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 29/05/2025 22:14

Do a smoker’s lungs look healthy, @Fragmentedbrain?

Smoking also causes atheroma - a build up of plaque in the blood vessels that can easily cause a heart attack or a stroke.

Smoking in pregnancy makes babies smaller.

Cigarettes contain all sorts of toxins - how is it healthy to inhale these things on purpose?

YourWinter · 29/05/2025 22:15

How ridiculous. I was born in the mid-1950s and I assure you there were fat smokers (and non-smokers) in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and every decade before and since. There are more fat people now because they eat less healthily and are less active, not because they’re not smoking.

Smokers stink and make everyone and everything around them stink.

NestEmptying · 29/05/2025 22:15

Correlation does not equal causation.
Just because people were less prone to being obese in the past it doesn't follow that it was because they smoked. Food habits have changed.
Anxiety was a thing in the past but it was under diagnosed, there is not more of it now.
Your logic is faulty.

justasking111 · 29/05/2025 22:16

Createausername1970 · 29/05/2025 22:07

Haven't got the will to read the thread, but back in the day when more people smoked and we were all thin, there also wasn't a Costa or a Starbucks on every corner selling calorie-laden enormous coffees and various high-calorie snacks/cakes etc., or Deliveroo bringing a bacon sandwich whenever someone fancies one. I think this culture of excess on demand has more to with expanding waistlines than not smoking.

This!!!

You had breakfast, lunch, dinner, mostly cooked from scratch. Saturday was sweets or ice-cream day. You didn't have to count steps because you walked everywhere, or cycled.

kshaw · 29/05/2025 22:16

And babies were born tiny due to either mums smoking or mum's breathing in passive smoke. Hence smaller people

Needspaceforlego · 29/05/2025 22:17

Op i think people have swapped one addiction for another, ie tobacco for sugar.

People used to sit down with a coffee n fag now it's coffee n biscuits

Falconfield · 29/05/2025 22:18

I was thinner when I smoked and it certainly helped my anxiety!
It wasn't until I stopped smoking I had a complete MH breakdown which I really believe was to do with using smoking as a coping strategy and then having to relearn how to cope.

However, my health was starting to suffer, I had a constant cough, I couldn't catch my breath when doing even light exercise. My teeth were shocking with the staining not to mention the cosmetic side of stained teeth and bad breath.
I was also very aware that COPD and emphysema. It is a horrible way to die and having watched a parent die this way due to a lifetime of smoking, I wouldn't wish it on my worse enemy, it's horrific, slow and painful whilst robbing the person of all their dignity.

I think if we can teach the next generation to not even start to get involved or interested in smoking it will be a very good thing!

Graters · 29/05/2025 22:19

I do see your point about smoking and obesity. But I don't think replacing one unhealthy habit with another is necessarily better.

ispecialiseinthis · 29/05/2025 22:20

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 22:13

I'd be fine with this tbh

I was going to suggest heroine but, sure, we can take it gradually.

No - smoking does not make you healthier.
It is an appetite suppressant, which is not necessarily a good thing, if you are not eating enough nutrients (essentially malnourished).
Then you can develop emphysema and the increased effort to just breathe helps you lose weight - it’s not fun struggling to breathe constantly.
Then you get cancers. Another not recommended way to lose weight. You have biopsies, scans, surgery (which can be very extensive), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, more scans, more scares, more biopsies, more surgery/chemo/RT.
Doesn’t sound like a great anxiolytic to me.

Theunamedcat · 29/05/2025 22:22

I mean of we could take away the bad things about smoking like the smell and the way it literally kills you then you might have a point

WearyAuldWumman · 29/05/2025 22:23

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:15

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace and nobody was long term unemployed with anxiety when smoking was commonplace

I guess I forget that people rarely think about health and just believe what they are expected to believe (understandably survival attitude)

You're confusing correlation with causation.

I think you're forgetting that we didn't have as many fast food outlets or the 'fat positivity' movement. Nor did we have quite as many convenience foods - we certainly didn't have the convenience of microwaveable ready meals.

Sweets were more of a treat. There wasn't the expectation that families would keep a shelf full of 'snacks'.

We did have fat people, but not quite as many and they were rarely as obese as those nowadays, though we also had doctors prescribing speed so that people could slim in the '60s and '70s.

One of my classmates was prescribed amphetamines at the age of 10/11 (1970). A few years later, my aunt died of a supposedly unrelated cerebral haemorrhage after being prescribed them by her doctor. Aunty was a smoker and smoking hadn't done much to help her lose weight.

WrylyAmused · 29/05/2025 22:23

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:15

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace and nobody was long term unemployed with anxiety when smoking was commonplace

I guess I forget that people rarely think about health and just believe what they are expected to believe (understandably survival attitude)

Correlation is not causation.

Yes, a higher proportion of people smoked, fewer people were obese and anxiety was less spoken about in the past (no idea about actual prevalence of anxiety though).

But, just maybe, it isn't smoking that caused those effects, and just maybe, there are some other common factors of changes in society that might be driving all these changes, no?

Tiredalwaystired · 29/05/2025 22:24

As a lifelong non smoker who was stuck in a house and unventilated cars with a chain smoking dad for my entire childhood (a dad who died from cancer age 69) I would not be surprised if cancer is what carries me off regardless of how healthily I choose to live my life. Smoking has impacted way more people than the smokers out there. So you’re being unreasonable.

LillyPJ · 29/05/2025 22:24

Fragmentedbrain · 29/05/2025 21:15

I think maybe you're dismissing too quickly the fact that hardly anyone was obese when smoking was commonplace and nobody was long term unemployed with anxiety when smoking was commonplace

I guess I forget that people rarely think about health and just believe what they are expected to believe (understandably survival attitude)

I think you're dismissing the many terrible consequences of smoking! And it's nothing to do with not smoking that causes anxiety. Do some research before you post any more nonsense.

WearyAuldWumman · 29/05/2025 22:24

NestEmptying · 29/05/2025 22:15

Correlation does not equal causation.
Just because people were less prone to being obese in the past it doesn't follow that it was because they smoked. Food habits have changed.
Anxiety was a thing in the past but it was under diagnosed, there is not more of it now.
Your logic is faulty.

Ah. I was beaten to it.

GanninHyem · 29/05/2025 22:27

Yes, smoking to to blame.for obesity, not the other massive lifestyle factors that have shifted in the past 30+ years 🙄

Enjoy fishing OP?

Cherryicecreamx · 29/05/2025 22:28

Have to admit, made some good connections in smoking shelters when I used to go out!

4naans · 29/05/2025 22:28

Why do you see addiction to food as a moral failing but not addiction to cigarettes?
Is it about aesthetics? You think smoking looks cool and fat people don't?k

Aposterhasnoname · 29/05/2025 22:30

Ah yes, people weren’t fat in the 70s when more people smoked so the two are definitely connected.

Did you also know alcohol makes you immune to electrocution? Tis true, in the Middle Ages everyone drank beer or wine cos the water was bad, but hardly anyone got electrocuted.

NaeRolls · 29/05/2025 22:31

No. I smoked for years. I'm overweight and suffer from anxiety. Nicotine addiction increases anxiety. I was always in a state of withdrawal and needed to smoke to relieve the nicotine cravings and anxiety. When it was the nicotine addiction causing the anxiety in the first place.

I quit a few years ago and am healthier and calmer now.