You might interpret it that way, but you have managed to interpret many things incorrectly so I am not surprised. It was not my intention though. I can lay it out for you. I can’t make you understand it. The very premise of your original thread was to bait atheists, and you alone managed to make 6 pages of posts on that, so it’s a bit rich to feel that one post over more than 40 pages is baiting you! Despite that, all of those who don’t subscribe to your way of thinking have engaged in good faith and all you could do was studiously ignore the many facts, discussions, debates that didn’t fit your narrow view on the world. You responded to those where you thought you were on safe ground. And often misjudged that.
Here is a sample of some of your more denigratory and / or insulting posts:
In discussion on objective truth, in which you were floundering badly, you posted To put my argument in a nutshell - your morals sound very very Christian to me. Despite your hostility to Christianity, it's moral system is the water you swim in and feels so obviously true. My fear is that atheism seems oblivious to this, and anti-theists are busily sawing away at the branch upon which they stand.
You posted that despite the fact it’s clearly inflammatory to suggest that atheists, somehow, aren’t entitled to have a different view of how morality evolved. Especially as there’s no evidence to support your point of view. We do not, and do not want, to live in Christianity’s moral waters. Firstly, they are too murky for me, and secondly, Christianity has taken an existing moral framework and corrupted it for its own use. Have you ever wondered how the church became so wealthy, and why it hasn’t helped more people at a practical level?
Then of course there’s your reply to a post on how atheists successfully live life without a Christian anchor (after a series of posts explaining why the moral framework claimed by Christians had existed for thousands of years before Christianity and indeed evolved, another word you have a problem with, denigrating that fact I think they don't realise how much they benefit from living at the apex of a civiliansation that was built on Christianty and until very recently has been running on Christian software. To me these happy atheists are like roadrunner who has just run off the edge of the cliff and hasn't yet realised there is nothing beneath their feet.. The typos in the quote are yours
In another post on why Christian’s can’t claim copyright over the moral framework by which the majority of the world live, you posted This conversation is very difficult because one side of the discussion is very entrenched and doesn't actually know their side of the argument well enough
I’m not sure what makes you think you are the arbiter of what others think, but surely even you can see that assuming you do is either (a) patronising (b) offensive and (c) a bit silly when you are clearly so ill informed and closed minded, and probably a combination of all three. Your post was the argument of someone who overestimates their intelligence, but isn’t bright enough to see it.
In a series of posts about how Christianity doesn’t have the final say in morals, where you insisted they did you wrote I would have thought gently coercing people of superior intelligence to procreate would be entirely in the interest of the species survival and flourishing!!
I could go on, but I won’t. I am genuinely amazed that you lack the self awareness to see how you have come across in however many posts 6 pages from you equal.