Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

9 yr old told off for calling non-binary teacher Sir

537 replies

Nowherecitizen · 12/05/2025 13:09

My friend’s son was told off by a teacher at his school for referring to them as ‘Sir’. The teacher is male but identifies as non-binary.

Their title is Mx which the children are aware of. But the little boy simply looked at an adult who is visibly male and used the term Sir.

I have seen this teacher and they are 'masculine' looking but will sometimes wear a skirt and heels.

Friend’s DS felt bad and can’t recall exactly what was said to them but said the teacher was ‘very cross’.

AIBU to think this was mishandled? Surely the child should be reminded gently of the preferred identity of this adult but should not face a telling off?

What is the non-binary version of Sir anyway?

OP posts:
LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:26

EdithStourton · 12/05/2025 16:10

Haven't RTFT.

Anyone going into teaching needs to be clearly told that it isn't up to children to affirm their identity. Children will call you Miss when youve been married for 30 years, they will sometimes say Miss when they mean Sir. The appropriate thing to do is either let it go or laugh.

And if you really really really want children to accept you as a woman sometimes and a man sometimes, and get the terms of address right each time too, you need to grow up. Children arent there to stroke your ego. You're there to keep an orderly classroom and to teach them, not have your identity affirmed by compelling the speech of children.

Amen

Roseyposey11 · 12/05/2025 16:27

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:08

OK, so, assuming this incident went as the OP tells it, if a child mistakenly says 'Sir' to a teacher who is male but who wishes to be seen as non-binary, what should happen?

The teacher should be told to get a grip and stop their ridiculous attention seeking.

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:27

Pawse · 12/05/2025 16:08

May I ask what they're suppose to call him if not Sir or Miss? Hey you?

In the '70s, my English teacher informed us that he hated being called 'Sir' and we should just call him 'Mr [Surname]' at all times.

That's been the custom in one school where I worked full time - the children used the full title and name at all times. In one other, the children used 'Teacher!'. it In all the other schools, it was 'Miss' for all women.

The one time that I came across the situation where a teacher wanted to be 'Mx', the kids coped with the 'Mx' - it was the pronouns that defeated them. However, the male teachers there were all 'Sir', so I've not idea what happened when they were trying to catch the attention of the N-B teacher. As I've said in a previous post, he eventually went off with stress after repeated 'misgendering'.

Even the school electronic register couldn't cope. When I had to search for his register, the available titles were "Dr, Miss, Mr, Mrs, Ms, Prof." He was down as "Other".

Roseyposey11 · 12/05/2025 16:28

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:26

Amen

Absolutely Amen

HunnyPot · 12/05/2025 16:28

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 13:48

It makes no difference. Kids can come out with the wrong title or name without thinking. I've been called 'Mum' by pupils a few times over the years, and I'm fairly certain that it wasn't done deliberately.

It does make a difference. I’d be concerned if my child was unable to remember a teachers name or title.

So let the OP answer the question. Facts matter.

ButteredRadish · 12/05/2025 16:30

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:32

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:11

The teacher should tell the child what they would like to be called. As a parent you are within your right to say - I don’t agree with this non binary idea. The child should not be disciplined - not because of the name they called the teacher but because they are 9. I find it hard to believe if it happened that it was malicious.

So 'Mx' in this case.
But he's a man.
Even if the child takes on that this is the 'correct' title for this person, as much as a 9-year-old (and a 9-year-old who is presumably concentrating on their maths or geography or whatever) can take it on, they will still say 'sir' at least some of the time going forward. As would I, and I'm 50. Because seeing something and saying something contra is really hard. Like that thing where you read a list of words for colours written in another colour, and you almost invariably say 'yellow' when the word is yellow even when the colour is blue.

This is unwarranted mental strain, and compelled speech.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 12/05/2025 16:32

I don’t think I have side stepped the point at all - and I don’t think white that identify as African American or able bodied people who identify as disabled are compatible arguments in my opinion.

Nobody ever seems to be able to explain why these things aren't 'compatible arguments'.

I am 53, not 14. I am white, not black or brown. I am female, not male. I am not disabled. Also, I am a human, not an antelope. All of those things are facts. If anything, race is more on a spectrum than the others, since people can obviously be of mixed race. But 'identifying as' a different age or species makes no less sense than 'identifying as' a different sex.

BunnyLake · 12/05/2025 16:33

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:19

Well thanks for that.

But I'm curious about this ...

I don’t think I have side stepped the point at all - and I don’t think white that identify as African American or able bodied people who identify as disabled are compatible arguments in my opinion.

Why not? It's exactly same principle, isn't it. There are people who are materially, physically, demonstrably one thing, but feel they should be treated as something because that's their identity.

Why is that different?

There is no difference but I’m all ears waiting for their response.

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:36

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:19

Well thanks for that.

But I'm curious about this ...

I don’t think I have side stepped the point at all - and I don’t think white that identify as African American or able bodied people who identify as disabled are compatible arguments in my opinion.

Why not? It's exactly same principle, isn't it. There are people who are materially, physically, demonstrably one thing, but feel they should be treated as something because that's their identity.

Why is that different?

I'm also very interested in the answer to this.

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:36

BunnyLake · 12/05/2025 16:33

There is no difference but I’m all ears waiting for their response.

I've been asking for a long time, but no one ever seems to be able to describe why it's different

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:36

BunnyLake · 12/05/2025 16:18

I think it’s probably best that is adopted as the norm now. That way the self-indulgent and self-obsessed can get their validation fix outside school hours.

I've not renewed my subscription to the GTCS - a requirement for teaching in Scotland. I'm getting too old for it.

It's like treading on eggshells these days. I had an S3/Y10 boy castigating me for saying "Ladies and gentlemen - you may go."

"That's sexist! You can't say that - there might be someone in here who doesn't identify as male or female."

I pointed out that I'd checked the register and everyone in the room was listed as either male or female.

Walkden · 12/05/2025 16:37

Well most teacher gave been called sir miss mum dad at some point so as a one off you would not expect a "telling off"

So it is possible that this is deliberate way to try and antagonise the teacher either by this pupil or a group of pupils taking turns to call him sir, knowing that is not his preference

Another possibility is that he was told "do not refer to me as sir but as "x" thank you "but with a firm tone which the child regards as a "telling off"

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:39

HunnyPot · 12/05/2025 16:28

It does make a difference. I’d be concerned if my child was unable to remember a teachers name or title.

So let the OP answer the question. Facts matter.

You'd be concerned? Really?

I had secondary school pupils who were still calling me "Miss Weary" instead of "Mrs Weary" after I'd been teaching them for 3 months. It happens - particularly in a school where the vast majority of female teachers are "Miss".

HunnyPot · 12/05/2025 16:44

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:39

You'd be concerned? Really?

I had secondary school pupils who were still calling me "Miss Weary" instead of "Mrs Weary" after I'd been teaching them for 3 months. It happens - particularly in a school where the vast majority of female teachers are "Miss".

It’s entirely your business if benefit from children being unable to remember things but as a parent I’d be concerned.

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:45

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:19

Well thanks for that.

But I'm curious about this ...

I don’t think I have side stepped the point at all - and I don’t think white that identify as African American or able bodied people who identify as disabled are compatible arguments in my opinion.

Why not? It's exactly same principle, isn't it. There are people who are materially, physically, demonstrably one thing, but feel they should be treated as something because that's their identity.

Why is that different?

I couldn’t eloquently put it - so I hope you don’t mind I have posted the link- www.bostonreview.net/articles/robin-dembroff-dee-payton-breaking-analogy-between-race-and-gender/

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:47

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:45

I couldn’t eloquently put it - so I hope you don’t mind I have posted the link- www.bostonreview.net/articles/robin-dembroff-dee-payton-breaking-analogy-between-race-and-gender/

I'll read the link now, but I'm curious as to why, if you agree with it, you can't use your own words to express that?

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:47

HunnyPot · 12/05/2025 16:44

It’s entirely your business if benefit from children being unable to remember things but as a parent I’d be concerned.

Now I know that you're being ridiculous for the sake of it.

CoffeeCantata · 12/05/2025 16:47

If this is true, then - poor, poor children. What an utterly baffling world we are presenting them with. They must be so confused.

Adults who've constructed all this complexity should at the very least be understanding and patient with them. How on earth can primary school children who haven't yet reached puberty be expected to understand gender politics?

The world truly has gone mad.

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:48

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:32

So 'Mx' in this case.
But he's a man.
Even if the child takes on that this is the 'correct' title for this person, as much as a 9-year-old (and a 9-year-old who is presumably concentrating on their maths or geography or whatever) can take it on, they will still say 'sir' at least some of the time going forward. As would I, and I'm 50. Because seeing something and saying something contra is really hard. Like that thing where you read a list of words for colours written in another colour, and you almost invariably say 'yellow' when the word is yellow even when the colour is blue.

This is unwarranted mental strain, and compelled speech.

This is why I said that I don’t believe that the child should be disciplined. But honestly they are 9 - it’s not unwarranted mental strain or compelled speach in my opinion. They are still learning and developing.

BundleBoogie · 12/05/2025 16:49

TY78910 · 12/05/2025 14:40

My point still stands. Nobody observed what had happened. The teacher could have simply said ‘Mikey, I’ve asked a few times now, please address me as Mx and not Sir’. A 9yo would see it as ‘telling off’ and therefore told his parent, who told their friend, who as many people on this thread leaped to conclusions that this teacher must’ve shouted, flipped the lid, and crucified this poor kid. Fine if people don’t like the Mrs and Miss analogy. What about Tommy-Josh going by TJ, or Michael Junior going by Junior? Not a crime to call them by their government name but person is still okay to correct. It’s not as outrageous as people think, it’s only because they assume there must be a hidden agenda because the teacher is non-binary.

there must be a hidden agenda because the teacher is non-binary.

You say this like it’s perfectly acceptable for a male teacher to tell his students that he is not really male but something else.

Trans ideology is not harmless fun with names, it is a sinister ideology that teaches children that in order to be happy if they don’t like the objects (clothes, toys etc) designated for their sex, they may have been born in the wrong body and face a lifetime of surgical interventions or suicide.

Mushypeasandchipstogo · 12/05/2025 16:49

Everything has gone too far now , if this is true I would be furious with the school. People like that should not be teaching IMHO!

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:50

TheKeatingFive · 12/05/2025 16:47

I'll read the link now, but I'm curious as to why, if you agree with it, you can't use your own words to express that?

Because it’s a complex and nuance issue that needs a lot of typing and this way is easier! 🙂

MyKingdomForACat · 12/05/2025 16:50

WearyAuldWumman · 12/05/2025 16:36

I've not renewed my subscription to the GTCS - a requirement for teaching in Scotland. I'm getting too old for it.

It's like treading on eggshells these days. I had an S3/Y10 boy castigating me for saying "Ladies and gentlemen - you may go."

"That's sexist! You can't say that - there might be someone in here who doesn't identify as male or female."

I pointed out that I'd checked the register and everyone in the room was listed as either male or female.

Love it. This is all getting out of hand. Aren’t some kids turning up at schools identifying as cats? If this is all allowed to carry on society will implode

LittleBitofBread · 12/05/2025 16:51

Nothankyov · 12/05/2025 16:48

This is why I said that I don’t believe that the child should be disciplined. But honestly they are 9 - it’s not unwarranted mental strain or compelled speach in my opinion. They are still learning and developing.

it’s not unwarranted mental strain or compelled speach How is it not? Do you mean specifically because the child is nine?

They are still learning and developing. And?