Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Part 2: MN misrepresentation in recommendations: a depressing blend of abject amateurism and outright greed

3 replies

Wondermoomin · 05/05/2025 17:36

Welcome to part 2. The quote I’ve added in the title is actually a generic quote about MNHQ not specifically about product recommendations, but it’s very eloquent and quotable.

Here is part one: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5326652-mn-have-used-my-quote-to-promote-a-product-ive-never-bought

And here’s a brief summary so far:

  • MN were caught out, allegedly acting in breach of ASA guidelines among other things
  • The thread was temporarily hidden
  • MN then provided a few explanation posts saying that this was a one-off cock-up and sorry that we MNers were confused
  • Then we were told that in 99% of cases, the quotes refer to the specific products being featured; in a tiny minority, they are referring to a generic product category and will make that clearer
  • Several users easily discovered multiple other examples, suggesting that it wasn’t just 1% of cases, or a one-off cock-up
  • MN went on an editing spree of their swears by/recommendations sections (editing about 64 out of 75 things), also suggesting it’s not just 1% or an isolated cock-up
  • The thread largely disappeared from active and trending, suggesting it’s been suppressed
  • MN says it hasn’t been suppressed, threads appear in active based on popularity and how new they are
  • Another MN source shows that they do sometimes remove threads from active to give them a chance to “calm down”

Please feel free to use this thread to capture any other examples you find, to update on anything you hear back from ASA, to provide your own professional or common sense input.

If you don’t agree, it’s probably not the thread for you so please feel free to pass on by! An issue doesn’t have to be the most pressing matter of our times to be important, and I think it’s important that trusted brands don’t mislead consumers.

MN have used my quote to promote a product I’ve never bought 🤔 | Mumsnet

AIBU to expect MN recommendations, where they quote a poster/member, to be genuine? I like being able to rely on recommendations in MN swears by...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5326652-mn-have-used-my-quote-to-promote-a-product-ive-never-bought

JustineMumsnet · 06/05/2025 22:00

Hi all,

Thanks to everyone who raised concerns about the use of quotes in our recommendation emails and on-site content. You were right to question it, and I want to reiterate unequivocally: I’m sorry this happened. It’s clear that our editorial standards haven't been high enough.

Our intention has always been to offer genuine, helpful recommendations that we believe Mumsnet users will love. I don’t believe there was ever a deliberate intent to mislead - we’ve always linked user quotes to their original threads and haven’t hidden the context. But, having now reviewed this thoroughly, it’s clear that in some cases we’ve been both lax and rushed in how we've used quotes to support recommendations.

Initially, I thought these were isolated incidents. I was wrong. Your feedback — and our internal review — shows this has happened more than a few times. That’s not acceptable, and we’re taking it seriously.

We’ve already started a full audit of all editorial content — including every Swears By and product review article (over 600 in total) — to ensure that every user quote is directly relevant to the product being recommended. Where quotes don’t meet that bar, they’ll be removed. If a quote is still helpful — say, it relates to a brand’s overall reliability or a feature common across a category — we’ll make sure it’s clearly marked as such.

For transparency: we do earn affiliate commission on most of the products we recommend (typically somewhere between 5–10% across a category), but no brand can buy an editorial recommendation. Sponsored content is clearly labelled, and our Mumsnet Reviews are based on weeks of hands-on, independent testing by our in-house team.

Trust has always been at the heart of Mumsnet. We can’t undo these mistakes, but we can fix them and do better. Thank you again for pointing it out - it’s been more than a bit humbling but incredibly helpful.

JustineMumsnet · 06/05/2025 22:45

RockyRogue1001 · 06/05/2025 22:11

That's a lovely post @JustineMumsnet
Will you consider my request to put the original post into classics? In order that other and future mners might be aware of this?
I'd also like this thread to be nominated for classics, please

I don't think of it as a classic if I'm honest RockyRogue.

JustineMumsnet · 06/05/2025 22:46

FattyBumBumNoMore · 06/05/2025 22:29

Please provide @Wondermoomin with a personal apology. I was trying to imagine how I would feel in her shoes. The least I’d expect was someone at MN approaching me directly. Just common courtesy. Knowing she’s not had anyone contact her doesn’t sit right with me.

I did so on the first thread but very happy to reiterate our apologies.

Watch this thread for updates

Tap "Watch" to get all the latest updates

End of posts

There are no more MNHQ posts on this thread