Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask what punishment the guys who cut down sycamore gap tree deserve?

323 replies

JorgyPorgy · 01/05/2025 09:04

I hope those sick thickoes get a jail term but also hefty fine and lengthy community service , planting hundreds of trees . Punishment to fit the crime.
I think they’ve angered & upset so many people globally that they will have targets on their backs now.
That beautiful tree was 300 y o & would have lived hundreds more. Lots of new samplings can’t replace the carbon sink of a mature tree nor give out the oxygen it did, nor support the biodiversity it did. It’s so sad.

OP posts:
Roosch · 01/05/2025 22:44

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 01/05/2025 09:18

I want them sent to the Sahara desert where they have to live with no trees or shade.

For life, preferably.

This is a good idea,

Otherwise, they should be shot! Knobs.

Thedogscollar · 01/05/2025 22:53

Viviennemary · 01/05/2025 09:10

Personally I think it's a great fuss about nothing. It's a tree fgs. They aren't serial killers though you would think so the way the media are carrying on. Yes it's vandalism and there should be punishment.

So if two idiots come along and bulldoze your house that's OK??
After all it's only a house fgs.
You are correct in there should be punishment and a big one.

Leafy74 · 01/05/2025 23:10

JorgyPorgy · 01/05/2025 21:58

A vile punishment to fit a vile crime by a pair of vile excuses for people

It really doesn't fit.

ClareBlue · 01/05/2025 23:10

Wasn't aware anyone has been convicted yet so speculating on punishment is a bit premature. They have both pleaded not guilty and have a presumption of innocence.

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:11

MoistVonL · 01/05/2025 09:08

Custodial. Because it would screw up their lives a lot more than community service.

Exactly.

Either that or the stocks every weekend for five years.

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:12

ClareBlue · 01/05/2025 23:10

Wasn't aware anyone has been convicted yet so speculating on punishment is a bit premature. They have both pleaded not guilty and have a presumption of innocence.

Look up “rhetorical question.” People are allowed to discuss hypotheticals.

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:14

PassingStranger · 01/05/2025 22:05

One of them had or has a partner and a baby at the time.

Gross. There is no low to which some desperado woman won’t stoop.

Both men are ugly, thick, ignorant and criminal. Who mates with that???

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Leafy74 · 01/05/2025 23:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ClareBlue · 01/05/2025 23:16

Numerous posts are specific to the two men on trial. This hasn't been abstract discussion about the criminal justice system, it's been a thread discussing outrage and over the top revenge and punishment against two men who have not been convicted of the crime.

Lavender14 · 01/05/2025 23:21

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:14

Gross. There is no low to which some desperado woman won’t stoop.

Both men are ugly, thick, ignorant and criminal. Who mates with that???

And @leafy74

I would say that judging women based on men's behaviour is gross. And misogynistic. And has no place on a site designed to be a source of support for women. Tell me about the time a man was held accountable for his wife acting badly and called gross, scummy and desperate for having a baby with her... ill wait.

DisabledDemon · 01/05/2025 23:24

BIossomtoes · 01/05/2025 15:12

It’s a perfectly valid comparison. A 300 year old tree can’t be replaced. I’d cut their fucking hands off.

I'm with you.

Leafy74 · 01/05/2025 23:36

Lavender14 · 01/05/2025 23:21

And @leafy74

I would say that judging women based on men's behaviour is gross. And misogynistic. And has no place on a site designed to be a source of support for women. Tell me about the time a man was held accountable for his wife acting badly and called gross, scummy and desperate for having a baby with her... ill wait.

That's a very intelligent and decent comment.

It was no place on this thread.

Cut off their balls and make them eat them!

Off with their balls!

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:37

ClareBlue · 01/05/2025 23:16

Numerous posts are specific to the two men on trial. This hasn't been abstract discussion about the criminal justice system, it's been a thread discussing outrage and over the top revenge and punishment against two men who have not been convicted of the crime.

They’re on video. What more do you need?

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:37

Lavender14 · 01/05/2025 23:21

And @leafy74

I would say that judging women based on men's behaviour is gross. And misogynistic. And has no place on a site designed to be a source of support for women. Tell me about the time a man was held accountable for his wife acting badly and called gross, scummy and desperate for having a baby with her... ill wait.

I judge people by the company they keep and the sperm they choose to accept.

JorgyPorgy · 01/05/2025 23:39

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:37

They’re on video. What more do you need?

Exactly!

OP posts:
Leafy74 · 01/05/2025 23:39

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:37

I judge people by the company they keep and the sperm they choose to accept.

I judge people by the bollocks they talk on MN.

gattocattivo · 02/05/2025 08:09

It’s totally reasonable to judge these pig ignorant men on their actions, while also wondering why some women want to have sex and have children with thick scum like these. The two points of view are valid. Women aren’t helpless little creatures without decision making abilities.

CovidMemories · 02/05/2025 09:10

StormCloud52 · 01/05/2025 22:40

They haven’t been found guilty yet.

Where is the motive?

I think it's largely pathetic masculinity. Wanting to have an effect on people/show power.

BoredZelda · 02/05/2025 09:17

JorgyPorgy · 01/05/2025 11:49

That’s a good point, I never see anyone doing community service, yet we know it’s a common sentence- how is it enforced indeed ?! Do they just not turn up. Is there a fine for not turning up & how are they made to pay it if they don’t work etc? Police should go & drag them there & if they won’t do their service then they do a prison sentence with no privileges until they complete community service. The tree cutters do work so they can pay up.

Because we don’t go down the US route of making them highly visible so that people can shame them for their crimes. And rightly so.

BoredZelda · 02/05/2025 09:20

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:37

I judge people by the company they keep and the sperm they choose to accept.

Women in abusive relationships for example?

BoredZelda · 02/05/2025 09:29

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:12

Look up “rhetorical question.” People are allowed to discuss hypotheticals.

Maybe you need to look it up.

A question to which no answer is expected, often used for rhetorical effect.
A question posed only for dramatic or persuasive effect.
A question to which the asker does not expect an answer.

This is not a rhetorical question. It barely qualifies as hypothetical either.

Daisiesandtulips · 02/05/2025 09:33

I haven’t followed the story but they are denying it aren’t they?

Can someone please explain why two grown men would want to go out in the middle of the night and chop down a tree? What could be the motivation?

As for the punishment. Realistically I’d like to see people like this have to pay back to the community. So spend the rest of their days planting trees and helping nature and wildlife. Won’t happen though.

BoredZelda · 02/05/2025 09:42

Thedogscollar · 01/05/2025 22:53

So if two idiots come along and bulldoze your house that's OK??
After all it's only a house fgs.
You are correct in there should be punishment and a big one.

Apples v Oranges. A more accurate example would be if someone trashed your garden.

Nobody said it was ok. That it “means something” to people is irrelevant to the case. Ashes are scattered all over the place, marriage proposals are no less valid now the tree has gone. Lots of places “mean something” to people, that doesn’t mean others feel the same.

I think it’s bizarre people are focusing on the tree rather than the damage to the far more historically significant Hadrian’s Wall. Some idiots did something really stupid for ridiculous reasons. To suggest whoever did it should have a long custodial sentence shows a deep misunderstanding of the law.

grumpygrape · 02/05/2025 09:50

TheHerboriste · 01/05/2025 23:37

They’re on video. What more do you need?

I may be wrong but I guess the two defendants will be claiming they can’t be positively identified on the video.

However, if/when somebody/somebodies are convicted there is a link to the Sentencing Guidelines below which will be used to decide the sentence given. The Judge will have to determine the offence categories of Culpability and Harm, then the aggravating and mitigating factors. Despite what a lot of people think Judges and Magistrates don’t just pick sentences from the air.

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/criminal-damage-other-than-by-fire-value-exceeding-5000-racially-or-religiously-aggravated-criminal-damage/

Criminal damage (other than by fire) value exceeding £5,000/ Racially or religiously aggravated criminal damage – Sentencing

https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/offences/magistrates-court/item/criminal-damage-other-than-by-fire-value-exceeding-5000-racially-or-religiously-aggravated-criminal-damage/