But health anxiety is unsurprising if information is being withheld because someone said it should be. This is what is wrong with that system, it shouldn't be up to some doctor, it's up to the patient.
I'm not surprised that people get anxiety about their health if that's the situation
Nothing is being withheld though, because nothing is wrong. You don’t tell people what’s not wrong unless you are working through a diagnosis pathway by exclusion. So, if they are suffering severe headaches and have an MRI, it would be appropriate to say ‘you don’t have a brain tumour’. You don’t need to detail everything else in the MRI that isn’t a cause of ill health.
What you are saying is more relevant to serendipitous discoveries that are relevant. For example, a motorist is hit by a drunk driver, they come in with cause to check for head injuries. A scan picks up they have a brain tumour. That had nothing to do with the accident, it s not currently causing adverse symptoms but is NOT normal. So, that information is NOT withheld! However, you do not have a discussion with an 85yo that their skin has lost a significant amount of elasticity and that’s why it has a saggy/wrinkled appearance, as that is in range of ‘normal’, and so are cysts that do not pose any problem (as I said above, various lumps and bumps on people are considered ‘normal’). If it is something not within the range of normal, then you would advise someone and with appropriate discussion.
There is zero point telling someone they are normal as they have two arms and two legs; or because they have wrinkled thinning skin as an 85yo; or, that they have an innocuous cyst that will never bother them - because all of that is normal. People only need to know about abnormal findings.