Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The poshest county in the UK?

435 replies

Eyes98 · 10/04/2025 22:57

Which one county would you say is the outright poshest in the UK? Let’s not use Greater London here, and I know there will be social diversity in all, but which would you say is the poshest overall?
I’m going with Berkshire, darling.😂

OP posts:
Delphigirl · 11/04/2025 08:50

What this thread proves is that only those who are smart know where smart people live

and everyone else doesn’t really understand the question

ho hum

back to Tatler

GetMeOutOfMeta · 11/04/2025 08:51

Lived in Kent and Surrey and can say there are certainly bad parts of both. Surrey is incredibly dull but lots of money usually from banking and legal roles. Kent is more interesting but possibly poorer over all.

I always thought places like Wiltshire would be where the real old money was, keeping far quieter than Surrey!

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 08:51

I think Surrey or Berks are the winners.

A lot of posters are confusing 'pretty villages' with wealth.

Delphigirl · 11/04/2025 08:51

Every smart county needs its rough parts, otherwise where would the staff and tradesmen live?
🤣🤣🤣

Calliopespa · 11/04/2025 08:52

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 08:51

I think Surrey or Berks are the winners.

A lot of posters are confusing 'pretty villages' with wealth.

A lot of posters are confusing wealth with posh is more like it I’d say …

Embarrassinglyuseless · 11/04/2025 08:52

Absolutely not Surrey (I live in a very green + beautiful part of the Surrey hills) - it’s expensive, it’s close to London. It isn’t smart in the way that parts of Norfolk / Aberdeenshire are.

ultimately the word ‘posh’ means very different things to different people though. And even the smartest rural areas have pockets of deprivation or urban areas that aren’t so ‘fancy’

I don’t think there’s a conclusive answer here OP

Calliopespa · 11/04/2025 08:52

Delphigirl · 11/04/2025 08:51

Every smart county needs its rough parts, otherwise where would the staff and tradesmen live?
🤣🤣🤣

Quite!

Calliopespa · 11/04/2025 08:53

Embarrassinglyuseless · 11/04/2025 08:52

Absolutely not Surrey (I live in a very green + beautiful part of the Surrey hills) - it’s expensive, it’s close to London. It isn’t smart in the way that parts of Norfolk / Aberdeenshire are.

ultimately the word ‘posh’ means very different things to different people though. And even the smartest rural areas have pockets of deprivation or urban areas that aren’t so ‘fancy’

I don’t think there’s a conclusive answer here OP

Aberdeenshire is a good contender.

Trumpsgoneloco · 11/04/2025 08:53

A lot of posters are confusing wealth with posh is more like it I’d say …

Agree, Virginia Water & Cobham are ££££ but not posh to me.

Jijithecat · 11/04/2025 08:55

Calliopespa · 11/04/2025 00:41

It is quite suburban in a McMansion-y kind of way.

Being expensive doesn’t stop it being suburban.

I think this thread won’t get much agreement because some people are calling £££ posh and others aren’t.

Edited

Surrey is a bit more nuanced than that. North Surrey is more suburban, which is likely due to it's proximity to London.
Towns like Haslemere and Cranleigh with it's surrounding villages are pretty and leafy.
Loads of National Trust properties, listed buildings and independent schools like Charterhouse and Cranleigh.
Surrey's definitely not like that all over, it has it's rough patches, but it's also not all new money either.

Frowningprovidence · 11/04/2025 08:55

I'm not sure there is such a thing as a posh county. Over the road from me is a 'stately home' still lived in by the lord and not mational trust and my sons school is on another estate (as in country estate, not housing estate) but I think that sort of thing is scattered across the country fairly evenly.

Delphigirl · 11/04/2025 08:56

Jijithecat · 11/04/2025 08:55

Surrey is a bit more nuanced than that. North Surrey is more suburban, which is likely due to it's proximity to London.
Towns like Haslemere and Cranleigh with it's surrounding villages are pretty and leafy.
Loads of National Trust properties, listed buildings and independent schools like Charterhouse and Cranleigh.
Surrey's definitely not like that all over, it has it's rough patches, but it's also not all new money either.

Nobody smart ever went to cranleigh, that’s for sure

Ilovelowry · 11/04/2025 08:58

BG2015 · 11/04/2025 07:18

Cheshire - loads of footballers live in Wilmslow, Alderly Edge. Lots of expensive houses.

Footballers and new money isn't posh. I grew up near there.

My offering is wiltshire. Camilla's house is there, Marlborough, Bath, lots of expensive schools. Old money landowners.

Springhassprungxx · 11/04/2025 08:59

Gogogo12345 · 11/04/2025 08:11

It's highly annoying that. Rural Essex has sweet sod all to do with Towie yet most of the country labelled like it. Add Basildon to that and Essex has no chance of being called posh lol.

But I think it's the same as most other places. Some nice bits and some dives.

Agree! I live in north Essex, on the border of Suffolk - a world away from Basildon but as soon as you say Essex....

Delphigirl · 11/04/2025 08:59

Assistantarchibald · 11/04/2025 08:43

Surrey easily wins. 29% of kids at independent school, highest house prices outside of London, more than 120 golf courses. Most wooded county in England.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 at the thought that golf courses = posh
they are the antithesis of smart
but I agree, very surrey

Trumpsgoneloco · 11/04/2025 09:02

Clearly lots of people here live in Surrey so are offended that others don't think it's that posh - which is very apt for Surrey residents 😆

ProfessionalPirate · 11/04/2025 09:02

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 08:51

I think Surrey or Berks are the winners.

A lot of posters are confusing 'pretty villages' with wealth.

Even more are confusing wealth with posh!

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 09:04

Calliopespa · 11/04/2025 08:52

A lot of posters are confusing wealth with posh is more like it I’d say …

so how do you define posh?

There will be an ONS survey on this and posh will be defined by both the cost of housing and the income of the residents.

So it will come down to wealth.

If you want to define 'posh' as going to Glyndebourne, wearing tatty old tweeds, driving an ancient Jaguar, hunting, having an Aga or two, and eschewing the trappings of wealth as shown by Oligarchs, that's different.

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 09:06

ProfessionalPirate · 11/04/2025 09:02

Even more are confusing wealth with posh!

Define posh please.

Posh is subjective.

It can't be applied to a county unless you evaluate the number of people there who you rate as 'posh'.

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 09:07

ProfessionalPirate · 11/04/2025 09:02

Even more are confusing wealth with posh!

You can be wealthy AND posh- and sometimes they do go together (ignoring people like the Beckhams.)

Wintersgirl · 11/04/2025 09:08

Jijithecat · 11/04/2025 08:55

Surrey is a bit more nuanced than that. North Surrey is more suburban, which is likely due to it's proximity to London.
Towns like Haslemere and Cranleigh with it's surrounding villages are pretty and leafy.
Loads of National Trust properties, listed buildings and independent schools like Charterhouse and Cranleigh.
Surrey's definitely not like that all over, it has it's rough patches, but it's also not all new money either.

I know I said this thread is pointless but I have to agree about Surrey, there's Haslemere, Cranleigh, Farnham, Godalming which are very upmarket, plus you have Virginia Water and the Wentworth estate which is off the scale......and then the flip side is Aldershot!

MikeRafone · 11/04/2025 09:11

posh is not the same as wealth or class, but posh is about appearance & money helps

ProfessionalPirate · 11/04/2025 09:13

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 09:06

Define posh please.

Posh is subjective.

It can't be applied to a county unless you evaluate the number of people there who you rate as 'posh'.

I have defined it, I quoted OED upthread. To be posh a person has to have more than just wealth. There needs to be a degree of ‘U’ there as well. In fact, the OED doesn’t mention money at all. It’s a way of being, not a bank balance. Albeit it does help if one has the funds to pay for the various trappings and activities that being posh tends to entail.

Calliopespa · 11/04/2025 09:13

DevonCreamTeaPlease · 11/04/2025 09:07

You can be wealthy AND posh- and sometimes they do go together (ignoring people like the Beckhams.)

You absolutely can be wealthy and posh.

But posh is a cultural concept more than a economics concept.

At least it is to me. Clearly some see more overlap between wealth and poshness.

And yes agas are quite posh and there’s nothing wrong with tweed

YourAzureEagle · 11/04/2025 09:15

stringbean · 11/04/2025 08:27

Not Hampshire - anywhere that contains Southampton, Portsmouth, Basingstoke, Totton and Eastleigh cannot be considered posh. There are pockets - places in the New Forest, Winchester - but not posh as a county overall.

Having lived in Eastleigh I agree, hole and shit come to mind!!

But Amazingstoke is great surely😂

Swipe left for the next trending thread