Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is being polyamorous a real thing?

114 replies

ThisFluentBiscuit · 10/04/2025 03:09

I would never have thought so. I assume that being "poly" is just a fancy way of saying you want to have your cake and eat it!

However, I have this new friend. She says that for her whole marriage, she has been "monogamous plus 1," as she puts it. She has had a small number of long-term partners in addition to her husband, who has had the same.

Here's the thing: I assumed it was a bit of a free-for-all and that they were practising consensual non-monogamy. But it seems that they are always "monogamous plus 1" - and here's the kicker - they really seem to love both their spouse and their partner!!!!!

I could never focus on more than one person.

But do you think that some people really are capable of loving two people? Like, they have so much love they need to love two people?! 🤣 I'm serious though - these two seem to be capable of so much love that they seem to need two people to love! It doesn't seem to be about sex - they both seem committed to both the people in their lives!

They don't do foursomes or threesomes or anything. They both think of themselves as having a primary partner (each other, married) and a secondary partner.

My mind is blown, but I'm trying not to judge.

OP posts:
Happyinarcon · 10/04/2025 15:57

I don’t think anyone is buying this rebrand 🤣 If polyamory was in the least bit acceptable mumsnet would be be full of women excited to find their husbands were having affairs because maybe they’d also like the other woman and could get extra help with the school run

JHound · 10/04/2025 16:00

Terrythefish · 10/04/2025 14:17

The claim I responded to was not that love has always existed but people married for practical reasons, but that romantic love is a social construct 100 years old and lust is timeless.

Royalty and aristocrats were married to build alliances between families and countries ( or, in the case of James 1st of England, because the King fancied a nice party so ordered young courtiers to marry), but poorer people have always had more freedom to marry for love if they could find it. Even amongst the Royalty and aristocrats there is clear written evidence of there being love between Kings and Mistresses, and aristocrats and mistresses. I have even read one touching case of an aristocratic woman having a long term affair with her children's much younger male tutor, with written expressions of love from between them both into her old age.

There has always been romantic love between couples. This idea that romantic love is about 100 years old ( and I have heard that claim elsewhere too) is absolute nonsense.

But doesn’t your point about mistresses prove the point that for many - long partnering was about the best match not love as the primary purpose. Even among poorer people it was finding a suitable spouse and achieving the expected milestone of marriage.

Probably why marriages / long term partnering had fallen now as people prioritise finding love over suitability / practicality.

Soubriquet · 10/04/2025 16:07

I’ve been in a long term poly relationship with my husband and my female partner for 9 years now.

It works for us. A lot of people don’t understand it, and I don’t care. It’s not their life. It’s mine. My children adore their second mother. As part of his “identity” (a project for school), ds happily said he has two mothers and a father.

ArtTheClown · 10/04/2025 16:39

I’ve been in a long term poly relationship with my husband and my female partner for 9 years now.

Does your husband have a second relationship, or share your relationship with your girlfriend?

Soubriquet · 10/04/2025 16:53

It’s all 3 of us together

ArtTheClown · 10/04/2025 16:57

It’s all 3 of us together

How does she feel about being the only one not married to someone else in the group? Do you all live together?

Soubriquet · 10/04/2025 17:04

We do. We all live together. We all share finances together. It’s like a normal relationship only there’s 3 of us instead of 2

OpheliaNightingale · 10/04/2025 19:12

ThisFluentBiscuit · 10/04/2025 03:45

Same here! I think most people are similar. There's the time aspect, but also, for me, I don't think I would get to know two people as deeply as I would with just one. I don't think I would notice or appreciate all their quirks and all the little things that make them them, and treasure them, if I was doing it with two people.

I found this excerpt from the link below interesting. If it's accurate, it seems that poly people are wired a bit differently:

"Many people seem to be naturally inclined to need only one person in their life. Such people experience a drive to seek out romantic companionship, but once they have found that romantic companionship, that drive disappears. It’s as if the need to seek out intimacy is switched off; the drive is satisfied, and the person is content to settle down with his or her partner.
For other people, this is not the case. People who are poly by nature experience the same drive to seek out intimacy and romantic relationships, but once such a person has found a partner, openness to new relationships doesn't switch off.
This is what many poly folk mean when they say “Having one lover does not meet all my needs.” It’s not a way of saying that a poly person expects to have every need, no matter how trivial or transient, satisfied at once; rather, it’s a way of saying that the need that is completely satisfied when a monogamous person finds a lover is not satisfied when a polyamorous person finds a partner."

www.morethantwo.com/polyformonogamouspeople.html

@ThisFluentBiscuit this description of poly doesn’t differentiate from those whose drive to seek out new partners doesn’t switch off when they have one partner who doesn’t know they are seeking others (v’s a primary partner who consents to others). So from reading this, it seems that people cheat for same reason that people are poly (that their drive to seek out partners isn’t satisfied by having just one). The difference being poly is seen as ethical. Perhaps the degree to which people seek out additional partners is partly dependent on the degree to which the initial partner has the capacity to meet their partners needs. So the more needs that are met within the primary relationship, the less likely they are to seek more partners and vice versa.

Keepingthingsinteresting · 10/04/2025 19:53

Terrythefish · 10/04/2025 08:13

This is absolute bollocks. I don’t know why this gets spouted so much. Romeo and Juliette is about romantic love. And that was written in the 1600s. There are references in the Hebrew Bible using romantic love as a metaphor for the relationship between God and his people.

Throughout literature and time and cultures you will find references to romantic love.

Do you really think we have ‘invented’ an emotion that we now all feel? How did that happen? Did evil scientists make it in a lab 100 years ago and release it in a smoke over the world?

Try reading my post again. I say of course there is lust, which is what R&J is about. The one true love forever thing is bollocks and new, marriage was about inheritance and property, evolutionary biology drives intense bonding to get infants through their first few precarious years, but the one person who is my match and can’t love anyone else stuff the OP is judging polyamory about is not real.

AngelinaFibres · 10/04/2025 20:26

Soubriquet · 10/04/2025 16:07

I’ve been in a long term poly relationship with my husband and my female partner for 9 years now.

It works for us. A lot of people don’t understand it, and I don’t care. It’s not their life. It’s mine. My children adore their second mother. As part of his “identity” (a project for school), ds happily said he has two mothers and a father.

Doubt your husband would be so accepting if your partner was another man.,

Soubriquet · 11/04/2025 01:40

AngelinaFibres · 10/04/2025 20:26

Doubt your husband would be so accepting if your partner was another man.,

No shit! But I didn’t want another man. I wanted a woman. Being a committed poly means taking everyone’s needs into consideration.

financialcareerstuff · 11/04/2025 09:06

So much seemingly willful ignorance and judgement on this thread…. Makes me reluctant to get involved but I’ll give it a try. Polyamory is one form of consensual non-monogamy, and is far more focused on multiple relationships, versus sex. It can range from decades long ‘closed’ partnerships, such as three people living together. It can mean a looser more fluid arrangement, with a primary more long term partner, then secondaries who are still relationships, but may be less permanent. Maybe they will last a few years, then move on, or maybe they will prove deeper and become another permanent, just like any boyfriend/girlfriend relationship may dwindle or prosper. Often these secondaries have their own primaries. It can also be very loose, with a simple belief that you don’t need to limit relationships/ partners/ romance atall, leading to a constantly shifting matrix… from my experience this model is more common in young people who may never aspire to be tied down in anyway. It is still not about fucking though, it is often about romance, caring, fluidity and freedom.

No, ‘love’ is not the same as ‘fuck’ for polyamorists. consensual monogamy is a larger umbrella term that can also include much looser ‘multi-fucking’ scenarios like swinging or being on the ‘lifestyle’. These groups tend to hold three core values in sync with polyamorists: that sexual activity does not need to be exclusive, and relationships can be just as wonderful or more without this sexual exclusivity. And that honesty is deeply important, and that by leading unconventional lives in these ways, they are able and committed to being more honest with their partners and indeed with themselves than many monogamous couples are able to be. The equivalence many monogamous people draw between polyamory/ consensual non monogamy and affairs or cheating is total anathema to them. They are polar opposites. Third, bisexuality, particularly among women, tends to be much more accepted, as sexual and romantic love is seen as less boundaried, the natural conclusion is you can relate to both sexes in that way.

However, otherwise the groups are very different. Swingers/ lifestyles are often quite wary of deep, romantic connections beyond their relationships. They may be very good friends with ‘play partners’ and are often part of warm. Genuine communities of people who approach sex in similar ways, but they start getting uneasy if romantic feelings start arising. In fact, there is mostly a pride that they have decoupled sex from expectations of romance and high emotion, and thus liberated themselves to enjoy the diversity of play partners and sexual activity that makes their sexual lives very satisfying. One of their core beliefs would often be ‘sex is a joyous, physically and even spiritually satisfying part of life, and it need not be bound down to traditional societal rules.’ There is often quite high level of sexual experimentalism…. But it is not a boundary-free zone for couples. Indeed often deep romantic connection becomes the new boundary - ie yes, you can fuck anyone, and explore all kinds of different sexual connections, but my partner’s romantic feelings are all for me… that’s what makes us the relationship’.

Polyamorists, by contrast, often steer clear of ‘sex means nothing’ scenarios. They may well be totally uninterested in sex clubs, orgies, day to day swapping of partners, bdsm, kinks etc They are building and maintaining relationships full of love and commitment. Just breaking beyond the norm by doing it with possibly more than one person at a time. Yes, it can be complicated and take great effort - not only to invest in two or three romantic connections, but also to cope with the judgement of others, and thinking and communicating really carefully to redefine boundaries, understand needs and make things work without the comfort of a well-worn playbook or societal affirmation. Often, Polyamorists are extremely mature, thoughtful and very evolved in their thinking and communication of needs, boundaries etc…. Basically, if you think it takes skill to maintain one relationship, imagine the skill it takes to manage multiples.

It’s obviously very complex and there are literally thousands of different models, many overlapping across the entire space. But it’s not all a joke for monogamists to judge and deride. Yes we love just as deeply. And generally we work much harder to ask ourselves what is truly right for us and others, what is ethical, how best to communicate, how best to build human connection, to protect ourselves and our loved ones, and have fulfilled, rich lives, because we are doing it with a far less defined playbook, and without the approval of others.

FoxLoxInSox · 11/04/2025 09:29

I used to feel mystified by polyamory / ENM and in hindsight was a bit judgey.

Recently I’ve found myself dabbling in this world (to my surprise) and what commenced as dipping a toe into single polyamory / swinging as a unicorn seems to be evolving into us forming a throuple. No one is more surprised at myself than me. It’s bizarre to me that it doesn’t seem weird for me and my friend/girlfriend to be texting about our hobby together whilst I’m in bed with her fiance (my BF) with her full knowledge & endorsement. We just all instantly «clicked » and it’s easy and happy and just works. We have spent some time sexually together as a 3 too, and sometimes all sleep in the same bed etc.

I say this as a peri-menopausal divorced mum of two.

Our situation works so well for me, as I 100% don’t want to introduce a partner to my kids and have them expect to move in with us etc. And in any « conventional » relationship set-up that would likely be the ultimate expectation in time (which would not work for me until my kids have left home). In my current set-up I get to have a really lovely BF & GF who also have their own kids and « get it », and we spend time together (when we’re all child free), support each other, I know my BF has my back with things, etc… and yet there’s no expectation of the usual pressures for someone to « meet the kids », co-habit etc - as they’re already in a domestic situation with each other and the others ones’ respective kids.

So far it’s working like a dream, and unexpectedly turning out to be exactly what I was after. 😊 (plus the sex is mind-blowing 🙈)

Longtimelurkerfinallyposts · 12/04/2025 12:35

ThisFluentBiscuit · 10/04/2025 12:49

But my point is, are poly people just making up a fancy way to say they want to shag around? Or are they really wired up a bit differently from monogamous people?

Yes, we really are wired differently.
And after many decades of 'successful' polyamory, I know better than to try to get together with someone who's wired monogamously - as I know it'd end in tears.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page