Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it is okay for DS (8) to stop swimming lessons now?

68 replies

NameChangedSummer1 · 07/04/2025 19:33

As he can swim well, and is doing lots of other activities that we are struggling to juggle. DH and I both work full time, and he already does activities during the week, we need a couple of nights where we don't have to finish early to get to a club to keep up with work commitments.

DS still would like to go as he enjoys it but I've said we can just go swimming at the weekend as we often do (our local centres don't do lessons on a Sunday which is our free weekend day)

And on Saturday he does football (winter) and cricket (summer) which he does not want to stop. I've said if he wants to continue with his Wednesday evening swimming lessons then he needs to drop either Tuesday football training (his favourite), martial arts (Thursday), or Cricket coaching (Friday). He loves all of these.

We will still take DS2 (6) to lessons on a Saturday as he cannot yet swim competently, and he doesn't do as much other stuff as DS1.

He loves swimming but loves the other stuff more. AIBU to say the mid-week evening lessons are not sustainable?

OP posts:
Powderblue1 · 08/04/2025 08:36

As long as he’s a competent swimmer I’d say this was fine. We only intend ours to take lessons until they no longer need them as they are very competent and safe.

Unbeleevable · 08/04/2025 08:44

I’d be careful about relying on school swimming. My dd school used a 60cm depth pool and the kids barely got any proper practice.

I would keep up swimming until dc have done the “swimming in clothes” test.

My ds is 6 and swims twice a week (once with me and once at his lesson) and I plan to keep up until he has passed stage 6 minimum.

There was a Guardian article recently about swimming in Australia and the problem of starting lessons too young and quitting too early. Unless you do keep up swimming the skills can be lost quite quickly.

GetMeOutOfMeta · 08/04/2025 08:46

YANBU - if he would rather do other things and won't sink if chucked in water then he is good to go IMO

autisticbookworm · 08/04/2025 08:55

I think 8 is a bit young to retain the skill, going to local pool he won’t maintain the same level of skill. I’d give it a couple more years

scotstars · 08/04/2025 08:59

I wouldn't stop I'd find another provider free with a more suitable timing. I was in similar position and considered dropping swimming as it was on a Sunday and only activity DS would give up but I switched to a different provider and fit it in after school now

itsgettingweird · 08/04/2025 09:07

Swimming isn’t about how far but about technique.

if he can comfortably swim 400m and have energy he’s doing well - but if that’s 400m stopping at each end and pushing off or putting his feet down that’s not the same.

There’s a huge difference in the standard of swimming taught. Those in smaller swim schools and learn to swim attached to clubs are generally more proficient at lower stages.

I live on the coast though so swimming was something we were brought up to be able to do well.

Although I never envisaged the life as a swim aren’t to a national swimmer - that’s a whole new level of ball game 🤣

isthismylifenow · 08/04/2025 09:08

I would stop the lessons if he is now confident in the water and knows all the strokes.

I seem to be going against the grain here, but I live in a hot country where a lot of people have their own pools and those who do lessons, are mostly to learn water safety and being able to swim.

Anything from there on, is training. Obviously water sport is very big here, so training is as well.

So I don't see the point of training for a sport if there is no intention to pursue it. If there is another sport he is more interested in, then that is where I would put the time and of course, the money. If he wants to continue with water sports at a later time, then look at it again then.

Iloveeverycat · 08/04/2025 09:43

Dramatic · 07/04/2025 20:45

They do at school

The only lessons they do at school is about 8 or less lessons only once a year for 2 years so 16 lessons in 2 years

Iloveeverycat · 08/04/2025 09:48

fashionqueen0123 · 07/04/2025 23:24

They should be free as it’s part of the curriculum.

When I was at school in the 70s we went to the swimming pool every week for PE and did swimming lessons and got a badge for how far you could swim

MarioLink · 08/04/2025 11:13

Our school does one half-term of lessons in junior school and passes the full cost of the pool hire, teachers and coach onto the parents. It is very nearly the same cost as our private lessons. They simply couldn't offer it otherwise; they don't have enough money for books: the PTA fund those!

FairlyTired · 08/04/2025 12:05

dabby · 08/04/2025 07:08

Mmm yes they get swimming lessons as part of the curriculum. They're not free though, albeit heavily discounted, come to think of it I'm not sure if the payment is for the lessons or the coach 🤔.

And I'm not sure how much they actually learn but it's better than nothing I suppose.

It should be a voluntary contribution, it's compulsory for them to teach so if someone can't afford it the child should still go if permission is given.

SnakebitesandSambucas · 08/04/2025 16:12

I don't see £36 a month over just over 50 weeks a year as expensive. I would cut back on other areas definitely before swimming. Plus unlimited swimming card. Living by the sea side you do have a different view. As you know that their teenage years will be down there. Multiple parties and play dates in the lidos paddling pools. Plus a great job for them training to be a life guard if they need spends. Schools offer very limited swimming lessons as funding is lacking. Obviously if you are on the bones of your ass different priorities. And I did start mine two In swimming lessons at different ages as I knew they would engage and not run away screaming!!

parietal · 08/04/2025 16:20

floating is a confusing one as a swim skill - when I was a skinny kid, I simply could not float. I lay in the water in just the right posture and my face would sink below the surface. now i'm an adult with a bit of fat on my belly, I can float perfectly with the same technique. but my skinny kids can't.

kids should definitely know the principle of how to float but actually doing it is different.

as for weekly swim lessons, it sounds like the OPs kid has a very intensive sport schedule. how about summer swim lessons (every day for a week) instead of weekly?

GooseOnMyGrave · 08/04/2025 16:24

fashionqueen0123 · 07/04/2025 23:24

They should be free as it’s part of the curriculum.

It is costing us £80 next term for school swimming.

DemonsandMosquitoes · 08/04/2025 19:46

DS stopped swimming age 7 as he completed his mile badge. I thought that was good enough regardless of age.

kaela100 · 08/04/2025 19:59

Swimming isn't about milestones it's about competance and a child that stopped swimming age 8 (which is essentially what happens unless you're lucky enough to live near the sea will never be competant as an adult. No matter how many milestones they achieve at age 8.

OldTiredMum1976 · 01/06/2025 19:39

I let mine stop at 11 by which time they were swimming competitively but didn’t want to take it any further. No way would I have stopped before they were that competent.

OldTiredMum1976 · 01/06/2025 19:42

Runnersandtoms · 07/04/2025 23:50

I'm astounded that so many people continue shelling out for swimming lessons long after the child can swim. The RNLI and others promote floating to save your life if in danger in water, NOT swimming. So the only life-skill kids need is floating. There is no plausible reason kids NEED to know how to swim butterfly, or do perfect front crawl technique etc unless they plan to swim competitively.

But the swimming lesson industry has done a brilliant job of persuading middle class parents they have to spend a fortune on swimming lessons for years and years. Taking your kids swimming and letting them enjoy the water is so much more beneficial for their confidence. My kids are all teens who swim regularly and confidently in the sea and pool having had only the bare minimum of lessons. They don't have perfect technique but it has no adverse effect on them.

I’d rather have my competitive swimmer caught in a current than your leisure swimmer. Only one of those has even a chance of getting out of it!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page