Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think too many people are happy to live off benefits forever?

1000 replies

BritishQueue · 03/04/2025 17:51

Okay, I know this is a touchy subject here on MN, but I need to ask, AIBU to think that too many people are just choosing to stay on universal credit rather than work?

Obviously, I’m not talking about people who genuinely can’t work - disabilities, carers, etc (even though a lot of those who claim to be unfit for work are perfectly capable, and I’ve seen “carers” for people who don’t actually need any care…). But I know multiple people who are completely able-bodied and yet have no intention of ever getting a job. They say things like “it’s not worth it” or “I’d be worse off working,” and honestly, I don’t get it. I work full-time, pay tax, and yet I see people getting rent paid, extra handouts, and still managing holidays and luxuries I can’t afford. Not to mention that a lot of women think the government should subsidise their SAHM lifestyle.

I just don’t understand how it’s fair? Surely benefits should be a safety net, not a lifestyle choice? AIBU?

OP posts:
Frowningprovidence · 04/04/2025 09:47

SixtySomething · 04/04/2025 09:12

Just to make the conversation more specific .....

What about the headline in today's Times saying there are 987,000 young people people not in education , employment or training (NEETS); that's 12%.

Of them, 59% are unavailable for work, with 27% citing long term illness.

58% have never had a job.

By my calculation, over 200,000 cite illness.

Is there a knowledgable person, who can advise whether that's actually quite reasonable? ie Obviously there is a certain percentage unable to work through illness and is that number too high or just reasonable?

I can't quite work that out. 27% of 12% is that about 3% of young people are saying they are too sick to work. Or is it 27% of 58% of 12% so more 1.8%

I mean that doesn't sound wildy too many people to be to sick to work, but the rumours seems to be it's a huge increase.

What are all the others doing? Are they carers. I can work out what the gap between those 59% unavailable for work but only 27% ill are doing. I assume the others are looking for work with no success?

Decembersunset · 04/04/2025 10:05

MuchuseasaChocolateTeapot · 04/04/2025 00:23

How does our benefits system compare worldwide, does anyone know? I’m not sure how it would be calculated, pro rata per number of citizens maybe? What are the benefit systems in India, America, Scandinavia, China, Australia or elsewhere in Europe? Is this a worldwide issue?

Oecd website has a lot of statistics, in terms of benefits Uk is average compared to other oecd/eu countires, also a bit better than average in terms of workforce participation with 82%. It is curious that there is no clear dependency between amount of benefits and workforce participation e.g. Mexico has low benefits but also low workforce participation. I guess in most of the countries about quarter of working age people don't work due to various reasons, and they can be supported by government via higher taxes or by family, so I think even if uk reduces benefits it won't necessarily push a lot of people to work.
www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/social-benefits-to-households.html?oecdcontrol-fda550f8da-var6=INCASH

BritishQueue · 04/04/2025 10:19

haastrope · 04/04/2025 09:01

Gosh! OP stopped posting on the first page. I was happy to continue just reading the OP's posts seeing as the sort of discussion on this thread happens every other day on mumsnet.

OP, where are you? @BritishQueue

Working, unlike many.

OP posts:
ruethewhirl · 04/04/2025 10:22

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · 04/04/2025 09:27

@ruethewhirl , no you mean I don’t agree with you so I’m wrong and actually I’m agreeing with this Labour government who are not right wing.

Don’t put words in my mouth, especially if you’re going to get it wrong. Oh, and it’s possible to agree with Labour and still be right-wing (especially these days, unfortunately).

Frequency · 04/04/2025 10:23

BritishQueue · 04/04/2025 10:19

Working, unlike many.

Your job is not one of the 70% of jobs likely to be replaced by automation in the next 15 years is it? Because if it is you're going to find yourself on the other side of the coin soon.

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · 04/04/2025 10:36

ruethewhirl · 04/04/2025 10:22

Don’t put words in my mouth, especially if you’re going to get it wrong. Oh, and it’s possible to agree with Labour and still be right-wing (especially these days, unfortunately).

@ruethewhirl , I see so you regard this Labour government as not sufficiently left wing which leads me to believe that you are of a hard left disposition. I don’t usually agree with anything that comes from the extremes of politics regardless of which barmy periphery it comes from.

Frequency · 04/04/2025 10:42

Changes do need to be made, and they're not going to be easy, but I believe Labour are aiming their cuts at the wrong people.

They're trying to push more people into work at a time when the job market is on its knees. People with degrees and experience are finding it hard to find work, so those coming out of long-term sickness or going back into the workforce after a long break, raising children, stand little to no chance.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/feb/10/britons-hunting-for-a-job-uk-jobseekers-pay

We need growth, not cuts. I don't know how we can encourage more growth but without it we're fucked. We also need more migration.

‘It’s nightmarish’: why 1.5m Britons are still hunting for a job

UK jobseekers say employers are hiring fewer staff, whom they expect to do more for less pay

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/feb/10/britons-hunting-for-a-job-uk-jobseekers-pay

LoveFridaynight · 04/04/2025 10:48

Whoevenknows79 · 03/04/2025 22:15

You pretty much can. Last time I claimed job seekers a speculative CV counted as a job application.

Doesn't work like that anymore. You have to prove the jobs you've applied for. Jobcentre follow up if you've been to interviews. They will sanction you if you can't show you've spent x amount of time looking for work (think it's 30 or 35 hours a week).
Either it was a while ago you were going to the Jobcentre or you had a work coach who didn't care (and probably lost their job).

bestcatlife · 04/04/2025 10:48

Wouldn't a trade deal with the EU bring more growth? Rejoin the customs union? Labour are banging on about growth but aren't taking any action. It's very frustrating to see..

DrCoconut · 04/04/2025 11:04

@AngelicKatyyou’re right. I might be able to get help with childcare but it’s irrelevant as there are no places. Literally not one child minder picks up from my DS’s school post Covid. They don’t do after school club either, it closed down. And before anyone says change school - good luck with that, anywhere that is not an utter bear pit and can meet his needs (SEN) is oversubscribed or miles away. So, I can only work hours that allow me to do my own school run most days. I try, I really do but between the kids needs and the practical realities I just can’t earn more at the moment.

ruethewhirl · 04/04/2025 11:07

Icanthinkformyselfthanks · 04/04/2025 10:36

@ruethewhirl , I see so you regard this Labour government as not sufficiently left wing which leads me to believe that you are of a hard left disposition. I don’t usually agree with anything that comes from the extremes of politics regardless of which barmy periphery it comes from.

😂😂😂

DrCoconut · 04/04/2025 11:07

@Mrsp2b33you won’t get free prescriptions or subsidised school trips or meals on £1100 a month. You have to be on very low wages to qualify for this sort of help.

jasflowers · 04/04/2025 11:16

Frequency · 04/04/2025 10:42

Changes do need to be made, and they're not going to be easy, but I believe Labour are aiming their cuts at the wrong people.

They're trying to push more people into work at a time when the job market is on its knees. People with degrees and experience are finding it hard to find work, so those coming out of long-term sickness or going back into the workforce after a long break, raising children, stand little to no chance.

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2025/feb/10/britons-hunting-for-a-job-uk-jobseekers-pay

We need growth, not cuts. I don't know how we can encourage more growth but without it we're fucked. We also need more migration.

So the jobs market is fucked... its not if you read the link you posted, it depends if you are willing to do anything or not.

But your answer is more migration... this is why we are in such a mess with public services and housing, too many people here, not working, so we pay them to sit on their arses and then get people from the developing world to come here to do the jobs they should be doing.

No this isn't a "right wing" view, the Labour party has its roots in unions ie people who work!
The Welfare state was never set up to be an option.

Frequency · 04/04/2025 12:41

jasflowers · 04/04/2025 11:16

So the jobs market is fucked... its not if you read the link you posted, it depends if you are willing to do anything or not.

But your answer is more migration... this is why we are in such a mess with public services and housing, too many people here, not working, so we pay them to sit on their arses and then get people from the developing world to come here to do the jobs they should be doing.

No this isn't a "right wing" view, the Labour party has its roots in unions ie people who work!
The Welfare state was never set up to be an option.

Edited

I don't think you read the same article as me. In the one I linked, there is a guy with a master's in a STEM subject working in a bar because he cannot find even a band 2 job in his chosen profession. 4 of his colleagues have a Master's.

There was a lady with hospitality experience and a degree who could not get a job at Subway.

In what way is that not being willing to work in any job?

RaininSummer · 04/04/2025 12:47

EdithBond · 04/04/2025 07:57

We have an insurance scheme. It’s called National Insurance.

So is there another benefit in Denmark once it runs out?

RaininSummer · 04/04/2025 12:52

SixtySomething · 04/04/2025 09:12

Just to make the conversation more specific .....

What about the headline in today's Times saying there are 987,000 young people people not in education , employment or training (NEETS); that's 12%.

Of them, 59% are unavailable for work, with 27% citing long term illness.

58% have never had a job.

By my calculation, over 200,000 cite illness.

Is there a knowledgable person, who can advise whether that's actually quite reasonable? ie Obviously there is a certain percentage unable to work through illness and is that number too high or just reasonable?

No it's not reasonable. I work with that demographic and too many are saying they can't leave the house, are too anxious, can't get a bus etc. They spend their lives online and as I said before won't study and often won't engage with anything to move them forward. Some obviously do have serious issues but plenty are just mooching along with no plans or real diagnosis other than general anxiety.

CyclingAddict · 04/04/2025 13:07

I also work with a demographic of people who cannot work due to anxiety as @RaininSummer has said. They have many fears, live very reclusive lives and just trying to function through the day is difficult, nevermind fulfilling a job role. They may also have generations of their family who have never been employed.

SixtySomething · 04/04/2025 14:03

RaininSummer · 04/04/2025 12:52

No it's not reasonable. I work with that demographic and too many are saying they can't leave the house, are too anxious, can't get a bus etc. They spend their lives online and as I said before won't study and often won't engage with anything to move them forward. Some obviously do have serious issues but plenty are just mooching along with no plans or real diagnosis other than general anxiety.

So do you have an opinion as to the solution?
If you don't mind, it would be interesting to know what sector you work in eg social/ youth work, education, health etc.

Ilovecleaning · 04/04/2025 14:09

SpringIsSpringing25 · 03/04/2025 17:59

Why do you need your very own thread on this?

Are the first 54 million of them not quite enough for you?

And no, I don't claim universal credit.

I’m not purposely picking an argument but why don’t you just ignore the thread and read ones you’re interested in? Rhetorical question.

Ilovecleaning · 04/04/2025 14:11

Ilovecleaning · 04/04/2025 14:09

I’m not purposely picking an argument but why don’t you just ignore the thread and read ones you’re interested in? Rhetorical question.

PS. To be fair, you’re not the only one who has said this.

StrictlyAFemaleFemale · 04/04/2025 14:15

RaininSummer · 04/04/2025 07:45

Thanks for your reply. So in Denmark does everybody pay for this insurance? What happens when the payments end if still out of work? Is there a benfit which then takes over?

Pretty much yes! I just googled: 2.5 million Danish residents are members and there are 3 million employed.

When the payments end they can apply for other benefits:

  • if they've worked for 40 years they can get a special early retirement pension. They quite often do this before the benefit runs out.
  • if they're too sick to work more than 20 hours in their most recent job and they are over a certain age they may be entitled to a senior pension (I've had ONE of these!). Again they quite often do this before the 2 years is up
  • if they are 5 years or less from the self paid early retirement then the Council HAS to find a senior job for them (I've never tried this!)
  • anyone else can apply for another type of benefit, but you aren't entitled if you own a house or have savings over a certain amount.
  • I try to encourage them from about the 18 month mark to think about further/higher education. Most are entitled to a student grant - yes we still have those! It's not much but it's better than nothing. If you're a single parent it's a very good option as you get a double grant.

Most people get a job within 3 months.

thepariscrimefiles · 04/04/2025 14:17

BritishQueue · 03/04/2025 18:24

It always seems to be single mothers. What do you mean not by choice?

She means that she didn't choose to be a single mother. She was in a relationship and he went off with someone else, leaving her to bring up the children on her own. She said that in her post.

Obviously more single mothers will claim benefits than married mums as, even if they work full time, their household income will be less than if both parents are working.

Mrsp2b33 · 04/04/2025 14:59

Shirking · 04/04/2025 07:16

You have to earn under £8,000 a year to get free school meals now.

edit, sorry £7,400

Edited

At the time of qualifying I was, then it lasts for the entire school life of that child (primary or secondary).

Mrsp2b33 · 04/04/2025 15:00

DrCoconut · 04/04/2025 11:07

@Mrsp2b33you won’t get free prescriptions or subsidised school trips or meals on £1100 a month. You have to be on very low wages to qualify for this sort of help.

You do! FSM lasts the child's primary or secondary school life depending on when you qualify.

I didn't make the rules but I do know them.

Catmads · 04/04/2025 15:35

FoolishHips · 03/04/2025 18:09

I'd be terrified if I had to live off UC....it sounds quite horrific all the time and effort it takes just to get a pittance. It seems very dehumanising to sanction people and constantly make them stressed. I was lucky enough to receive tax credits which was a rather more dignified system.

I am trying to help support my lifelong friend deal with UC currently and you are absolutely spot on.
It's absolute hell.
He's worked solidly for 45 years but after a change of job, found himself with irregular hours that weren't disclosed at interview.
He put in a claim to UC, has attended numerous meetings at the Job center and via phone.
In a 6 month period, he has received 3 payments and a letter demanding he repay an over payment of almost £400 that he has never received.
Yesterday, we attended yet another appointment at the job center at their request. This time they are saying the payments haven't been made because his employer hasn't submitted the "correct information".
There's much more I could add but, I have found the whole process exhausting, frustrating and demoralizing.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread