Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be concerned about what Liz Kendall is up to with disability benefits?

1000 replies

Locutus2000 · 01/02/2025 13:54

The Times reporting just how enthusiastic Labour are about targeting the disabled.

I can only hope they are getting the worst ideas out there first, if not I dread to think what is coming in the upcoming review.

I was confident Labour would at worst be no worse than the Tories.

I was wrong.

Free archive link here.

Long-term sick will need to look for jobs in benefits overhaul

Claimants could face cuts of £5,000 a year as government prepares for rows with backbenchers and campaigners over bringing down £65bn sickness bill

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/long-term-sick-will-need-to-look-for-jobs-in-benefits-overhaul-kzxr3hjpw

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
FreedomandPeace · 02/02/2025 00:12

Tittat50 · 02/02/2025 00:01

Yes I think that's a really good point. The current system is pretty flawed and we can see examples like the PIP situation in your case that isn't fair in comparison to another PIP person bringing in much more than you guys. That's not fair.

Yet, I fear the media demonise and stigmatise to shift public perceptions on this so they believe things that aren't true, get angry about the perceived extent and then support policies that might actually kill people.

It's why I'm a bit obsessive with the RFamily reference. The media doesn't really go there and doesn't demonise them so the public generally ignore the massive elephant in the room - which they are.

There are many elephants in the room, including big business tax fraud etc etc

each is worthy of being looked if it’s considered necessary

to make the WelfareState fair for everyone as @JoyousGreyOrca noted.

RatalieTatalie · 02/02/2025 00:15

safetyfreak · 01/02/2025 14:56

So willing to cut benefits but, happy to keep funding illegal immigration.

Edited

What a nonsense thing to say

Tittat50 · 02/02/2025 00:19

FreedomandPeace · 02/02/2025 00:12

There are many elephants in the room, including big business tax fraud etc etc

each is worthy of being looked if it’s considered necessary

to make the WelfareState fair for everyone as @JoyousGreyOrca noted.

I don't know the exact specifics in this but I believe this to be true.

When you look how someone like Elon Musk bankrolled Trumps campaign, could we believe that Politicians would make sure their mates are ok, including high tax dodging business owners?

Don't know the answer to solve that one. I'm of the feeling they'd all make sure their mates are ok ( Politicians).

Something about Starmer struck me as someone who was human with integrity and morals. That was an error because that ' feeling ' means not very much.

lovelysunshine22 · 02/02/2025 00:21

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 15:50

@Miley1967 certainly in England two people claiming carers allowance for each other was abolished a few years ago

Absolutely not true

Nosebooper · 02/02/2025 00:22

Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 15:35

I think with raises in pension age this has put the benefits bill up considerably. People can claim PIP until pension age and this can end up being hugely more than Attendance Allowance ( which people claim after Pension age) because it has a mobility component as well so can be almost double the Attendance Allowance rate. So more people able to claim more disability benefit because pension age has risen and then once you have that PIP award it just continues sometimes at £175 a week for the next 20 + years or however long you live for ! I can't believe someone didn't cotton on how much this was going to cost ??
I think mental health is going to be targeted. And I think there's going to be a lot more of checking up on people. I have noticed an increase people being accused of benefit fraud on forums and amongst my own benefit clients. I am really reinforcing with my PIP clients that if their condition improves they must report the change because many many do not and they are clamping down on it. People become completely reliant on the money.
In the past few weeks I have had one client in trouble because he was getting so much money from PIP/ ESA/ Disability premiums, all rent paid for etc and has let it build up in his account when he should have reported it, another has been found guilty of council tax fraud ( over a very small amount of council tax discount claimed) and slapped with a huge penalty, he is devastated.
The benefits bill is shocking and something needs to change. I guess we will have to see what Liz Kendall's spring reforms bring.

Edited

PIP doesn't "just continue". It is reviewed every two years.

JoyousGreyOrca · 02/02/2025 00:31

@Nosebooper PIP is awarded for different periods of time. And my mums PIP that she got until she died, was never reviewed.

Miley1967 · 02/02/2025 00:47

Nosebooper · 02/02/2025 00:22

PIP doesn't "just continue". It is reviewed every two years.

Ten year light touch reviews after state pension age.

JenniferBooth · 02/02/2025 00:55

Miley1967 · 02/02/2025 00:47

Ten year light touch reviews after state pension age.

Yeah cos its well known that health and mobility gets better after state pension age
Check out the elderly parents board, Its like a scene from Cocoon! 🙄

JoyousGreyOrca · 02/02/2025 00:58

@JenniferBooth My mum got PIP for depression. I agree if it is for mobility or physical disability, that is extremely unlikely to improve, so I can understand the light touch review.

FreedomandPeace · 02/02/2025 03:03

Tittat50 · 02/02/2025 00:19

I don't know the exact specifics in this but I believe this to be true.

When you look how someone like Elon Musk bankrolled Trumps campaign, could we believe that Politicians would make sure their mates are ok, including high tax dodging business owners?

Don't know the answer to solve that one. I'm of the feeling they'd all make sure their mates are ok ( Politicians).

Something about Starmer struck me as someone who was human with integrity and morals. That was an error because that ' feeling ' means not very much.

Tbh I wasn’t just dwelling on that particular issue, it was one example of so many

Headliners like the RF or big business just pull in the punters
and others like taxing private schools are sure vote winners

but we have to look at everything including the benefits bill.

Labour said they would not tax workers, they didn’t say much else.
So far
they’ve hit farmers
They've hit the elderly
They've hit education
they’ve just attacked those that traditionally don’t vote for them

They’ve hit democracy by overriding the publics say on planning issues and Now they’re looking at whatever else they can do to raise money and reduce the bills…….I think it was always fairly obvious benefits would be up for grabs at some point.

FreedomandPeace · 02/02/2025 03:16

JenniferBooth · 02/02/2025 00:55

Yeah cos its well known that health and mobility gets better after state pension age
Check out the elderly parents board, Its like a scene from Cocoon! 🙄

and yet am I correct in thinking that if you are not receiving PIP prior to getting to pension age you can’t apply for it after.
How can that be right.
Are there no people over pension age that need PIP

or do pensioners get some other type of support that is akin to PIP.

Magicmushroomsauce · 02/02/2025 04:10

This really worries me. My wonderful pre school aged child is on the ASD pathway, is non verbal and has significant sensory needs. He receives MR DLA despite us being in the squeezed middle (and therefore unable to access any other benefits). It’s been a lifeline tbh.

NHS therapies (such as speech and language and OT) are incredibly stretched and appointments few and far between. So DLA enables us to give him those therapies privately, freeing up space for others in the NHS system and take tangible steps to help him. It doesn’t cover all of it, but certainly helps soften the blow.

the costs are horrendous. A SLT assessment costs £300 and weekly S&LT costs £90. An OT assessment is £500, and ongoing therapy about £90 as well. We get MR DLA at £70 per week. You can do the math!

NattyTurtle59 · 02/02/2025 04:24

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 22:45

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/sep/23/cost-of-grant-that-funds-uk-monarchy-to-rise-by-more-than-53

This article is quite short for those who are willing to just look here.

Look at the picture of those two silver spooned bell ends and tell me why they are off the hook as part of this ongoing debate? Just look at them. These people make me physically sick more than any pie head scrounger who is actually defrauding the system ( and yes they need to be addressed).

Why aren't more people angry at these guys. Do you think they work akin to the guy slaving away every day on a building site? Therefore do they deserve this life of luxury and ridiculous decadence right now when people are working their arses off to manage a home and a basic standard of living.

Oh will you give it a rest. You are derailing the thread and boring everyone.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 04:31

Bignanna · 01/02/2025 15:55

Wouldn’t they have been over the limit for pension credit, with all that coming in?
I do think that it is wrong for some to be off sick indefinitely, with no requirement to look for work, ( not including long term disabled ) perhaps that will be something they will look into.

That post was referring to pensioners not a couple of working age.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 04:49

Namechange828568 · 01/02/2025 17:36

It's the same with DLA... For the parents eligible for UC, in addition to the DLA, they then get the carer's element (fair enough), but then an additional disabled child element?

It's paying them twice...

We claim DLA for our eldest DC, but because we're not eligible for UC, we don't get anything extra... And I can guarantee that there will therefore be some UC claimants with a greater income.

Edited

It's not paying them twice because they are for different people. The carers element is for the carer who may well have had to sacrifice their career to provide full time support. Carers allowance is deducted pound for pound from UC.

The disabled child element recognises the additional costs of disability alongside DLA.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 04:59

Jabtastic · 01/02/2025 19:06

An enormous number will be autism and ADHD. This was a mistake in my opinion for all but the most severely affected.

Tell me you know nothing about Autism and ADHD without telling me you know nothing about Autism and ADHD....

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 05:01

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 19:27

DLA is not for the costs of getting to appointments. Lots of people have health conditions that means frequent hospital and Drs appointments, but they do not get benefits.
Lots of 3 year olds are still in nappies and have sleep disturbances.
I am sure it is tough though.

It absolutely can be used to cover additional costs of getting to appointments.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 05:09

JoyousGreyOrca · 01/02/2025 19:50

No one is saying it does not affect peoples life. ADHD is common. But most people still look after themselves and work.

But PIP is not an out of work benefit.

Many people with ADHD can't look after themselves - that's why they have a reduced life expectancy and make up 25% of the prison population.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 05:12

Miley1967 · 01/02/2025 20:12

Absolute madness isn't it. A lot of my older clients ( many of whom have always led frugal lives) are genuinely embarrassed at the amounts I tell them they can claim. Some choose not to, some only claim when they absolutely need to like when they have to start paying for care, others of course will take all they can !

Breakdown of that figure?

HelmholtzWatson · 02/02/2025 05:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 05:14

LizzieSiddal · 01/02/2025 20:46

What do you mean they aren’t “free”. He doesn’t pay a penny for it.

Of course he is. Everyone who has a motability car does.

Willyoujustbequiet · 02/02/2025 05:20

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 01/02/2025 21:28

Nothing is even free, there is always someone who pays for it.

So yes, the taxpayer paid for your coffee. It wasn't free.

Why are you presuming someone on PIP isn't also a tax payer?

HRT · 02/02/2025 05:52

Autism and mental illness mentioned again. Attacking invisible disabilities people don’t understand. Make them the scapegoats for cuts. Whip the people up so they punch down and don’t look up…

Pat888 · 02/02/2025 06:03

I thought that Rachel Reeves started with the winter fuel and land inheritance tax so that there would be less whingeing when she went after disability benefit and pensions and income tax in the future.
Britain is broke and the money has to come from somewhere - everyone moans but I’d love them to state where the money should come from - and don’t say the rich, they are already fleeing the country in droves.

HRT · 02/02/2025 06:33

If Britain is broke maybe a little from everyone instead of finding scapegoats. Oh, but that wouldn’t be a vote winnner! Silly me!

Anyhow, who would be on here so early on a Sunday morning. It’s almost like someone is paying you LOL

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.