Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be concerned about what Liz Kendall is up to with disability benefits?

1000 replies

Locutus2000 · 01/02/2025 13:54

The Times reporting just how enthusiastic Labour are about targeting the disabled.

I can only hope they are getting the worst ideas out there first, if not I dread to think what is coming in the upcoming review.

I was confident Labour would at worst be no worse than the Tories.

I was wrong.

Free archive link here.

Long-term sick will need to look for jobs in benefits overhaul

Claimants could face cuts of £5,000 a year as government prepares for rows with backbenchers and campaigners over bringing down £65bn sickness bill

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/long-term-sick-will-need-to-look-for-jobs-in-benefits-overhaul-kzxr3hjpw

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
ivegotanewmop · 01/02/2025 20:40

Hotflushesandchilblains · 01/02/2025 20:18

There are too many people on benefits. There are people who could work but are not making any effort to. The benefits system needs to be overhauled to be more nuanced, but also to support people into work so that if they need to work fewer hours to keep their benefits they can, or if they genuinely try but the job does not wok out they can get benefits back. There are may ways the system could be updated without disadvantaging the the people who really cannot work.

@Hotflushesandchilblains

Where are the jobs?

Have things drastically changed in the last couple of months? If no, then there aren't enough job vacancies for everyone on jobseekers, let alone those on disability benefits.

XenoBitch · 01/02/2025 20:43

user243245346 · 01/02/2025 20:31

I agree. We are in a situation now where people are better off being permanently on disability benefits than working. People have no incentive to work as a result. It's unaffordable and bad for trust within society as a whole if a large section are not contributing.

Anyone under £40k is not contributing either. Do you think all the disabled people being thrown off benefits are going to be walking into £40k+ jobs?
And at the end of the day, if you cut their money, they are still going to be disabled and struggle even more, meaning their health will worsen and they end up on benefits again.

LadyKenya · 01/02/2025 20:43

NimbleGreenRaven · 01/02/2025 20:39

I wonder if so many of the pro immigration posters are so passionate about us " doing our bit " now they realise the costs involve their benefits cut. Time for the financial stupidity of the left to kick in - time to pay the piper

Where have you gleaned your information from? Care to show exactly how this would correlate to people getting their benefits cut. I would be most interested to read your source of information.

Andwhoisasking · 01/02/2025 20:45

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 20:37

@Andwhoisasking my knowledge of politics is not great. I think you may have been the poster who talked about personal responsibility ( you're absolutely right), also this problem we have with how people absorb the news and what they're told.
I'm forever challenging family members on what they just heard on some news channel. It doesn't seem to matter the source anymore, something is always left out and people are misinformed.

So not wishing to absolve of personal responsibility, I do wonder how the everyday man decides who to vote for and where their main source of info comes from.

I am very unwell ( hence this thread interest). My illness had me so incapacitated I didn't even vote this time because I was out of action completely. I therefore have no place to speak. However, If I'm honest, I would have voted Labour had I been capable at the time. For the reasons you highlight.

I believe people are both misinformed and misled and maybe distracted by shit on SM. I wonder what the case may have been for me.

You seem to have a good understanding of this. What's the answer? I don't know. Not everyone knows where to go for information or realise that they're being so misled.

My most valued and appreciated source of insight and growth is from here ( MN). I shit you not.

We need to stop punishing business and people for doing well. We need people to work in skilled jobs and pay good taxes. We currently tax our highest earners too much, they are leaving or reducing hours. Since the budget, many jobs have gone. Many of these are high paying - high tax jobs. Many are also small jobs which are often taken by women and the disabled workforce. These opportunities are now gone. Taxing jobs and putting business off employing is crazy. Profit is not a dirty word. We need business here and to feel like the UK is worth basing themselves in. Plenty of other countries with more incentive to be successful.

People have to understand that success isn’t bad. You can’t just keep taxing and taking more and more. People then think - why bother? This now means there is less spending for state. The essential jobs don’t pay the bills. You need a functioning private sector for that. Destroying it with excessive tax now leads to the situation we are in now. Not enough people to pay for the state.

LizzieSiddal · 01/02/2025 20:46

PandoraSox · 01/02/2025 14:58

"Free car".

They are not "free".🙄

Qualifying for the Motability scheme has nothing to do with whether someone is able to work or not.

Edited

What do you mean they aren’t “free”. He doesn’t pay a penny for it.

user243245346 · 01/02/2025 20:46

Dishwashersaurous · 01/02/2025 16:34

The really difficult question is how much as a society do we want to pay in disability benefits, and therefore how many people do we want to support.

It's currently about £65 billion and forecast to rise to nearly £100 billion in the next ten years I think.

To fund that growth will mean either not spending on other things or tax rises.

Everyone agrees that vulnerable disabled people should be supported, but how many? Something like a quarter of working age people over 10 million identify as disabled. How many of them should society support?

And how much should we spend? £20 billion, £30 billion, £100 billion?

I think this is right. I have disabilities myself. Most disabled people can do some sort of work. We need help to get people into work much more than just giving them money to keep them out the workforce

chrsanthenum · 01/02/2025 20:46

arrowplant · 01/02/2025 16:42

I think the current Labour government looks at the people on ESA and sees a vast potential well of tax payers, it wants as many people working and paying tax as possible so it can fund government spending ostensibly to boost growth. What it really needs to do be honest about the huge inequality we are now seeing that is sapping people of the will to even live. It needs to tax the assets of very wealthy people. People can of course move and wealth can be hidden but the assets wealthy people from all over the world hold in the UK cannot be hidden or spirited away. The fact that they don't do this shows you exactly who they work for.

If we suspend belief and go along with the fiction that all ESA recipients can be processed into taxpayers - I would ask the government where are the jobs ?

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 20:48

NimbleGreenRaven · 01/02/2025 20:39

I wonder if so many of the pro immigration posters are so passionate about us " doing our bit " now they realise the costs involve their benefits cut. Time for the financial stupidity of the left to kick in - time to pay the piper

Seriously. Which proportion on here do you think tick those boxes you have assigned them to. So much more complex than that which is why it's useful and productive to debate on here.

We just don't have sufficient enough facts imo to take a firm unwavering position on immigration one way or the other.

For example, I see how we need immigration to survive, to prop up the services we need such as the NHS. I see immigration values all of us. I also see there will be groups not contributing and requiring ' services ' and they will cost. How does that compare to other ' drains'. I don't know because I don't have the stats. Are we given reliable stats we can trust? So as you see no one really sits comfortably on one side if pressed enough on the subject.

I tell you what I do know, that again, no one cares a dot to debate the grifters I continually refer to ( the Royals). No one is interested in vitriol towards this group or analysing their drain on your taxes. Why is this.

I obviously need therapy for my obsession with the Royal Family 😆.

Vettrianofan · 01/02/2025 20:49

Rather than trying to shaft those who are disabled, just give every citizen a small benefit then no one can get up in arms about it. Everyone being treated equally.

HRT · 01/02/2025 20:52

So, once the disabled are in absolute poverty, who is next?

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 20:52

user243245346 · 01/02/2025 20:46

I think this is right. I have disabilities myself. Most disabled people can do some sort of work. We need help to get people into work much more than just giving them money to keep them out the workforce

But do we know this? Do we know they really can. I absolutely agree there will be people who can. Why do those who can, not. If we could trust a system that didn't go for the genuinely vulnerable, we'd all support this. We'd support it if we knew the support was there to accommodate those who can. It isn't in many cases. No easy solutions.

Vettrianofan · 01/02/2025 20:53

LizzieSiddal · 01/02/2025 20:46

What do you mean they aren’t “free”. He doesn’t pay a penny for it.

Do you not have to pay car tax or insurance? Or fuel for it?? I had no idea it was that free.

Andwhoisasking · 01/02/2025 20:54

HRT · 01/02/2025 20:52

So, once the disabled are in absolute poverty, who is next?

Everyone. That’s what happens when you tax so heavily that the higher earners start changing their behaviour and think why bother. Then the private sector jobs market is decimated because of huge tax rises.

EasternStandard · 01/02/2025 20:54

HRT · 01/02/2025 20:52

So, once the disabled are in absolute poverty, who is next?

After all the other groups the public sector

kitteninabasket · 01/02/2025 20:54

user243245346 · 01/02/2025 20:46

I think this is right. I have disabilities myself. Most disabled people can do some sort of work. We need help to get people into work much more than just giving them money to keep them out the workforce

A lot of people with disabilities will be capable of doing some sort of work, but where is this work? Which employer is going to hire them?

ChishiyaBat · 01/02/2025 20:56

TigerRag · 01/02/2025 19:37

It's for the extra care compared to the average child of their own age. You don't get it just because you have disability costs

She does need extra care though and that is exactly my point!

OverHillandDale · 01/02/2025 20:57

TheNuthatch · 01/02/2025 16:21

@PandoraSox
Nobody on this thread is attacking genuinely ill and disabled people. There is no need to try and start a bun fight!

Yet it is the genuinely ill and disabled who will suffer from any sweeping changes made. How do you prove the genuine from those you claim are not?

Ubertomusic · 01/02/2025 20:57

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 20:11

Because you just aren't allowed to even use the word suicidal without people shitting themselves and throwing Samaritans numbers out in panic.

We need to be open and honest and admit, people will be wanting to kill themselves when you add together the stress and misery of struggling with very real problems, being gaslit by professionals who often feel they have no other choice due to no resources. Then you add in these new stressors for people who already struggle. Well of course it will drive people to suicide or to attempt it.

They won't ever adequately record those statistics either. Just another ' mental case' who didn't try hard enough.

It's very noticeable on the tube where "customer incidents" and "trespassers" (euphemisms for suicide attempts) are now happening daily. Some employees are obviously very distressed themselves and nearly shrieking "stand back, stand behind the yellow line!!!" in a very disturbing manner. They are clearly scared "incidents" may happen in their presence.

LadyKenya · 01/02/2025 20:58

I tell you what I do know, that again, no one cares a dot to debate the grifters I continually refer to ( the Royals). No one is interested in vitriol towards this group or analysing their drain on your taxes. Why is this.

Because the majority of the population see an attack on the RF, as an attack on the Country, and maybe themselves. They have been conditioned to look up to these people, and even if they were to deny it, see these people as being somehow better than them, and somehow deserving of all their wealth, and whatever else they have greedily amassed for themselves. People have been conditioned to punch down, not up, unfortunately. The film, The Platform, is well worth watching, if you have not already seen it. Anyhoo back to the thread...

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 20:58

Andwhoisasking · 01/02/2025 20:54

Everyone. That’s what happens when you tax so heavily that the higher earners start changing their behaviour and think why bother. Then the private sector jobs market is decimated because of huge tax rises.

I used to be in a category where I just met the threshold to pay high tax and it pissed me off so much. Because I still couldn't easily afford to buy a home and more.

But , is there not a group, the significantly wealthy who aren't those in the group like myself ( when I was) who really can pay more tax and absolutely should.

Ubertomusic · 01/02/2025 20:59

OverHillandDale · 01/02/2025 20:57

Yet it is the genuinely ill and disabled who will suffer from any sweeping changes made. How do you prove the genuine from those you claim are not?

Exactly. Genuinely ill are unable to fight the system. But who cares.

Andwhoisasking · 01/02/2025 21:00

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 20:58

I used to be in a category where I just met the threshold to pay high tax and it pissed me off so much. Because I still couldn't easily afford to buy a home and more.

But , is there not a group, the significantly wealthy who aren't those in the group like myself ( when I was) who really can pay more tax and absolutely should.

Yeah. The issue is they tried that with the non-doms. RR is now having to back track because of the amount of tax we are losing. Wealth is mobile so they upped and left.

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 21:02

LadyKenya · 01/02/2025 20:58

I tell you what I do know, that again, no one cares a dot to debate the grifters I continually refer to ( the Royals). No one is interested in vitriol towards this group or analysing their drain on your taxes. Why is this.

Because the majority of the population see an attack on the RF, as an attack on the Country, and maybe themselves. They have been conditioned to look up to these people, and even if they were to deny it, see these people as being somehow better than them, and somehow deserving of all their wealth, and whatever else they have greedily amassed for themselves. People have been conditioned to punch down, not up, unfortunately. The film, The Platform, is well worth watching, if you have not already seen it. Anyhoo back to the thread...

Thankyou. You have answered this perfectly because this is exactly what I believe to be true. This is why no one is addressing it when I raise it again and again 😆. Apart from a rare few of us.

It goes back to the point that the sick and disabled and even the poor are ' them ' and if I don't have to see ' them' then it's kind of ok if they just go away and die because I don't like ' them ' and I don't want to ever be like ' them '.

That's the truth and people will convince themselves of anything to make that fit in a socially acceptable way.

LizzieSiddal · 01/02/2025 21:02

Vettrianofan · 01/02/2025 20:53

Do you not have to pay car tax or insurance? Or fuel for it?? I had no idea it was that free.

. I specifically said the CAR was free. I didn’t say anything else was.

Tittat50 · 01/02/2025 21:04

Andwhoisasking · 01/02/2025 21:00

Yeah. The issue is they tried that with the non-doms. RR is now having to back track because of the amount of tax we are losing. Wealth is mobile so they upped and left.

And I have no idea how you legislate to stop that.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.