Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Princess Di was killed

1000 replies

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 15:35

There OK I said it. You hoo, crazy conspiracy theorist over here…

Yes, I know they had an inquiry though anyone high up enough to kill a Royal could snowball an Inquiry or influence the outcome ? I think it’s naive to think the law is this perfect thing.

Ive always found it odd that she was labelled a “loose cannon” by the press and was campaigning against landmines. It was said that it caused a lot of noses out of joint in politics. I would have thought that weapons dealers and the industry would have taken a huge hit.

There aren’t many celebrities or organisations that could have taken on the weapons or arms industry as powerfully as Diana. It was until then an issue that nobody touched.

Since her death there’s still landmines and the issue has never really been addressed.

I wonder if she’d been alive today what she’d be doing. Not hard to imagine her visiting children impacted by war and maybe even Palestinian refugees, beaming images around the world to restore some sanity and humanity.

I dont think we realise the humanity, bravery and brilliance she had. Could have been going to glamorous events and being a Princess but instead she was carrying on even when powerful people were upset.

I wonder how powerful those people were or was it someone British. Men don’t take a liking to women with power and it amazes me more that she wasn’t killed deliberately in the context of this.

What are the chances she would die at such a young age and to not be wearing a seat belt seems bizarre to me. Just too many coincidences.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
pelargoniums · 28/01/2025 20:24

Noooo, I don’t think the theory is they arranged for the car crash and hoped it would magically kill her. They arranged to kill her in the car, then engineered the car crash as a cover up. V short window to get it all done before the paps showed up, but that’s MI5/MI6/Big Landmines/the Royal Family/al Fayed/Phil the Greek/wizards for you.

TheGuineaPigsAreConspiringWorldDomination · 28/01/2025 20:24

BMW6 · 28/01/2025 19:43

Irony alert...........its as likely that she arranged to die in the crash as anyone else orchestrated it.

Both farcical theories.

Couldn't agree more with this !

Mumtobabyhavoc · 28/01/2025 20:26

devastatedagain · 28/01/2025 20:20

I'm amazed that I have to keep explaining to people why it's extremely highly unlikely Princess Di was killed.

If you are going to kill someone, there are far more effective ways of doing so than by initiating a car crash. To start, with, many hundreds of thousands of people a year are in car crashes and survive them, so engineering a car crash as a method of murder is very inefficient.

Secondly, there are too many variables and things outside of the assassins control with the car crash theory - they can't control other drivers for example.

Unless the crash was meant to be a warning and went too far.... 🧐

The suspected other vehicle/driver or rider has never been found. That's also very odd given the high profile. You'd think everyone across the country would be reporting anything suspicious, wouldn't you?

oakleaffy · 28/01/2025 20:26

I met her at a work event and she seemed absolutely lovely- she definitely had star quality, it was as if she glowed from within, her beautiful sapphire eyes - she was a stunner.

A beautiful woman.

She'd be in her Sixties now, if alive, I heard she'd died after coming home from a trip in Europe, but there wasn't internet then, it was when a friend phoned to say ''Terrible news about Diana, isn't it?'' that I found out.

I didn't believe him at first, as knew from the works thing how she had protection staff- But when I turned on the TV it was all too real.

I would hope that the royals didn't arrange for Diana to be killed-

There have been more inflammatory people since then and they haven't been 'bumped off' so I hope that is was just a terrible accident rather than Diana being deliberately murdered.

Blinkingbonkers · 28/01/2025 20:26

She was killed by getting in a car with a drunk driver and not putting a seatbelt on. HTH.

Drivingoverlemons · 28/01/2025 20:27

The length of time that has passed is irrelevant, it is just incredibly unlikely.

On the other hand, Marilyn Monroe being murdered is quite believable, as is Natalie Wood.

deeahgwitch · 28/01/2025 20:30

You know the video of Diana, Dodi and the driver just before they got in to the car, in the lift or corridor of The Ritz Hotel - the driver doesn't look drunk in it.
Diana had a bodyguard who afaik was sitting in the passenger seat. He survived.
Surely he would have noticed if the driver was drunk.
I feel sorry for the driver and his loved ones if he wasn't drunk, as he is the fall guy.
A car seen at the scene was never traced.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 28/01/2025 20:31

Drivingoverlemons · 28/01/2025 20:27

The length of time that has passed is irrelevant, it is just incredibly unlikely.

On the other hand, Marilyn Monroe being murdered is quite believable, as is Natalie Wood.

Marilyn Monroe - very possibly murder.
Natalie Wood - accident, but RJ did it and lied about it.

Moveoverdarlin · 28/01/2025 20:32

Raindropskeepfallinonmyhead · 28/01/2025 16:02

Agreed. Don't know why people are still so fascinated

I think people are fascinated because it was very convenient for the Royal Family. Would Charles and Camilla have gone on to marry if Diana was still making the front pages day in, day out? She completely outshined him back in the 80s and 90s. And even more so after they divorced. Everyone loved her and despised Charles and Camilla. I think people forget how unbelievably famous she was. Everything she did completely trumped the good work of the other royals. He would try and launch something or attend a ceremony for a charity and she could go to the gym with skimpy shorts on and the press would cover her shorts and not mention Charles at such and such or the Queen attending Great Ormond Street.

JoyousGreyOrca · 28/01/2025 20:32

Diana's popularity was not on the wane. The papers and magazines carried mountains of stories about her.
The rumours in the press the week before was that she was pregnant. Diana herself said she had an announcement to make.

JandamiHash · 28/01/2025 20:34

GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples · 28/01/2025 19:50

I don't think think you categorically say that. I highly doubt that the Royal Family don't have influence beyond what is obvious to us commoners.

I don't think they would have to directly order anything. I think other players would on their behalf or in their own interests with the RF possible reluctant benefactors by proxy.

But all this emotional projection of how PP feels is in my opinion misplaced. His childhood experiences are by-the-by. He was absolutely loyal to the Queen at the end of the day and given a choice he'd come down on the side of her and the institution, not Diana who, you could argue , fulfilled her usefulness after producing two heirs and certainly had no usefulness as a single woman capable of connecting those future heirs to the throne with any number of wholly unsuitable step-fathers.

I don’t think loyalty required plotted murder against his exDIL though

Luddite26 · 28/01/2025 20:36

Mumtobabyhavoc · 28/01/2025 20:31

Marilyn Monroe - very possibly murder.
Natalie Wood - accident, but RJ did it and lied about it.

Edited

You know this or that is your theory?

sprigatito · 28/01/2025 20:37

Lavenderfarmcottage · 28/01/2025 15:55

When in actual fact she was run off the road by paparazzi/trained tactical drivers and a flashing light planned to ensure maximum impact and kill her. I don’t think she was tended to in the ambulance. Her body was embalmed. The list goes on.

I read that the flashing light in the tunnel routine was part of an MI6 plan to take out Slobodan Milosevich. Repurposed to get rid of Diana because she was planning to marry al Fayed. Racist royals couldn't stomach the idea of the future King ending up with a half-Egyptian half-sibling.

But one reads all sorts of things.

AcquadiP · 28/01/2025 20:37

GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples · 28/01/2025 19:31

I don't think (but wouldn't rule it out) that PP orchestrated it (assuming we're suspending reality) But you're making the mistake of thinking like an ordinary family person.

The Royal Family is an institution not just a family. They think first and foremost of their survival. They will brutally cut off anyone who is a threat to its continuence.

Two cases in point: They didn't offer asylum to their Romanov cousins did they? In fact George V urged the government not to allow them to come to Britain. They changed their surnames to remain popular and they let Edward abdicate and become a social patriarch and an outcast rather than have him as King with Ms Simpson by his side.

Fergie wasn't a threat to anyone. No need to remove her. She was despised by the press and not really loved anywhere on the same level as Diana by the public. People also miss the fact that Fergie is also very loyal to the RF. Yes she acted stupidly, bit not out of spite. She continued to love Andrew and that meant she never really criticised the family, despite suffering deliberate exclusion for years.

You also being contradictory. You say 'why would he deprive his grandchildren of their mother?' Whilst acknowledging that he forced Fergie to sit out in the lodge whilst her children went to celebrate Christmas without her. Fergie was left out of big family and royal state events. They also deprived their grandchildren's mother of funding. Hardly caring about his royal GC was it? She was forced to hustle like the plebs and go on Oprah.

Being in the Navy makes a man capable of killing for expediency.

Again I don't think PP had anything to with her death. I think the whole thing was an accident. I do think though, that if someone else planned it and he knew, he'd be sad but still comply with it if necessary. It depends on whether there was a perception that Diana's conduct was a threat to Williams future regency as well as other people, the institution, Britain in some way.

I'm well aware that the RF is an institution, that's why, twice, I talk about potential destabilisation of the monarchy.

Yes, the Royal Family have been ruthless in the past and excluded family members. But it's a long, long stretch to go from social exclusion to murder.

It made perfect sense for the RF to change their Germanic name to Windsor given WW1 and WW2. German Shepherd dogs remained popular as pet dogs but became known as Alsations (Alsace being their place of origin.) No-one wanted to be seen to support anything germanic.

Re Edward and Mrs Simpson, at that time in society, having a divorced woman as a future queen consort was unthinkable as divorce carried a social stigma, that's why Edward gave up the throne. They became outcasts because the Queen Mother blamed her husband's early death on Edward's abdication.

I am not in anyway contradicting myself by stating that PP wouldn't wish two young boys to be bereft of their mother but at the same time would ban Fergie from Christmas lunch. One mother would be dead whilst the other mother would have to make other arrangements to occupy herself whilst her daughters were with the RF for ONE day. The two are not even remotely comparable. Beatrice and Eugenice would have the choice to either spend the day with the RF or with their mother. With Diana dead, William and Harry would have no such choice.

Emilyontmoor · 28/01/2025 20:38

Yogaatsunrise · 28/01/2025 20:12

The biggest issue for me was the sheer time it took for the ambulance to arrive. An hour and forty five minutes after the crash she finally arrived at the hospital, that always felt off to me having used that tunnel and I know its location.

I don’t believe it was the RF for a moment, but i know the Al Fayeds had lots of enemies, so I have always wondered about that.

Edited

I have already highlighted the nature of her injuries, in particular that as well as multiple fractures because she was sitting sideways the force of a crash at 95mph had sent her heart into the other side of her chest rupturing a pulmonary artery. That meant her blood pressure was almost non existent. They first had to stabilise her at the scene including sedating her as she was conscious and agitated at first, and dealing with a cardiac arrest. The ambulance had to go slowly as any acceleration or breaking would cause her blood to slosh around her body starving her brain further of oxygen, and travel to a hospital equipped to deal with such life threatening injuries, and indeed there were further cardiac arrests. If there is any suspicion it is whether there was actually any prospect of saving her by the time she reached the hospital but to have followed any other treatment plan would also have killed her, and possibly extended her suffering if they had tried to drag her from the car any sooner. All this is standard protocol for dealing with that degree of trauma, the inevitable result of crashing at 95mph without a seatbelt. No specialist in emergency medicine has ever questioned her treatment, that is just for the armchair experts 😂

Is it me or is this debate getting more divorced from common sense and facts as the evening wears on….. 🍷

RockStarMartini · 28/01/2025 20:38

I love how ‘I read that…’ seems to mean ‘I know for a fact’ to some posters.

Harry has definitely married his mother without her charm or warmth.

Hwi · 28/01/2025 20:40

NotOneOfTheInCrowd · 28/01/2025 19:51

There was everything reckless about her lifestyle. Needing to be seen with money, shagging other women’s husbands as standard, including Dodi, fact is that it would have been better for the RF to keep her alive because she was starting to become an embarrassment and her popularity absolutely was on the downturn.

The only reason people remember her as a saint is because the press had to do an about-turn due to the fact that she died while being pursued for photographs.

She was in fact incredibly manipulative, had no thought for the people whose lives she had a part in destroying by sleeping with their husbands.

If she’d stayed alive I have little doubt she would have done everything to appear in the limelight, although she’d have been too old for “I’m a celebrity” but I don’t doubt for a minute she would have ended up on instagram and any other social media.

You are so right, the definition of recklessness. And that interview of hers which William is now trying to blame Bashir for - as if Diana lacked capacity and did not know what she was doing. And pestering Oliver Hoare by phone, with his wife reporting a caller for phone harassment and the police tracing nuisance calls to her apartment in Kensington Palace! And Will Carlin's wife 'Diana is messing with the wrong woman'. Had she survived, she would have discredited herself beyond anything one could imagine. And all the time recklessly competing with the heir to the throne for popularity. Insane. And allowing her speech coach to video her revelations about 'Charles being over me like a rash, eeeww'. Unbelievable.

Mumtobabyhavoc · 28/01/2025 20:40

Luddite26 · 28/01/2025 20:36

You know this or that is your theory?

Obviously my opinion. 😂

Whatsnmynameagain9 · 28/01/2025 20:41

Aren’t the posters saying the driver was drunk and no seatbelt missing the point. The high ups could have made the blood result out to have alcohol in it. And messed up the seatbelt. Etc. have you not seen James Bond?

JoyousGreyOrca · 28/01/2025 20:41

Her popularity was not on the downturn. That is a rewriting of history.

pelargoniums · 28/01/2025 20:42

sprigatito · 28/01/2025 20:37

I read that the flashing light in the tunnel routine was part of an MI6 plan to take out Slobodan Milosevich. Repurposed to get rid of Diana because she was planning to marry al Fayed. Racist royals couldn't stomach the idea of the future King ending up with a half-Egyptian half-sibling.

But one reads all sorts of things.

“Here, are you using this plan for Slobodan or can I borrow it for Diana? I’ll bring it back when I’m done.”

MJconfessions · 28/01/2025 20:42

I definitely think there was a smear campaign against her in the press. Whereas we often see people in power suppressing negative press stories, such as the prince involved with Epstein.

So it was obviously in someone’s best interests to ruin her reputation as we know the royals can bury bad press should they want to.

I’m not saying she was purposely killed by the royal family but they certainly used her death to their advantage. I don’t think anyone aside from her sons cared that she died. Her death was likely considered unfortunate internally, but with the caveat that she didn’t fit their image and needed to go so it was for the best.

wordsworthundercover · 28/01/2025 20:44

Was there something about the cameras being out, or am I confusing this with Epstein?

JoyousGreyOrca · 28/01/2025 20:45

The press before she died were full of rumours that Diana was pregnant. If she was pregnant, that would have really upset the Royal Family.

Wordsmithery · 28/01/2025 20:45

I've wondered this so many times since it happened. A lot of things seemed not to add up, plus her death was so convenient to some members of the royal family and the arms dealers. Ultimately, though, I concluded it was just a terrible accident. Not helped in any way by a drunk driver and lack of a seatbelt.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread