Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Dispatches- Britain’s Benefit scandal

1000 replies

Sunnywalker · 12/01/2025 13:04

Anybody watched this? It’s made me so angry. Some highlights include a company that can’t recruit an apprentice on 26k because sickness benefits would amount to 24k so it wouldn’t be worth it. 500,000, 25-34 years old on long term sick, a woman who has never had a FT job and claims 35k in benefits, this lady would like to work but says will never achieve the same income if she worked.

This country is bankrupt, public services crumbling! What is going on? Why isn’t there an overhaul!

OP posts:
Stirabout · 12/01/2025 19:35

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 19:29

Rare as rocking horse shit I’d have said.

To get a mortgage a property must be structurally sound
It was
Not having internal doors is not a requirement
Not having a bathroom is not a requirement
Being an ex whore house is not an issue

Im assuming you’ve all at one time needed a mortgage ….

Rosscameasdoody · 12/01/2025 19:35

ThejoyofNC · 12/01/2025 19:08

Vote reform

Nobody who is disabled or has a health condition would vote Reform unless they were out of their minds.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/01/2025 19:35

Plopandflop · 12/01/2025 19:32

I tell what I will go and throw myself off a bridge- one less disabled person to leech off the system. I suggest some posters take their benefit basing to social media- might get a few others with disabilities to do themselves in as well- all saving money.

ok I won’t because I would not do it to my daughter but that’s how some of you have made me feel.

Virtual hug x

No-one should feel like this. Between this thread, and one I was on yesterday complaining about the coverage of the LA fires, I'm seriously concerned about the lack of humanity being encouraged in general society.

Beekeepingmum · 12/01/2025 19:36

Simonjt · 12/01/2025 19:30

So that would increase JSA significantly as it would need to be at the age appropriate NMW.

Nope. It would the same as it currently. If you want to get more money for the time - get a fucking job.

Simonjt · 12/01/2025 19:36

Stirabout · 12/01/2025 19:35

To get a mortgage a property must be structurally sound
It was
Not having internal doors is not a requirement
Not having a bathroom is not a requirement
Being an ex whore house is not an issue

Im assuming you’ve all at one time needed a mortgage ….

Yes, and despite having a specialist broker when I found a run down house in an area I loved, not having an indoor bathroom meant it wasn’t possible to get a mortgage, which I’m still annoyed about!

Spaniellover2 · 12/01/2025 19:36

Willyoujustbequiet · 12/01/2025 18:48

You don't get universal credit if you own other property.

PIP isn't a means tested benefit. You wouldn't get council tax paid.

She has not declared the properties. Her Council Tax is paid. The system is unfair. It is anecdote, based on her partner, who told me. I am not attacking those who get benefits, but it is riling that she is. Maybe she is legitimately ill, with anxiety. But how can she get rental income from two inherited properties, and still receive benefits - unless they are undeclared.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 12/01/2025 19:37

Not working is incredibly boring and lonely. I can't imagine many of the people who "choose" this life are happy this way.

PickleBranst · 12/01/2025 19:37

Yanbu. Benefits need to be cut and should be received in exchange for public service, so X amount of hours doing work for the local council, road sweeping, sign cleaning etc.

If that work is not attractive, claimants will decide to take another job. I agree with PP, at the moment its too easy to claim benefits and play xbox all day.

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 19:38

Simonjt · 12/01/2025 19:36

Yes, and despite having a specialist broker when I found a run down house in an area I loved, not having an indoor bathroom meant it wasn’t possible to get a mortgage, which I’m still annoyed about!

I’m pretty sure a house is unmortgageable without a functioning kitchen and bathroom. That’s why these wrecks almost always go to auction and developers buy them for a song.

2dogsandabudgie · 12/01/2025 19:39

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/01/2025 18:42

Which is as much use as a chocolate teapot to someone on benefits who obviously can't afford to buy.

My posts are clearly addressing the idea that people on benefits who live in expensive areas should simply move to cheaper areas to save tax payers money. It's simply not feasible unless you have spare money to facilitate such a move, and it's ridiculous to suggest that cheaper council areas will house people from out of area while social housing is at an all time low.

I thought you were implying that the pp was lying about buying a "wreck" in the south as the cheapest property according to you was £200,000 for a studio flat.

No need to be rude.

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 12/01/2025 19:39

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/01/2025 19:24

Perhaps these work gangs could all wear some sort of uniform or emblem to cement their "lesser" status in the eyes of society?

Or if these jobs need doing, the council could you know, offer them actual employment with rights and things. Just a thought.

These jobs do need doing, but councils are skint. Work experience then.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 12/01/2025 19:39

Sunnywalker · 12/01/2025 13:15

Really ? Because a large portion of society appear to manage on salaries less than the benefits packages these people are getting. How on earth can you expect someone who has effectively never worked and has no qualifications to be employed with a 35k salary ? I mean teachers start on 32k and many other professions I would imagine!

who has effectively never worked and has no qualifications to be employed with a 35k

Not all of us on benefits have never worked and are not qualified.

GivingitToGod · 12/01/2025 19:40

sunshinestar1986 · 12/01/2025 19:31

But how many actually get £35000?
A single mother of 1 child receives very little
About 7000-8000 a year and about 14000 if rent is included! (Yes London rents are higher but most people do not live in London)
Not everyone is long term sick(and why would you have an issue with them)
Or have 6 plus kids all born before 2017. Cuz you only get paid for 2 kids born after 2017.
So, yeah who are you actually upset with?
Who's living an easily life?
Most youngsters live with their families these days, and if their on UC, they get about £300 a month.
Are you angry that they chose to live on that rather than get a job for massive amounts more?
You know nothing about people's lives and their actual situation.
Everyone that can get a job, usually gets one. People who are comfortable on benefits are rare

I disagree that people who are comfortable on benefits are rare.
I know several people on benefits who are comfortable and in many instances, better off than people who are working

Stirabout · 12/01/2025 19:41

Simonjt · 12/01/2025 19:36

Yes, and despite having a specialist broker when I found a run down house in an area I loved, not having an indoor bathroom meant it wasn’t possible to get a mortgage, which I’m still annoyed about!

Like I said the plumbing was on the ground floor, just no bathroom or toilet actually in existence at the time of purchase

Our Lender ‘Cheltenham and Gloucester ‘ I think had no issue and we didn’t have to shop around either. No one had an issue.

Ps Just noticed your dilemma re run down property. We have always bought run down properties, sometimes at Auction that we quickly convert to mortgaged and we have had ones with outside toilets still. Mortgage no problem. Never used a broker

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 12/01/2025 19:41

PickleBranst · 12/01/2025 19:37

Yanbu. Benefits need to be cut and should be received in exchange for public service, so X amount of hours doing work for the local council, road sweeping, sign cleaning etc.

If that work is not attractive, claimants will decide to take another job. I agree with PP, at the moment its too easy to claim benefits and play xbox all day.

Are you specifically relating to universal credit or do you think this should extend to those on disability benefits too? How would you make that work? Will reasonable adjustments be offered for disabilities?

SevenMoon · 12/01/2025 19:41

Stirabout · 12/01/2025 19:30

Not against the law but choosing not to work when you can should not be a possibility once a child reaches a certain age.
They should be required to be in work or training to receive benefits.
Being unemployed should not mean you are financially better off than working.

Once your child reaches the age of 3 you are required to look for work. If you cannot show proof that you are spending 30 hours a week on this you will be sanctioned.

If your child is over 3 and you work less then 30 hours a week, you are required to prove you are looking and applying for more hours/another job.

Beekeepingmum · 12/01/2025 19:42

GivingitToGod · 12/01/2025 19:40

I disagree that people who are comfortable on benefits are rare.
I know several people on benefits who are comfortable and in many instances, better off than people who are working

We all do. That is why the argument that everything is fine falls apart. We all know people who brazenly exploit the system. It is so prevalent in society.

Princessponies · 12/01/2025 19:43

username299 · 12/01/2025 18:55

They're not real. People just pluck figures out of the air to demonise poor people. If you could get 5k a week because of 'anxiety', most people wouldn't work.

I also can’t believe people are getting 5.5k take home per month on benefits disabled or not. That’s crazy money.

Katypp · 12/01/2025 19:44

PunnyRobin · 12/01/2025 19:10

a living wage, companies want cheap labour to make a profit, well why not have a better business model instead

Surely you know this is a gross simplification. What exactly would the incentive be to start a business - small businesses are the backbone of our economy - if there is no profit to be made? Talk about 6th form politics.
I am interested in your better business model though. Do share.

Julen7 · 12/01/2025 19:44

Princessponies · 12/01/2025 19:43

I also can’t believe people are getting 5.5k take home per month on benefits disabled or not. That’s crazy money.

Several posters on this thread have said they do.

BIossomtoes · 12/01/2025 19:44

Princessponies · 12/01/2025 19:43

I also can’t believe people are getting 5.5k take home per month on benefits disabled or not. That’s crazy money.

Nor can I. I think those posts should be taken with a (very large) pinch of salt.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/01/2025 19:44

2dogsandabudgie · 12/01/2025 19:39

I thought you were implying that the pp was lying about buying a "wreck" in the south as the cheapest property according to you was £200,000 for a studio flat.

No need to be rude.

I can be rude if I like, and believe me, I'm biting my tongue as it is due to the vile rhetoric all over this thread.

The PP with her "wreck" for 100000 bought it in 1999 and how they got a mortgage is apparently questionable, but that's outside my expertise as I've never been privileged enough to "need a mortgage" so I'm going by other posters comments.

But I can 100% guarantee that in 2025 in my affluent University town, there are no properties, wrecks or otherwise available for sale at 100000.

dingledangledoos · 12/01/2025 19:45

Truthseeker456 · 12/01/2025 19:19

It's a bias documentary to pave the way for disability benefit cuts. Wake up

It's a deliberately provocative and designed to rile people up and pitch them against "benefit scroungers"

What it's not is government propaganda, that's a ridiculous suggestion.

PunnyRobin · 12/01/2025 19:46

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 12/01/2025 19:21

and picking up litter and graffiti removal. In other words, no more money for nothing.

and when the jobs have been completed then what excatly ? there are only so many humans needed for x positions in any given area, so then its taking workers out to villages ext but then travel costs, etc are need to be covered which is more expenses, for what society needs no one including companies want to pay a proper living wage

Thegoatliesdownonbroadway · 12/01/2025 19:47

SevenMoon · 12/01/2025 19:41

Once your child reaches the age of 3 you are required to look for work. If you cannot show proof that you are spending 30 hours a week on this you will be sanctioned.

If your child is over 3 and you work less then 30 hours a week, you are required to prove you are looking and applying for more hours/another job.

So let's get them working for half of that 30 hours, say 15 hours. Doing something socially useful. Better for the claimant and better for society. Win-win.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.