Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

One child has inherited AGAIN

885 replies

EWAB · 10/01/2025 16:20

A decade ago my younger son benefited from a massive inheritance.

Essentially my MiL bypassed her three children and left everything to her 6 grandchildren.

The grandchildren: 2 siblings, 3 siblings and my younger child.

SHE WAS ENTITLED TO DO AS SHE PLEASED. IT WAS HER MONEY.

The fallout was quite seismic for lots of reasons. My partner felt that as he only had one child the family of the brother with 3 children benefitted disproportionately.

It was said at the time and I believe this to be the case that the will was designed like this. to stop my elder child from a previous relationship from benefiting as he might have done 40/50 years later if the money had gone directly to my partner.

As for my relationship, my partner refused to consider changing our wills leaving more to elder child who was at the time very unlikely to inherit from his own father. He is now on property ladder but any inheritance will pale into insignificance compared with younger child’s

Well it’s happened again!

Late MiL’s half brother has left his entire estate to the MALE grandchildren of his siblings. Younger son and partner’s nephew and we think 2 or 3 others.

HE WAS ENTITLED TO DO WHAT HE WANTED WITH HIS OWN MONEY.

I genuinely can’t contemplate my two sons having such vastly different lives.

I want advice to come to terms with it . I have disabled voting. I can’t talk to anyone.

OP posts:
Manxexile · 10/01/2025 18:00

Soontobe60 · 10/01/2025 16:37

A deed of variation legally cannot be done that decreases the inheritance of a minor.

That's what I thought.

I suspect the two youngest have been cheated ...

omelettenipples · 10/01/2025 18:00

Looks like it was 120k. So not millions.

corvidconvo · 10/01/2025 18:00

There's nothing you can do about it, and frankly, I think your husband leaving more to one sibling than the other would be more potentially damaging than the current situation. Treat them equally while accepting that there is no such thing as total equality in life.

poemsandwine · 10/01/2025 18:01

BingoLarge · 10/01/2025 16:28

Is the son who has inherited their blood relation and your elder son from another relationship? (Sorry if this is in the post- I couldn't quite grasp it.)

Yes. my elder child from a previous relationship

As such, it's not great but also not that surprising. It happens a lot.

ThejoyofNC · 10/01/2025 18:01

Surely this is what happens when you have children with fathers with vastly different wealth?

KnightsTemplar00 · 10/01/2025 18:04

legally its correct, morally is there a reason why your other child was left ?

IkeaMeatballGravy · 10/01/2025 18:05

This is one of the things that makes blending families so difficult, you cannot make things totally fair and equal between mixed siblings. As much as your DH and his family may get along with your older DC, they will not disadvantage their biological children/grandchildren to benefit someone else's child.

The only thing you can do is adjust your will but that may affect your relationship with your youngest if they find out while you are still here.

Michellesbackbrace · 10/01/2025 18:06

Another2Cats · 10/01/2025 17:50

@SometimesCalmPerson

"Leaving money only to males is horrible"

@EveryoneKnowsJuanita

"The half brother thing with the male heirs is very peculiar though!"

There was a case in 2022 that involved just this thing. It was about "reasonable provision" for a widow.

The couple had been married for a very long time and had two sons and four daughters (this is relevant).

Everything was in the husband's name and, when he died, his will left everything to the two sons. The wife and daughters were excluded. The total estate was worth upwards of £1 million.

The widow was left with just a state pension and nothing else, not even a lifetime trust in the property.

One of the sons wanted to share with the mother but the other didn't so it ended up going to court.

The mother was awarded 50% of the total estate. The daughters, who also had been left nothing were not awarded anything but I think that they didn't make any applications anyway.

Kaur v Estate of Karnail Singh & Ors [2023] EWHC 304 (Fam)

Edited

I mean, I thought it was law in this country that marriage means everything is passed to the spouse upon death? She should’ve got the full lot not 50%, I don’t get that at all.

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 10/01/2025 18:07

omelettenipples · 10/01/2025 18:00

Looks like it was 120k. So not millions.

Noticed this too. 120k is great, but from the many posts and the way it was referred to, I assumed millions.

Crazycatlady79 · 10/01/2025 18:07

Sadly, it's the price the children pay for parents having children with more than one partner. It's harsh, but not unfair.

Porcuporpoise · 10/01/2025 18:13

Michellesbackbrace · 10/01/2025 18:06

I mean, I thought it was law in this country that marriage means everything is passed to the spouse upon death? She should’ve got the full lot not 50%, I don’t get that at all.

Spouses inherit automatically only if there is no will stating something different.

ChicLilacSeal · 10/01/2025 18:13

I mean, some people have money in life and some don't. That's just the way it is. At least your eldest son is on the property ladder.

CharityShopChic · 10/01/2025 18:14

Oh here we go again. Today's installment of the soap opera of "blended families" where people have children who have complex step/half relationships and don't like the fact that children are not inheriting apparently large sums of money from people they are only very tangentially connected to.

It's almost as if these situations could be predicted...

Wonderi · 10/01/2025 18:14

There are various things to consider when having multiple children, especially with different fathers.

Inheritance is one of them.

Theres always the chance that one family is going to be better off/have less family members and one child is going to receive more than the other.

This can also be the case for pocket money, holidays, presents etc when you have kids with different families.

Instead of seeing it as a negative thing, I would look at the positives.
Your first son is set up, which is great.

I absolutely would not be changing my will as that may cause issues between the siblings.
Instead, I would try and give the 2nd son more financial help whilst I was still alive.

researchers3 · 10/01/2025 18:15

immoreexcitedthanthekids · 10/01/2025 16:24

Sadly there's nothing you can do. They obviously didn't see your elder child as part of the family.

How old was dc1 when you met your current partner?

Did You read the OP?

She knows there's nothing she can do - she asked for advice coning to terms with the hurt this has caused.

Another2Cats · 10/01/2025 18:16

OliveThe0therReindeer · 10/01/2025 16:59

Please don’t let your partner stay there until he dies.

If you die next week, your child may have to wait another 30 or 40 years to inherit from you. Meanwhile his late mum’s former partner could be living there with his new wife and kids, while your family bring up your children.

"Please don’t let your partner stay there until he dies."

You do realise, that works both ways? If he dies first then you are saying that the OP should not be allowed to remain in the family home afterwards?

QuimCarrey · 10/01/2025 18:18

The more I read this, the more I can quite see why family members have been careful not to leave money to OP and DP. With feelings this strong, odds are they've been noticed.

CovertPiggery · 10/01/2025 18:19

Personally, I'd change my own will to leave everything to the disadvantaged child (assuming the definitely won't inherit from anyone else).

No need to even tell your partner if he might kick off or change his to then not leave you anything.

FoolishHips · 10/01/2025 18:20

FrannyScraps · 10/01/2025 16:33

I genuinely can’t contemplate my two sons having such vastly different lives.

It's always going to be the case when you choose different fathers for them. They might have different health outlines due to genetics, or different personalities and intellect due to their fathers. All sorts of things could give them vastly different lives. Thankfully this is just money.

Maybe I watch too many Jane Austin adaptations, but it's not 'just' money. Money affects every aspect of life, including health and education. It equals choices and freedom. Money is crucial to having a decent life.

JHound · 10/01/2025 18:21

Michellesbackbrace · 10/01/2025 18:06

I mean, I thought it was law in this country that marriage means everything is passed to the spouse upon death? She should’ve got the full lot not 50%, I don’t get that at all.

I am pretty sure that’s not the law when there is a will.

What is interesting is that it was seen as his assets but I assume everything was in his name.

Another2Cats · 10/01/2025 18:21

MounjaroOnMyMind · 10/01/2025 17:04

I don't really understand! Are your other DC not your in laws' relatives?

As far as I understand it, the OP has two DC; one with her current DH and one with a previous partner.

Porcuporpoise · 10/01/2025 18:21

Just wow @CovertPiggery (apt name btw) . Your marriage must be utter shit for you to suggest that.

CurlyhairedAssassin · 10/01/2025 18:22

Stirabout · 10/01/2025 16:59

My mother died first and left my db and I her estate.
My df had use of her share of the house until he died
They set it up like that and I would suggest OP makes arrangements to do the same to safeguard her eldest inheritance .
Its also worth noting they sign agreed reciprocal wills, this will protect the eldest son from being disinherited by OPs dh.

Edited

This seems sensible but for some families the remaining partner may end up with a house to live in for the remainder of their life but very little actual money to live off if all other other assets are left to children. They could live a long time on a very small pension or salary in an expensive-to-maintain house while the adult children are rolling in it, cash-wise, from their inheritance of other assets. I wonder in that case if the adult children would be willing to pay for expensive repairs on the house out of their inheritance, knowing they are going to benefit from the sale of it eventually?

It gets quite complicated and each family will have a very unique set of circumstances. Wills should be reviewed regularly.

Unexpectedlysinglemum · 10/01/2025 18:24

Doesn't your older son have anyone to inherit from? His dad's family?
You can always give all your wealth to just your younger son?

BettyBardMacDonald · 10/01/2025 18:25

This is one reason I personally don't think it's right to produce offspring by different co-parents. One and done.

Swipe left for the next trending thread