No, dont be ridiculous.
Firstly, i find the evidence against LL to be unconvincing, whilst i know she was found guilty, articles i have read since have made me doubt the convinction.
Secondly, nurses, of all kind, perform tasks that display intimate areas of patients. whether that patien is newborn, 16, 60, or 106, dignity in care is paramount, and should not be recorded.
Thirdly, there are plenty of steps in place that hospitals could bring in to protect patients. One example is the insulin, ours is stored in a computer controlled fridge, it takes finger prints to open that fridge, we input how many units are being removed, pharmacy confirm the correct amount of medication is in the stores each day. This is all medications, right down to calpol. Controlled drugs, and anything being given by injection or IV are 2 nurse checked. Whilst medication errors do happen, nurses are human, over worked, under massive pressure, often caring for more acutely unwell patients at once than is considered "safe", they are traceable to the individual/s giving the medication and acted upon.
Fourthly, comparing it to regular checks on children withdrawn from mainstream education is ludicrus. All children should be visable to authorities. Having occasional checks on these children is in the best interests of all children.