A colleague started a bit of a furore at our works Christmas dinner last night. Was lighthearted, but it instigated such a range of views. This is the scenario as explained:
A and B are in a relationship. Have been together for about 8 years. Not married, but committed. They have 2 children, a house and a business together (colleague is involved, but also works with us). About 15 years ago, B had a FWB, C. This was before A and B met.
B and C had been friends for a long time but hadn't seen each other often. Both had moved around quite a bit, then settled about 3 hours away from each other. Not much contact in the intervening years.
C has now got back in touch with B to rekindle friendship. They acknowledge that B is now with A. However, C has told B that they have feelings for them, then and now. C acknowledges that from B's perspective, it was a friendship and FWB at the time.
A doesn't think that B should stay friends with C.
B says they have no feelings for C, that it's just a friendship, and they should be able to stay friends.
A thinks B is unreasonable for wanting to stay friends with C, and C is unreasonable for telling B this in the first place.
B thinks A is unreasonable for trying to put an end to the friendship.
I've deliberately not used the sex of the parties, because some people did say they might think differently depending on who was male or female!
There were people agreeing with both A and and B, but also people saying it's not U for B wanting to stay friends with C, but now that C has admitted to having feelings, it's only going to cause hurt.
What do we think?