Oh dear...Harry and Meghan's Christmas card photo

[ChristmasPudd1990]

Does this scream "Photoshop" to anyone else? Lilibet's shoes, Meghan's leg and outrageously long arm,L is dressed for summer,A dressed for winter,the 3 year old looks more like 6. Jeeez...how embarrassing...🤦‍♀️

@FloofPaws oh I've mentioned Charlie just not Andy, I'm sure you will keep everyone right on what they can talk about though... very helpful

Just the derailing , I'm
Not too invested in what you actually say, easy to mix you up with another derailer

@FloofPaws best you reference most of the posters then, including yourself, as many have " derailed" from the original Christmas card

For someone who doesn't care what I say you sure have spent a lot of time and effort

However, it's a typical response from someone who has made a bit of an arse of themselves

@Livingtothefull - I think your argument is more about the many many things H&M do that basically steals someone else's ideas/limelight/grief thief/ cos play / use other people's money to self promote .. the list goes on - it's not, as PP said, about hate, it's the constant user/narc/manipulative behaviours and the constant bullying of family/staff etc ... and got the victim claiming is unreal - they're toxic lying bullies

There's no proof that Virginia slept with Andrew, and I don't think he did. She tried to say that Alan Dershowitz slept with her too, but when she realised that he wouldn't back down but would defend himself, she said "Oh, I must have been mistaken." Mistaken?! The RF had to pay Virginia off because the alternative would have been a messy trial where everything private about Andrew, including information about his genitalia, was put into the public domain. It was sheer extortion on her part, and it worked with the RF but not on Dershowitz. She accused Dershowitz and then withdrew. Well, he either raped you or he didn't. I also don't think she was trafficked; she was not kept prisoner and went home to her dad every night. She could have left any time, and others who she tried to recruit and rejected Epstein's advances were told to leave, they weren't forced. She was a willing and well-paid sex worker.

@Manypaws aahhh I see, a bully who sides with a bully - rightho

What sort of proof do you think there would be? And well paid by whom?

Catherine is very attractive so she’s added some good looking genes in to the mix.

I’m sure H&M’s kids are lovely too. Meghan was very attractive around her graduation time. I admit I don’t find her very attractive now. She’s lumbered herself with a heavy curtains hair do she might find hard to change, but it’s not flattering.

I’ve never liked Andrew, he’s always been a pompous prick.

@FloofPaws oh now we are using the bullying word, so you attack people, they respond and subsequently they are bullies, righto

@Manypaws - I've not attacked anyone

Even if all that you say is true (and some of this is debatable) it is strange to me that H&M attract so much vitriol despite being the only members of the RF that aren't costing the public money. And it is about hate. The insults just roll off the virtual tongue in your post, says it all.

I think they are being used as a distraction from the behaviour of other family members who are still on the public purse. Apart from Andrew's conduct, people seem to have forgotten that Charles & his elder son are basically slumlords. It seems that they don't mind that (to give just another example) they have been enriching themselves by charging charities to access Duchy property and profiting tax free; meaning that they are enriching themselves directly from donations made to charities by the public out of their taxed income.

A lot of people aren't happy about that. But that ship has sailed a long time ago. That's the trouble with royalty. They aren't elected so can't be voted out

@Livingtothefull - to be fair they are costing the UK money for the multiple court cases Harry has instigated re his security - wanting security at the same time level as his sibling rather than the level afforded to his rank in the RF which is, self dictated, very low.
He's also causing the US public money as apparently his security is paid by them / via Biden
That's only two examples off the top of my head I'm sure there are others

@Viviennemary - it's somewhat laughable considering Henry VIII started CoE ... he didn't have much of a track record of keeping it in his pants, or heads on necks... 😉

@UniqueOP

You know absolutely nothing about sex trafficked vulnerable girls. The girls were lured by Maxwell to be abused by Epstein. Your post is appalling. Do you think Maxwell would've been jailed for 20 years if those young girls were just well paid sex workers?

Evidence please?
And not just the tabloids.....

apparently.............

Hahaha

That may be so though maybe Harry felt justified in instigating the court action due to the level of threat against himself and Meghan, described as 'disgusting and very real' by the outgoing Met assistant commissioner.

I thought that any member of the public with a sufficiently high public profile would be entitled to security if deemed to be at risk. It is surprising if his security was at a level 'afforded to his rank in the RF' rather than the level of risk they are faced with. Given the ongoing hate campaign against them I would be very surprised if the risk did not continue to be high.

If he is costing the US money that is the business of the US government & people, not ours.

If true, then whatever money H&M are costing us is probably dwarfed by the c£12m which Andrew paid to a woman whom (according to a poster above) he never slept with. Or the millions of pounds extorted from the public every year.

what's funny? @Petitchat

Well you should have looked at it because you are wrong 😂

Topical? You mean the drones with aliens? 😂

But you can't see them. How do you know?

@Livingtothefull - he's wanting the high level security though if the king/next in line - all the time in the UK, rather than in a case by case basis.
Also he's caused such controversy with him slagging off so many of the RF, and others. By discussing in his book that he made plenty of money from, about killing people, bad enough, but killing terrorists, which to be honest, it's controversial as he's thrown in a bimb, run off and expecting others to pick up after him and his revelations rather than keeping a lid on his military kills .. which in itself isn't exactly the sort of thing military people make public - they've made themselves a target!
Ref USA public purse - yes their issue, but the poster just said public money.... let's not even talk about the money from the public in Nigeria and in Columbia

Isn’t the little boy cross eyed and that’s why they do t show his face?