So much judgement on lifestyle approaches around weaning. I sort of did BLW. By that, I mean I mainly gave finger food they could feed themselves but would spoon feed naturally runny things like weetabix or scrambled egg. (So the purists would probably say that is not BLW). I personally thought it was ott to follow recipes to bake runny foods into fingers they can hold, but each to their own.
Personally it was so much easier than purees. Instead of making a veg puree, I gave them some chunks of veg I was cooking for us. I made sure the floor (or mat underneath) was clean and then put the food they dropped back for another go! Out and about I could take things like a banana or cucumber sticks with me for them to eat (obviously took more as they progressed). It was cheaper than pouches which many did as easier than making their own puree.
I work as a SALT. Parents often talk about difficultly moving their child through textures and them gagging when lumps are involved because they can't figure out the change. For me it seemed easier to start as you mean to go on.
I had 2 bottle refusers, so lots of bf, but went back to work when they were 9m old and they were eating fine. I agree parents need to respond to their child's needs, and if they are dropping weight that's an issue. (Likely needing more milk as one PP said, as it's much higher calorie than puree). I understand there are reasons why people choose to do it differently, and there is likely some judgement from the evangelical BLW crowd, but some of the posts in this thread are a bit judgemental the other way.