I feel fairly neutral about it.
Undoubtedly it was probably Sir Tom's daughter who got the media involved at the very beginning. Without that, there would have been little attention given to his efforts and all that money would never have been donated and raised for the NHS. He would have been a nice old man walking in his garden with not a great deal of reach. Sir Tom's family had probably been managing everything in the background all along and 38 million is a load of money. They never touched that money.
I feel it's not moral, but I can't be asked to be upset over them getting some personal cash on the side since then. Trustees in all these big charities get huge salaries. Why are the CC making it seem like a £85,000 salary was extraordinary?
I also don't see why there was such a fuss about the £18,000 payment by Virgin O2 being personally pocketed. There doesn't seem to have been anything strictly stipulating that it must go to the charity.
I feel the SPA and home cinema was wrong, but demolition was unnecessary.
I feel these people are shifty, but they have done good too. Unless someone is saying that the big mainstream charities never spend funds on superfluous things (Travel? Eating out in expensive restaurants? Conferences in expensive locations etc etc) and there aren't people on big salaries working in them, then to me they are perhaps correct to say they have received extraordinary scrutiny.