Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

By making Jeremy Clarkson their spokesperson, Farmers have shot themselves in the foot

215 replies

Coolasfeck · 19/11/2024 14:34

JC openly admitted to becoming a farmer to avoid IHT. Why do farmers think having him as the figurehead will help them? Just because he’s off the telly doesn’t mean ordinary people will support him. It makes them all appear to be out of touch millionaires.

Feels like a spectacular own goal. Either that or the media is setting them up by making him the focus.

Quote from Sky News:

‘Those generous reliefs have made agriculture an attractive investment for those seeking to shelter wealth from the taxman.

Clarkson, the UK's highest profile farmer - and opponent of the government's plans - said as much when promoting his Amazon series about becoming the proprietor of Diddly Squat Farm in Oxfordshire.

"Land is a better investment than any bank can offer. The government doesn't get any of my money when I die. And the price of the food that I grow can only go up," he told the Times.

Mr Clarkson is far from alone. Private and institutional investors, along with so-called "lifestyle" farmers funding purchases from previous careers, like the former Top Gear presenter and his Oxfordshire neighbour, the Blur bassist Alex James, now dominate agricultural land purchases.’

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/whats-the-beef-with-farmers-inheritance-tax-13256257

What's the beef with farmers' inheritance tax?

As thousands of farmers cry foul over tax measures in the budget, Sky News explains the issues at stake and why they feel so aggrieved.

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/whats-the-beef-with-farmers-inheritance-tax-13256257

OP posts:
Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 19/11/2024 16:43

‘ Hope they tax Grouse Shooting out of existence .. monoculture ruining the biodiversity of the countryside, so a few rich boys can dress in tweed, leaving piles of rotting birds behind‘

Grouse were £27 a brace * at the farm gate where I am this year. Not much danger of rotting piles being left on the ground when they fetch that much.

( BtW , grouse moorland is very poor in nutrients and not much else will grow there, nor do many other birds or animals find it a prosperous environment for ‘bio diversity’ . So the grouse moors are a pretty good use for that land. )

’Brace’ = Tweed ‘ term for two 🤭

Aliciainwunderland · 19/11/2024 16:43

EuclidianGeometryFan · 19/11/2024 16:40

For grazing horses so no food.
Agree this is a bad use of land. Not as bad as golf courses but still bad.
Until the day oil becomes too expensive and we return to horses for transport.

Hobbyist farmers who only provide for their own house.
So like a super-big garden then? I have no issue with this (at least, no more of an issue than I have with anyone owning a huge house and/or garden).

People who just want a patch of land to one day do something or because land goes up in value. Purchased by investors and Left to just sit because they cannot currently get planning but holding the land till one day they hope they can.
But banked-land will have to be used eventually (even if years later), or sold on with tax to pay at some point. So only a temporary delay.
Meanwhile, idle land is very good for nature and wildlife (as long as they don't keep 'clearing' it), and it gives the soil a chance to recover.

But what will we eat?

rayofsunshine86 · 19/11/2024 16:45

The government are blatantly banking on land being sold to developers to mass build on greenfield sites.

Onlyvisiting · 19/11/2024 16:46

He's a twat. And he's not been elected, he's just a self appointed bigmouth

Marabousfy · 19/11/2024 16:50

Yup. He’s a hobby farmer and a tax dodging C&nt.
They should bin him and have some real farmers - and not poshos who’ve inherited big estates, actual farmers who’s assets are £1m+ but who aren’t wealthy

RedToothBrush · 19/11/2024 16:52

There are some incredibly dismissive posts of Clarkson on this thread.

I don't think he is remotely 'Reform'. Yes Conservative but not Reform.

You can tell the posters who have watched Clarkson's farm and those who haven't.

Tbh whilst on a personal level he maybe trying to dodge the inheritance, I also think he understands how the change will effect other farmers.

I know that this might be a different concept to hold for some people, but it's Clarkson is right about somethings and wrong about others and he can be both an arse and be doing something very constructive for farmers.

At the same time.

But it seems impossible for people to get beyond anyone being 'good' or 'evil' in a childish simple view of the world.

Shejustkonws · 19/11/2024 16:53

I thought he was brilliant on Clarkson's Farm but oh boy he was so rude to Victoria Derbyshire this afternoon when she was interviewing him at the march. Totally unnecessary and did the farmers cause more harm than good I'd say

CurlewKate · 19/11/2024 16:54

@FelixtheAardvark "You don't see the Duke of Devonshire worrying about IHT on his vast estates do you."

Nor the other 19 Dukes who are major landowners- several of them significantly more substantial than Devonshire.

morellamalessdrama · 19/11/2024 16:55

Why don't farmers make their farms a business so it's not passing it on to family but instead they could sell it on (which could be given to family at a super low price)?

This is a genuine question.

derxa · 19/11/2024 16:55

RedToothBrush · 19/11/2024 16:52

There are some incredibly dismissive posts of Clarkson on this thread.

I don't think he is remotely 'Reform'. Yes Conservative but not Reform.

You can tell the posters who have watched Clarkson's farm and those who haven't.

Tbh whilst on a personal level he maybe trying to dodge the inheritance, I also think he understands how the change will effect other farmers.

I know that this might be a different concept to hold for some people, but it's Clarkson is right about somethings and wrong about others and he can be both an arse and be doing something very constructive for farmers.

At the same time.

But it seems impossible for people to get beyond anyone being 'good' or 'evil' in a childish simple view of the world.

Totally agree

MrsPeterHarris · 19/11/2024 16:56

Wellingtonspie · 19/11/2024 15:59

Honestly though I don’t care who there leader is if it stops farms being sold off to pay tax to be able to farm. The more farm land that’s sold off the less farming will actually happen. The more we will rely on imports which places our food security in an even worse position that is already is.

Farmers don’t tend to be rich apart from assets as it costs so much to farm but those assets are the farm, one bad crop or a case or TB or bird flu can wipe out more than a years “profits” farming is a life style and for the love that also feeds us.

If you want higher welfare and more organic you want more and better farming not imports or heavily sprayed for highest yields vs managing the land well.

Completely agree.

It baffles me that various governments are happy to give away both our energy & food security. I just don't understand why?!!

Badhero1 · 19/11/2024 16:59

WilmaFlintstone1 · 19/11/2024 15:17

This….pay your bloody way, everyone else has to.

Edited

This, I totally agree. 3 million tax free and then half the rate of tax the rest of us would have to pay. As a single parent, who has a family home and disabled children, my allowance is £500K which I think is just under what my house is worth. My kids will have to pay 40% on any amount over the threshold and they will not have the 10 years that the farmers children will have to pay it

Aliciainwunderland · 19/11/2024 17:00

Badhero1 · 19/11/2024 16:59

This, I totally agree. 3 million tax free and then half the rate of tax the rest of us would have to pay. As a single parent, who has a family home and disabled children, my allowance is £500K which I think is just under what my house is worth. My kids will have to pay 40% on any amount over the threshold and they will not have the 10 years that the farmers children will have to pay it

I think the difference is I can’t eat your house.

Boomer55 · 19/11/2024 17:01

They screamed the loudest for Brexit, which has cost us all £100 billion. Thry got what they wanted, it’s not my fault they were lied to, so they will have to suck it up. 🙄

DadJoke · 19/11/2024 17:02

There are 500 people, by definition rich landowners who are affected by this. Why should I pay 40% on my estate which includes a business, when a farmer only has to pay 20%? (To be clear I think we should both pay 40%).

Farmers also get cheap diesel and pay no road tax.

If anyone is screwing farmers, it's supermarkets.

Clarkson is either lying now about why he bought a far, or he was lying then. The idea that he would have been anything other than proud of shooting on his land is laughable.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 19/11/2024 17:07

Aliciainwunderland · 19/11/2024 17:00

I think the difference is I can’t eat your house.

Can't eat your farmhouse or your view from the back bedrooms, either.

FranticHare · 19/11/2024 17:10

Badhero1 · 19/11/2024 16:59

This, I totally agree. 3 million tax free and then half the rate of tax the rest of us would have to pay. As a single parent, who has a family home and disabled children, my allowance is £500K which I think is just under what my house is worth. My kids will have to pay 40% on any amount over the threshold and they will not have the 10 years that the farmers children will have to pay it

But you are comparing Apples and Oranges. Your children's inheritance will be spent on whatever it is they want. A deposit for their own house, home improvements, a large holiday, a new car, even drugs if that is what they want I hope not, but that is there option!)

Farms are a different beast. All one farmer is passing down to their child is the responsibility of looking after the land / animals, to continue to farm and to continue to produce the food that will go on your children's plates. They don't have the option of doing what they like - they are simply inheriting a massive responsibility.

There is likely no cash to pass down. (OK, likely to be something in the business account, but likely a lot less than your children will get from you, and will be needed for the purpose of farming). And if you now saddle the farmers child with massive inheritance tax, that farm will have to be sold off - and probably for housing. And where is that food now coming from? Oh yes, being shipped in from abroad.

This whole "I'm poor, so should everyone else" attitude stinks, and completely misses the point. If you want food, it has to be produced by someone! And preferably in this country!

Shejustkonws · 19/11/2024 17:13

FranticHare · 19/11/2024 17:10

But you are comparing Apples and Oranges. Your children's inheritance will be spent on whatever it is they want. A deposit for their own house, home improvements, a large holiday, a new car, even drugs if that is what they want I hope not, but that is there option!)

Farms are a different beast. All one farmer is passing down to their child is the responsibility of looking after the land / animals, to continue to farm and to continue to produce the food that will go on your children's plates. They don't have the option of doing what they like - they are simply inheriting a massive responsibility.

There is likely no cash to pass down. (OK, likely to be something in the business account, but likely a lot less than your children will get from you, and will be needed for the purpose of farming). And if you now saddle the farmers child with massive inheritance tax, that farm will have to be sold off - and probably for housing. And where is that food now coming from? Oh yes, being shipped in from abroad.

This whole "I'm poor, so should everyone else" attitude stinks, and completely misses the point. If you want food, it has to be produced by someone! And preferably in this country!

Totally agree

StaunchMomma · 19/11/2024 17:14

He's amusing and all but yes, a buffoon. It is a tad embarrassing now that his admission has come back to haunt him.

As far as I'm concerned, if average Joe has to pay inheritance tax on a property then farmers should, too.

Nobody, be they land owners, share holders, CEO's or bloody royalty should be getting out of paying taxes that the average person on the street has to.

Clarabell77 · 19/11/2024 17:17

ExtraOnions · 19/11/2024 15:16

He is the face of the campaign whether farmers like it or not.

A millionaire hobby farmer, who openly said he bought the land to dodge tax. Who boats about killing protected species. He’s exactly the kind of person the government is targeting.

First three million tax free… and let’s not forget they barely raised a murmur about the amount of income they lost due to Brexit.

They should be more taxed for the river pollution alone.

No idea why they think they are such a special case .. what other occupation shouod be exempt?

This.

Mebebecat · 19/11/2024 17:21

EuclidianGeometryFan · 19/11/2024 16:28

The more farm land that’s sold off the less farming will actually happen.

This bit I don't understand.
If the farmland is sold, it can only go to another farm - likely a much bigger farm.

I suppose if it got planning permission then houses could be built - which is a good thing as I think the need for houses is greater than the need for UK-grown food.

It seems vanishingly unlikely that the land would be bought for anything else. Golf courses?

Well the Chinese are busy buying up British farms to grow rice to send back to China.

DoThePropeller · 19/11/2024 17:23

As Jeremy Clarkson himself pointed out, he has an army of accountants and will just put his in trust. As will many other wealthy Dukes and landowners. They are rich enough to pay for the best estate planning advice and will minimise their tax bill accordingly.

As with much of government policy, it’s the ordinary people who are “rich” enough - with land in this scenario, not cash - who will pay while the extremely rich pivot to a new scheme.

Not dissimilar to the private schools stuff, all the really rich people paid upfront for years in advance and it’s the people just about affording it who will pay the tax.

Reugny · 19/11/2024 17:24

I heard someone explain how they do it in Ireland. If 80% of the land isn't used productively for the 6 years before the owner's death then inheritance tax is due.

Incidentally some of my siblings and friends new houses were on farmers fields that were sold off....

FrippEnos · 19/11/2024 17:24

The problem is that you have two types of farmer (for simplicity). One is the type whose family has been farming for years, the farm will (hopefully) be passed on down the line, and those are the ones to feel sorry for,
The other type are the clarksons of the group that are hobby farmers and doing this to avoid tax.
Ending up with a hobby farmer as the face of this is not going to help the cause.

As an aside farmers are generally tory voters( or they are where I lived so Labour will lose very few votes over this.

Barbadossunset · 19/11/2024 17:25

@ExtraOnions which grouse shoot left rotting birds?