Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Trainees no longer ready for workplace

562 replies

Kukcoo · 18/11/2024 21:12

I used to love having trainees allocated to us. They were so enthusiastic, hardworking and a breath of fresh air. It was great to see them develop.

The last few have acted like they're doing us a favour if they turn up by lunchtime because they could have called in sick for nothing. Seriously can't be bothered doing the basics and expect everything to be done for them. Little respect for anyone else and the huge support they're being given. Won't meet a deadline, because this would affect their mental health and basically impinges on their human rights.

They all still expect to qualify and will be passed by the provider unless they do something truly dangerous, but they won't have the real experience or skills to join the workplace and get on with a job.

I'm barely even a different generation, but wouldn't have dreamed of acting the way they do when I was learning and felt I had to prove myself. AIBU to expect standards to be the same?

OP posts:
Mnetcurious · 22/11/2024 16:49

taxguru · 22/11/2024 15:54

Same with lots of jobs/"professions". Accounting is the same. A few "lower tier" professional bodies making out they're equivalent to the "chartered bodies", but with far fewer exams, much quicker timescales, and lower standards of qualifications. Also some so-called "professional" bodies that don't even have any exams, just need a couple of years of relevant experience signed off.

You could say the same with the medical profession, with "physician associates" and prescribing nurses doing the work previously done by doctors.

Which bodies for accountants are these that don’t require exams or have lower standards, out of interest? Thinking about what I’ve heard our finance team say about recent recruits.

cassgate · 22/11/2024 17:03

Smorgs2014 · 22/11/2024 14:03

I know many will shoot me down for this, but I think this is at least partially another outcome of COVID lockdown, and universities looking to increase income at the expense of a properly rounded and delivered education. We are now seeing a 'generation' of young people that didn't sit GCSE's due to the first lockdown and then spent their A levels etc mostly learning online. Universities realised that they could sign up way more paying students by using this ' hybrid ' approach and reducing direct tutor contact / support time. This means that those crucial years of indirect learning of the associated skills of time keeping, group interaction, team work and commitment etc etc have been much harder to pick up / teach. Also, younger people will never have the work ethic of the older generations because to be frank, they don't have the same rewards or future to work for, with barely enough potential income to be able to own a home and raise a family and the world not looking such a great place to do that in anyway, so their priorities have changed to reflect that.
I think it's down to all of us to set an example as well as for the manager to cover this directly via performance management and evaluation - especially in a field like teaching, where setting healthy boundaries is essential, but being fully engaged can provide such hugely fulfilling rewards that they may have simply never experienced before. There will always be some who just won't be receptive but you could see it as an opportunity to help.

The young people who did not sit GCSEs during the 1st lockdown are now in the 3rd year of their degrees. My Dd is one of them. If anything her and her friends who are on a mix of different courses ranging from stem, English, history to logistics and politics don’t seem to have been affected at all by Covid. They all have strong work ethics and all have part time jobs. My friends son seems worse off as he was already at uni during the 1st lockdown and although came out with a 1st, it took ages for him to get a job. His job is still hybrid albeit getting better now the company are stipulating more days in the office.

KindlyOldGoat · 22/11/2024 21:38

Being mostly office-based simply isn’t always “better” though - it totally depends on the job. When I worked in an office pre-Covid I got about half the amount work done compared to WFH during the pandemic, because the noisy, disruptive arsing around of colleagues, the pointless presenteeism, the constant bickering, and the meetings that didn’t need to happen wasted so much of my time and energy. I now work 90% from home and have undertaken more challenging and genuinely collaborative work since starting this role than ever before. In both jobs I’d say my experiences are pretty representative, and that includes older and younger colleagues.

TempestTost · 22/11/2024 23:06

KindlyOldGoat · 22/11/2024 21:38

Being mostly office-based simply isn’t always “better” though - it totally depends on the job. When I worked in an office pre-Covid I got about half the amount work done compared to WFH during the pandemic, because the noisy, disruptive arsing around of colleagues, the pointless presenteeism, the constant bickering, and the meetings that didn’t need to happen wasted so much of my time and energy. I now work 90% from home and have undertaken more challenging and genuinely collaborative work since starting this role than ever before. In both jobs I’d say my experiences are pretty representative, and that includes older and younger colleagues.

WFH is one thing in a profession or area you are already experienced in. It's terrible for new employees though who are still learning.

whatsgoingon2024 · 23/11/2024 05:19

I worked with a young lady who went sick for 3 months with MH issues. Our team worked with another company who used one of our rooms, they had their own employees. Some of our staff occasionally worked as hoc for them as it was essentially the same job. We would sit side by side. She turned up 4 days in to her sick leave to work for them as her MH only affected her with the pressures from our clients even this they just helped with the overspill. It came to a head when we went down the disciplinary route, she called her mum who had a go at the manager. This is not the first time I’ve seen stuff like this sadly. People can blame schools but personally I find it’s parents who mollycoddle children. Some of these kids can’t cope with pressure or stress or hard work because their parents seem to fight responsibility and are quite prepared to offer MH days. They aren’t always creating health adults who can cope with real life and take responsibility.

Bewareofthisonetoo · 23/11/2024 06:36

BeyondMyWits · 22/11/2024 13:04

The trouble that "good" trainee teachers are finding now is that right from early on they are being pushed to specialities that they did not sign up for. Dd wants to teach biology y7-11. (With the full understanding that that includes all 3 sciences)

She has already had 4 people in the science dept and SLT go to her on placement asking if she'd consider going on for A level chemistry... her degree was both Biolgy and chemistry based... and more and more of her assigned observations are now Y12 Chemistry. (Despite her non committal answer, and this being her first placement for PGCE)

I'm guessing chemistry teachers at a level are in really short supply.

There is an oversupply of biology but anyone with a pulse is begged to tach physics. I did general supply for a while a couple of years ago as I like to actually teach when on supply was overheard by a passing SLT and asked to take on a permanent role as a physics teacher. I know pretty much nothing about physics having failed my o level but the were utterly desperate. I didn’t take the job!!

KindlyOldGoat · 23/11/2024 08:12

TempestTost · 22/11/2024 23:06

WFH is one thing in a profession or area you are already experienced in. It's terrible for new employees though who are still learning.

I’m not sure writing it off as “terrible” for new employees is helpful. As with anything, it depends entirely on the role and situation. I’m not advocating largely home-based working for brand new employees, but IME a bit of flexibility goes a long way in terms of fostering productivity and good working relationships.

MobilityCat · 23/11/2024 08:37

MissRoseDurward · 20/11/2024 18:15

Don’t think we’re suggesting all boomers had advanced brain development.

The majority left school at 15/16, though, and had to learn how to behave in the workplace from then on, instead of at 18-22, as is the case now. And very few of their parents would have had cars, or it was one car that father took to work so not available for chauffeuring services, so they'd have grown up walking cycling or taking the bus, instead of being driven everywhere. And they'd have walked themselves to and from primary school from an early age. All opportunities to develop independence at an earlier age than many children do today.

In fact, we leaned good working ethics and how to behave which were further developed in the workplace.

PennyCrayon1 · 23/11/2024 11:02

TempestTost · 22/11/2024 23:06

WFH is one thing in a profession or area you are already experienced in. It's terrible for new employees though who are still learning.

I strongly agree with you on this. Certainly for my profession anyway.

Can’t learn from those around you simply by watching and listening to what’s going on. Can’t join in those quick, unplanned chats about difficult issues that arise from time to time within the team. They also don’t learn basic office etiquette if they’ve never worked in one before.

No, trainee, it is not ok to be bellowing down the phone at someone as if you are lying on your bed at home. Take it into a quiet room.

RainbowColouredRainbows · 23/11/2024 16:56

I think the learning from experienced staff is probably a reason for the decline in standards of some trainee teachers. The percentage of teachers that quit the profession in 5 years of starting is high, and experienced teachers are expensive so are often managed out. This has created a boiling pot in many schools of very young staff with little experience, some in management positions within their first few years of entering the classroom.

itsallrosy · 23/11/2024 18:47

As someone who has a lot of experience with this exact situation, I have to totally disagree. Students that I am aware of on that course basically ran a class whilst being unpaid (not even travel) and receiving very little support from the teachers in schools. Most of them claiming they were too busy to help, however that leaves students and ECTs in an impossible situation. Many schools just want cheap labour from students and ECTs without actually giving them any support. Even worse, most that graduate from one of these courses don’t even get a job in the field because it’s so competitive and schools have a lack of motivation to actually support new teachers. The whole situation is a mess and it’s such a shame for the students and ECTs involved. When I look at current students now I just feel sorry for them as the whole climate of teaching is geared against them; quite frankly I don’t blame them for feeling disheartened and unmotivated. What a shame.

WoolySnail · 26/11/2024 16:38

taxguru · 22/11/2024 11:01

We've been seeing that for a couple of decades really though. At first, it was to an extent covered up because of Eastern European tradesmen coming in after their countries were brought into the EU and had freedom of movement, but even before Brexit, there appeared to be quite a reduction as they either went back home or moved to different EU countries.

I've got a few dozen clients who are various trades, electricians, plumbers, joiners, kitchen fitters, window blind and carpet fitters, painters & decorators, and a couple of small "grease monkey" garages. I'm 60 myself and have been running my practice for 25 years, so most of my clients are likewise now middle aged or retirement age. Only 1 has an apprentice, the rest are sole traders and their businesses will just disappear when they finally retire. Plenty have already retired. I don't have a single tradesman under 40 years old! Several have taken on apprentices in the past but soon gave up due to a combination of ridiculous administrative burdens and/or the apprentices not turning up, being drunk or high on drugs, being incapable of following instructions, or just messing around instead of working. Those who did simply aren't bothering again!

The one "lucky" one is an electrician/alarm fitter, who found an absolute gem of a lad. He's now in his second year and is absolutely lovely. Really friendly, always smiling, really polite, and the guy says he's a very quick learner, never been late once, always follows instructions to the letter etc. The guy has already decided he's going to give the lad a partnership as soon as he qualifies and will hand over the business to him a couple of years later, for free! Funny how the lad is going to end up very "lucky" indeed to have a business given to him, but it's really not luck - he's put himself into that position by his personality, his hard work, etc. The guy himself is happy because he knows he'd just give up his business when he has to retire so would get nothing for it anyway and he's glad that all his regular customers will be well looked after by the lad in years to come!

That's really lovely 😊

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread