Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the tactics of CBR UK are disgusting? Trigger warning - pro life.

420 replies

MistressoftheDarkSide · 18/11/2024 08:24

I've been seething since Saturday when I encountered the organisation CBR UK on one of the busiest parts of our town centre.

CBR UK are a fundamental pro-life organisation claiming to have the interests of women traumatised by abortion at heart. Actually their roots are in the US and are underpinned by fundamentalist Christian beliefs.

Their way of educating and supporting women is to display 6 x 8 feet technicolor pictures of the aftermath of abortion in full view of women and children to get their point across.

A look at their Facebook page will prove to you I am not making this up. They place a warning sign ahead if the images, and also warn that they live film their activities, but it's obviously lip service.

They hand out leaflets and try to engage people

I challenged one of the very smug beatific older woman and suggested they must really hate women, but no, it's because they love and want to protect us apparently. And "God" - which slipped out as I took my leave and she called out God bless you. To which I responded how dare you bring God into this - and her parry was - why do you hate him that much?

Anyway, I'm posting this to make you aware that you might come up against this while doing your Christmas shopping.

Whatever your views on abortion, (Mine are pro choice and pro it's noone else's Goddamn business except a woman and her doctor) can we agree that this kind of "awareness raising" is almost psychological terrorism and should not be on our high streets in such graphic forms?

Women who have been rated, suffered traumatic medical miscarriages and are possibly accompanied by curious children don't need this shit rubbed in their faces while doing their Christmas shopping - or at any time.

AIBU?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:09

OneAmberFinch · 18/11/2024 10:56

I support decriminalisation of abortion to a point, but I don't relate to a lot of the pro-choice arguments here. It's perfectly possible to have a view that what's in the womb slowly evolves from being a ball of cells to being a baby, and that the switchover point might not conveniently coincide with viability. Personally I had an 8 week scan and saw a ball of cells, and a 12 week one and saw my beloved baby. PP is perfectly within her rights to see that point at 4 weeks.

In my experience the people I know who are explicitly pro-life also love babies after they're born, support new parents with enthusiasm and hold intellectually coherent positions on e.g. euthanasia as well, so I don't recognise this characterisation that they only care about controlling women's bodies.

Anyway, I came to this thread to say regardless of all that, I think it's not acceptable to show such graphic imagery in public as it's really traumatising. Those kinds of images stick with you forever. I'm not sure how the organisers cope with packing up every day and just casually glancing at those images in their car backseats on the way home...

see in my view the whole “Life begins at X weeks” is irrelevant. It’s all semantics. Women’s lives matter more. The women’s life trumps the life of a foetus. Bottom line. End of.

TiredCatLady · 18/11/2024 11:10

Went to a catholic school and during an RE lesson around the age of 15 was shown a video of a late stage abortion happening.
It still enrages me now as it was clearly for medical reasons but was presented as “look how cruel this is”.
These zealots don’t give a toss about women or children.
I’m genuinely concerned that we’re moving backwards with respect to women’s rights and bodily autonomy.

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:10

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 10:56

At no point have I said that choice should be removed. Placards don't stop women accessing abortions.

Of course they do! It’s a form of harrasment

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:10

Besides I thought an image stopped you having your abortion??

ErrolTheDragon · 18/11/2024 11:10

But my opinion is that abortion has been a net negative for women

Even if that was true, safe legal abortions are a hell of a lot less negative for women than illegal unsafe ones. Which is too often the real choice in countries where abortions are illegal or not accessible.

Unwanted pregnancies are a net negative for women. But the very same organisations who are anti choice re abortions are often also anti choice re conception.

ErrolTheDragon · 18/11/2024 11:12

There is no other legal killing happening in developed, peaceful countries - as it were - so they fixate on abortions.

Isn't there quite an overlap between anti-choice US states and those which still have the death penalty?

Tittat50 · 18/11/2024 11:13

When we look at the institutions doing god's work - let's look at their track record. Abuse, peadophilia, mysogyny, rape, and the rest. In god's name my arse.

These old ladies protesting are probably the type married to sex pests and child molestors; who'd cover up for them and blame the women or children for seducing their poor innocent men.

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:14

DamselinDistress24 · 18/11/2024 11:09

I’ll tell you why - they fucking hate women

From an entirely neutral viewpoint (I have no skin in the game) my impression is that they are relatively fundamental Christians. And their religion says "thou shalt not kill" and they see abortion as killing.

There is no other legal killing happening in developed, peaceful countries - as it were - so they fixate on abortions.
(If our armed forces do any, it tends to be on other soil (and there will be a rhetoric/interpretation that might make it acceptable to them; "it's national defence", "they're bad people" etc).

I think the fact that it is a foetus, a potential baby, is also very emotive to them.

If they are devout/fundamental - they feel they have to (to be a good Christian and a good person) save people (make sure they believe in Christianity) and try to stop killing. Since it's a major tenet of Christianity. They probably feel they're failing or not doing their duty or not doing "right" if they don't.

I think everything else, including women's issues come second to that.
So it's probably not that they hate women per se. It's just that they think they have to try to stop everyone, including women, from doing what is outlawed by the commandments; especially the (apparently) most important one.
They think they would be turning a blind eye and doing nothing about what they see as a sin/travesty/crime/outrage/deeply immoral action and feel they shouldn't.

The zeal supercedes any considerations about anything else.

(There probably are, of course, men in the movement who do see it as a tool for control of women, but I'd imagine most of the women & a portion of the men are more just fundamental Christians who feel it's breaking one of the central tenets of their beliefs).

Edited

That’s just a fancy way of saying they hate women but “in the name of religion”.

Funny how these Christians cherry pick which values to uphold. They still fiercely protect pedophiles even though I’m pretty sure the Bible says you shouldn’t rape children. They still try and justify Magdalene laundries even though abuse is apparently un-Christian

This is why I renounced the Catholicism I was raised with

Tittat50 · 18/11/2024 11:16

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 10:52

But this thread is not about removing choice. This thread is about placards.

They have an impact. They have an impact on young, vulnerable women. I would be terrified and deeply concerned at age 16, needing an abortion and seeing this. It's frightening, not because I care about a few shitty cells replicating inside.
These placards also influence and spread misinformation - which is dangerous.

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:16

Hoppinggreen · 18/11/2024 10:58

Well according to you such images stopped you from having one.
I am pleased you are happy with your outcome, many women may not be

It didn't literally stop me. I could still have if I wanted to. Shall we remove calorific information from food packaging lest it interfere with your ability to eat the contents?

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:17

Hoppinggreen · 18/11/2024 10:52

Well if what you had to say was about removing the choice THAT YOU HAD from other women then you are correct, nothing you have to say on the matter is acceptable.

What?

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:19

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:16

It didn't literally stop me. I could still have if I wanted to. Shall we remove calorific information from food packaging lest it interfere with your ability to eat the contents?

You’re completely contradicting what you said earlier:

If it wasn't for pro-life campaigners I would have aborted my first. I didn't and it was based on the images I saw

Eating a bar of chocolate is quite different than having an unwanted baby.

It’s quite obvious that you’re projecting your guilt about wanting an abortion onto others. You need to square that with yourself and leave other women to make THEIR choices

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:20

I have to say there’s no one quite as annoyingly pious in the pro life movement as someone who crows about changing their mind over an abortion. Like having a baby, despite demonstrating that you’re a person who isn’t exactly bright or kind, is a noble feat over taking the road you WANTED to take.

Also, no one cares.

Heidi1976 · 18/11/2024 11:21

DamselinDistress24 · 18/11/2024 11:09

I’ll tell you why - they fucking hate women

From an entirely neutral viewpoint (I have no skin in the game) my impression is that they are relatively fundamental Christians. And their religion says "thou shalt not kill" and they see abortion as killing.

There is no other legal killing happening in developed, peaceful countries - as it were - so they fixate on abortions.
(If our armed forces do any, it tends to be on other soil (and there will be a rhetoric/interpretation that might make it acceptable to them; "it's national defence", "they're bad people" etc).

I think the fact that it is a foetus, a potential baby, is also very emotive to them.

If they are devout/fundamental - they feel they have to (to be a good Christian and a good person) save people (make sure they believe in Christianity) and try to stop killing. Since it's a major tenet of Christianity. They probably feel they're failing or not doing their duty or not doing "right" if they don't.

I think everything else, including women's issues come second to that.
So it's probably not that they hate women per se. It's just that they think they have to try to stop everyone, including women, from doing what is outlawed by the commandments; especially the (apparently) most important one.
They think they would be turning a blind eye and doing nothing about what they see as a sin/travesty/crime/outrage/deeply immoral action and feel they shouldn't.

The zeal supercedes any considerations about anything else.

(There probably are, of course, men in the movement who do see it as a tool for control of women, but I'd imagine most of the women & a portion of the men are more just fundamental Christians who feel it's breaking one of the central tenets of their beliefs).

Edited

I agree a lot of it can be rooted in christian fundamentalism, however the statement "There is no other legal killing happening in developed, peaceful countries - as it were - so they fixate on abortions." is technically incorrect.

Life support is turned off every day for people being kept alive by machines (similar to the function women's bodies play in a foetuses existence) yet they aren't queuing up outside hospitals protesting about that.

It's a complete hypocrisy.

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:23

IdylicDay · 18/11/2024 11:01

Evidence clearly shows abortion is health care and is positive for women. Evidence also shows between 95% to 99% of women who have had abortions don't regret having them.

Legal abortion is a positive. It restores womens health, their lives, and means they aren't Gestational Slaves. It's about human rights for women. It is a good thing, and I genuinely believe there should be more abortions because too many girls get pregnant and keep the baby when they shouldn't. There is no negative to abortion, only positives.

Why should these lives be taken, can you clarify lest I speculate wrongly...

Heidi1976 · 18/11/2024 11:23

Also it's good to remind people that religion, all facets of it is a 'belief'. Not fact. We cannot apply laws to govern people based on beliefs that aren't rooted in any fact bar a book that was written thousands of years ago, which has been annotated over the centuries to mean whatever those doing the annotation wanted it to mean to suit agendas. It's just wrong on so many levels.

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:25

NonPlayerCharacter · 18/11/2024 11:04

Ok... Annabella.

But the number of women fighting for, in favour of and not regretting their abortions carries more weight in working out the net outcome for women than your personal account of being glad you chose not to have one. Annabella.

It's about much more than women.

IdylicDay · 18/11/2024 11:26

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:23

Why should these lives be taken, can you clarify lest I speculate wrongly...

What 'lives' are you talking about? I don't understand what you're getting at.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 18/11/2024 11:27

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:23

Why should these lives be taken, can you clarify lest I speculate wrongly...

They're not "lives" when they are completely dependent on their mothers body to survive.

The emotive language is unnecessary - killing, murder, etc etc. I assume you'd tell a man he's committing murder if he uses a condom?

OP posts:
IdylicDay · 18/11/2024 11:27

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:25

It's about much more than women.

No its not. Its about women, and only women. No one else. Nothing else.

NonPlayerCharacter · 18/11/2024 11:28

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:20

I have to say there’s no one quite as annoyingly pious in the pro life movement as someone who crows about changing their mind over an abortion. Like having a baby, despite demonstrating that you’re a person who isn’t exactly bright or kind, is a noble feat over taking the road you WANTED to take.

Also, no one cares.

It's so interesting when it's someone who was apparently so sure they wanted one that their mind was made up, but then they were deterred by hearing the same arguments they would have been aware of before. And despite having at one point been sure they wanted one, they can suddenly no longer understand why any woman would and demand justification.

And even go so far as to say their personal views represent what the net outcome for women would be and what women should do!

Don't you find that incredibly interesting?

MistressoftheDarkSide · 18/11/2024 11:28

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:25

It's about much more than women.

Is it? Please do elaborate. Just how unimportant are the women directly affected by choice around abortion?

OP posts:
NonPlayerCharacter · 18/11/2024 11:29

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:25

It's about much more than women.

Oh we know that, Annabella. We know.

SoporificLettuce · 18/11/2024 11:29

I’m very much prolife but I don’t approve of displaying images of abortions in the public arena, especially where children can see them. They are simply too horrific.

Annabella92 · 18/11/2024 11:29

EvilsElsasPetSnowman · 18/11/2024 11:20

I have to say there’s no one quite as annoyingly pious in the pro life movement as someone who crows about changing their mind over an abortion. Like having a baby, despite demonstrating that you’re a person who isn’t exactly bright or kind, is a noble feat over taking the road you WANTED to take.

Also, no one cares.

Posting in caps convinces me you don't care