Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Justin Welby Archbishop of Canterbury must resign/be charged TW CSA.

120 replies

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 10/11/2024 13:02

Justin Welby knew in 2013 about a prolific child abuser.

He did nothing

"I personally failed to ensure that after disclosure in 2013 the awful tragedy was energetically investigated."

He is not resigning, he should be bloody charged with aiding and abetting. The abuser was allowed to move to Africa and continue to abuse.

This is the Archbishop of Canterbury.

https://news.sky.com/story/archbishop-of-canterbury-justin-welby-considered-resigning-over-appalling-barrister-abuse-scandal-13250363

Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby considered resigning over 'appalling' barrister abuse scandal

John Smyth QC's abuse was covered up within the Church of England for years, an independent review found.

https://news.sky.com/story/archbishop-of-canterbury-justin-welby-considered-resigning-over-appalling-barrister-abuse-scandal-13250363

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 12/11/2024 15:58

mitogoshigg · 12/11/2024 15:34

I do feel for Justin Welby as it was reported to the police and they simply didn't act at all reasonable speed, apparently the c of e reported it a second time before they even started to investigate. The main mistakes are in the past before his time

The only people that deserve sympathy are the victims.

Their own report puts the blame of Welby so I'm not so sure why you are quick to blame the police.

OP posts:
ErrolTheDragon · 12/11/2024 16:17

It has lost the church thousands of worshippers who got out of the habit of going and have never gone back.

Sounds like one good thing to come out of covid to me tbh.

ginasevern · 12/11/2024 16:23

mitogoshigg · 12/11/2024 15:32

@GinnyPiggie

Sarah mullally, bishop of London and former chief nursing officer.

She's pretty high church I believe but I think squeaky clean partly because she came into the church later, after the rules were tightened.

Don't trust any of them. Remember Paula Vennells was in line to be the Bishop of London. Anyway, Welby should have been sacked. Although I don't doubt that he was ultimately pushed. Of course, the church will use him as a sort of scapegoat to say "look everyone, everything's OK now". Wonder what Charlie's private words with him were. Same encouragement as he gave to the paedophile Bishop of Gloucester I expect. The establishment is rotten to the core and needs to be re-established.

alexdgr8 · 12/11/2024 16:25

Yes probably they will look for a woman archbishop next.
They are very rarely implicated in this sort of scandal.
This sort.
Paula Vennells was being seriously considered as a Bishop of London.
By Justin Welby I believe.
Anyone remember Paula Venells . . .

ZewitewichOVcrismas · 12/11/2024 16:36

Absolutely rotten rotten rotten

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 12/11/2024 16:39

The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse is just finishing its investigation of the scandals involving the Church of England in Sussex or, in the jargon, the diocese of Chichester. What it has found, in the words of one witness has been “horrifying to a huge degree, because you see this extraordinary and atrocious willingness to turn a blind eye to things going very, very seriously wrong, and entirely damaging human beings for their whole lifetimes”. The speaker was Justin Welby

From the editorial @Uricon2 linked . Speechless

OP posts:
Ilovemyshoes · 12/11/2024 17:02

@MrsRobinsonsHandprints and @Uricon2 I read that same bit in horror, he had the gall to say that in 2018, after doing exactly that in 2013. Welby’s hypocrisy is off the scale. Thank you for posting that article. I feel so sad for the survivors who have to go through this all every day.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/11/2024 17:03

Yes, I noted that bit about "willingness to turn a blind eye" myself, @MrsRobinsonsHandprints

Perhaps a way of distancing himself from any blame for the horror, mentioning what he saw others doing in the hope it keeps the focus off him?
It's an ancient tactic, but while it's not helped Welby this time I've no doubt there are others for whom it continues to work just fine

Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/11/2024 17:09

Yes, I noted that bit about "willingness to turn a blind eye" myself, @MrsRobinsonsHandprints

Perhaps a way of distancing himself from any blame for the horror, mentioning what he saw others doing in the hope it keeps the focus off him?
It's an ancient tactic, but while it's not helped Welby this time I've no doubt there are others for whom it continues to work just fine

The establishment is rotten to the core and needs to be re-established

Edited to add they could make a useful start with the disestablishment of the CofE, @ginasevern, and getting all religions well out of public life and back to being a purely private matter

It won't happen though, because the establishment operating as it does creates a very cosy roost for far tooo many

the80sweregreat · 12/11/2024 17:23

People I know are saying all sorts about pedophile ' rings ' and who was also in the know about this individual.
Makes you wonder doesn't it?.. probably goes right to the top.
The victims get all my sympathies.
Cover ups have been going on for years , so no surprises there. Glad his resigned , but he should have been sacked.

Uricon2 · 12/11/2024 18:12

I think that Welby resigning should only be the start. Other senior clergy in the the C of E knew of this and similar situations and did little or nothing. The chance to try to set up proper safeguarding was underminded by people in the Church itself

https://anglican.ink/2023/07/13/statement-by-meg-munn-on-her-resignation-as-acting-chair-of-the-independent-safeguarding-board/

I tend to believe Ms Munn entirely as I have no idea what she would gain by saying this if it were not accurate.

It would be good to think that today will make a difference but until there is the will for proper systemic change around how the C of E really deals with this issue, nothing will alter. Words are meaningless.

Statement by Meg Munn on her resignation as Acting Chair of the Independent Safeguarding Board.

I, like I am sure many others, felt a combination of astonishment, incredulity and growing anger at what happened during the safeguarding debacle at General Synod on Sunday 9th July. The troubles of course centred on the Independent Safeguarding Board...

https://anglican.ink/2023/07/13/statement-by-meg-munn-on-her-resignation-as-acting-chair-of-the-independent-safeguarding-board

Chipsandcheeseandgravy · 12/11/2024 21:25

Poor Justin, an innocent and powerless little man who couldn't do anything about the big bad paedo, so helpless was he. Oh yeah, powerless Justin, it's not as though he was the fucking Archbishop of Canterbury, is it?!

Puzzledandpissedoff · 12/11/2024 22:39

@Uricon2 an interesting statement from Meg Munn, but the point she seems to have missed is that although supposedly independent, the Safeguarding Board was convened and paid for the the Archbishop's Council, and the old phrase about "he who pays the piper calls the tune" comes to mind

They must have been disappointed to find they'd co-opted someone who actually wanted to do something about it, especially since her comments suggest the Board was merely a vehicle for pretending action was being taken, but then that's probably why they only gave her a temporary contract - in other words "best see if this one's 'sound' before we're too far in"

Either way her findings contradict their recent claims of being committed to the independence of the safeguarding process, but then I doubt anyone with sense believed that anyway

TameRockChick · 13/11/2024 13:29

GinnyPiggie · 12/11/2024 15:13

Now the church has the challenge of finding a senior Bishop who doesn't have any sort of history with child sex abuse, or signing off on a cover up. I genuinely doubt there are any left, purely because it was the normal process in the 90s and beforehand.

Maybe a female Bishop, someone younger?

The Bishop of Newcastle, The Right Revd Dr Helen-Ann Hartley ☝

Rinoachicken · 13/11/2024 20:41

There’s more…Bishop accuses Archbishops of 'coercive language' www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj0je7mg8ygo

MabelMora · 13/11/2024 21:40

Helen-Ann Hartley seems to have the most integrity out of the whole lot.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 14/11/2024 10:06

@TameRockChick I see the Telegraph offers alternative names in the frame of "who else knew and should go", though Conway's common to both

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/11/13/bishops-conway-wells-seeley-makgoba-makin-review-john-smyth/

Trouble is that, between them, two are women (so much for the thoughts that appointing a woman would help?) and another's black, and targeting these could well lead to angst of a different stripe

All that can safely be said for now is that the whole thing's a hideous mess, and that the church can be relied on to minimise and deflect just as they always have

upinaballoon · 14/11/2024 21:32

TempestTost · 11/11/2024 15:19

Yes, I think so.

Even if we accept his claim that he knew nothing until 2013, when he couldn't have done much directly, his response was poor, he didn't meet with the victims until years later.

But it's also questionable if he really know nothing.

I think it is fair to say - sometimes a person can have heard rumors in these situations, but it's almost impossible to do anything if no one will come forward officially. You can't take action based on rumors. So perhaps he had heard something but there was no way to take action.

But even so, I think the look of the whole thing is so terrible that he should resign. It's not just about him personally, it's about the institution.

Disclaimer - I think JW is a flagrant careerist and a shitty ABC, who doesn't really care about preserving the institution so long as he preserves his career, and that underlies everything he has taken in this job. And he is a shitty priest to boot. So I'd be happy to see him go.

"And he is a shitty priest to boot."

I've known several vicars and I consider some to have been more industrious-seeming than others, or better at holding the attention of a congregation with a few well-said words, or having given me food for thought with just one sentence, but how do you decide that a priest is a 'shitty priest'?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread