Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

If you don’t want to observe two minute silence- don’t be out

741 replies

Mokel · 10/11/2024 08:46

Every Remembrance Sunday and Nov 11th, when I worked at retail, we did a tannoy announcement with 5 min, 2 min before to inform customers that the store will be observing the 2 min silence. Then another to start it.

Every time there were customers who kept talking. Plus one time a woman in her 50s shouted “why can’t anyone serve me some fucking fags?” Everyone just looked at her. Some had the courage to say how disrespectful she was once the silence ended.

If you are unable or refuse to observe the silence at 11am today or tomorrow, please don’t be in a public place.

OP posts:
taxguru · 12/11/2024 10:49

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 10:45

What's your point?

Responding to someone saying they shouldn't be in a public place if they don't want to observe it. If they don't want to be in a public place for 2 minutes, it usually means they can't go to work that day at all! Thought it was pretty obvious point really!

MereDintofPandiculation · 12/11/2024 10:51

CG90 · 11/11/2024 19:59

I don’t think people who don’t want to observe the silence should stay home. I think it’s a bizarre suggestion tbh.

As others have said, if you feel that strongly then perhaps avoid public places during the silence and attend a remembrance ceremony specifically.

If you’re at work in a public place then I think you need to understand not everyone takes part in the silence and that’s each individual’s choice, wether you agree or not.

Given Remembrance Sunday commemorates all British and commonwealth armed forces who died in all wars and conflicts worldwide, I certainly wouldn’t be taking part in any silence including the soldiers responsible for Bloody Sunday, Ballymurphy massacre and innocent lives taken at the hands of the British army in other countries they have no right being in.

It's two minutes! You can stay quiet for two minutes without taking part. Carry on walking, ahopping, whatever and it's clear you're not taking part, it's simply politeness not to make a noise so other people can have two minutes silence.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 10:55

taxguru · 12/11/2024 10:49

Responding to someone saying they shouldn't be in a public place if they don't want to observe it. If they don't want to be in a public place for 2 minutes, it usually means they can't go to work that day at all! Thought it was pretty obvious point really!

Well, no. The reason the suggestion is unworkable is because someone who is so much of a twat that they can't possibly refrain from making noise during a two minutes' silence is obviously not going to put themselves out in other ways, for example, staying at home.

Even if you don't care about or agree with the two minutes' silence, it's really not that hard to just keep your mouth shut for two minutes while other people are observing it.

MereDintofPandiculation · 12/11/2024 10:57

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 10:45

What's your point?

She's explaining why staying at home if you want to observe(or staying out of public places if you don't want to observe) would mean that all those working in a public facing role would need to stay home for a day, that they can't just magically return home for two minutes.

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:10

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 10:55

Well, no. The reason the suggestion is unworkable is because someone who is so much of a twat that they can't possibly refrain from making noise during a two minutes' silence is obviously not going to put themselves out in other ways, for example, staying at home.

Even if you don't care about or agree with the two minutes' silence, it's really not that hard to just keep your mouth shut for two minutes while other people are observing it.

But if you "keep your mouth shut" you're taking part in it! Because that's what it is.

JudgeJ · 12/11/2024 11:14

rosesaredeadvioletsaretoo · 10/11/2024 08:58

What a ridiculous post. A silence is meaningless. Just a pointless gesture. People aren’t forced to be involved.

True, they are free to make these choices, they can choose not to participate but to actively screech for blessed fags is disrespectful. We're lucky to have the freedom to make choices.

CG90 · 12/11/2024 11:19

MereDintofPandiculation · 12/11/2024 10:51

It's two minutes! You can stay quiet for two minutes without taking part. Carry on walking, ahopping, whatever and it's clear you're not taking part, it's simply politeness not to make a noise so other people can have two minutes silence.

To my original point, if people are that concerned about their two minutes silence then they’re best not to be in a public place at that specific time.

If it was for the world wars only, I’d had no issue with taking part. It’s not, so I have a major issue.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 11:19

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:10

But if you "keep your mouth shut" you're taking part in it! Because that's what it is.

You don't have to stand there thinking about war heroes if that's not your thing.

Literally all that is being asked of you is not to disturb other people who are observing it.

Everyone stays silent on a daily basis for more than two minutes at a time. There's generally no reason why you specifically need to make noise between 11:00 and 11:02 am on Remembrance Day.

How much of a twat would you have to be to start mouthing off at a shop assistant who won't serve you until 11:02, or making a loud phone call right at that moment when you can see other people around you are standing in silence?

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 11:20

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:10

But if you "keep your mouth shut" you're taking part in it! Because that's what it is.

No you aren't. Put your headphones on and listen to some music if you want to demonstrate that you're not taking part without actively disrespecting people who are taking part.

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:23

Whatever else you're doing, if you're silent while doing it you're observing the silence. That's what you're requiring people to do.

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe · 12/11/2024 11:30

MrsKJones · 12/11/2024 10:49

Is this not a bit like saying "You can only pray if you go to Church on Sunday between 10am and 12 noon"?

I am from a military family so I do attend the local service on Sunday and I observe the two minute silence on both Remembrance Sunday and Armistice day (if I can) but that is a personal choice for me. I would even go so far as to suggest those who choose to go shopping don't want to observe the silence and have actively gone somewhere to avoid it (for whatever reason). Being forced to observe it anyway is authoritarian. Perhaps those shop workers who wish to observe should be given the choice of either Remembrance Sunday off or Armistice Day off so they can observe their silence - or the shop open at 11.05 on the Sunday?

I doubt the deceased soldiers from WW1 & 2 would expect or believe, we are still commemorating them all these decades later.

On the other hand if we went to war now, we'd lose. Too many people with the attitude of "Nah, mate. Not my problem. It's my right to not fight/defend etc"

Too many people with the attitude of "Nah, mate. Not my problem. It's my right to not fight/defend etc

Many of those would be the ones on this thread demanding that other people bow to their will. Shop workers who want to observe can step back for the two minutes. No need for dramatic flourish.

I agree with your post, it's very well-written too.

taxguru · 12/11/2024 11:38

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe · 12/11/2024 11:30

Too many people with the attitude of "Nah, mate. Not my problem. It's my right to not fight/defend etc

Many of those would be the ones on this thread demanding that other people bow to their will. Shop workers who want to observe can step back for the two minutes. No need for dramatic flourish.

I agree with your post, it's very well-written too.

The shop workers can only "step back" if the customers let them and don't make a fuss about wanting to be served "NOW" and not willing to wait 2 minutes.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 11:40

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:23

Whatever else you're doing, if you're silent while doing it you're observing the silence. That's what you're requiring people to do.

So you would make noise during a two minute silence just to demonstrate to others how you feel about it?

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:56

I would if I was standing next to you.

MereDintofPandiculation · 12/11/2024 11:57

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:10

But if you "keep your mouth shut" you're taking part in it! Because that's what it is.

It's called a "silence" but it's a lot more than that. It's about stopping what you're doing and thinking about the futility of war. lives lost or whatever. The stopping what you're doing is as important as the silence. If you're carrying on with what you're doing, you're not taking part in it, and no-one would suspect you of taking part in it. But by deliberately talking near those who are obviously taking part (because they're standing still with eyes lowered and not doing anything) you are distracting them from their thoughts, which is actively denying them their right to observe. Surely for two minutes a year you can suffer the minor detriment of being quiet for the sake of something which is so important to so many people.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 11:58

HauntedBungalow · 12/11/2024 11:56

I would if I was standing next to you.

If you were standing next to me in the street, all you would know about me is that I was not talking during the two minutes' silence, so I guess we have to assume you would try to spoil it for anyone wanting to observe it who has the misfortune to be standing next to you at the time.

Ridiculous behaviour.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 12/11/2024 11:58

CG90 · 12/11/2024 11:19

To my original point, if people are that concerned about their two minutes silence then they’re best not to be in a public place at that specific time.

If it was for the world wars only, I’d had no issue with taking part. It’s not, so I have a major issue.

You do realise that some people have to be in a public place because they are working? They have the right to observe the silence and not be harassed by arseholes who think they are so important they have to be served during those 2 minutes.

Rhaidimiddim · 12/11/2024 11:58

Mokel · 10/11/2024 08:46

Every Remembrance Sunday and Nov 11th, when I worked at retail, we did a tannoy announcement with 5 min, 2 min before to inform customers that the store will be observing the 2 min silence. Then another to start it.

Every time there were customers who kept talking. Plus one time a woman in her 50s shouted “why can’t anyone serve me some fucking fags?” Everyone just looked at her. Some had the courage to say how disrespectful she was once the silence ended.

If you are unable or refuse to observe the silence at 11am today or tomorrow, please don’t be in a public place.

If you really don't want your two minutes' silence disturbed - stay home!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 12/11/2024 11:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MereDintofPandiculation · 12/11/2024 11:59

If you don't want your two minutes' silence disturbed - stay home!

As @PinkSparklyPussyCat said "You do realise that some people have to be in a public place because they are working? They have the right to observe the silence and not be harassed by arseholes who think they are so important they have to be served during those 2 minutes."

taxguru · 12/11/2024 12:00

Rhaidimiddim · 12/11/2024 11:58

If you really don't want your two minutes' silence disturbed - stay home!

Edited

We've covered that. What about workers who actually have to be there because it's part of their working day? They have the right to a measly 2 minutes of peace and silence and not be disturbed by self obsessed arrogant dickheads who can't wait 2 minutes for their fags!

MereDintofPandiculation · 12/11/2024 12:02

Rhaidimiddim · 12/11/2024 11:58

If you really don't want your two minutes' silence disturbed - stay home!

Edited

I appreciate you may be pissed off at the suggestion that you should stay at home if you don't want to observe, and I would agree with you about that. But to be out and about, actively disrupting it rather than quietly going on with your own business is just ignorant. There's no need for anyone to stay at home if people could just be polite about it.

BarbaraHoward · 12/11/2024 12:04

No one is saying staff shouldn't be free to observe the silence, nor that they should be interrupted while doing so.

But quietly continuing to browse, scrolling on phone etc are all fine, they don't get in anyone else's way. Suggesting that people who do so should have to stay home is not very tolerant. OP still hasn't clarified what she means by unable.

If you're not working and the silence is important to you, then I don't think you'd be in the supermarket at that time. So it's safe to assume that the customers are the ones who aren't overly concerned either way.

CG90 · 12/11/2024 12:05

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 12/11/2024 11:58

You do realise that some people have to be in a public place because they are working? They have the right to observe the silence and not be harassed by arseholes who think they are so important they have to be served during those 2 minutes.

The post I was replying to wasn’t referring to anyone working. It mentioned to carry on walking, shopping etc.

I personally wouldn’t think I’m so important I need to be served during those 2 minutes, but the reasons I don’t observe the silence are.

Luckily for me, I’ve lived in the same area all my life and I’ve never walked in to a shop where the silence has stopped people serving.

This year my wee boy was playing football with an 11am kick off, there was no silence. There are local services but not a lot of silences etc outside of the specific services.

LyingWitchInTheWardrobe · 12/11/2024 12:10

Oh my. We've leapt onto the 'workers have to work!' now. Yes they do. What happened in my local supermarket was that the observing workers stepped two feet away from checkout and all was well. There had been a message over the tannoy about the 2 minute silence.

The mystical 'fag woman' wouldn't have been at checkout anyway, she would have been at the kiosk because that's where the fags are. Any screeching/disruption and security who are close by, would have removed her.

I don't believe for a second that this happened. The fag woman was a useful prop drawn on to elicit righteous indignation and stomping. Objective achieved I think?

Nobody should be focusing on what other people are doing. If they are quietly going about their business then it's absolutely none of yours. Don't get in their way and all will be well.