Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Private Schools- hear me out before you judge!

334 replies

Silverbook · 08/11/2024 13:01

I'm a state school teacher in Scotland. Class sizes are - 25 for P1, 30 for P2-3 and 33 for P4-7. I currently have a class size of 25, most classes in the school are 25-28. Relatively small town- 2 primaries, 1 independent and 1 secondary. The next nearest independent is 45 mins away.

The local independent school is closing due to VAT, the pupils are largely coming here. This is pushing all our class sizes up. No extra funding or staff, obviously. My issue with independent schools closing is that is directly impacting the state sector and no extra funding, resources or infrastructure is in place to support it.

Yes, our classes are still within legal limits but it will always be the most disadvantaged children/those with greater need of support who are impacted most by larger class sizes as there is just less time to spend with them.

I really feel this has been a poorly thought through and knee jerk policy. Surely you invest and create capacity in existing resources before increasing pupil numbers?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
twistyizzy · 09/11/2024 15:15

StandingSideBySide · 09/11/2024 15:12

Yes I remember the MN threads saying none of this would happen
Not that many kids would leave.
They deserve it…..nice😳

The ISC are lying.

It's the IFS who "ommitted" certain key elements however they have now put on record not to expect the policy to bring in any money 🙄
The ISC represent Indy schools and in their survey of schools + parents they gave the 10% which was jeered at by many on here. Looks like they had it exactly right.

Longma · 09/11/2024 15:16

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:18

BungleandGeorge · 09/11/2024 15:05

No VAT on university fees? Or tutors? Or many other services?
selling it in the finances was ridiculous as there was no consideration of the actual picture and it was obvious to many it wouldn’t yield what was proposed, another Brexit!

I think it’s a good move, but I have never thought fee paying schools should be VAT free or have charity status. It’s a better policy for our country I think.

Parry5timesbeforedeath · 09/11/2024 15:18

BungleandGeorge · 09/11/2024 15:05

No VAT on university fees? Or tutors? Or many other services?
selling it in the finances was ridiculous as there was no consideration of the actual picture and it was obvious to many it wouldn’t yield what was proposed, another Brexit!

@Ohthatsabitshit quote above this post is rubbish. Fee paying schools don't accept children with additional needs? Our school has a full 27% of children with SEN. Like I said earlier, I am also an exam invigilator for the school as well as a parent in the school with SEN and LDs. I really know what I am talking about. Some fucking joker when this was first starting to be discussed on Mn said 'Oh just get an EHCP that names the school as the right school and you won't have to pay VAT... I cant believe you have not done that already'. What a profoundly stupid comment. Very very many of us put our kids in an indy because they provide for their needs. Mine has been in the same school since the age of 4. I did not need to burden the LA with mucking around with applying for an EHCP because we sorted it all out ourselves on our own dime. We have done pretty much everything privately because we are fully aware of the pressure on state finances and can pay for it ourselves. I have a cousin who is very scathing about us going private but she and her DH strategically moved house to a better catchment area, yet we are the immoral ones for being honest enough to pay?

StandingSideBySide · 09/11/2024 15:23

twistyizzy · 09/11/2024 15:15

It's the IFS who "ommitted" certain key elements however they have now put on record not to expect the policy to bring in any money 🙄
The ISC represent Indy schools and in their survey of schools + parents they gave the 10% which was jeered at by many on here. Looks like they had it exactly right.

Exactly.

and in fact it’s clearly higher than that 10% already and that doesn’t even include those that won’t ‘join up’ .

Labour should have asked those experienced in this area,but instead, they asked a mate.( as you say in pp, I didn’t know that ) Why? Because anyone with actual knowledge and experience won’t fudge the figures …. unlike mates

They’re all the same
Blatant lies to the electorate

MumonabikeE5 · 09/11/2024 15:23

Silverbook · 08/11/2024 15:17

Any support currently in place won’t change because the school role increases.

Well if that’s true then campaign to make your school funding system more equitable.

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:24

It’s highly unlikely that a child in an independent school that has significant SEN doesn’t have all the reports etc necessary so they won’t arrive at state school needing to join the queue for EP etc. Many are shed from private schools and most local schools know this. The change in fees will not have changed that. Adjustments are always stretching but this should resolve in time. I think it’s an excellent development.

Sawlt · 09/11/2024 15:26

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. at the request of it's author.

Then when this exclusive catchment catches attention, like when sr politicians kids attend … admissions gets social engineered by council to make sure it looks “right”. Just the right % on free school meals, just the right amount of diversity ….

StandingSideBySide · 09/11/2024 15:27

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:24

It’s highly unlikely that a child in an independent school that has significant SEN doesn’t have all the reports etc necessary so they won’t arrive at state school needing to join the queue for EP etc. Many are shed from private schools and most local schools know this. The change in fees will not have changed that. Adjustments are always stretching but this should resolve in time. I think it’s an excellent development.

Just not one that’s going to make any money.

Wolfpa · 09/11/2024 15:28

I doubt that VAT is the reason the school closed, there will have been something wrong with their business plan if they can’t even last one term with it being added.

your area is most likely unlucky and it would have happened in any case.

Sawlt · 09/11/2024 15:28

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:24

It’s highly unlikely that a child in an independent school that has significant SEN doesn’t have all the reports etc necessary so they won’t arrive at state school needing to join the queue for EP etc. Many are shed from private schools and most local schools know this. The change in fees will not have changed that. Adjustments are always stretching but this should resolve in time. I think it’s an excellent development.

You are joking about the reports … right? Local SEN will make wait for an assessment, refuse private assessments and put them at back of the queue.

SabrinaThwaite · 09/11/2024 15:31

Luke [Sibieta] is Matthew Pennycook’s best mate who is a Labour MP and was a key player in the implementation of the proposal.

Thats quite a stretch.

Pennycook is the minister for the department that will oversee the removal
of business rates relief, and not the VAT proposal. The Scottish Government removed business rates relief from independent schools a few years ago, nothing to do with Sibieta or Pennycook.

BungleandGeorge · 09/11/2024 15:31

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:24

It’s highly unlikely that a child in an independent school that has significant SEN doesn’t have all the reports etc necessary so they won’t arrive at state school needing to join the queue for EP etc. Many are shed from private schools and most local schools know this. The change in fees will not have changed that. Adjustments are always stretching but this should resolve in time. I think it’s an excellent development.

You can’t base policies on your personal opinion. Which is gained from where? Are there any facts to actually back this up? If the school is providing for needs they don’t need reports. The whole point is that people choose a school with small classes, more funding for pastoral, more understanding over absence, more specialist teachers so they don’t need reports and diagnoses. Those become needed when those things aren’t available. Private schools also aren’t generally keen on EHCPs. LAs will generally not fund mainstream private, they also generally aren’t allowed half and half funding with parents paying fees. I believe this is labours problem as well they’ve not considered the actual implications because they don’t understand peoples’ actual lives

twistyizzy · 09/11/2024 15:33

SabrinaThwaite · 09/11/2024 15:31

Luke [Sibieta] is Matthew Pennycook’s best mate who is a Labour MP and was a key player in the implementation of the proposal.

Thats quite a stretch.

Pennycook is the minister for the department that will oversee the removal
of business rates relief, and not the VAT proposal. The Scottish Government removed business rates relief from independent schools a few years ago, nothing to do with Sibieta or Pennycook.

And Luke was his best man. They lived together at one point

MummyJ12 · 09/11/2024 15:33

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:24

It’s highly unlikely that a child in an independent school that has significant SEN doesn’t have all the reports etc necessary so they won’t arrive at state school needing to join the queue for EP etc. Many are shed from private schools and most local schools know this. The change in fees will not have changed that. Adjustments are always stretching but this should resolve in time. I think it’s an excellent development.

Do you then think that this should be extended to all extracurricular activities and tuition? Swimming lessons, music lessons, drama clubs etc….

BungleandGeorge · 09/11/2024 15:34

And the whole point is that the change in fees will change the affordability and balance of benefits for parents, and also the schools when pupils start leaving. The other option is obviously to fight the legal route for what the child is actually entitled to rather than taking the easier option of funding fees

Arran2024 · 09/11/2024 15:35

Parry5timesbeforedeath · 09/11/2024 15:18

@Ohthatsabitshit quote above this post is rubbish. Fee paying schools don't accept children with additional needs? Our school has a full 27% of children with SEN. Like I said earlier, I am also an exam invigilator for the school as well as a parent in the school with SEN and LDs. I really know what I am talking about. Some fucking joker when this was first starting to be discussed on Mn said 'Oh just get an EHCP that names the school as the right school and you won't have to pay VAT... I cant believe you have not done that already'. What a profoundly stupid comment. Very very many of us put our kids in an indy because they provide for their needs. Mine has been in the same school since the age of 4. I did not need to burden the LA with mucking around with applying for an EHCP because we sorted it all out ourselves on our own dime. We have done pretty much everything privately because we are fully aware of the pressure on state finances and can pay for it ourselves. I have a cousin who is very scathing about us going private but she and her DH strategically moved house to a better catchment area, yet we are the immoral ones for being honest enough to pay?

My daughter went to a private sen secondary school paid for by her ehc. Most parents couldn't self fund this school - the fees are enormous, partly due to the on site speech and language therapists, occupational therspists etc. Nearly all the children had ehc plans as a result.

This is a bit different to private schools taking kids with dyslexia for example.

Tbh if your child qualifies for an ehc, it is probably better to be in the state system and get one. The ehc goes up to age 25 and is useful for post 16 education (unless the yp goes to university).

Lots of kids with sen don't need ehc plans of course. Their needs can be met in mainstream state schooling through the sen budget.

Most private schools don't have a sen budget and parents have to fund on top of the fees for anything the school needs. And most private schools won't take on kids with significant additional needs anyway.

So if a child's sen is being catered for at a n ordinary private school, I suspect that the sen is limited tbh.

BotanicalGreen · 09/11/2024 15:35

twistyizzy · 09/11/2024 15:33

And Luke was his best man. They lived together at one point

Oh my goodness. Did they have children together?!

Parry5timesbeforedeath · 09/11/2024 15:43

Arran2024 · 09/11/2024 15:35

My daughter went to a private sen secondary school paid for by her ehc. Most parents couldn't self fund this school - the fees are enormous, partly due to the on site speech and language therapists, occupational therspists etc. Nearly all the children had ehc plans as a result.

This is a bit different to private schools taking kids with dyslexia for example.

Tbh if your child qualifies for an ehc, it is probably better to be in the state system and get one. The ehc goes up to age 25 and is useful for post 16 education (unless the yp goes to university).

Lots of kids with sen don't need ehc plans of course. Their needs can be met in mainstream state schooling through the sen budget.

Most private schools don't have a sen budget and parents have to fund on top of the fees for anything the school needs. And most private schools won't take on kids with significant additional needs anyway.

So if a child's sen is being catered for at a n ordinary private school, I suspect that the sen is limited tbh.

His SEN is mot limited and it is catered for very well by his Indy. He had brain damage thanks to a very badly mismanaged birth and although he is 14 chronologically he is aged about 11 mentally. He has a recorded IQ (two separate tests 12 months apart of 63- and 65. The school deal with him very well and are exceptionally accommodating. Although they have already warned us he is not going to get through GCSEs. The pastoral care is exceptionally good. They are very good at allowing us massive flexibility for him coming in and going home on days he can and cannot cope. The school is costing is £25,000 a year and he is relatively happy and content.

The latter is what we are paying for.

lasagnelle · 09/11/2024 15:44

DieStrassensindimmernass · 09/11/2024 14:36

What?
Children already at state schools are just as much 'victims'.

They aren't the ones having to leave their school to go to another one where teachers clearly don't want them

BlitheSpirits · 09/11/2024 15:44

Seashor · 08/11/2024 15:53

There is ONE day in the year that the funding is calculated on and that day has gone!
We won’t be getting extra funding, we won’t be getting extra TA’s. We will have bigger classes. No children are going to benefit. Education should NEVER be taxed, it’s a tax on children.
All the local schools in my area rely on the private school to host sport activities, theatre events, swimming lessons and translating when we receive pupils who don’t speak English. Apart from the swimming they charge us NOTHING. Well guess what, that’s all about to change!
I loathe the ‘Well if we can’t afford it no one should have it’ attitude. It’s pathetic. No one benefits. I hope all the jealous state school parents are happy now!

Is your town the only one in the country with no swimmimg pool? and your school the only one in s have a playing field for fixtures and PE and a school hall for productions

lasagnelle · 09/11/2024 15:45

yorktown · 09/11/2024 14:42

It's a real shame you think that.
93% of kids are not in private schools and at least some of those are getting a good education, my own kids included.

That's lucky for you. It's so hit and miss depending what school you end up sending your kids to

MummyJ12 · 09/11/2024 15:45

SabrinaThwaite · 09/11/2024 15:31

Luke [Sibieta] is Matthew Pennycook’s best mate who is a Labour MP and was a key player in the implementation of the proposal.

Thats quite a stretch.

Pennycook is the minister for the department that will oversee the removal
of business rates relief, and not the VAT proposal. The Scottish Government removed business rates relief from independent schools a few years ago, nothing to do with Sibieta or Pennycook.

Not quite a stretch at all.

order-order.com/2024/10/07/independent-labour-supporting-private-school-report-written-by-ministers-close-friend/

lasagnelle · 09/11/2024 15:46

Parry5timesbeforedeath · 09/11/2024 14:47

Indeed@AngsanaFlower I pay fuckloads of tax. We are top 10% of income. And am slightly tired of being told we are just rich bastards with the 'broadest shoulders' so should pay more and more and more.

I'd like to think someone, somewhere would say 'thanks for being a net contributor'.
Anyway, fuck it. I'm out. My family is out. I refuse to engage any more or pay anymore and we are off.

Are you moving country? That's sad

Ohthatsabitshit · 09/11/2024 15:47

Sawlt · 09/11/2024 15:28

You are joking about the reports … right? Local SEN will make wait for an assessment, refuse private assessments and put them at back of the queue.

What on earth are you talking about? Private assessments are used routinely by parents when asking for accommodations in school and for attaining an ehcp.