Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How would you fix the NHS?

969 replies

PinkFruitbat · 21/10/2024 07:37

The Government is asking for ideas on how to fix the NHS.

https://change.nhs.uk/en-GB/

What would you do to fix it?

https://change.nhs.uk/en-GB

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 07:54

That is endemic throughout the public sector... a new fire door plus fitting and disposal of the old door will be very expensive, so its patched because the budget doesn't allow for a new door.

Same with chucking a shovel full of tarmac into a pothole, they know it will wash out again but they don't have the 1000s required to resurface the area for a permanent fix.

To cost save, they buy cheaper quality tarmac, so they can do more temp pot hole repairs......

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:03

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 07:49

Err i'm not following your reasoning, you do know what a private company is don't you?

These were services provided by the NHS, now run by private companies... ie privatised....

Er, why does paying a sub-contracting private company (or even a doctor who practises in the private sector, as do many have always done) to do the work privatise anything? It’s all still owned by the NHS.

I’m not sure that you understand the meaning of ‘privatise’.

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:08

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:03

Er, why does paying a sub-contracting private company (or even a doctor who practises in the private sector, as do many have always done) to do the work privatise anything? It’s all still owned by the NHS.

I’m not sure that you understand the meaning of ‘privatise’.

No, because these were services provided solely by the NHS, then moved across into a private company, taking the former NHS staff across too, in order to keep the service running.

Thats the very definition of "privatisation" and you know it too.

& Livewell is not owned by the NHS.

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:16

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:08

No, because these were services provided solely by the NHS, then moved across into a private company, taking the former NHS staff across too, in order to keep the service running.

Thats the very definition of "privatisation" and you know it too.

& Livewell is not owned by the NHS.

Edited

No it isn’t. Privatisation is ownership of the service or asset. It’s not being a contractor.

When Labour nationalises the railways it’s not going to make the trains itself; the tracks will be made by private steel mills; there will still be catering suppliers; and so on. Will rail still be in private ownership? If so, you’d better tell the government.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 08:16

Windchimesandsong · 23/10/2024 22:41

Re older people having "benefited from the best times".

People aged over 85 were born before the NHS and the welfare state. One of DH's grandparents went to the dentist as soon as the NHS came in to get all his teeth taken out replaced by false teeth - because until the NHS he couldn't afford a dentist so his teeth were in a state. He knew lots of others who did the same.

Yes some were wealthy - like in any generation - but loads were in serious poverty. Many started life in pre-WW2 slums. Then they went through WW2. Bombings, rationing (which didn't fully end until the 50s). And the vast majority left school at 14 or 15 to start work (same for "boomers", and actually "Gen X").

As for benefiting from property boom. Some did, yes. Others didn't. Look up Rachman landlords.

And the Centre for Ageing Better's study last year
offers a clear rebuttal of the “wealthy baby boomer” narratives that have become so commonplace in public discourse, fueling intergenerational conflict and resentment towards our older population.

Although it is undeniable that there are wealthy older people, wealth inequality within older age groups is vastly greater than between older and younger age groups.

Edited

There are very very few people alive who have living memory of pre-war Britain, they are not who benefited from the property boom. We all know those born '45-65 have absolutely had blessed lives, born at the inception of the NHS, affordable housing, stable employment, consitently improving standard of living.

Thatsmyjob · 24/10/2024 08:24

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 08:16

There are very very few people alive who have living memory of pre-war Britain, they are not who benefited from the property boom. We all know those born '45-65 have absolutely had blessed lives, born at the inception of the NHS, affordable housing, stable employment, consitently improving standard of living.

I get really riled up when people talk about the war generation as if the old soldiers are alive now. They're not! If you were born in 1939 you would be 85 now. There is no (pre)war generation left anymore.

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:26

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 08:16

There are very very few people alive who have living memory of pre-war Britain, they are not who benefited from the property boom. We all know those born '45-65 have absolutely had blessed lives, born at the inception of the NHS, affordable housing, stable employment, consitently improving standard of living.

Yeah, rationing, rickets, polio, national service, post-war prefabs, the joys abound.

The standard of living has improved for every generation against the last. Financially, the assets held by the ‘blessed’ boomers will pass down. Then the inheriting generation will be whinged at by their children and grandchildren.

Cornercandy · 24/10/2024 08:32

Thatsmyjob · 24/10/2024 08:24

I get really riled up when people talk about the war generation as if the old soldiers are alive now. They're not! If you were born in 1939 you would be 85 now. There is no (pre)war generation left anymore.

Lost my DGM this year aged 96. She was average aged the care home. One is 104.

The last veterans of WW1 died 93 years after WW1 finished. With the life expectancy increasing, it would not surprise me that someone who fought in WW2 lives until 100 years after the war finished - ie 2045, another 21 years. This is probably someone who turned 18 in 1945 (born 1927) and saw a couple of months of fighting.

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:34

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:16

No it isn’t. Privatisation is ownership of the service or asset. It’s not being a contractor.

When Labour nationalises the railways it’s not going to make the trains itself; the tracks will be made by private steel mills; there will still be catering suppliers; and so on. Will rail still be in private ownership? If so, you’d better tell the government.

Edited

You re in the wrong and you know it, making yourself look foolish by digging in.

Services previously owned and provided by the NHS, "sold off" into a private company, is privatisation.

Caring on arguing with yourself.

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:42

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:34

You re in the wrong and you know it, making yourself look foolish by digging in.

Services previously owned and provided by the NHS, "sold off" into a private company, is privatisation.

Caring on arguing with yourself.

No, I’m in the right. You’re just spouting slogans.

Doin · 24/10/2024 08:48

The NHS should stop being worshipped. We should keep universality but adopt a more European social insurance model.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 08:51

Rummly · 24/10/2024 08:26

Yeah, rationing, rickets, polio, national service, post-war prefabs, the joys abound.

The standard of living has improved for every generation against the last. Financially, the assets held by the ‘blessed’ boomers will pass down. Then the inheriting generation will be whinged at by their children and grandchildren.

Rickets in those born post war ? Polio was vaccinated against from 1955 in 1961 there were only 161 cases worldwide. Yes if you were born at the beging of this period and v. unlucky you might have caught it, but most were vaccinated at school. Again rationing ceased in 1954 when the oldest of this age group were 8 or 9.

Living standards in the UK are falling and have been since 2008.

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:56

Doin · 24/10/2024 08:48

The NHS should stop being worshipped. We should keep universality but adopt a more European social insurance model.

Wouldn't that just be another "tax" ? with another layer of administration on top...

European countries spend more per head of population on health than we do, having done so for decades, so until that fundamental difference is addressed, healthcare in the UK will continue to lag.

Rummly · 24/10/2024 09:00

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 08:51

Rickets in those born post war ? Polio was vaccinated against from 1955 in 1961 there were only 161 cases worldwide. Yes if you were born at the beging of this period and v. unlucky you might have caught it, but most were vaccinated at school. Again rationing ceased in 1954 when the oldest of this age group were 8 or 9.

Living standards in the UK are falling and have been since 2008.

Okey dokey. How about measles, mumps, rubella and whooping cough? AIDS?

It’s not true that living standards have fallen since 2008. More to the point, every major indicator has been improving over time since 1945, the time you chose as a starting point.

YellowphantGrey · 24/10/2024 09:19

Vets and Private hospitals buy the equipment and have service plans but NHS hospitals rent equipment and upgrade when new are available

DH is one of 4 people employed to cover the UK by an overseas worldwide company who do this for the NHS.

He says he would rather be operated on in the NHS because the equipment is always latest model and stay at private because they are cleaner and more hygienic.

He also said ideally it would all happen at a private Vet because they score highest for equipment and cleanliness

PinkFruitbat · 24/10/2024 09:25

I am humbled by all of your wonderful comments, insights, and ideas.

OP posts:
Doin · 24/10/2024 09:44

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:56

Wouldn't that just be another "tax" ? with another layer of administration on top...

European countries spend more per head of population on health than we do, having done so for decades, so until that fundamental difference is addressed, healthcare in the UK will continue to lag.

These systems are more efficient. Some competition and choice is good. And people should be made to pay out of pocket for certain bits of healthcare.

By all means spend more.

taxguru · 24/10/2024 09:49

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 07:49

Err i'm not following your reasoning, you do know what a private company is don't you?

These were services provided by the NHS, now run by private companies... ie privatised....

It's been like that since the inception of the NHS. Most GPs have always been "private" businesses. Likewise most opticians and dentists offering NHS services. And pharmacies.

If you build a new hospital, you don't expect the builders to be employed directly by the NHS do you??

taxguru · 24/10/2024 09:52

Alexandra2001 · 24/10/2024 08:56

Wouldn't that just be another "tax" ? with another layer of administration on top...

European countries spend more per head of population on health than we do, having done so for decades, so until that fundamental difference is addressed, healthcare in the UK will continue to lag.

No more than Blair/Browns "extra" percentage on NIC to "save the NHS". It doesn't have to need a completely new set of rules. Just add a percentage point or two to income tax rates, or council tax, or VAT, or whatever, but ring-fence the amount generated to go straight to the NHS. (If that's the answer which I highly doubt!). After all, Brown/Blairs extra NIC didn't "save" the NHS it all - the money was just wasted on poor decision making.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 09:53

Rummly · 24/10/2024 09:00

Okey dokey. How about measles, mumps, rubella and whooping cough? AIDS?

It’s not true that living standards have fallen since 2008. More to the point, every major indicator has been improving over time since 1945, the time you chose as a starting point.

Edited

Real household incomes have been falling for everyone
Household incomes have been flat since the 2008 financial crisis, growing by less than 0.5% per year between 2007/08 and 2022/23.

From this:
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/how-have-living-standards-changed-since-2020/#:~:text=Real%20household%20incomes%20have%20been,%2F08%20and%202022%2F23.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 09:54

Of course the one group whose living standards and income have continued to rise in real terms over this periods over the over 65s.

Thatsmyjob · 24/10/2024 09:56

taxguru · 24/10/2024 09:49

It's been like that since the inception of the NHS. Most GPs have always been "private" businesses. Likewise most opticians and dentists offering NHS services. And pharmacies.

If you build a new hospital, you don't expect the builders to be employed directly by the NHS do you??

The NHS operates on a commissioning model, it buys in services through the use of very rigid contracts.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 09:57

Which means if the average has been flat some people's income has been reducing.

mumsneedwine · 24/10/2024 10:07

Is this helpful to anyone ? NHS has been under funded for 14 years, both in capital spending and wages.

How would you fix the NHS?
Neurodiversitydoctor · 24/10/2024 10:10

Another source

https://ifs.org.uk/news/past-15-years-have-been-worst-income-growth-generations

Not sure what you mean about measles, I had measles aged 1 in 1977, children still get measles now ( Andrew Wakefield, remember him?). AIDS- well pandemics happen (as we know) 1919, 'flu ? SARS , COVID not sure this was very unique to the post war generation.

Past 15 years have been worst for income growth in generations | Institute for Fiscal Studies

Weak income growth – widespread for richer and poorer people, older and younger people – has been with us since the Great Recession.

https://ifs.org.uk/news/past-15-years-have-been-worst-income-growth-generations