It was all seven or eight years earlier.
Some of this just depends whether you believe LL or the prosecution.
Nobody claimed there was anything odd at the time about LL’s observation of Child I.
It wasn’t disputed that a bung was off and the relevant doctor doesn’t seem to have denied leaving it off.
LL may have been mistaken about losing IV access or Dr Brearey may have lied. He certainly has form for lying.
On Child E, it was a mistake from LL (8 years later) to say the mother hadn’t visited when she had at 9 o’ clock but given the doctor arrived at 9.40 and the baby was stable, not evidence of anything suspicious.
On the track suit, I just find it annoying that the prosecution claim that Lucy Letby said she’d been dragged out of the house in her nightie seems to have been reported uncritically. She clearly said tracksuit bottoms over a nightie.