Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think if men had to have mammograms...

131 replies

YourSpleenIsDamp · 22/09/2024 13:32

... somebody would have invented a better way to do it? Still bruised three days later - chest and boobs - and holding poses while they get the right angle has set my arthritic shoulder off. I feel bad complaining about it, because obviously I'm grateful for the screening, but my god the soreness. It's brutal. Currently on yearly screening, looking forward to only needing it every three years when I turn 50. Maybe it's less awful without F cups? But my mum is an A cup and she finds it horrendous too! Any advice for making it more bearable?

OP posts:
Edingril · 24/09/2024 06:30

Do men have to be blamed for everything? They get prostate checks that don't sound the most pleasant experience in the 'I am so hard done by olympics'

FarmGirl78 · 24/09/2024 06:40

You're being unreasonable just because you seem to think that a woman couldn't possibly be an engineer, a scientist or a research fellow and it's just down to men to invent these things as they're the only ones capable of doing such jobs.

CrochetForLife · 24/09/2024 09:37

They're free and recommended every two years once you turn 40 in Australia. I'm a G/double G cup and find it uncomfortable but never any bruising. Maybe because there is so much of my boobs the machine doesn't rest on my chest? I find standing in an odd position the worst of it. I get lower back pain (mostly because of the size of my boobs I think). My mum has much smaller boobs and finds it more uncomfortable/painful. Maybe it depends on the size? I had a scare earlier this year in February and was called back for further testing in March then again last year (just a swollen milk duct), been given the all clear til February 2026 when I'm due again for it.

Coruscations · 26/09/2024 00:04

Ifoughthefight · 22/09/2024 19:23

aint doing one , period

Why not?

Eggseggslegs · 26/09/2024 15:29

DisenchantedOwl · 24/09/2024 03:17

Please I ask a you a question? I am now 51 and likely to be invited for a mammogram soon. I have mental health issues and am neurodivergent. I can't cope with the sensation of being squashed at all. Definitely not on my breasts. I don't like them being squashed or pulled about (or even moving really). There's no way I'll cope with a mammogram, it's likely to leave me suicidal as it will trigger one of my MH conditions, especially if I am mauled about like some of the stories on this thread!!!

Interestingly my mum went for one mammogram, found it absolutely horrendous and never went back and she is really really stoical about such things and has a high pain threshold.. So that's also making me think I won't cope as no-one would describe me as stoical!!!

So mammograms are not an option for me. My question is would it be worth me paying for an MRI instead? I've had a head one and that didn't touch me so assuming they are the same? Appreciate they may not be as good as a mammogram as you've said but wondered whether they are worth considering if mammograms are not an option at all. What would the pros and cons of the MRI. Is there a greater risk of false positives for example?

Or should I just stick to self-exams at home?

Thank you!🙏

Hi, I'd give a mammogram a go if you can, try taking pain relief before and explain your anxiety to the mammographer. Maybe ring first and see if they can give extra time at the hospital, we do have techniques to minimise the compression if patients are really struggling. MRI isn't really a screening tool but I guess you could discuss best options with a breast surgeon privately if you wanted. Self examination is ok but we can find things years earlier! Good luck.

Rosscameasdoody · 26/09/2024 19:30

Coruscations · 26/09/2024 00:04

Why not?

Presumably because they haven’t actually thought it through. A few minutes discomfort to rule out cancer, or to find one early enough to be treated and possibly cured is preferable to the consequences of a cancer which goes undiagnosed. If the test is there why not have it ?

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread