It does make me wonder sometimes
Children in this country had a label tied around their necks, they were shoved onto trains and shipped around the country to complete strangers who in some cases physically and mentally abused them, they were sometimes forced to work on the farms/shops etc. Not everyone got a Mr Tom. I'm not sure on this but I don't think they were sent to one place en-masse from a school so they didn't see their friends, they could of course write. Not sure just how many people had a telephone or the financial means to use one. They also didn't know if their parents were going to survive the bombs
Those who refused to go (my mom) spent nights in the air raid shelters (again not my mom neither she or my grandmother would go down) but still had to hand their homework in the next day, no excuses
Parents sent their children away because they thought it was best for them. I expect many of those children would disagree.
Were studies done on the effects this had on them? I don't believe so, it was war.
Perhaps we should remind ourselves of this fact when there are constant studies on how lockdown has affected children. Yes they were scared, don't blame them, but they were with their parents, could visually communicate with their friends even if they couldn't physically meet up with them.
I don't want to minimise either of these groups experiences and it's not a race to the bottom. It's just something that has bothered me