Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

October budget going to be painful

1000 replies

increasinglyconcerned · 27/08/2024 10:26

Here we go..... I knew it. Labour were promising not to hike our taxes in the election campaign and here we are.... apparently they discovered £22 billion black hole in his first weeks in the role and it's not his fault.

Let me guess, those of us who earn six figures and already pay 45% will pay EVEN more and take home even less. It's the hard workers who will take the brunt. What's the point in working anymore!

I earn a little over £120k and I'm taxed the same as those earrings £500k.

Before people jump in saying they don't feel sorry for me, I work full time to support my family, as of January I will have 2 DCs in nursery, plus my mortgage and get ZERO free hours childcare, whilst they keep promising free childcare but I just pay more for everyone else to benefit.

I cannot afford to pay more taxes to fix this country and especially when so many people are getting a free ride and not paying their way, ranging from millionaires with tax havens to those claiming benefits dishonestly.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
BIossomtoes · 28/08/2024 22:22

Trust me, I don’t.

Aduvetday · 28/08/2024 22:39

Trying to show how debt increasing is proof Labour are solid - it’s a monumental failure for anyone with half an ounce of understanding of what is being described.

The deficit was huge. That means that we were spending far more than we received as a country. The deficit needed to be reduced - not the debt. Until the deficit is 0 and we break even the debt increases. We are borrowing to meet our outgoings. Sure let’s reduce the debt - to do that means instantly reducing the deficit. Fine - cut welfare and pensions. Then we aren’t borrowing. Obviously that can’t be done…

We still have a deficit as the original was so huge…plus Covid. That means we are spending more each month than we collect. With the highest tax burden in real and recent times; this means huge change is needed and our state reliance bill isn’t sustainable. Not enough being put in by the majority and too much going out to the majority. Very basic maths. Think of it like calories - we are an overweight state.

It’s genuinely terrifying that people think they know it all and worse can vote when they don’t understand basics like deficit and debt.

Thistlewoman · 28/08/2024 22:54

Anyone who voted for UK Labour and didn't expect their taxes to be raised is-frankly-an idiot. Keir Starmer would have promised anything to get into Downing Street. Now reality is hitting. Thank goodness I live in Scotland-Starmer's duplicity has guaranteed we'll get Independence sooner rather than later!

Thistlewoman · 28/08/2024 22:55

increasinglyconcerned · 27/08/2024 10:26

Here we go..... I knew it. Labour were promising not to hike our taxes in the election campaign and here we are.... apparently they discovered £22 billion black hole in his first weeks in the role and it's not his fault.

Let me guess, those of us who earn six figures and already pay 45% will pay EVEN more and take home even less. It's the hard workers who will take the brunt. What's the point in working anymore!

I earn a little over £120k and I'm taxed the same as those earrings £500k.

Before people jump in saying they don't feel sorry for me, I work full time to support my family, as of January I will have 2 DCs in nursery, plus my mortgage and get ZERO free hours childcare, whilst they keep promising free childcare but I just pay more for everyone else to benefit.

I cannot afford to pay more taxes to fix this country and especially when so many people are getting a free ride and not paying their way, ranging from millionaires with tax havens to those claiming benefits dishonestly.

Anyone who voted for UK Labour and didn't expect their taxes to be raised is-frankly-an idiot. Keir Starmer would have promised anything to get into Downing Street. Now reality is hitting. Thank goodness I live in Scotland-Starmer's duplicity has guaranteed we'll get Independence sooner rather than later!

BlazenWeights · 28/08/2024 22:55

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 28/08/2024 05:32

You're forgetting about the fact that as a society we actually need people doing certain roles. But we don't value them and they get paid next to nothing.

My point wasn't about certain industries being valued. It was about the country as a whole placing less value on roles that, if not filled, we'd crumble without.

It's messed up, and your response proves you're completely unaware of the real problems and only money focused.

I agree with you on your first two paragraphs. Respectfully disagree on your last. More value should be placed on some jobs at least more than they are being done right now but hey I don’t make the rules. Don’t blame me.

MumsGoneToIceland · 28/08/2024 22:56

So far, labour have stated they won’t raise individual taxes and all indications are it will be inheritance and capital gain tax rises. So what makes you think they will raise your tax rate?

DdraigGoch · 28/08/2024 22:57

taxguru · 27/08/2024 12:16

How? Most cruise ships are registered in tax havens like Panama, are owned by foreign cruise line firms, etc. You'd need some kind of international tax treaty to tax them more. This is the problem with the global economy! Successive governments have been negotiating and trying to find international agreement to stop/curtail tax havens, but unsurprisingly the tax havens don't want to play ball. What can we do? Do you want to nuke places like the Isle of Man to force them to give up their tax haven statuses? Cruises don't even charge VAT or duties on booze or fags because they only open their shops whilst out at sea, so you can't buy from their shops when docked!

Another "nice idea in theory" but completely impossible in practice.

I'd crack down on the ferries. Any vessel that is in British waters for at least 186 days (a "day" here defined as any part of a calendar day) should comply with British employment laws, minimum wage etc. No more cases of P&O or Irish Ferries sacking their entire workforce and employing Filipinos on a pittance. No, they should pay a living wage.

BlazenWeights · 28/08/2024 22:57

Thistlewoman · 28/08/2024 22:55

Anyone who voted for UK Labour and didn't expect their taxes to be raised is-frankly-an idiot. Keir Starmer would have promised anything to get into Downing Street. Now reality is hitting. Thank goodness I live in Scotland-Starmer's duplicity has guaranteed we'll get Independence sooner rather than later!

Good Lord! I hope we don’t get Independence anytime soon. SNP is 10 times worse than Labour could ever be. Bunch of corrupt and inept clowns. By the we already pay more tax and still ….

VickyPollard25 · 28/08/2024 23:10

zarf2007 · 28/08/2024 20:41

Thats fine Labour because I, and others like me on £100k+ will just dine out less, buy less goods, make our own lunches and not buy them. Screw your economy. Lets see how fast it grows then.

This is exactly right. I’ve not bought a take away coffee in ages, I bring my own lunch on the days I go in to the office. During summer holidays I’ve gone in very infrequently. It saves a lot on train fare and lunches, coffees etc. I’m also at the age where I’d rather drink nice wine in crystal glasses at my home with friends than pay more for lesser quality wine at pubs and bars.

Im with you. Screw them.

Thistlewoman · 28/08/2024 23:13

MumsGoneToIceland · 28/08/2024 22:56

So far, labour have stated they won’t raise individual taxes and all indications are it will be inheritance and capital gain tax rises. So what makes you think they will raise your tax rate?

They'll go after pensions too. Not pensioners per se-those with company and personal pensions. They are the soft underbelly of tax hikes.

keffie12 · 28/08/2024 23:22

@increasinglyconcerned you clearly have no clue about benefits if you think you wouldn't be much worse off. They certainly wouldn't pay your mortgage either. They only pay towards rent

Basic for a single person not on longterm sick is £400 approx per month plus the monies per child.

For the first child it is approx £333 and the 2nd child is £287.

More is available to help towards childcare.

Once your child is 2 if your on UC you are actively made to look for work.

It's not the fancy life you think it is. Incidently, Dr's, nurses, cleaners, porters etc all work just as hard if not harder for far less

Thistlewoman · 28/08/2024 23:24

BlazenWeights · 28/08/2024 22:57

Good Lord! I hope we don’t get Independence anytime soon. SNP is 10 times worse than Labour could ever be. Bunch of corrupt and inept clowns. By the we already pay more tax and still ….

I agree that the SNP are a bunch of clowns... but so are UK Labour. And Keir Starmer and his duplicity will drive a huge increase in votes for Indy parties. Most Scots would rather pay huge taxes into the Scottish Exchequer rather than the bottomless pit which is RUK.

VickyPollard25 · 28/08/2024 23:30

WickerwomanIamnot · 27/08/2024 11:17

Cry me a river. I am an unpaid carer caring about 80 hours per week for two disabled family members. I get £81 per week. I am not sure what to say for someone working less hours and taking home almost 30000 as much. 🤷

Who pays you £81? Is that a carer’s benefit from the Government?

CrowleyKitten · 28/08/2024 23:54

VickyPollard25 · 28/08/2024 19:58

Pride in herself?

so, if you earn less, you are less worthy of having pride in yourself?

people who earn more aren't better than people who earn less, or more worthy of being proud of themselves. I'm an unpaid carer with chronic pain and fatigue issues of my own. am I proud of myself? yes I am. I'm strong and resilient, even if not physically. I might be paid a pittance in carers allowance, but I can hold my head high, even if I'm not paying income tax.

Nadeed · 28/08/2024 23:58

It is carers allowance. For anyone caring for someone caring for someone at least 35 hours a week. It used to be the same as unemployment benefit for a single person, but is now less. It means you do not have to look for work. The person you are caring for has to be in receipt of certain disability benefits. You can only earn up to £151 a week. Earn any more and you do not get Carers allowance.

CrowleyKitten · 28/08/2024 23:58

VickyPollard25 · 28/08/2024 23:30

Who pays you £81? Is that a carer’s benefit from the Government?

yes, that is carers allowance. still worth less than job seekers allowance, even though JSA is a temporary situation, and being a carer usually isn't. we're told it's "not supposed to replace a wage"
basically, we're told over and over again, you save the government a lot of money, but you're worth less than someone temporarily out of work

Nadeed · 29/08/2024 00:01

There is no check on whether people are caring for the person 35 hours a week. For those caring for someone with complex disabilities or illnesses it is far too little. But for others it is in reality a perk. So someone could be working get PIP and their partner could claim carers allowance and stay at home with their child while the disabled partner is at work.

CrowleyKitten · 29/08/2024 00:06

nearlylovemyusername · 28/08/2024 21:26

I wonder if people ever check government gateway as to How your tax was spent?

This is last tax year snapshot:

How can this be that we spend almost 20% of out taxes on NHS and still have such appalling service? isn't this obvious that the issue is not funding but the way it's being managed?

Is everyone happy with 20% of their taxes going to welfare? this doesn't include state pensions.

With interests going down it's prudent to expect National Debt Interest going down and substantial amount being released.

It's really not obvious to me why there is a need for even more taxes rather than fundamental review of spend.

I do think that the real agenda of this government is redistribution and that's it.

so, you're not okay with disabled people and their carers getting the bare minimum to survive on?

fine. cut disability and carer benefits, then what? we'll be homeless and starve, shall we?

CrowleyKitten · 29/08/2024 00:09

Scrollbreadroll · 28/08/2024 21:40

The amount we pay out in welfare is a massive issue. This is why it baffles me when people say benefits/benefit fraud is a drop in the ocean. It’s really not.

there is actually more that goes unclaimed than is claimed either fraudulently or in error (those statistics are combined into one and still make up less than 1%)

if, tomorrow, everyone received what they were entitled to and nobody received what they weren't entitled to, the cost of social security in this country would go up, not down.

BlazenWeights · 29/08/2024 00:38

Thistlewoman · 28/08/2024 23:24

I agree that the SNP are a bunch of clowns... but so are UK Labour. And Keir Starmer and his duplicity will drive a huge increase in votes for Indy parties. Most Scots would rather pay huge taxes into the Scottish Exchequer rather than the bottomless pit which is RUK.

Honestly it feels like we are screwed either way 😬

Thistlewoman · 29/08/2024 00:45

BlazenWeights · 29/08/2024 00:38

Honestly it feels like we are screwed either way 😬

Totally agree with you on that!! 👍🏻

DoodleDoo37 · 29/08/2024 01:13

Julia3703 · 28/08/2024 18:32

Are you seriously looking for sympathy? Suck it up…. You are lucky to be on that salary, it doesn’t mean you work harder than anyone else…. If you don’t like it, reduce your earnings then you won’t pay so much tax…..

And if every high earner takes that attitude what happens? There will less tax revenues and what then? Why is it always reduce your salary and pay less tax - why is it never keep going keep working and the system will help you. The richer people are the less they will rely on public services and there will be more for those who actually need them.

Pinkstripepurplespot · 29/08/2024 01:16

nearlylovemyusername · 27/08/2024 10:55

Interesting as whenever there is a struggler on benefits who has multiple kids the answer is always "she can't just shove them back" but it's a fair game to suggest this to high earner.

Op, I'm with you but this was very much expected.

Starmer is very clear:

"I promised that this government would serve people like you," he says.
"Apprentices, teachers, nurses, small business owners, firefighters, those serving our community and our country every day."

Politics latest: Starmer giving major speech in Downing Street ahead of parliament's return | Politics News | Sky News

This government won't serve anyone in private sector on above min wage, pensioner etc.

Op, try to see what you can do in terms of reducing your hours to save on childcare/ get below threshold to get free hours. Maybe having lower mortgage repayments would help.

I fully anticipate a lot of higher earners will reduce hours dramatically or retire early. This is not to say that high achievers and wealthy are already leaving UK in droves

So what? There will be other workers to replace them.

Retire early and open a spot for the next person. Move abroad, your job will be filled by someone else.

We are still a large economy with low regulation and high consumerism; a market business want to operate within.

So much moaning.

Pinkstripepurplespot · 29/08/2024 01:20

Charlie2121 · 27/08/2024 10:57

The reality is that people will do a lot less. If the tax burden gets any higher I may well look at going part time and limiting income to 99.9k. There are a lot of others who feel the same.

The biggest mistake Labour are about to ale where higher earners are concerned is if they reduce tax relief in pension contributions. That would remove the one significant benefit of earning over 100k.

And? If your job needs doing, they’ll find someone else to make up the rest of it when you go part time. Until we are at zero unemployment and stop
importing workers, all that happens when someone goes part time is that someone else gets the rest of the job. Do people really believe that if they go p/t, their employers will decide to downscale operations? Madness

DoodleDoo37 · 29/08/2024 01:27

Shakeoffyourchains · 28/08/2024 19:41

Taxes are low, you've just gotten so used to it you think they're high. Someone earning the equivalent of £25k today in 1970 was paying 41% basic rate tax, somone on £100k was closer to 79%, in 1980 it was 30% and 60%, today it's 20% and 40%/45%.

But I must say, it's quite a feat that your poverty stricken mum was able to send you to private school, almost as impressive as your ability to have never used a road, sewer, hospital, garage, shop, bus or building. I mean that's the only way you could get "nothing out the state system".

The only thing worse than a silver spoon elitist is someone who has experienced hardship and wants to pull the ladder up behind them now they're doing alright. But enjoy your low tax, low cost, well funded utopia wherever that may be.

Please do not be sarcastic about my Mum - you tone implies it - and for your information I did not go to private school - please do not make assumptions like that - OR is it you believe that I could only be where I am with a private school education - which reflects what you think about the state system here perhaps - in fact I didn't grow up in this country - but at least the public state system where I did grow up was first class for those who wanted to get on and do well. And for all the services you refer to that I have used - hospital - roads - sewers - buses etc - I have PAID my way to use those services - either through separate bills (road tax council tax NI contributions) or are you saying that's not enough??? I am referring to unemployment benefits - rent allowances - etc not services that I and all other tax payers have paid to use. And I am not pulling any ladder up behind me - I am merely saying that a marginal rate of 47% to pay in tax should be sufficient. And if taxes are so low as you say - why do I keep hearing the tax burden is the highest it's been since WW2??

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.