Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Married before kids?

46 replies

AdviceNeededplesse · 19/08/2024 14:41

Hello. Please can anyone tell me what the pros of being married before having children are? Sorry if I’m being extremely dense.

I read a lot that it offers financial security (and I totally agree) but what if DP and I both earn the same and neither of us are likely to go on to be high earners? Does it matter so much then?

For context DP and I are desperate to start a family sooner than later and time is of the essence as I have endometriosis so this may be a lengthy process. The original plan was to start trying this September however after much thought we have decided to get married in a very low key wedding next year first as we want the security of being married before children.

After discussing with my friends who have kids they all seem to think this is stupid as they all have children without being married and they don’t think it impacts them. They pointed out we are unlikely to be rich and neither of us are set to inherit anything. I know marriage before children is the sensible idea but I can’t seem to think of why other than financial. Am I being old fashioned here?

OP posts:
EllieQ · 19/08/2024 20:03

Lots of great explanations here about the legal implications of marriage. I can only add a more superficial comment that before children you are more likely to have the money for a wedding and the free time and energy to plan it!

Once children come along, you are likely to have a reduced income (on maternity leave/ working part time/ paying for nursery) and there’s always something else to pay for. If we hadn’t got married before having a child, I can see it would be easy just to keep putting it off.

JaketheVaulter · 19/08/2024 20:07

When I was young I wanted a legal contract so we both knew exactly where we stood and had some rights if we split.

Now I'm older for the inheritance tax benefits!

museumum · 19/08/2024 20:07

It would be EXTREMELY unusual if having children did not impact one parent’s career, earnings, pension and future earnings more than the other's.
Usually it’s the woman as she usually takes more of the leave. Even just being a mother can count against you in some careers.
The joining of assets by marriage is an important mitigation for this.

HeliotropePJs · 19/08/2024 20:10

A lot of people who get married do so because that's part of their culture and a declaration of their commitment to staying together through thick and thin. Yes, many who marry don't actually end up staying together, but for some of us, the wedding vows still hold a great deal of meaning.

There doesn't have to be any other reason for it.

DreadPirateRobots · 19/08/2024 20:11

Let's say for a moment that your DC happens to be born with significant health problems or SEN. They can't attend "normal" childcare for any length of time. So one of you is going to be giving up or significantly curtailing work, inevitably. Which one of you do you think that's likely to be?

That's when marriage matters. When the rubber hits the road and things go to shit in a way you never planned. When one of you spends years not working or not working very much because of DC or health issues. When one of you gets hit by a bus or dies of an undiagnosed cardiac anomaly and everything is a million times easier because you have that legal tie.

EllieQ · 19/08/2024 20:12

RadoxRita · 19/08/2024 19:45

The IFS published a paper not long ago on the (statistically) different outcomes of children (social, emotional, etc,) who are born to married versus cohabiting couples. I think it is fairly easy to Google if you're interested.

Is this the one you mean?

IFS Study

The summary seems to say that there are differences in outcomes, but they are more likely to be linked to the type of people who get married - higher income, higher levels of education, etc.

thicklysettled · 19/08/2024 20:19

Summertimer · 19/08/2024 16:07

It seems fashionable to marry after kids these days. It’s a thing that’s recently become more fashionable again having been a late 1960s and 70s thing for some.

I personally didn’t get married to have children. It was part of the logical progression of the romance.

I think it’s good that we live in an era when it’s socially acceptable to get married when you already have kids without parents of the bride and groom feeling embarrassed.

If you are getting married or civilly partnered for financial security etc. then the ceremony and reception might only feel necessary for family.

There’s lots of different ways to look at it. Ultimately, you should do what’s right for you. And only you can know what feels right,

I'm not sure I'd agree that it's "fashionable" to have children first, though I'd agree that the era of the stigma of being an "unmarried mother" has thankfully passed (never an "unmarried father" who was scorned, was it?)

I actually think that for parents, marital status is a class indicator (divider?). All of the MC people I know were married before kids, even the "non traditional" ones. Whereas my WC family or origin, and friends, seem to have kids and then talk loosely about getting married "one day". That "one day" rarely comes, in my experience, and it's typically the male partner with all of the "Why bother with a wedding, kids are more of a commitment" lines, whereas the female partner is either quietly unhappy or kids herself that "We're as good as married anyway."

If I sound cynical it because I am. I actually wonder if some of your unmarried friends are telling you not to bother because their partners haven't shown any interest in marrying them.

thicklysettled · 19/08/2024 20:21

GreatMistakes · 19/08/2024 15:27

Financial protection.

So many men decide not to marry once they have kids because they hold all the cards so don't want to weaken their position.

As an example, say after maternity leave, someone has to work part time. Your partner receives 5% uplift because of his performance in the last 12 months. You get 3% because they can't assess you as exceeding, nor can they say you are underperformed. Or he gets a promotion and you don't. Who works full time? Him.

You go part time because its cheaper for you to be off than him. Or you fall for the Storybook line that you might as well be off because your salary is cancelled out by childcare. Then you're working part time and hoping he is prepared to share "his" money that "he has worked hard for" while you've had a "baby holiday". You also end up paying for baby clubs and clothes.

Suddenly you are on baby 2 and he is earning relatively more and you give up work because he comes and goes as he wants and won't commit to nursery pick ups and you're better off not working and paying a pension or getting your yearly 5% and then he leaves you. You can't pay bills, you've not kept your skills up to fate, you aren't sighted on his salary or account and you have no recompense to his pension in a split.

Or say he has a horrible accident. The money is due to his child if you have one or his parents if you don't. Either way, how do you think you'll access his personal account or pay bills during this time?

Marriage is there to protect you from breakups and tragedies.

This is a brilliant post and should be tagged on every "my boyfriend wants kids but doesn't want to get married" post!

JaketheVaulter · 19/08/2024 20:22

DreadPirateRobots · 19/08/2024 20:11

Let's say for a moment that your DC happens to be born with significant health problems or SEN. They can't attend "normal" childcare for any length of time. So one of you is going to be giving up or significantly curtailing work, inevitably. Which one of you do you think that's likely to be?

That's when marriage matters. When the rubber hits the road and things go to shit in a way you never planned. When one of you spends years not working or not working very much because of DC or health issues. When one of you gets hit by a bus or dies of an undiagnosed cardiac anomaly and everything is a million times easier because you have that legal tie.

Exactly this!

Peonies12 · 20/08/2024 07:27

Your friends might change their tune if their partners up and left them. Even with equal incomes and if you plan to return full time, all women I know have made career and financial sacrifices once they’ve had kids, and being married means that if the relationship ends, there is a legal framework around the break up. Just have a low key wedding as soon as you, and then TTC. Why wait.

Hateam · 20/08/2024 07:35

Catza · 19/08/2024 14:47

There is no benefit except financial protection. And that only really kicks in if you are separated and then get 50/50 split of assets. I don't see a point in it either, OP.

So, quite a significant benefit then.

Catza · 20/08/2024 07:42

Hateam · 20/08/2024 07:35

So, quite a significant benefit then.

If you read OP’s post she asked if there are any other benefits aside from financial. Cue all responses outlining financial benefits. She didn’t actually ask for that at all.

DreadPirateRobots · 20/08/2024 07:47

Catza · 20/08/2024 07:42

If you read OP’s post she asked if there are any other benefits aside from financial. Cue all responses outlining financial benefits. She didn’t actually ask for that at all.

It also hugely simplifies inheritance, post-death administration and legal affairs, and serious illness. There is a reason hospitals will organise bedside weddings. Because marriage really matters when the chips are down.

MollyButton · 20/08/2024 07:47

The two biggest reasons that relationships break up are:
An affair
Money

It is a mistake to ever forget money. And even if your incomes seem equal now the inheritance tax advantages are massive. And a lot of houses put people into the inheritance tax bracket

Sparklesandbeer · 20/08/2024 07:53

Depends what one plans in life and current situation.
We have it easier with visa in places (different passports), next of kin so make certain decision if needed (though you can nominate in medical decisions but how many peoppe really think aboit doing that), and some people simply want to be married.
Financially it makes sense sometimes even without kids. Inheritance (we have them spread across countries), tax, pension, in our case no need for wills really (various laws some don't really do wills as UK, eg. Can't leave out heir or spouse unless prescribed reasons etc).

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 20/08/2024 07:57

I don't think there are any objective benefits other than legal and financial. But legal and financial protections are often vital.

Supersimkin7 · 20/08/2024 07:58

You’re financially equal now.

You won’t be in 15 years after kids.

Marriage keeps you equal.

Cohabiting lets him skip off with all the cash and lovely kids but no pesky parenting or family bills.

Cohabiting benefits men even more than marriage does.

At the direct expense of women. And children.

MsNeis · 20/08/2024 08:11

Hi there! I just wanted to say that, unless there are religious concerns, I don't think that it's so important that the marriage be before having your child. I mean, as long as there's a commitment to marriage and to raise your kids within this family set up, then I would say it doesn't impact them if you marry when they're already born.
I admit that I don't have legal knowledge so I don't know if there are particularities of both situations. But ultimately, I think the most important think is that, if this is the family structure that you want, you both commit to it and build it with intention. Marriage is an ongoing project, anyway :-)
As a fellow "endowarrior", I wish you the best of luck! 💐🍀

Hateam · 20/08/2024 08:19

MsNeis · 20/08/2024 08:11

Hi there! I just wanted to say that, unless there are religious concerns, I don't think that it's so important that the marriage be before having your child. I mean, as long as there's a commitment to marriage and to raise your kids within this family set up, then I would say it doesn't impact them if you marry when they're already born.
I admit that I don't have legal knowledge so I don't know if there are particularities of both situations. But ultimately, I think the most important think is that, if this is the family structure that you want, you both commit to it and build it with intention. Marriage is an ongoing project, anyway :-)
As a fellow "endowarrior", I wish you the best of luck! 💐🍀

I think you're looking through the world with rose-tinted spectacles.

I don't plan to burn down my house, I still take out insurance though- just in case.

MsNeis · 20/08/2024 08:29

Hateam · 20/08/2024 08:19

I think you're looking through the world with rose-tinted spectacles.

I don't plan to burn down my house, I still take out insurance though- just in case.

Maybe you're right. After reading all the other advise, I see the benefits of marrying before the child is born.
However, I think I misunderstood the OP: I thought she meant that she had the wedding already planned and that she wanted to start ttc now. That's why I said that if it's a matter of months or a year tops, as long as they are actually getting married next september, it doesn't impact their kid if they're already born next september? That's what I meant.
I personally got married before having my dc, and because I believed in the "institution", but I know what it's like ttc while going against the clock, so I wanted to lift some pressure.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page