Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Inheritance and care home fees

594 replies

Hateam · 17/08/2024 11:59

Hello!

My mother-in-law is in a care home.

My wife, her daughter, is also in a care home for medical - non age related- issues. My council are paying for my wife's care as we have under £24500 in savings.

When my MIL dies (she's 94) my wife will inherit about £180,000.

We don't want this money going to Essex CC.

Is there anything we can?

Could my MIL's will be changed to remove my wife and replace her with me? She is still of sound mind.

Could the money go into an account in my sole name?

I am aware of the concept of deprivation of assets.

OP posts:
Iwasafool · 17/08/2024 13:21

BIossomtoes · 17/08/2024 13:16

I was talking generally hence “the person needing care”.

OH I thought this was about the OP and his wife particularly when you referred to him being greedy.

Happyher · 17/08/2024 13:21

The council won’t take the money off your wife all at once - they will
bill her presumably monthly her share of the care costs. If she wants to spend her money on day trips etc she can still do that as it’s not deliberate deprivation. If she hasn’t got capacity to make these decisions the council will appoint someone to ensure she doesn’t suffer financial abuse

Hateam · 17/08/2024 13:21

DixonD · 17/08/2024 12:58

@Hateam can I PM you please?

Yes

OP posts:
ChickenTikkaKebabs · 17/08/2024 13:22

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 13:21

I’m not saying it’s not possible for MiL to make decisions about who she wills the money to. I’m saying that the LA will treat it as deprivation of assets. If MiL makes her will now and leaves everything to her daughter, once she runs out of money the LA will refuse to fund her care because as far as they are concerned she had a reasonable expectation of needing care when she made the will. She can’t escape that because she’s already in care !!

It's about timing.

The 7 year rule may apply here as it does to giving away assets to avoid inheritance tax.

But I'm not sure so the OP needs legal advice.

anonhop · 17/08/2024 13:23

Without commenting on the morality of all this, 100% get your MIL to speak to a solicitor, if this is what she wants to avoid. There are options such as changing her will & trusts.

Ryeman · 17/08/2024 13:24

Happyher · 17/08/2024 13:21

The council won’t take the money off your wife all at once - they will
bill her presumably monthly her share of the care costs. If she wants to spend her money on day trips etc she can still do that as it’s not deliberate deprivation. If she hasn’t got capacity to make these decisions the council will appoint someone to ensure she doesn’t suffer financial abuse

This is true. A lump sum could even be invested to provide a small income before it’s needed for the care costs.

Ryeman · 17/08/2024 13:26

Iwasafool · 17/08/2024 13:08

Do you think care homes are like prisons? I'm retired but worked for a company that ran care homes, our residents were out for meals, to shows and even (shock horror) on foreign holidays. Some only needed one carer, others would need two or three but they were still entitled to a life. One person can't give the 24/7 care that may be needed but it doesn't mean there shouldn't be any fun in life.

So true, my Dad is in a home and even has a car!! (albeit against our advice). They don’t all just sit around watching tv all day.

MrsSkylerWhite · 17/08/2024 13:26

Sorry but I think if we can we should meet our own care costs. We have to pay our way through adult life. Why should that stop just because we’re old?

Iwasafool · 17/08/2024 13:26

Rosscameasdoody · 17/08/2024 13:21

I’m not saying it’s not possible for MiL to make decisions about who she wills the money to. I’m saying that the LA will treat it as deprivation of assets. If MiL makes her will now and leaves everything to her daughter, once she runs out of money the LA will refuse to fund her care because as far as they are concerned she had a reasonable expectation of needing care when she made the will. She can’t escape that because she’s already in care !!

I don't think you understand about leaving money in a will. If her will says she is leaving everything to her daughter then her daughter will get what is left after her mother has paid for her care up to her death. There is no deprivation of assets as no money will go to the daughter or any beneficiary until the mother dies.

Zanatdy · 17/08/2024 13:27

Any grandchildren who can inherit? It is frustrating but that’s the law. You’re on dodgy grounds coercing an old lady to change her will for you to benefit. It’s joint money anyway as you’re married

ilovesooty · 17/08/2024 13:27

Bluefields96 · 17/08/2024 12:45

You need to speak to a solicitor.

If your MIL still has capacity she can change her will. She should leave her money to a discretionary trust. The income from the trust can then be used to benefit whoever the trustees choose, including you and/or your wife. Any payments would need to ensure that neither of you exceeded the benefits savings cap.

There are tax and admin implications but a solicitor will be able to advise.

Many families with dependents in care do this.

It's about time steps were taken to stop people playing the system. And if the OP's wife does inherit money it should be used to pay for her care. The OP just wants the taxpayer to foot the bill.

Hateam · 17/08/2024 13:27

Thank you fir all your responses.

My wife is permanently disabled following surgery on multiple brain tumors.

I feel the state should pay for the care of people with disabilities. The council have assessed her as in need of 24 hour care.

OP posts:
Iwasafool · 17/08/2024 13:27

Ryeman · 17/08/2024 13:26

So true, my Dad is in a home and even has a car!! (albeit against our advice). They don’t all just sit around watching tv all day.

I hope he's having a great time. Our residents loved their trips out and holidays.

rozzyraspberry · 17/08/2024 13:28

I8toys · 17/08/2024 13:13

I understand I really do. MIL is in a dementia home and receiving excellent care at the princely sum of £2,000 a week.

Its hard to see their carefully saved money being used for this when those without funds get it paid for free in the same home. Of course everyone should get care but those paying are funding those who aren't. Quality of care should be equal.

Its pointless saving anything. Its an absolutely rubbish system, a contribution yes of course but not everything they own and have saved for their entire life.

Also, if you suffer from cancer or another physical illness you get funded care through nhs. But if you have dementia you have to self fund. That’s definitely a rubbish system.

ChickenTikkaKebabs · 17/08/2024 13:28

@Hateam My understanding was that if someone needs medical care it's possibly funded by the NHS. Not the family.

Have you had proper advice on this?

I've never heard of anyone having to declare savings for a spouse with a medical condition, who would need care for 30+ years.

pgtips2 · 17/08/2024 13:29

Kelly51 · 17/08/2024 12:28

You don't want the council to get the money to pay for your wife care but are happy for them to fund it, what am I reading??

To be fair, in a welfare state surely the state indirectly through everyone's tax paid (including OP) should fund this?

ChickenTikkaKebabs · 17/08/2024 13:29

rozzyraspberry · 17/08/2024 13:28

Also, if you suffer from cancer or another physical illness you get funded care through nhs. But if you have dementia you have to self fund. That’s definitely a rubbish system.

This is why I wonder if the OP is confused.

If his wife has an illness that is not dementia, and her care is being funded now, why would his savings be relevant?

BlackShuck3 · 17/08/2024 13:30

OP is about to become very wealthy, and is looking for a way to avoid paying their way in life.
I guess that's just how the rich get to stay rich isn't it 🤷🏻‍♀️

Hateam · 17/08/2024 13:30

ChickenTikkaKebabs · 17/08/2024 13:28

@Hateam My understanding was that if someone needs medical care it's possibly funded by the NHS. Not the family.

Have you had proper advice on this?

I've never heard of anyone having to declare savings for a spouse with a medical condition, who would need care for 30+ years.

Edited

I'm very early on in this process.
My council just said if I my wife has more than £24500 she has to pay. They didn't mention Continuing Health Care.

OP posts:
EI12 · 17/08/2024 13:30

Don't listen to some of the commenters - they are fine with the tax money to be spent on those who never paid into the system, yet adamant taxpayers should be punished in every instance. If I were you, I would talk to a lawyer. My ex SIL from Bulgaria, brought her Bulgarian parents here, they are in a council-paid care home, both of them. Their multiple properties in Bulgaria are being rented, cash, no tax being paid anywhere, and my dn is being educated at a top boarding school, on a 100% bursary, because my ex SIL pleads poverty, and the school is even providing her with a uniform!

ChickenTikkaKebabs · 17/08/2024 13:31

BlackShuck3 · 17/08/2024 13:30

OP is about to become very wealthy, and is looking for a way to avoid paying their way in life.
I guess that's just how the rich get to stay rich isn't it 🤷🏻‍♀️

£180K is not very wealthy.

It would pay for 2-3 years in a care home.

Skippingropes · 17/08/2024 13:32

If his wife has an illness that is not dementia, and her care is being funded now, why would his savings be relevant?

He doesn't have savings, he's eyeing up the inheritance money his 'physically and mentally impaired' wife will likely recieve in the coming years from her mum. Sounds pretty grim if you ask me!

GabrielOakRose · 17/08/2024 13:32

Hateam · 17/08/2024 12:16

It's very early on in the process.

Continuing health care is an avenue I haven't looked at yet.

I hadn't heard of the cap. I'll look into that - thank you.

The tories didn't ever bring in the cap on care home fees. They talked about it, in the hope of getting people to vote for them. They had 14 years to bring it in, but never did so and they are no longer in power. Labour have inherited wrecked public services and huge debt, so dont wish for the tax payer to fund care home fees that people could afford.
The NHS did used to have a lot of geriatric beds that people didn't pay for. A friend's grandmother was in one for 16 years with dementia. But Margaret Thatcher privatised elderly care, so it's now profit making, which pushed up prices.

Lookingforunicorns · 17/08/2024 13:33

Why should I as a taxpayer pay for your wife's care if she gets £180k
You are being totally unreasonable.
Grow up.

pgtips2 · 17/08/2024 13:33

I8toys · 17/08/2024 13:13

I understand I really do. MIL is in a dementia home and receiving excellent care at the princely sum of £2,000 a week.

Its hard to see their carefully saved money being used for this when those without funds get it paid for free in the same home. Of course everyone should get care but those paying are funding those who aren't. Quality of care should be equal.

Its pointless saving anything. Its an absolutely rubbish system, a contribution yes of course but not everything they own and have saved for their entire life.

This!
And care home costs are ridiculously high in this country. I know people who own care homes and, what can I say, they're doing very nicely indeed!