Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

VAT on school fees not applied retroactively- ultra wealthy are safe

257 replies

Kitkat189 · 29/07/2024 18:43

VAT on school fees won’t be applied retroactively to school fees paid before 29 July meaning if you paid your child’s entire education upfront, you escape the 20% increase. I know people who did this in the hopes that this would happen and now it has. TELL ME HOW THIS IS FAIR??? The ultra wealthy won’t be impacted by this at all while other families are going to have to move their children. To those of you who support VAT on school fees, please know that it won’t apply to everyone and that some of the revenues from this will be lost. If you think it won’t matter because very few will have prepaid, you should disagree with this on principle.

regardless of where you stand on the topic of VAT on school fees, I think we can agree this is fundamentally unfair.

VAT on school fees not applied retroactively- ultra wealthy are safe
OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
User14March · 29/07/2024 20:28

Some well known schools refused to allow parents to pay up front.

persistentyes · 29/07/2024 20:29

SabrinaThwaite · 29/07/2024 20:13

From what Dan Neidle is saying, it seems likely that a school operating its usual scheme of paying a year up front would be OK because it’s a long standing arrangement for a set of fees that are fixed and agreed.

However, schools that have come up with a new scheme where multiple years are paid in advance where the actual fees are undefined could be in trouble, because they are not true pre payment schemes.

no school would do that

simply not in their interests to do that

Bugsbunni · 29/07/2024 20:29

Our school positively banned parents from paying in advance purely on basis that it wouldn’t make a difference.
its a very well est school so im not sure this is correct

edwinbear · 29/07/2024 20:30

@Imaginaryhairstyle they’ll inherit a lot less than you think once Reeves announces her planned changes to inheritance tax.

GiveDogBone · 29/07/2024 20:31

This is standard practice for all tax changes. Would be the same if you put in a big order for spirits before excise duty went up but which was delivered afterwards. Nothing out the ordinary at all.

SabrinaThwaite · 29/07/2024 20:32

persistentyes · 29/07/2024 20:29

no school would do that

simply not in their interests to do that

You’d think so, but Dan Neidle says that he received reports of schools doing just that.

We said that paying several years’ fees in advance would in principle avoid any later VAT change, because VAT would be charged at the point an early payment is made. We added that we doubted many people would want to do this – but it turns out we were wrong.

We have now received numerous reports of schools promoting the scheme.

taxpolicy.org.uk/2024/05/09/private_school_vat_risk/

Howtoeatanelephant · 29/07/2024 20:34

So if they bought in vat on childrens clothes, you'd be happy to pay that for say, 2 years retrospectively?
No, nor should you. There is always a start and cut-off point.
But hey, the old people are losing their winter allowance, so swings and roundabouts...

SaltyChocolate · 29/07/2024 20:35

I suspect some of those who would have paid upfront may well have already done so before the scheme was even a thing. As it was still incentivised before the scheme in some schools.

I agree that taxing the ultra wealthy is important and I don't think Labour are going far enough but they have to start somewhere because right now they are just trying to raise some cash. I think inheritance tax will be the next thing.

Delphigirl · 29/07/2024 20:37

persistentyes · 29/07/2024 20:29

no school would do that

simply not in their interests to do that

Not true. My cousin paid all 5 years at Radley in one hit back in 2015 and did the same for his second son 2 years ago. He has 3 years to go. They give you a price with estimated fee rises built in, less a tiny discount for early payment, and that’s it no more discussion about fees.
it is not uncommon. Grandparents do it a lot for their grandchildren.

Xyz1234567 · 29/07/2024 20:37

Well I don't agree with the VAT, I think at worse it will backfire and, at best, have little effect but I haven't attempted to pay anything in advance as I recognise my good luck in life and would ultimately love nothing better than all children to receive an excellent education.
But what do you think you are going to gain by having a tantrum. This sounds like sour grapes because you're not as well off as others. I'm sure you're just thinking of 'me, me, me'.

Delphigirl · 29/07/2024 20:38

That scheme has existed for decades btw. I remember being sent a leaflet about it in around 2010.

Scammersarescum · 29/07/2024 20:42

Those who privately educate their kids save the state money by not taking up their state places.

If you want things to be totally fair, they should get a rebate.

Calling them ultra rich in attempt to stir up the politics of envy makes you look pathetic.

Loads of normal families work fucking hard to give their kids the best start they can.

It's not for everyone. However everyone chooses different spending priorities. Stop trying to take away other people's choices because you are jealous

HalfasleepChrisintheMorning · 29/07/2024 20:42

My Dad died recently and before he died he paid into a fees in advance scheme to cover years 8-11 for DS. Thankfully DS school is financially very well off.
if this is true it’s great news for us!

MumblesParty · 29/07/2024 20:45

Scammersarescum · 29/07/2024 20:42

Those who privately educate their kids save the state money by not taking up their state places.

If you want things to be totally fair, they should get a rebate.

Calling them ultra rich in attempt to stir up the politics of envy makes you look pathetic.

Loads of normal families work fucking hard to give their kids the best start they can.

It's not for everyone. However everyone chooses different spending priorities. Stop trying to take away other people's choices because you are jealous

No one is taking away your choices. You can still pay for private school. It’s just that the fees will be a bit more now, so you may have to work harder, save more, and review priorities. Just like you did when you planned private school in the first place.

user8464987632 · 29/07/2024 20:51

Our school along with many others all received advice from a KC about this. The school permitted early payment for a maximum of one years fees but payment had to be made before the election.

GlutenfreeFast800 · 29/07/2024 20:52

Imaginaryhairstyle · 29/07/2024 20:16

@stillavid
“- I know locally to me where there are may privately educated children that many parents who would have been enrolling their 3 year olds aren't any more - they will simply use the outstanding state schools near them and move to areas if necessary for good secondaries.”

I genuinely think this is the crux of the misunderstanding evident in so many threads here. I’ve heard people say this as if it’s a bad thing that wealthy parents will be accessing state education. No! That’s in fact the point - the point is for all of our kids to get an outstanding state education. Private schools are socially regressive. They perpetuate class divisions and reduce the talent pool for top jobs.

you seem to think that those of us who oppose private schools are jealous of other people’s wealth. Personally speaking, no I’m not. But I do think sending your children to private school is a bad choice, for your child and for the rest of us.

I was privately educated and chose not to do that for my dc. They are privileged and yes they will inherit the money I could have spent on their education. But I believe a state comprehensive is the best education they can get, and will set them up for a life in our society, with all of the opportunities they deserve.

I am sure we all feel strongly that we want our children to have a good education. I also want your children to have a good education.

@Imaginaryhairstyle I’m
assuming your state comprehensive is a good one? Perhaps you chose your catchment area carefully when buying? I’m assuming it’s not in special measures?

Sdpbody · 29/07/2024 20:53

I paid full up front school fees yesterday 😂😂 I honestly CANNOT believe I got this lucky!! Probably saved £40k over the next 6 years.

Propertyladder123 · 29/07/2024 21:00

Utterly ridiculous post. These are tedious now.

if you’re ultra wealthy 20% increase is nothing. No need to pay upfront.

Already clear there can be offset, so schools don’t need to pass on the 20% albeit some are choosing to.

there’s been lots of recent fee increases, anyone who went into private schooling without anticipating a 50% rise given pension/inflation really didn’t think straight.

Let’s hope we see the standard of state education rising for all.

dammit88 · 29/07/2024 21:00

Scammersarescum · 29/07/2024 20:42

Those who privately educate their kids save the state money by not taking up their state places.

If you want things to be totally fair, they should get a rebate.

Calling them ultra rich in attempt to stir up the politics of envy makes you look pathetic.

Loads of normal families work fucking hard to give their kids the best start they can.

It's not for everyone. However everyone chooses different spending priorities. Stop trying to take away other people's choices because you are jealous

But their choice isn't being taken away. Private schools still exist, They just need to adjust their spending priorities a bit further now the price is higher.

Yousaidwhatagain · 29/07/2024 21:01

user8464987632 · 29/07/2024 20:51

Our school along with many others all received advice from a KC about this. The school permitted early payment for a maximum of one years fees but payment had to be made before the election.

Same here.
Our school did the same and almost everyone I know prepaid.

Emmanuelll · 29/07/2024 21:02

Oh, here we go again.

People who could pay up front have always got a better deal than anyone else. Schools offer significant discounts to parents who pay advance fees.

Nobody wants to hear your sob stories any more - you're lucky to be able to afford private school in the first place.

user8464987632 · 29/07/2024 21:03

Most people I know also put it on cash back credit cards and effectively got a further discount..,Biscuit

EHCPerhaps · 29/07/2024 21:07

Please could you tell me what the actual status of this document is? I mean legally? Doesn’t it have to go through Parliament first?

Jeregrettetous · 29/07/2024 21:10

SabrinaThwaite · 29/07/2024 20:13

From what Dan Neidle is saying, it seems likely that a school operating its usual scheme of paying a year up front would be OK because it’s a long standing arrangement for a set of fees that are fixed and agreed.

However, schools that have come up with a new scheme where multiple years are paid in advance where the actual fees are undefined could be in trouble, because they are not true pre payment schemes.

Yep - that's what we were told too. The only people who'll benefit are those who can afford to pay all the fees upfront, and are in schools where they've always had the opportunity to do that.

opalescented · 29/07/2024 21:11

user8464987632 · 29/07/2024 21:03

Most people I know also put it on cash back credit cards and effectively got a further discount..,Biscuit

That's just wise financial use of a credit card

Swipe left for the next trending thread