Absolutely this. To all the posters saying ‘rape was always known to be wrong, even in the 70s’ - well yeah, superficially, but it’s difficult from today’s perspective to truly understand how deeply rooted the normalisation of sexual violence and coercion was.
We still struggle today to effectively prosecute rape, but, as a PP said, to be taken seriously as a victim back then was nigh on impossible. Accusations were automatically viewed with scepticism by everyone, from doctors to police officers to judges, and women were almost always seen as somehow culpable or complicit - wrong clothes, wrong time, wrong place, wrong number of drinks, wrong boyfriend. And you literally couldn’t be raped by your husband in the eyes of the law - it was not a crime until 2003.
At Camden Market in the early 80s, one of the epicentres of youth culture in London, they were selling badges that said ‘Avoid rape - say yes’ alongside ‘Fuck Thatcher’ and ‘Jobs Not Bombs’. All very politically right on, except when it came to the objectification and sexual assault of women, which was just joke fodder.
That prevailing social climate, plus the whole ‘only a bit of slap and tickle’ misogyny that pervaded mainstream 70s TV, where men were men, and girls were basically tits and arses, there to be sexually pursued, meant there was almost a tacit acceptance that rape was just a thing that happened - because boys will be boys, wink wink - and, by extension, that women shouldn’t make such a bloody fuss about it.
I was sexually assaulted multiple times in my teens and 20s - but it never occurred to me for a moment to actually report any of the men involved in those incidents. It would have been almost laughable to try to get anything done about it - it was just life, just the shit that most women experienced at one time or another.
In that context, the reference in Butterflies will - sadly - not have been particularly shocking to a lot of people at the time (except maybe for being an obscenity on prime time telly).