Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

About half of British workers earn under £15 hour - new Living Wage?

242 replies

Melisha · 09/07/2024 00:20

At the moment about half of the workforce earns under £15 an hour. We need to increase national minimum wage to £15 an hour, lifting many of the workforce out of poverty.
Do you agree NMW should be £15 an hour?

OP posts:
Missamyp · 09/07/2024 17:25

MidnightMeltdown · 09/07/2024 01:16

I don't think the problem is simply that some people are paid too little, some people are also paid too much. The problem in the UK is high inequality.

This is not to say that some people shouldn't earn more, but it should be within reason (e.g. the highest earner in the company is not earning more than 5 times the salary of the lowest earner). We need a maximum wage as much as a minimum wage.

Companies also shouldn't be allowed to pay out to shareholders while their staff are dependent on tax payer funded benefits because their wages are too low to live on.

This is quite observant. Not for the reasons you think though.
The problem with setting an arbitrary artificial wage floor is some are being paid too much and some too little. This of course includes all skill sets and pay bands. However, minimum wage rewards the useless with the useful. Some on minimum wage are being paid too much for the value and level of service they provide.
So what happens is businesses just cut hrs or introduce zero hrs contracts.

caringcarer · 09/07/2024 17:32

MrsRobinsonsHandprints · 09/07/2024 14:26

But where do you stop. So those that were on £15 don't get a £1 pay rise?

I've clearly said those on a little above MW should also.br raised £1 per hour too.

GG1986 · 09/07/2024 17:33

Booboobedooo · 09/07/2024 17:19

Well yeah – so maybe there would be pressure to increase wages to attract workers.

Yeah that would be nice! However no doubt we would all have to strike in order for them to do anything and even then the increase is shocking.

caringcarer · 09/07/2024 17:34

BemoreJane · 09/07/2024 14:47

I’m paid minimum wage for a local retail company with 8 sites. When NMW went up in April they cut everybody’s hours across the company by 3 hrs a week to pay for the increase, so we actually ended up slightly worse off.

THe company is struggling to recruit several supervisors at the moment as they are only prepared to pay 20pence more an hour for these roles for a much higher level of responsibility.

You were better off if you got the same pay for 3 hours less work.

Melisha · 09/07/2024 17:35

Missamyp · 09/07/2024 17:25

This is quite observant. Not for the reasons you think though.
The problem with setting an arbitrary artificial wage floor is some are being paid too much and some too little. This of course includes all skill sets and pay bands. However, minimum wage rewards the useless with the useful. Some on minimum wage are being paid too much for the value and level of service they provide.
So what happens is businesses just cut hrs or introduce zero hrs contracts.

How do zero hour contracts or less hours mean that people who are not productive suddenly become productive? They do not.
Zero hour contracts are simply a way to make people work unpaid as they are so desperate for the hours. It has been common in some businesses for low paid staff to do some work for free.

OP posts:
Booboobedooo · 09/07/2024 17:43

GG1986 · 09/07/2024 17:33

Yeah that would be nice! However no doubt we would all have to strike in order for them to do anything and even then the increase is shocking.

Yeah it’s a joke. But presumably if people left the professional it’d kind of force their hand.

(Can’t remember what the rules are in terms of salary for recruiting overseas workers for jobs on the shortage list.)

Melisha · 09/07/2024 17:43

And look at the thread with multiple people saying they are paid a lot but do very little work. But magically their high wages and skiving does not increase prices.

OP posts:
kitsuneghost · 09/07/2024 17:46

GG1986 · 09/07/2024 17:16

Also I would be changing my career and leaving the medical profession if I could earn the same working at a till in B&M as I do in nursing!

What makes you think B&M would have you. People talk about check out jobs in such a derogatory manner but it is a frustrating and thankless job.

When NMW went up last time we had people threaten to leave to work in Tesco. They wouldn't have known what had hit them TBH. Even if they got in with no experience

Mrsttcno1 · 09/07/2024 17:46

Melisha · 09/07/2024 17:35

How do zero hour contracts or less hours mean that people who are not productive suddenly become productive? They do not.
Zero hour contracts are simply a way to make people work unpaid as they are so desperate for the hours. It has been common in some businesses for low paid staff to do some work for free.

It is ILLEGAL for anybody to be working for free, anybody in any business who is working for less than NMW should be reporting their employers to HMRC. HMRC investigate and the workers get what they are owed.

hattie43 · 09/07/2024 17:55

I fear it maybe a poisoned chalice because yes it's nice to pay £15 per hour but I bet they'll be a huge number of redundancies

Metempsychosis · 09/07/2024 17:57

Maverickess · 09/07/2024 17:06

Well considering an article from the BBC in April had the Tesco boss talking about the £2.3bn, up from £882m, pre tax profit, I think they can afford the £30m to increase the wages of the nmw staff, and still not cut into an increased profit significantly. Even doubling that figure to take account of scaling up other wage increases still leaves an increased profit of £812m.

Instead the tax payer is supporting many of their nmw workers instead and Tesco get to pocket another £30m in profit.

30 million extra per week, not per year, obviously. About a billion and a half per year (although that assumes that all the NMW workers are full time, which I suspect isn't the case).

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 09/07/2024 18:01

FloatyBoaty · 09/07/2024 07:32

Mumsnet is amazing.

Working people are struggling- shouldn’t NMW be raised?
mumsnetters: absolutely not. Inflationary spiral! Costs passed on! No incentive to be a nurse! (?!)

Working people are struggling- should uc/ in-work benefits be extended?
mumsnetters: Absolutely not. No incentive to work! People reliant on benefits! Country can’t afford scroungers etc etc etc

Alright then lads. What IS the answer? Shall the working class just fucking rot then?

The funniest part is there are probably a lot of women who would be struggling as lower earners if they didn't have their rich husbands but because they see his earnings as "joint earnings" they think they've earned it too.

Blushingm · 09/07/2024 18:06

Melisha · 09/07/2024 00:32

There are lots of jobs paid under £15 an hour that are very stressful.
And nurses on the lower bands are already paid less than £15 an hour. This would increase the starting pay of qualified nurses.

But then should everyone then get a pay rise if those on lower grades salaries are lifted and are closer to the next grade surely there should be an overall rise or there's no incentive to progress plus people with more responsibility etc should be paid more

Floogal · 09/07/2024 18:12

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 09/07/2024 18:01

The funniest part is there are probably a lot of women who would be struggling as lower earners if they didn't have their rich husbands but because they see his earnings as "joint earnings" they think they've earned it too.

That's called being 'hubsidised'.

justasking111 · 09/07/2024 21:53

Floogal · 09/07/2024 18:12

That's called being 'hubsidised'.

That's really offensive actually

Melisha · 09/07/2024 22:42

Blushingm · 09/07/2024 18:06

But then should everyone then get a pay rise if those on lower grades salaries are lifted and are closer to the next grade surely there should be an overall rise or there's no incentive to progress plus people with more responsibility etc should be paid more

Some employers already have difficulties filling jobs as those above minimum wage are not paid much more.

OP posts:
Melisha · 09/07/2024 22:44

@Mrsttcno1 I know, but it is common.

OP posts:
HulaChick · 09/07/2024 22:51

I work in the public sector and despite my qualifications & experience, earn well under £15 per hour & only a few pence over current minimum wage. I have a demanding & responsible job, no chance for a parish and will probably have to start looking elsewhere as cost of living has got so ridiculous. I already have a part time second job which I would love to give up but can't afford to. However, the money for increased wages has to come from somewhere & until government funding is increased towards the public sector, I can't see it happening.

HulaChick · 09/07/2024 22:52

Pay rise, not parish!

User2460177 · 09/07/2024 22:57

Melisha · 09/07/2024 01:27

@iamtheblcksheep somehow there is always enough money to pay senior staff and CEOs very high wages though.

There’s one CEO and you need the best. Like it or not many of the staff at the bottom are low skilled and interchangeable. If you start paying them a lot more then they will be replaced by technology.

Also the existing minimum wage is enough to live on. But it depends on your circumstances how good your life will be

User2460177 · 09/07/2024 23:00

justasking111 · 09/07/2024 21:53

That's really offensive actually

It’s not. I was the higher earner in my relationship (I’m a woman) and my ex did not earn a penny of my money: why are men who don’t pay their way “cocklodgers” yet women are not?

Melisha · 09/07/2024 23:02

User2460177 · 09/07/2024 22:57

There’s one CEO and you need the best. Like it or not many of the staff at the bottom are low skilled and interchangeable. If you start paying them a lot more then they will be replaced by technology.

Also the existing minimum wage is enough to live on. But it depends on your circumstances how good your life will be

There are often lots of senior staff. Have you seen the thread of people talking about being paid a high wage and doing very little work?
And do you live on the minimum wage?

OP posts:
User2460177 · 09/07/2024 23:03

kitsuneghost · 09/07/2024 17:46

What makes you think B&M would have you. People talk about check out jobs in such a derogatory manner but it is a frustrating and thankless job.

When NMW went up last time we had people threaten to leave to work in Tesco. They wouldn't have known what had hit them TBH. Even if they got in with no experience

You think working on the checkout is much more difficult than being a nurse? Seriously? I’ve worked on checkouts in several different stores when younger. It’s not that hard

Cobbledstreets · 09/07/2024 23:05

Answersunknown · 09/07/2024 02:04

I Was a doctor on less than that for nights and weekends.
unless all wages rise fairly then no I don’t think it should rise.

our nurses should not be paid the same as the Costa barista.

our nurses should not be paid the same as the Costa barista.

This exactly.

Especially when you add in the fact that nurses etc will have the graduate tax aka student loan repayment that many -not all- in NMW jobs won’t have.

User2460177 · 09/07/2024 23:07

Melisha · 09/07/2024 23:02

There are often lots of senior staff. Have you seen the thread of people talking about being paid a high wage and doing very little work?
And do you live on the minimum wage?

There are not lots of senior staff- that’s why they are paid a premium. Very few people outside the public sector are paid high wages with no work. I say that as someone who has worked in both the public and private sectors.

I have in the past lived on the minimum wage yes. I don’t now. It was fine for me then as my costs were lower.

expecting other people to pay you more than you can get at market rates is not a great idea economically. Basically you will likely be replaced by technology or offshore.

Swipe left for the next trending thread