Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To actually feel sorry for the woman driving the car in the Wimbledon car accident

994 replies

bagpuss90 · 06/07/2024 16:44

I’m sure I’ll be flamed here . I totally sympathise with the bereaved parents- I can’t stress that enough. I can understand them wanting justice . As we know the driver of the car suffered an epileptic seizure at the wheel - she had no history of epilepsy. I don’t see what she could have done differently. She has to live with what she did although it wasn’t her fault. AIBU to feel quite sorry for her ?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
marigoldandrose · 06/07/2024 18:51

BobbyBiscuits · 06/07/2024 18:39

I do but she didn't receive a strong enough punishment. They said she had an epileptic seizure, but she's never had one before? So it can't be diagnosed as epilepsy. Alcohol withdrawal? I don't know. But it's just horrendous.

Absolute rubbish.

You can start having epileptic seizures at any point in life

Also you do realise if she was in the middle of a seizure the intention to commit the crime would not be present therefore what would she be punished for?!?

TheWayTheLightFalls · 06/07/2024 18:53

Longma · 06/07/2024 18:38

It's not the driver's word. Are you suggesting all the medical staff involved are lying and covering for her too?

This kind of answer really frustrates me, or perhaps that's a reflection of my inhabiting a world that sounds similar to the person in question.

I have an ADHD diagnosis. I got it by going to two doctors (which I paid for myself, bypassing the NHS) and explaining my symptoms. I got a diagnosis. Now, I was accurate in describing my symptoms and how they affect my life, but I'm not sure they'd have realised if I actually just reeled off "Top 10 adhd symptoms" off Google. It's not uncommon for people with money to spare to, for example, seek advantage for their children by finding a doctor to confirm that Bobby has slow processing and needs extra time in exams. There are plenty of situations in diagnostic medicine where there is a huge amount of input from patients because there's no evidence as such, there's nothing to see the way there would be if a bone was broken. That doesn't mean that the medical staff, police or whoever else are lying or covering for the person in question - it just means that reasonable doubt has been created.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 06/07/2024 18:53

maudelovesharold · 06/07/2024 18:45

So they just have to take the police decision on trust?

I don't see any other option. They should not be entitled to see, and probably spread, someone's medical details.

Serencwtch · 06/07/2024 18:53

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 18:12

What % of people with seizures not caused by tumors, bleedings or other health isues that can be named will have the first seizure between 20 and 60?
I couldn't find the data, just most articles mention onset either before 20 or after 60.

But I think this % would be much smaller then % of people like her that can afford good advocates.

I don't understand why people don't even try to compare both probabilities and see the obvious.

Edited

That is the percentage where other causes are ruled out. Most people are genuinely surprised how high it is.
Epilepsy is caused by a disturbance in electrical signals in the brain.

There are tests that can indicate whether a seizure was epileptic (caused by disturbance in electrical signals) or caused by something else. Blood tests & EEG among others.

swayingpalmtree · 06/07/2024 18:55

GoFigure235 · 06/07/2024 18:49

Why should the parents have to accept anything anyway? The CPS have made their decision. I don't get why people think the parents should accept it with a good grace. They've lost their precious children due to this woman and her car. People expect too much of them if they expect them to accept that it is "just one of those things" and forgive her. They're entitled to howl at the moon if they want to, to challenge and question as much as they want. They don't have to be objective, impartial, when they're secretly wishing she had just smashed herself and her car up. She'll have to find a way to live with what happened that doesn't involve their acceptance, if they're not able to give it.

Exactly. Oh so easy to say "ah well it's just one of those sad things!" when its someone else and not your child isnt it?

Bloody hell, talk about a lack of empathy. Also, according to the rules wont she be able to drive again in a year if she has no further fits?

TennisLady · 06/07/2024 18:56

@BobbyBiscuits is a “strong enough punishment” not having to live the rest of your life knowing you unwillingly killed 2 children? I think most would struggle with that.

HowIrresponsible · 06/07/2024 18:56

The burden of proof in any criminal case is beyond reasonable doubt.

That's a very high burden of proof. Is there reasonable doubt this was deliberate?! Absolutely!

Zippedeedooda · 06/07/2024 19:00

TheFallenMadonna · 06/07/2024 17:15

My mum had her first seizure aged 44.

Likewise my uncle had his first in his 40s.
Was wondering how long it would take before someone mentioned her personal financial situation which, of course, is completely irrelevant .

In this case a terrible accident happened but it was no one’s fault.
A review is pointless unless we ban driving all together, just in case

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 19:01

Serencwtch · 06/07/2024 18:53

That is the percentage where other causes are ruled out. Most people are genuinely surprised how high it is.
Epilepsy is caused by a disturbance in electrical signals in the brain.

There are tests that can indicate whether a seizure was epileptic (caused by disturbance in electrical signals) or caused by something else. Blood tests & EEG among others.

Medical professionals, scans and blood tests can't prove she didn't have a seizure during the accident if she insists she did. She was not wearing EEG in the car.
90% on this thread have no actual idea how it works in this case.

Daffodilsandbagels · 06/07/2024 19:01

TheaBrandt · 06/07/2024 17:56

Agree op a dreadful accident terrible for all concerned. I honestly don’t understand the zeal to prosecute. There’s a “class war” tinge to some of these comments. If she’d been a cleaner driving a Nissan micra think she would have got more sympathy.

If she had been driving a Nissan micra, the chances of her killing two little girls would have been much, much lower. (SUVs are actually 8x more likely to kill children than smaller cars.) We really need a movement against urban SUVs - they should be taxed and licensed out of existence in cities. They kill children and they are killing the planet - and for what? So people can drive ridiculous status symbols around.

maudelovesharold · 06/07/2024 19:02

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 06/07/2024 18:53

I don't see any other option. They should not be entitled to see, and probably spread, someone's medical details.

If someone told me that my child had been killed by someone when they were in the throes of a seizure and were not in control of their actions, I most certainly wouldn’t take that on trust, and would want the evidence to have been robustly examined on my behalf.

HowIrresponsible · 06/07/2024 19:02

Daffodilsandbagels · 06/07/2024 19:01

If she had been driving a Nissan micra, the chances of her killing two little girls would have been much, much lower. (SUVs are actually 8x more likely to kill children than smaller cars.) We really need a movement against urban SUVs - they should be taxed and licensed out of existence in cities. They kill children and they are killing the planet - and for what? So people can drive ridiculous status symbols around.

I bet the kids parents were driving similar. Wimbledon and private school after all.

wizbit93 · 06/07/2024 19:03

Who is to say she didn't have more than one at the time/soon after? Earlier in the year I had three at home within an hour and then a further two in hospital. This may have been the case with her and that might be why she has now been diagnosed with epilepsy.

HowIrresponsible · 06/07/2024 19:03

maudelovesharold · 06/07/2024 19:02

If someone told me that my child had been killed by someone when they were in the throes of a seizure and were not in control of their actions, I most certainly wouldn’t take that on trust, and would want the evidence to have been robustly examined on my behalf.

So you'd rather believe that a woman with no history of criminal offences who is an upstanding member of society just decided to drive at your kid for shits and giggles and risk killing themselves too?

Such a weird attitude.

EmmaGrundyForPM · 06/07/2024 19:04

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 17:11

I think it's a very convenient diagnosis - human brain is so complex, they can't prove she didn't have a seizure. Never heard of a person diagnosed with epilepsy at 40 though - I believe if you have it, it starts at the childhood.

This driver lives in a detached house in Wimbledon (worth millions in that area) and her car was not the cheapest one so apparently she could afford good lawyer and suitable diagnosis.

Edited

This was my first thought when I heard the decision. Very convenient

HowIrresponsible · 06/07/2024 19:05

EmmaGrundyForPM · 06/07/2024 19:04

This was my first thought when I heard the decision. Very convenient

Are you lot seriously considering having money made her bribe police and she somehow bought them off?

There are truly horrible people and I don't mean the driver.

multimillionaire · 06/07/2024 19:05

So you'd rather believe that a woman with no history of criminal offences who is an upstanding member of society just decided to drive at your kid for shits and giggles and risk killing themselves

How on earth do you know she is an "upstanding member of society" what a load of garbage.

HowIrresponsible · 06/07/2024 19:07

multimillionaire · 06/07/2024 19:05

So you'd rather believe that a woman with no history of criminal offences who is an upstanding member of society just decided to drive at your kid for shits and giggles and risk killing themselves

How on earth do you know she is an "upstanding member of society" what a load of garbage.

You know upstanding member of society just is a fancy way of saying a good person?

She had no criminal convictions. You're considered of good character if that's the case.

You'd probably be considered one too...unless you think you're not?

KnittingKnewbie · 06/07/2024 19:07

CelesteCunningham · 06/07/2024 17:43

Desperately sorry for all involved.

I don't understand the doubts people have about the police decision - a medical event or mechanical failure seemed the most likely causes on the day to me.

Horrific for everyone.

Exactly.
There were 4 possible reasons

  1. deliberate attack NO
  2. negligence/dangerous driving NO
  3. accident due to medical event
  4. mechanical failure NO

A family member of mine had a seizure out of the blue aged mid 30s, not while driving thankfully, but if they had been, a similar situation is likely

Katkins17 · 06/07/2024 19:07

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 17:11

I think it's a very convenient diagnosis - human brain is so complex, they can't prove she didn't have a seizure. Never heard of a person diagnosed with epilepsy at 40 though - I believe if you have it, it starts at the childhood.

This driver lives in a detached house in Wimbledon (worth millions in that area) and her car was not the cheapest one so apparently she could afford good lawyer and suitable diagnosis.

Edited

This just isn't true.
My partner had his first seizure, out of the blue, at 50.
A lot of things can cause this...it was found he had intercranial hypertension which put pressure on his brain and eyes. He had no previous symptoms.

Zippedeedooda · 06/07/2024 19:08

Daffodilsandbagels · 06/07/2024 19:01

If she had been driving a Nissan micra, the chances of her killing two little girls would have been much, much lower. (SUVs are actually 8x more likely to kill children than smaller cars.) We really need a movement against urban SUVs - they should be taxed and licensed out of existence in cities. They kill children and they are killing the planet - and for what? So people can drive ridiculous status symbols around.

Why just cities. Is everyone outside cities irrelevant.

If we re banning large cars to save lives we’ll need to ban all vans, trucks, articulated lorries. Farm machinery from using the roads. Construction machinery from using the roads etc etc. Ambulances
Anyone driving these large vehicles can suddenly have a siezure and kill others

KnittingKnewbie · 06/07/2024 19:09

wizbit93 · 06/07/2024 19:03

Who is to say she didn't have more than one at the time/soon after? Earlier in the year I had three at home within an hour and then a further two in hospital. This may have been the case with her and that might be why she has now been diagnosed with epilepsy.

Yes, further to my point above, when the medics arrived, family member had another seizure and potentially a 3rd one in hospital, I can't remember.
So that would be evidence

maudelovesharold · 06/07/2024 19:09

HowIrresponsible · 06/07/2024 19:03

So you'd rather believe that a woman with no history of criminal offences who is an upstanding member of society just decided to drive at your kid for shits and giggles and risk killing themselves too?

Such a weird attitude.

No, obviously not. Such a weird comment. Haven’t you heard of dangerous driving, driving without due care and attention, speeding…?

Sirine1708 · 06/07/2024 19:09

KnittingKnewbie · 06/07/2024 19:07

Exactly.
There were 4 possible reasons

  1. deliberate attack NO
  2. negligence/dangerous driving NO
  3. accident due to medical event
  4. mechanical failure NO

A family member of mine had a seizure out of the blue aged mid 30s, not while driving thankfully, but if they had been, a similar situation is likely

Why are you so convinced about #2?

marigoldandrose · 06/07/2024 19:09

@maudelovesharold well it would be tough cause you'd be extremely unlikely to be allowed to view medical evidence of a third party regardless of the circumstances