Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is there money to do what Labour wants to do?

243 replies

AutismHelp1980 · 05/07/2024 17:15

The majority of us are feeling optimistic today and we should!

However my concern is, is there the money to do what Labour needs to do? I keep thinking back to Gordon Brown selling off our gold!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 22:59

izimbra · 05/07/2024 22:56

If Labour don't engage in an enormous spending spree to reverse the impact of 14 years of Conservative austerity and public sector neglect, they'll be accused by everyone on both the left and the right of failure and hypocrisy.

If they do signficantly increase public spending and have to raise taxes to fund this, the right will shout about 'same old tax and spend Labour'.

So maybe some of the detractors here would like to explain what they think Labour can or should do to improve the state of public services and the country.

I’m not a detractor. Cutting tax evasion and corruption would be a good start.

HappiestSleeping · 05/07/2024 23:08

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 05/07/2024 22:17

They’re coming for every working person. Nat insurance up. Income tax up. Inheritance tax up. I just hope they spend it all wisely.

Conservatives have implemented over 25 tax rises, so probably not much need to raise anymore. Just stop squandering what is raised already and spend it more wisely.

PoppyCherryDog · 05/07/2024 23:09

MissyB1 · 05/07/2024 18:01

Agree, We are higher rate tax payers (well dh is, I earn minimum wage). But dh says he would happily pay more tax for improved public services.

This. I’d happily pay more income tax for good public services.

They promised not to go after income tax or VAT. My understanding is they plan to increase CGT and something about agricultural land? (Didn’t quite understand it though…) but my point is there are other types of tax other than income tax.

izimbra · 05/07/2024 23:10

SeriaMau · 05/07/2024 22:59

I’m not a detractor. Cutting tax evasion and corruption would be a good start.

I'd be very disappointed if Labour doesn't address these issues.

Ihateslugs · 05/07/2024 23:19

WhitegreeNcandle · 05/07/2024 18:40

Nope. Booked in a meeting with the family lawyer for this week to look at IHT planning as I think there will be some big raids on that and CGT.

id love to know what your solicitor can suggest re IHT planning as two solicitor’s I have spoken to on this subject were not able to reduce my anticipated bill at all! Divorced or single people do not have seem to have many options.

Andanotherone01 · 05/07/2024 23:19

LaurieFairyCake · 05/07/2024 18:32

The uk does not have incredibly high taxation Hmm

Most of the developed European democracies have much higher taxation and much better public services

And much higher salaries to manage it!

trainplanesleep · 05/07/2024 23:32

They will tax us for everything, garden, inheritance,VAT for private school fees. Basically anyone who has worked hard and earns a decent amount of money will be taxed to the limit

I don’t believe they will actually be able to deal with companies like Google so it will come down to the little guy, the business owners etc and the higher earners whol are relatively wealthy but nothing in comparison to the corporations…

But this is easy game

Fanlover1122 · 05/07/2024 23:37

Brandonsflowers · 05/07/2024 18:52

All of these people who are saying they don't want to pay more tax, do you already pay to send you kids to private school and pay for private health care?

Surely the only alternative to not raising taxes and borrowing is privatisation of the NHS. Do you want that instead?

Yes! The health care bills on top of tax = 100 k a year, I would be very happy to pay extra tax if I didn’t then have the medical bills (for a chronic illness- majorly under funded in U.K.)

Iffx · 05/07/2024 23:37

trainplanesleep · 05/07/2024 23:32

They will tax us for everything, garden, inheritance,VAT for private school fees. Basically anyone who has worked hard and earns a decent amount of money will be taxed to the limit

I don’t believe they will actually be able to deal with companies like Google so it will come down to the little guy, the business owners etc and the higher earners whol are relatively wealthy but nothing in comparison to the corporations…

But this is easy game

Indeed this. I cannot believe so many people voted for this.

tennesseewhiskey1 · 05/07/2024 23:39

Sorry - NOW you ask or wonder this?! After it’s all said and done and labour is in?!

TheThingIsYeah · 05/07/2024 23:39

trainplanesleep · 05/07/2024 23:32

They will tax us for everything, garden, inheritance,VAT for private school fees. Basically anyone who has worked hard and earns a decent amount of money will be taxed to the limit

I don’t believe they will actually be able to deal with companies like Google so it will come down to the little guy, the business owners etc and the higher earners whol are relatively wealthy but nothing in comparison to the corporations…

But this is easy game

So true

I don’t believe they will actually be able to deal with companies like Google so it will come down to the little guy,

You owe the taxman £10k they've got you by the balls. You owe them £10mil you've got them by the balls. Or something to that effect I read once!

SophiaElise · 05/07/2024 23:44

bluejelly · 05/07/2024 17:57

Personally I'd rather pay more tax for good quality health services, social housing, education, policing, probation and social care. I'm a higher rate tax payer and feel under-taxed. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

(Just to be clear I don't think lower rate earners should be taxed more, far from it...)

I also think corporations need to be taxed more effectively - it's not right that massive companies like Facebook are able to dodge tax when they make so much money in this country (and do little social good).

My exact thoughts!

Theideaofthem · 05/07/2024 23:54

LutonBeds · 05/07/2024 19:54

@MissAmbrosia are wages higher too? Genuine question, I’ve no idea. In my last job I earned under £22k for f/t (37.5 hours per week). I’m lucky that I have a fantastic husband who has a good pension and can do some consultancy work. The people I worked with who were on their own in rented accommodation really struggled.

None of the parties that have been in power in my 44 years have ever done anything to help single, childless, low-paid people.

Or just even single and childfree people but yes especially the low paid ones.

A friend of mine was getting no help at all when her mum made her homeless, and then she became unemployed thanks to her ex (long story). it just broke her down and she signed off on disability where she finally got some support (housing & disability income etc ) Without being on disability - being single without a child she’d have got next to nothing.

It’s really messed up that the way they have made things with rising rent and house prices against a backdrop of low pay, it’s like you need two incomes to live independently.

So many single thirty somethings are moving back home but what if the ones who don’t have a nice family to go back to? . You should be able to live on one income.

Glengarrybell · 06/07/2024 00:06

There’s plenty of money for the right investments, that’s the thing about investing- you invest well you can expect a return. If you’re good at investing you’ll get people (or banks really usually) who will give you money to invest. A good government is good at investing on behalf of its people, and ideally the benefits of those investments are distributed fairly well across the population.
HS2, inappropriate PPE? These were bad investments. Education and training ungraded? Likely good investments, but then failure to invest in health and public health could undermine those investments if poor health impacts on the workforce and burden to the health and care system to such an extent that productivity is lost.

Starmer probably looks like a nice safe pair of hands so he will find it easier to “find the money” than say crazy eyes Truss. He’ll have to say he won’t spend a penny more than is needed and that he’s going to keep debt down etc etc because that’s the nature of the poker game, but if he has any sense he’ll quietly invest like crazy in the things that matter to growth and prosperity without trying to catch too much glory for either being mean to poor people or showing how generous “he” is to the nation. I imagine he’ll use the next few months of political capital to make the big unglitzy long term investments he needs to make to avert disaster.

caringcarer · 06/07/2024 00:08

LaurieFairyCake · 05/07/2024 17:59

Yeah once they drop Rwanda and national service and paying all their mates money

Should be fine 👍🏻

Nothing was spent on National Service as Sunak knew he was going down so no money to be recouped there. The money on Rwanda has already been spent so no hope of getting that back.

Theideaofthem · 06/07/2024 00:09

HappiestSleeping · 05/07/2024 22:15

This 👆

We currently have the highest rate of tax for over 70 years. If waste stops, stupid contracts that line the pockets of the Conservative party's chums, Rwanda stops, etc. etc. there might not be a need to raise taxes. I know that a lot goes on paying back borrowing, but even then.

Historically, Labour spend, Conservatives cut back, however many of the best things were brought in by the Labour government which takes money. Labour Have also presided over higher GDP growth, and lower levels of unemployment.

If more people are working, and GDP growth is good, then people are earning which makes them less susceptible to tax rises.

Starmer strikes me as considered and targeted in his approach.

Historically, Labour spend, Conservatives cut back, however many of the best things were brought in by the Labour government which takes money. Labour Have also presided over higher GDP growth, and lower levels of unemployment.

I hope so!

It was awful under the tories IMO so if they had got re-elected yet again I’d definitely have been packing my bags now I’m more open to seeing how things go . I was already wanting to leave after GE 2019 but then covid scuppered my plans.

Now, it’s a new party and all that so I’ll give them a chance. I get that it won’t exactly take a short time to turn things around, but I need to see they’re moving in the right direction.

I hope under this government more people get back into work and also salaries rise! Because it’s ridiculous both how low the pay is here and how so many people are out of work.

caringcarer · 06/07/2024 00:10

cryinglaughing · 05/07/2024 18:47

I thought it was Tony Blair who instigated PFI 🤔

Yep, it definitely was Tony Blair who set up the PFI's. My DH was a civil servant and he had to manage many of them. He used to be frustrated at how much it was all costing and it kicked the cost down the road too.

Theideaofthem · 06/07/2024 00:11

The money on Rwanda has already been spent so no hope of getting that back.

Great 😤 it’s absolutely criminal how reckless he’s been with our money.

ll09sm · 06/07/2024 00:12

No there is no money left. Again.

But Labour will borrow even more and tax even more than the Tories did.

If you’re a net contributor, prepare to be rinsed even more. If you’re a net taker, happy days, your freebies are about to multiply. Until, finally the IMF decides to step in.

The country is doomed.

caringcarer · 06/07/2024 00:20

mumof1or2 · 05/07/2024 20:27

A lot of people on this thread are just making up rubbish! Labour have said they'll raise the extra money by putting VAT on private school fees and closing all the loopholes so companies such as Facebook and Starbucks have to pay tax in the UK. In their manifesto they clearly set out where the money would come from.

Once they have added 20 percent VAT to school fees and many parents take their DC with some SEN out of independent schools where they could cope on small classes and put them back into state schools it won't save any money. It will just mean the classes get larger for all DC. Labour claims they'll hire 6500 new teachers. This is laughable because there has been a shortage of teachers for years. As older teachers retire it gets worse every year. Yet RR thinks she'll click her fingers and magic all these new teachers up.

Glengarrybell · 06/07/2024 00:24

Also I don’t want to be too rude here but obviously OBVIOUSLY the tories did a spectacularly terrible job with the economy and general investment even if you measure them by their own vague and meagre standards. As a party they invested in party loyalty at the expense of talent development and while it didn’t matter so much initially and in fact paid off very well at first, in the long term it’s been very destructive. In government they stoked division in the population because it’s genuinely a great and cheap way to gain support (blaming EU, lazy poor people, or immigrants for their failures, or at least writing policy as though they were blaming these) and deflect blame in the short term but at a certain point they ran out of road and had to resort to blaming Labour from 14 years ago and their imaginary version of future Labour who had at times seemed to have already squandered all the lovely future money and plunged us back into free trade with that terrible biggest single market in the world.
oh and each other, they turned on each other, eventually they destroyed the one thing that had protected them, loyalty

NewName24 · 06/07/2024 00:27

TheThingIsYeah · 05/07/2024 22:22

@NewName24 @MissyB1

Ah didn't take long for the excuses!

So people are only "happy to pay more tax" if they are forced to pay more tax?

Ok.

Look, let's be honest, no one would choose to pay more tax so let's not pretend otherwise.

Actually, many, many people would be happy to.
As have stated on so many threads over the last days, weeks and months.

Just because you feel that way, it doesn't mean "everyone else" does.
what a narrow minded way of thinking.

NewName24 · 06/07/2024 00:28

We currently have the highest rate of tax for over 70 years

How do you work that out ?
Can you link to some independent figures ?

Glengarrybell · 06/07/2024 00:35

ll09sm · 06/07/2024 00:12

No there is no money left. Again.

But Labour will borrow even more and tax even more than the Tories did.

If you’re a net contributor, prepare to be rinsed even more. If you’re a net taker, happy days, your freebies are about to multiply. Until, finally the IMF decides to step in.

The country is doomed.

I’m sorry I know it’s become a terrible thing to say apparently these days but if the country’s doomed, why stay here? I mean it should have been clear for a while that the tories were not going to magically turn things around, and you have no faith in Labour so why not just find somewhere better?

Muttley17 · 06/07/2024 00:38

They were very vocal about scrapping the spare bedroom subsidy years ago but now say that its not possible. So much for helping the poorest in society, you can’t downsize when theres no suitable social housing