I supported the lockdowns and stuck to them.
I think that, at the time, we were making the best decisions we could with the information we had available. Hospitals were struggling to cope with the number of Covid patients they got - ICU patients being nursed on ordinary wards and in operating theatres was unprecedented, in my experience.
When I was in hospital with Covid early in the second wave, I talked to the Charge Nurse on the ward, who told me of queues of patients on trolleys stretching from the ward all the way back to the ambulance drop off point, and the ambulance centre manager begging them to admit patients faster because he had almost no ambulances and crews left on the road - they were all in the queue.
It seems logical to me that the lockdowns reduced the spread of Covid, and that if there had been more cases in total, there would have been more cases requiring hospitalisation, and the hospitals would not have coped.
It is also worth noting that there is a statistic that says that over 70% of people hospitalised with Covid, have gone on to develop long covid. I am in that group - even though I wasn't in ICU, and didn't feel really ill - I just had low oxygen saturations - but I am now disabled by long covid. I can't stand for long - even having a shower is hard work - and I can't walk any distance. Any effort - sitting at the table peeling the potatoes and sprouts for Christmas dinner, for example - leaves me shaking with fatigue, and just going to the loo downstairs leaves me breathless. If it wasn't for dh doing pretty much everything, I wouldn't be coping.
I wouldn't wish long covid on anyone - and if the lockdowns prevented more people from getting it, I can't say that's a bad thing.
However, I do think that, in hindsight, we needed to consider the long term consequences of lockdown, and to put in place measures both then, and since, to mitigate those.