Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Medical Negligence claim against GP

97 replies

amnidyaa · 03/07/2024 12:15

Aibu to think I have grounds for a claim?

In March 2023 I had an operation on my spine for Cauda equina syndrome. After the operation the spinal specialist sent a letter to me and mh GP saying there is a 5cm growth on my ovary and they recommend a follow up with a Gynecologist and another scan. I went to see my GP and enquired about getting the growth looked at by gynaecology. The GP refused and said people have growths all the time and its nothing to worry about and she said she will not be ordering a follow up.
Then 1 year later in March 2024 I had pain and went to A&E and they did a scan and found the growth was now 10cm and had spread all over the pelvic region. I ended up having to have a hysterectomy within 2 weeks and I had to lose both my ovaries and uterus because the growth had spread. I am now in menopause at the age of 39 and unable to have children all because my GP didnt follow up on the growth before it spread.

Would it brlw unreasonable to think I have a claim?

OP posts:
BeethovenNinth · 13/07/2024 03:55

Absolutely yes. Disgustingly negligent by the GP

CormorantStrikesBack · 13/07/2024 07:46

5431go · 13/07/2024 00:20

@AnnaMagnani

I Don’t work in England, but I can’t see how what you’re saying is true. E.g patient comes into an acute receiving unit with an MI, managed medically, but requires cardiology review and follow up. A review being requested by that speciality is essentially consultant to consultant referral.

What about a TIA? Referred to a stroke consultant for secondary prevention on d/c.

But that would be a referral to a different specialist but for the same condition which i believe is still allowed. It’s just the consultant to consultant referrals for different conditions which aren’t. My rheumatologist was suspicious I had MS and told me to go back to my GP and ask for a neurologist referral as it’s a different condition.

dd’s rheumatologist was concerned her heart had been affected by her rheumatologist managed condition and he referred her to cardiology for a scan.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 13/07/2024 07:51

AnnaMagnani · 03/07/2024 15:40

@Truetoself It really is true. In England consultant to consultant referrals have been banned for years except for certain circumstances eg cancer treatment or to see a specialist about the same condition.

So you have to make a trip to the GP for a referral.

A new gynae cyst would in practically all of these referral policies be back to the GP, neurosurgery would not be able to refer.

In my trust since 2017 it has been absolutely explicit that it is the consultant's responsibility to make the onward refferal. I refer to other specialties all the time, I have never had one declined (except mental health- but that is a whole new ball game). This sendi g back to GP is unnecessary and potentially dangerous practice....

DefyingGravitas · 13/07/2024 07:55

FlyingAfterDark · 03/07/2024 12:17

Did you have any symptoms related to that growth March 2023-2024?

🤷‍♀️

DefyingGravitas · 13/07/2024 07:57

5431go · 03/07/2024 13:22

So why didn’t your neurosurgeons refer your you to gyn? It’s not just the GP’s responsibility particularly because the NS/Ortho team ordered your MRI and so they should be responsible for the results IMO. Besides that, incidental findings appear on scans all the time, and an MRI is superior imagining to an US so really a referral to gyn would have been what you needed and I think that should have been done by the team that ordered your scan.

Sorry to hear you lost your uterus, but you aren’t being very specific about this growth either. In terms of what the scan said it was and what it turned out to be.

Then the GP should have told the OP and facilitated that.

101Nutella · 13/07/2024 08:00

When I had a finding during pregnancy the sonographer explained that as it was 5cm it would medically be classed as a cyst and should be followed up with another scan.

which it was.

im sorry this happened to you, I would check the NICE guidance and the gyne guidelines and I would complain to the GMC as this doctor is negligent and dangerous. How bizarre to ignore a specialist colleague. Also go legally. People like this need to be rooted out. Playing god coz too egotistical.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 13/07/2024 08:10

So I refer to :
Neurology ENT, orthopeadics and general surgeons regularly. Never had a problem..... maybe it's just our trust.

Chartreux · 13/07/2024 08:22

Yes, it sounds like you have a case, and you need to have it investigated soon as the time for bringing a claim is relatively limited. Make sure you go to a solicitor who knows what they're doing, preferably one accredited by AVMA.

CormorantStrikesBack · 13/07/2024 08:25

Neurodiversitydoctor · 13/07/2024 08:10

So I refer to :
Neurology ENT, orthopeadics and general surgeons regularly. Never had a problem..... maybe it's just our trust.

certtainly seems a variation nationally and I agree that going back to the gp is not in the patients best interest. Locally I’m told it’s to do with payment for referrals. No idea how that actually works.

Izzynohopanda · 13/07/2024 08:25

Difficult to say if you have basis for a claim.

The doctor doesn’t have to go what the consultant advises, it’s advice, not an order, and at the end of the day, they’re both doctors, one doesn’t outrank the other.

If what the gp says is true, and he can justify his reasoning, then you don’t have a claim. However, if the scan could have prevented the situation, then maybe you do.

And sorry you’ve had to go through all this. Wishing you all the best.

Variolia · 13/07/2024 08:27

I think for clinical negligence claims you have to show that no(?) reasonable doctor would have taken the action they did? And that you suffered a different outcome as a result. Or something along those lines, hopefully someone who knows more is on the thread.

But anyway - I’d have thought it was worth speaking to a lawyer, the GP was specifically told to refer for investigation and chose not to. Maybe if he’d done that, you wouldn’t have needed the hysterectomy.

FixTheBone · 13/07/2024 08:37

CormorantStrikesBack · 03/07/2024 15:30

I think it depends on the area. I have certainly been told by a consultant to go back to my GP and ask for a referral for a different speciality. They stated that referrals need to come from primary care because whoever makes the referral pays for it??????? Or something to do with funding anyway.

This was abandoned a while ago precisely because of this type of situation, and because it introduces delay in care.

FixTheBone · 13/07/2024 08:46

Variolia · 13/07/2024 08:27

I think for clinical negligence claims you have to show that no(?) reasonable doctor would have taken the action they did? And that you suffered a different outcome as a result. Or something along those lines, hopefully someone who knows more is on the thread.

But anyway - I’d have thought it was worth speaking to a lawyer, the GP was specifically told to refer for investigation and chose not to. Maybe if he’d done that, you wouldn’t have needed the hysterectomy.

It doesn't work like that. No doctor can tell another what to do, they can refer for an opinion.

I wish people would stop saying GMC, thats for professional misconduct, not negligence claims, and a good way to absolutely ruin a person's career and life.

As for negligence, nobody here can answer.

It is clear there has been a potential breach of duty by both the neurosurgeon and GP (although for reasons I don't understand never by the radiologist who reports the scan) for not referring in a timely manner.

We don't know for sure that harm has been caused by this breach of duty as the outcome may have been the same if referred earlier.

taxguru · 13/07/2024 09:10

@5431go

So why didn’t your neurosurgeons refer your you to gyn?

My OH's oncologist won't do any direct referrals to other departments. Always tells him to go to GP to get a referral for anything not directly linked to his cancer. It's a bloody nightmare as OH ends up being passed from pillar to post between the GP surgery and the oncology department.

Even when a skeletal x-ray required by the oncologist showed something (not what the oncologist was looking for), they wouldn't do a direct referral to the orthopaedic department. Told him had to go to the GP to get a referral, which was ridiculous because when he contacted the GP, they had no knowledge of what had been shown on the x-ray, there'd been no communication between oncologist and GP, and GP couldn't access the x-ray. GP just told OH to go back to the oncologist - wouldn't even contact the oncologist themselves to ask for the detail of the problem! Took OH six weeks to get the oncologist and GP communicating directly to move it forward!

It's this kind of fragmentation and ffiefdoms in the NHS that's killing it!

MattDamon · 13/07/2024 09:13

Make sure you get a few opinions. I had one turn the case down, went with someone else, and it was successful.

taxguru · 13/07/2024 09:13

FixTheBone · 13/07/2024 08:37

This was abandoned a while ago precisely because of this type of situation, and because it introduces delay in care.

When you say "a while ago", how long? In my OH's case, it was only six months ago the last time it happened.

Blackcats7 · 13/07/2024 09:23

@amnidyaa I would suggest you research medical negligence solicitors and pick the one you want and contact them direct. If you just go via the huge number of no win no fee firms and call or email their general enquiries your case will be evaluated at a very low level and the advice given can be poor. I speak from experience.
I found a solicitor who is actually a qualified doctor too and who had worked in the nhs at a senior level before retraining in the law. I read her history of cases and was impressed so I emailed her directly and got far better advice. I had offered to pay her for a one off consultation but after hearing the details she took my case on a conditional fee. If I had allowed the non qualified staff who take calls for the other firms to deter me I would have got nowhere.

UncharteredWaters · 13/07/2024 09:40

The hospital contract is very clear - the person ordering that initial scan should have done the referral.
Not buck passed to the gp.
Too many areas say ‘can’t refer’ when actually anyone can put pen to paper.

Had that come our way, we’d have written back saying do your fecking own work, informed you to contact that team.

if they still hadn’t done it and it met guidance for follow up, I’d off done it and made a formal complaint too the hospital team.

Although the wait here for a pelvic uss is over a year already.

Floatlikeafeather2 · 13/07/2024 10:13

I'm not sure it could be proved as medical negligence. The NHS website makes it clear that you are entitled to ask for a referral but also that "Your GP is not obliged to accept the specialist's recommendations". It's horrible but true that this is the way things work. I think it looks as if she would only be deemed negligent if you had gone to her with symptoms which she ignored. Google "Referrals for specialist care" to get the full explanation. The assumption is that your GP will always have a patient's interests at heart, which these days just isn't always true because of the pressures they work under. I'm so sorry this has happened to you.

FixTheBone · 13/07/2024 11:17

taxguru · 13/07/2024 09:13

When you say "a while ago", how long? In my OH's case, it was only six months ago the last time it happened.

That may have been what you were told, but its been the case since 2017 for the whole of England in guidance that explicitly states you shouldn't refer back to a GP for an onward referral

England www.england.nhs.uk › ...PDF Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers NHS England Guidance

Dolly567 · 13/07/2024 11:28

Oh my god this is horrific
Yes I would due 100 percent
I know you can't if they haven't diagnosed you or missed a diagnosis but you were!

taxguru · 13/07/2024 11:33

FixTheBone · 13/07/2024 11:17

That may have been what you were told, but its been the case since 2017 for the whole of England in guidance that explicitly states you shouldn't refer back to a GP for an onward referral

England www.england.nhs.uk › ...PDF Key messages for NHS clinicians and managers NHS England Guidance

Well it's happened several times to my OH over the past few years since his cancer diagnosis.

But then again, his oncologist has been pretty useless in other things too, so it wouldn't surprise me that she isn't up to date with the regulations.

FixTheBone · 13/07/2024 12:31

taxguru · 13/07/2024 11:33

Well it's happened several times to my OH over the past few years since his cancer diagnosis.

But then again, his oncologist has been pretty useless in other things too, so it wouldn't surprise me that she isn't up to date with the regulations.

Edited

That happens from both ends, individual consultants haven't been updated, and the people receiving referrals probably try and use it as a justification to make their own lives easier by getting or of their referrals through ers from a single source (GPs)

kiwiane · 13/07/2024 12:36

If you’re in a Trade Union they may support your claim through referral to their solicitors.
You have 3 years in which to claim so best to look into it now.
I claimed and won against a locum GP; it was stressful.

amnidyaa · 13/07/2024 14:36

I did ask a few times to be referred following the specialist's advice.

And for years I've suffered with crippling cramps on that side and terrible periods and the GP just shrugged it off as 'period problems/pms/etc'. I feel that after the advice of ultrasound and if she'd looked thru my medical history she should have followed thru instead of dismissing me.

Ive spoken to a solicitor a couple of days ago and she feels I do have a case. Now the details and my medical files go to a Dr and they look thru and decide
1 - if they would have done anything differently - so would they have referred a year earlier
2 - if the altered decision would have resulted in a different outcome for me - so is it likely if caught earlier could I have kept an ovary.

I'll update on the progress but it might be a very slow process.

Thank you to everyone taking the time to respond Flowers

OP posts: