Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Public funding of the royal family should be optional

214 replies

FuckinghamPalace · 15/06/2024 00:08

Not sure if this has been duscussed before but…

What if the tax payer could opt out of funding the royal family? And opt in if they want to contribute?

It should be optional

Why not?

OP posts:
Atethehalloweenchocs · 15/06/2024 19:56

Great idea!

TonTonMacoute · 15/06/2024 20:18

Why just the RF?

Why can't we opt out of any public spending we think is a complete waste of money, and I can think of plenty of things I don't want to pay for.

Hawki · 15/06/2024 21:18

Bazinga007 · 15/06/2024 19:50

Rather than opt out how about opt in. Let's see how many people come forward then.

The monarchy make their money from land, a lot of which that they took by force.

They need to start paying corporation tax and inheritance tax and for their own security, including for those palaces and the cost for of hiring the army for their pony parades.

I think you can tell that I am not a fan.

"corporation tax and inheritance tax "

they will have the services with the best accountancy firms and at a guess pay very little tax's.

cherish123 · 15/06/2024 21:31

No one would opt in

FuckinghamPalace · 16/06/2024 00:19

Question for all of you supporters: How much are you voluntary willing to pay each year should this utopia be possible? Would you limit yourself to the mere 70p or round it up to £1?

OP posts:
Crispsandcola · 16/06/2024 00:53

Meadowfinch · 15/06/2024 18:19

@Crispsandcola I happened to know the numbers of billionaires in the UK, because I looked it up last month for something else. I don't know about the rest. But I'm sure someone will.

I happened to know that the royal family's net worth is £22 billion according to Forbes. I also know verifiable factual data about the other things in my comment so I guess I am that someone.

Meadowfinch · 16/06/2024 02:24

@Crispsandcola Forbes includes the crown jewels and Buckingham palace in their estates, and they don't own either of them.

newnamethanks · 16/06/2024 06:31

Defintely should be optional OP. There'll be a queue of p'd off royals, carrying armfuls of tiaras, outside the pawn shops of Gloucestershire. I'd pay to see it.

Ofcourseshecan · 16/06/2024 07:32

Why can’t you opt out of funding the royal family?

Same reason you can’t opt out of funding the military, or prisons, or anything else. It would be impossible to administer and too many people would choose not to pay for things they dislike or don’t care about.

I remember some people withholding a percentage of their tax as a protest against military intervention in other countries. (1970s or 80s? Or Iraq? I forget the details.) I think they were prosecuted same as people who evaded tax for non-principled reasons.

Lkjhgdsrtgbjjm · 16/06/2024 08:48

I can't stand the Royal Family, they have opted out of paying certain taxes so I wish I could opt out of paying anything towards them.

There was no inheritance tax paid on the Queens estate because she changed the law with the help of Tony Blair before she died. Worked nicely for him because he then got a Knighthood.

I don't understand why people fawn over them. I find it really strange. They is nothing special about them other than they happen to be born into a massively wealthy family.

King Charles isn't particularly nice and he's certainly not particularly intelligent.

Katypp · 16/06/2024 09:06

Lkjhgdsrtgbjjm · 16/06/2024 08:48

I can't stand the Royal Family, they have opted out of paying certain taxes so I wish I could opt out of paying anything towards them.

There was no inheritance tax paid on the Queens estate because she changed the law with the help of Tony Blair before she died. Worked nicely for him because he then got a Knighthood.

I don't understand why people fawn over them. I find it really strange. They is nothing special about them other than they happen to be born into a massively wealthy family.

King Charles isn't particularly nice and he's certainly not particularly intelligent.

Agree with everything you say, but opting out of paying for the RF is a logistical impossibility.
We can't pick and choose.

Crispsandcola · 16/06/2024 15:11

Meadowfinch · 16/06/2024 02:24

@Crispsandcola Forbes includes the crown jewels and Buckingham palace in their estates, and they don't own either of them.

Once again, you are very interested in discussing exactly much money these incredibly wealthy people have whilst ignoring the point I was making.
King Charles alone currently has a net worth (that is publicly known about) of £610 million.

I hope you realise that, just because the word billionaire cannot be verifiably applied to one single member of this family due to missing information about their true financial records, it does not negate the immorality of their actions.

GingerScallop · 16/06/2024 18:45

newnamethanks · 16/06/2024 06:31

Defintely should be optional OP. There'll be a queue of p'd off royals, carrying armfuls of tiaras, outside the pawn shops of Gloucestershire. I'd pay to see it.

đŸ˜‚đŸ˜‚đŸ˜‚The image is stuck. Jostling outside a bhf shop while arguing quietly in their posh a cents. A few fainting each time a non aristocrat walks out of that shop. Their despair at the possibility that that pleb could buy one of their wares

DragonGypsyDoris · 17/06/2024 14:08

Onomatofear · 15/06/2024 08:55

@DragonGypsyDoris no it's not a valid argument at all. It's not even an argument. People are allowed to disagree with how their country is run - we live in a democracy.

Sounds like you desire an uprising. Good luck with that.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread